Hornby bike lane will get more people “spending more money” downtown, VACC says
With a second open house on Wednesday (September 8) looming large, the Vancouver Area Cycling Coalition has issued a feel-good news release congratulating the city on the proposed Hornby Street separated bike lane.
The VACC is suggesting that the bike lane would come with economic benefits, whereas much of the public debate has so far focused more on safety and the inconvenience for downtown businesses.
Its release declares that the bike lane will “increase cyclist traffic, bringing more people downtown spending more money, using less roadspace and parking space, and producing zero emissions”.
“The Vancouver Area Cycling Coalition and city cyclists welcome the idea of a Hornby Street separated lane connector to complete a cross-downtown separated bike lane corridor as part of city efforts to achieve higher cycling mode shares,” VACC president Arno Schortinghuis said in the release. “Since cyclists use less road space than other modes, Vancouver should be breathing easier at the prospect of encouraging more cyclists.”
The VACC does acknowledge the concerns raised by some downtown businesses, but argues the “opportunities and potential upside outweigh any potential risks”.
In the release, the group puts forward the following points:
Ӣ Studies have shown that pedestrians and cyclists stay longer and spend more money at local shops than drivers do.
Ӣ According to a study by Mintel, regular cyclists - those who cycle at least once a week - are disproportionately likely to be well educated, have a household income of at least $75,000 per year.
Ӣ One on-street car parking space can fit a dozen bicycles- consider the number of cycling customers who could park near a business.
Ӣ Vancouver Bike to Work week statistics show over 7,000 cycling commuters with an average income of over $50,000 and 27% making over $75,000.
On Wednesday, between 11 a.m. and 7 p.m., city staff will be present in the rotunda of the Pacific Centre Mall—site of the first open house on August 11—to answer questions on the bike lane.
Today (September 2), the city released a draft design for the bike lane.




Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Comments
It looks like to me that the CoV tried to accommodate both groups, neither getting all of what they wanted. The cyclists wanted a complete separate lane the whole way, but businesses wanted to maintain their loading zones so what the cyclists got is a mostly separate lane and businesses kept their loading zones. Businesses also only lost about 1/2 of the on-street parking on Hornby, not all of the spots as they had feared. Not to mention CoV is opening up a lot of spots on some other nearby streets. Both groups have an excuse to complain, sounds like a win-win to me.
Mayor Robertson will be looked upon fondly in the coming years for making Burrard Bridge safe and for going against the flow to promote a healthy lifestyle here. It will be up to the next Mayor to tackle the political hot potato of TransLink and its obscene diesel buses, in particular the B-Lines, invading our city and trolley bus routes.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48331153@N08/
Just print these out and take them to the "open house" and ask them if they'll finally let police enforce the use of the bike lanes.
Maybe I'll walk in the bike lanes from now on, instead of the sidewalk, will that be ignored just as this is?
The article is flawed. Making it easer to drive downtown and eliminating street parking fees will get more people downtown shopping.
It's hard to argue that a safe space for cyclists should play second fiddle to the unlikely chance somebody will suddenly feel an urge to buy a washing machine, find a store selling appliances on Hornby with unoccupied parking right in front of their door, actually be driving a vehicle big enough to carry it, and then change their mind because they will have to park on the other side of the street.
Public consultations are typically mandated and rarely, if ever, reverse the stated objective. We elect you to take care of this trivial stuff because we don't have the time or interest to do it ourselves. Just do it!
nohocyclechic.blogspot.com
Hey... a post from Mayor Robertson himself. ;)
This is no longer about bike lanes. This is about whether we have a democracy or not.
What will happen –The downtown core is accessible on most sides by bridges, so people who live on the north shore will still have to go through downtown so that is core traffic you can’t get rid of. But with more bike lanes, that’s more gridlock which means more carbon dioxide is released by the cars sitting in traffic, so it doesn’t actually help the environment. Or else, they will have to take the long route around to the Ironworkers Memorial Bridge, which also doesn’t help the environment. If you know about the demographics of people who live in West Van, they are not going to be riding bikes or likely to take the Seabus. An increase in their commute time will likely also lower the property values of real estate on the north shore.
As the baby boomers age, they will mow over the cyclists in the bike lane, or they will be too impatient with the gridlock downtown, the businesses will fail and go further out of the downtown core. Real estate prices downtown will fall, and increase outside of the downtown core where people can drive and park. The only types of businesses that will remain downtown will be offices. There are many cities where their downtown area is business only and they become a ghost town after 6pm; this will happen to Vancouver.