Long-time readers of the Georgia Straight might have noticed that there is a distinct lack of "unnamed sources" cited in news articles.
There are two reasons for this:
The first is that readers have trouble trusting articles that are based on people who can't be identified.
The second is that our senior editor, Martin Dunphy, lays down the lumber on any writer who tries to pass along information via anonymous sources.
On very rare occasions, an anonymous source will appear in the paper. But the person's identity must be independently confirmed by an editor, usually Dunphy.
Good journalism is often like good science. The facts can be replicated by an independent observer based on what appears in the article. This is impossible to do whenever an unnamed source is cited.
This is why the public should be extremely skeptical when reading reports about a so-called "media enemies" list compiled by Vision Vancouver.
I have seen no evidence that it's true.
The blogger who unveiled this list, which included my name, described it as a "kind of McCarthyism".
The real practitioners of McCarthyism are those who declare without proof that the mayor's office has a list of media enemies, whose lives and careers will be destroyed for not following the Vision Vancouver songsheet.
For all I know, this "unnamed source", if he even exists, has borderline personality disorder and is prone to making things up and creating conflict.
Without knowing his name, I can't make a reasonable assessment.
I have no problem with a story like this appearing if it can be proven. So far, this hasn't occurred anywhere close to my satisfaction.
Update (September 7): This clarification appeared on page 3 of the September 7 edition of 24 hours:
"Last week 24 hours reported an anonymous informant claimed a media 'hit list' was created by a group that included Mayor Gregor Robertson's assistant Kevin Quinlan. At this point in time that information should be considered rumour as we have not been able to prove it to our satisfaction. We continue to investigate and will apprise you of any further developments."
Follow Charlie Smith on Twitter at twitter.com/csmithstraight.




Comment (25)
Comments
But you've got to walk the walk and bring the goods.
Content counts.
If institutions were people - BC's media is a toxic as the BC Liberal government is --- why is this a surprise?
Be straight - fly right - do things properly or do something else---
we all fall down when the media is disreputable and in denial about it.
Mr. Smith, good to see you distancing yourself from this guy.
Oh come off it.
Hack, cough, hack, cough.
"Journalism is not a profession or a trade. It is a cheap catch-all for fuckoffs and misfits – a false doorway to the backside of life, a filthy piss-ridden little hole nailed off by the building inspector, but just deep enough for a wino to curl up from the sidewalk and masturbate like a chimp in a zoo-cage." --Dr. Gonzo.
"The first is that readers have trouble trusting articles that are based on people who can't be identified."
Oh, thank you, Missa Journalist, for telling me how I, as one of the mafs of "readers", thank you oh so much for telling me how I "have trouble." Can anyone be identified? Oh, Charlie, I "know what you mean"---you mean you want the GIVEN NAME and SURNAME on this guy's birth certificate, right? After all, every good little boy and girl knows that they're only ever properly identified after they've coughed up state-granted names and so forth.
"For all I know, this "unnamed source", if he even exists, has borderline personality disorder and is prone to making things up and creating conflict."
If we're going to, you know, simply speculate wildly, perhaps the one who produced the list fears for his life? If these violent socialists are willing to prepare a media "hit list", what else might they be willing to do?
Wow.
As for the "list", if it is fake, and it has yet to be shown as anything else, it's a damn sleazy way to try to turn local media against the city. Seems someone may have taken a page from the Glenn Beck book of 'How to Create Suspicion and Doubt for Dummies'.
http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/News/2010/09/02/15223056-24hvan.html
If you have any issues with the senior editing decisions made by 24 hours, you should probably take it up with their management.
You're aware that the Soviets simply _made up_ mental illnesses in order to deal with political dissent, right? Nothing new under the Sun...
Hey, wow, you're letting the Music Kids write those hilarious captions for all your photos now! This is a joke, right? There are no communists, never were, right?
Oh wait, Alex...Alex T...yes this guy is getting increasingly annoying. I mean, I am annoying but I am not wanting people to know my name or, curiously given the situation, look at my face. He is making it unpleasant to read pugetsoundradio, Bula... I'm almost afraid to check out canucks.com (where, it has to be admitted, baseless rumourmongering and poor writing skills are no impediment)
http://thestar.blogs.com/politics/2010/09/journalism-petitions-and-activ...
Genius!
Bob Mackin in his article SPOKE WITH THE SOURCE. He is a real journalist who has broken many more stories than Charlie Smith, the blogger. His stories have to go through a vetting process that's more thorough than this blog or the Straight in general.
I'm quite sure the Mayor and his party are quite well-equipped with lawyers and will sue 24 hours if they printed falsehoods that couldn't be proven in a court of law. After all, it's their only recourse if the allegations are false.
But if they don't sue, I guess we know the truth...
I'm thinking of auditioning too, if this other gig I am working on don't pan out. Fer cereal. I mean, I can do invective, insinuation, mindless appeals to nationalism.... But I won't! I am all about saying R U Kiddingme! And then presenting something mildly different and trollish but carefully parsed to avoid overcommitting. That will make me seem relatively balanced and an antidote to the charge of being a fully right wing media outlet! Ha ha ha ha!!!
Tsakumis promised the insider was going to go on the record. This has now been downgraded to a promise of an interview where the insider's identity will remain concealed. Ostensibly to protect him/her from retaliation...though I would think someone who was an "ex" insider would be free from such things.