Faroe Des Roches: Paddling to stop a tar sands pipeline in B.C.

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      It’s been said that a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. For my fellow kayakers and me, our journey of 900 kilometres will begin with a single paddle stroke.

      Starting September 1 in Kitimat, my friends and fellow Ecomarine kayak instructors Ryan Vandecasteyen and Curtis White, and videographer Brian Dixon—collectively the Pipedreams Project—will begin a two-month kayak trip along the coast to Vancouver. Why are we embarking on this epic journey? I’m glad you asked.

      The Pipedreams Project has a few goals: to participate in building momentum against the pipeline that would connect the Alberta tar sands to the B.C. coast and make B.C. vulnerable to tankers and oil spills; to physically connect to the coast itself; to learn more about this beautiful, precious ecosystem and about how others are—and how we may—further engage and support efforts to stop the pipeline.

      We’re embarking on this journey filled with many questions. It is undoubtedly our passion that drives us, and our concern about the state of the world and the responsibility we have in preserving it. But somewhere behind that passion lies a sea of questions.

      I was born and raised in this big coastal city that puffs its chest so large to be considered cosmopolitan on the world map that it cannot see the land and water it is part of. I grew up in this country where murmurs of political decisions are barely audible behind so many thick, sound-proofed doors. And somewhere in this climate a few questions silently took hold of me. But I have yet to find any meaningful answers, and have yet to satisfy what I feel is my duty to get involved, to stand up for injustice, to fight for an ecosystem that can’t fight for itself.

      And so, I paddle.

      This pipeline that Enbridge is proposing, or the one Kinder-Morgan might—and the process by which these pipelines could be approved—amalgamate significant social, political, environmental, and economic issues in one nice, neat, disastrous package. At the heart of these issues sits the question of how we involve ourselves in these processes, in these decisions, and in the creation of the world we live in.

      Far from the North Coast, in cosy Vancouver, Enbridge is a name of the same lineage as the Boogeyman, intangible and out-of-reach. The government with its joint review panels and environmental assessments is barely any better. We feel we must do something, step up, get involved—but the same question jumps up every time: what? What can I, as just one person, do? There is less and less space in which we may become involved, oppose, question, challenge, and create alternatives. So we raise more awareness in the hopes that enough dinner table complaints will sway the outcome.

      We hope that through this experience we will come to better understand the realities the coastal peoples are facing so that we may find or create space to act in a way that supports and empowers those most affected by this insanity. What we do know now is this: we refuse to participate in an increase in production of the tar sands; we refuse to allow profit margins and dollar digits to put at risk ways of life, livelihoods, democracy, and beautiful, fragile, complex ecosystems; we refuse to be silenced.

      And so, we paddle.

      We paddle 900 kilometres to legitimize our voices in this debate. We paddle to search for a clearer picture of the confusing, out-of-reach, beyond-comprehension decision-making process. We paddle to learn from the First Nations and communities and people and how they’re engaged in creating space to participate. We paddle for the future of our coast. We paddle to be involved and be heard. And we hope that in some way, it inspires others to become involved, too.

      Faroe Des Roches is a kayak instructor in Vancouver who is participating in the Pipedreams Project. You can track the journey at www.thepipedreamsproject.org.

      Comments

      11 Comments

      Elvira

      Aug 25, 2010 at 5:56pm

      Muy bien amiga te felicito. BRAVO.

      Ron Johns

      Aug 26, 2010 at 12:48am

      Yeah, do it and best of luck with stopping the despoilation or our one and only west coast.

      Brad Hayes

      Aug 26, 2010 at 10:48am

      I hope when it comes time to make a decision on whether to build the pipeline, that you come to the table with some facts and intelligent analysis - not just a bunch of name-calling and nasty assumptions about people and companies that see things a little differently than you do.

      Jeet Chatterjee

      Aug 26, 2010 at 10:14pm

      Fully agree with Brad Hayes' comment above. I hope when rational minds decide on the pipeline, they consider the thousands of people whose livelihoods depend on the tar sands. I hope the thousands of people in Quebec who get free day care remember that it is paid for through Alberta's oil. I hope the thousands of Canadians across Canada who are on EI remember that the same oil pays for their existence too. I hope they also consider the environmental implications of such a pipeline and take adequate precautions. With a one-sided, biased, ignorant and pretty much naive point of view such as the one in this article, environmental concerns, extremely crucial, will remain out of the legitimate sphere and be unheard.

      barbara

      Aug 27, 2010 at 12:20am

      Beautifully, movingly eloquent!

      CHA

      Aug 27, 2010 at 1:40pm

      Economic decisions aren't one-sided, biased and ignorant? Industry supports people, but endangers ecosystems. Our lack of foresight can be astounding.

      Kelsey H

      Aug 27, 2010 at 5:11pm

      It truly is up to our generation to be preserve and protect our exquisite coastline. Even though I realize the importance of the tar sands to many people, I simply do not think putting oil tankers through our delicate north coast is worth the economic gain.
      I wish you all the best, and good weather!!

      Brad Hayes

      Aug 28, 2010 at 11:03am

      CHA - we're talking about a balanced decision about whether to build a pipeline. It's not an ECONOMIC decision - it's a balance of many factors, including the economic factors Jeet discusses, the integrity of the ecosystems, and the rights of the people who may be directly impacted. The problem with the article and with your comments is that you have no balance. Beautiful coastline is good, industry is bad, discussion over. The world is more complicated, we all have to live here, and we all have the right to health and prosperity. All sides must be heard. The article, and you, are degrading the discussion by assigning those who don't agree with you to the side of evil.

      John Gellard

      Aug 28, 2010 at 4:58pm

      The naivete behind Jeet Chatterjee's remarks is breathtaking. So-called Rational Minds have ensured that there is not a region on earth that is not faced with enviromental degradation. The Rational Minds start from faulty premises and lead us step by logical step to a ruined world. The benefits to humanity of exploiting the tar sands are taken for granted, but really, the costs far exceed the benefits.
      I hope that next year there are a hundred kayakers paddling down the coast in horrified protest.

      David Friesen

      Sep 16, 2010 at 12:42pm

      Having kayaked the outer islands of Alaska (3 month trip) and the BC coast from Prince Rupert to Bella Coola (2 month trip) I know how beautiful and pristine these areas still are. I whole heartedly endorse your pipedream project and your paddle from Kitimat to Vancouver. So paddle on.