Media commentators often treat smoking as though it's a lifestyle choice.
It might explain why the Vancouver park board has not encountered a great deal of opposition from newspaper columnists over its decision to ban smoking from beaches and parks.
But for many mentally ill people, nicotine provides relief for their brains.
A paper published in 2000 in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported that people with mental illness are "about twice as likely to smoke as other persons but have substantial quit rates".
According to the Web site schizophrenia.com, almost 90 percent of people with schizophrenia smoke.
For those with bipolar disorder, the rate is between 60 and 70 percent.
It's why people with schizophrenia are more likely to die of cancer than those in the general population.
"Certain thinking patterns are affected in schizophrenia including sustained attention, focused attention, working memory, short-term memory, recognition memory and even processes that are preattentive (eg reflexes)," the Web site states. "Some studies have suggested there may be improvements in these areas after treatment with nicotine."
A schizophrenia researcher at the University of Maryland, Dr. Gunvant Thaker, studies genetic links between schizophrenia and nicotine addiction.
Schizophrenia.com cited a 2004 article in the Baltimore Sun in which Thaker talked about a faulty gene. People with this gene cannot tune out repeated noise, like a car alarm, which might explain why people with schizophrenia display confusion and fear in harmless situations.
This same faulty gene is also a nicotine-receptor gene.
"When schizophrenia patients smoke, or are given nicotine gum, this deficit of sensory gating is reduced or normalized," Thaker told the paper.
Yale researchers learned that cognitive functioning improved in people with schizophrenia after they smoked. This didn't occur in people without mental illness.
Other research has indicated that auditory processing improves for people with schizophrenia when they use nicotine.
"In addition, schizophrenic patients have fewer nicotine receptors in their brains than normal people," schizophrenia.com reports.
Cigarettes contain hundreds of toxic chemicals, which is why some nicotine replacements, such as the patch, have been recommended to people with schizophrenia.
But not everyone with schizophrenia is going to walk into a pharmacy to buy a patch.
By banning smoking from beaches and parks, the elected commissioners have basically put up a "not welcome" sign to many people with schizophrenia.
That's because the vast majority of people with schizophrenia smoke because it provides some relief for their symptoms, which include psychosis.
They may be less likely to go to Oppenheimer Park or English Bay to relax if they know they'll get harassed about lighting up a cigarette.
Because society loathes smokers, nobody will raise a fuss about this.
Doctors don't want to be seen to be supporting smoking. No local politician will question the ban.
I don't expect to see any deep-pocketed downtown lawyers rushing to the defence of people with schizophrenia. There won't be a charter challenge against the nonsmoking bylaw even though it discriminates against people on the basis of their disability.
If you know someone with schizophrenia who smokes, here's something you can do to help: tell them that they're still allowed to puff on a cigarette in regional parks.
Capilano River Regional Park and Pacific Spirit Regional Park are just two examples.
The joggers and the dog walkers might not like it, but for people with a serious and chronic mental illness, it sure beats hanging out in an alley in the Downtown Eastside.
Follow Charlie Smith on Twitter at twitter.com/csmithstraight.




Comment (71)
Comments
I can't believe I wasted my time reading this.
I have nothing against people who suffer from schizophrenia, but let's get real here. You can obtain nicotine other than smoking... gum, patch, etc. You said "but not everyone with schizophrenia is going to walk into a pharmacy to buy a patch". I sure know I would take that route if my physical AND mental health depended on it. Making non-smokers suffer because those with a disability "need" to smoke? Please.
I somehow doubt that, if you really were put in their shoes. How high and mighty of you.
There is no reliable evidence that second hand smoke is harmful, no matter what vested interests say and using it as an excuse to exclude smokers is a farce.
Please note the sarcasm above. And please stop the parks board from over-regulating the parks. They are public spaces intended for use by ALL members of the public. If you can't handle someone smoking next to you in the park, then speak to them about it directly like a human being. Failing that, move ten feet away from where you are in the park. Failing that, go home and blog about it.
Now, with these laws, she can't do one of her favorite things, and one of the few things that gets her outdoors - enjoying an afternoon at the beach. She used to find a quiet spot, away from kids, and didn't litter her butts. Now, thanks to a parks board that wants everyone to live according to their very narrow view of the world, all she will do is sit at home. Just great.
We should be preaching this view not acting as if mentally ill people (supposed) are stupid,blind,deaf and dumb and in wheelchairs and scooters and do not have the capacity to see or understand.
Help enlarge the view, not shrink it down to a myopic issue about self-medicating, , include them in the right to clean air, widen the fold, not treat them like lepers to be sent to a smokers colony. The right to clean air is not exclusive: please enjoy!
We can only but help people with 'other' mental conditions in addition to addictions in asking them to see the bigger picture of how much a contribution access to clean air really is: for the lungs, brain and entire circulatory system.
I support the non-smoking ban in public places like parks and I thank and appreciate the smokers who follow the rule and by-law. Supposedly mentally ill or not: your participation is noted and appreciated. Thank you.
I am mentally ill and know that smoking isn't necessary for relief from my problems. That is what a psychologist is for. We should be clear, people who are mentally ill are twice as likely to smoke, but that doesn't mean it gives them any relief. The article goes on to talk only about schizophrenia lumping all other mental illnesses in. Do you honestly think smoking would be a good therapy approach to OCD? You do not overcome your problems by avoiding them, blocking them, or running from your fears. Face, embrace, and erase your fears. Cognitive Behavior therapy is the way to help.
Just another of the many wonderful gifts that the antismoking movement has bestowed upon the world.
Michael J. McFadden
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
11,000 bad
90% world's leading mathematicians smoke
smokers know what I'm talking about
those that don't understand : no explanation possible
those that understand : no explanation needed
This shows how the screwheads have destroyed our quaint English world. Destruction of one's quiet enjoyment is an injury. But because bourgie fuckos think it their "right" to fly in airplanes on vacation, drive cars, etc. etc. gosh, I guess no one has a right to quiet anymore, and those who cannot hack srewhead noise, they're genetic defectives.
Actually, the better explanation is that those who are able to tolerate ridiculously loud noises are dead inside and lack true consciousness, if we're going to sling genetic arrows. Anyone who can tolerate a car alarm going off without wanting to bludgeon the cunt whose alarm it is, well, must be nice being dead inside. Apparently the cunt's precious zoomzoom is worth more than my peace and quiet.
I can tell by the ratings of each comment which side of the fence each poster is on.
Apparently Crazies agree with other crazies.
Smoking in Parks is unnecessary. Period.
Seriously though the anti smoking BS is out of control in this city. First you can't smoke within 6 yards of a building (most of the time this will put you on the road), now parks. Soon it will be banned within 100 meters of a building, then there'll be a total outdoor smoking ban. Soon there will be nowhere to smoke, and you will win, but who's going to pay for your roads and EI then?
To all the haters out there. Get a life! Don't you have something better to do than make yourself feel big by berating smokers? Probably not I guess, carry on with your sad little existences but please keep the persecution to yourselves.
Sadly a lot of them don't, USSR. Many of them are suffering variations of ASDS (AntiSmoking Dysfunction Syndrome). See:
http://www.wispofsmoke.net/recovery.html
for more on that and to get ideas on how to help in the recovery of any loved ones so suffering.
- MJM
Why?
I suspect there's plenty of undiagnosed cases of mental health problems among law makers....
I say this, because as a society it is hypocritical to collect enourmous taxes off this product, then do our level best to stop the use of it!
Sorry people, you can't have it two ways, you can't tax it to the max then stop people from using it!
People with asthma and certain other health conditions such as MCS or EI can not tolerate even small amounts of cigarette smoke, some have immediate severe reactions, others hours of delayed reactions, and even if one tries to stay downwind it is impossible to predict the way the wind is going to blow next. I have experience with persons with mental illness and can sympathize, but why should persons with health conditions that prevent them from being around secondhand smoke be the ones who have to stay away from the parks rather than smokers? Smoke does not stay in one place; if there was going to be a compromise, certain days could be designated as smoking.
Re mathematicians, correlation is not proof of a cause and effect relationship; I had math skills superior to any of my peers even though I didn't smoke.
A ban on walking on the grass in parks, because of the undeniable damage footsteps can cause to those fragile green blades of vegetation.
Fines for breathing in parks, because breathing releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, and that is a greenhouse gas. (Exceptions will be allowed for people who trade their carbon credits in a properly constituted commodities exchange.)
And biking - without the aforementioned carbon credits - should be a criminal offense, punishable with jail time, because bike riders breathe deeper and more frequently than other people, and release larger quantities of greenhouse gases into the environment.
And don't forget, the greenest world is one without people at all!
As far as I know, cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has never been shown to be an effective treatment for Parkinson's symptoms, nor can it correct chemical imbalances in the brain. CBT helps those whose depression or anxiety is situational and it can be helpful in working to create new behavior patterns and ways of thinking for those who have been biochemically depressed or anxious for years and years. But when the condition is caused by a malfunction of neurotransmitters, some type of chemical intervention is usually required before the CBT can be effectively employed.
Treating a chemical imbalance does not constitute running away from one's problems. We don't chastize those who take Synthroid to treat thyroid deficiency or Metformin to treat insulin resistence. Why should treating the brain be considered shameful, while treating the body is OK?
In BC, even for those coping with their conditions, treatment options range from marginal to non-existant. The only adult ADHD clinic was shut down because its waiting list was *too long*, which ruins the health region's record. Adult treatment options for bipolar? There's an ongoing research study at UBC, constantly full, and that's it. Seeing a specialist? Get in line, and be prepared to pay - MSP doesn't cover most of it. Your GP, if you can even find one, can give you a prescription at best, but has neither the time nor expertise for ongoing monitoring; most of the time it's signing off on a plan for self-medication.
This is to say nothing of those with more serious illnesses. Many of those most ill can't even get housing, and this might not even be their largest problem. And smokers are no more likely to help them than non-smokers.
You want to see what being loathed by society is *really* like, Mr Smith? There are plenty of opportunities to volunteer to actually help the mentally ill. And bring your cigarettes, they might be appreciated. Until then, I'll offer you the same advice that's traditionally offered to those dealing with mental illness in this problem: "it's your problem, now get over it."
I, too, would like to voice my vehement support for a city-wide "non-smoking ban".
Kits beach is disgusting, a butt every two feet.
Some people have written it more politely and convincingly, but these sentiments seem to summarize the bulk of the pro-smoking comments I've read here. Really enlightening stuff, it's surprising our elected representatives aren't swayed more by it.
Say Megan are you the driver who raced around the corner, while chatting on your cell phone and spewing your auto exhaust in my baby's face?
MysTerri
This is the test to distinguish between the truly concerned and those who just use excuses to flail against smokers. Those TRULY concerned about these issues would be working with Free-Choice groups to return smokers to comfortable well-ventilated indoor venues so that encounters with wisps of smoke on the street and cigarette butts washed up on beaches from storm drain runoff would largely disappear. The simple antismokiing fanatics on the other hand simply switch their argument to some other aspect of the topic.
Michael J. McFadden,
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
Smoking affects blood circulation, which may be why it has an effect on cogitation, not to mention all the other comforts of a habit.
Miguel
However...as someone who CHOOSES not to smoke for any of the obvious reasons not to mention that it is pretty dumb thing to do. This means I do not want ANY cigarette smoke nor the rest of the disgusting poisons from cigarette smoke in my lungs/system.
So when someone else's bad habit is forced into my breathing air it is offensive to me. Why do you people not get this???? Just because you smoke? That is your problem - bottom line. Find anything anywhere that defines cigarette smoking as anything other than a problem. You refuse to acknowledge your accountability here. It is the smoker's problem. So if you are now unhappy with the restrictions placed in places where people want to enjoy smoke free air please look to yourself to solve your problems.
.