Stephen Harper’s religion clouds aid in Afghanistan

Federal government health programs may be failing young Afghan women.
The former head of Canada’s aid program in Afghanistan has expressed concern that Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s religious beliefs are hampering humanitarian efforts.
Speaking to the Straight from Kabul, Nipa Banerjee noted that Harper is a born-again Christian, and she argued that his religious beliefs could be adversely affecting the Canadian International Development Agency’s efforts to help Afghan women.
“It has been said that reproductive health would not be a part of the government and CIDA’s aid programs,” said Banerjee, who led CIDA’s mission in Afghanistan from 2003 to 2006. “And the reproductive-health issue is a major problem in the context of Afghanistan because the maternal mortality rate is very high.”
A 2009 United Nations release stated that if you were a woman giving birth in Afghanistan that year, you had a one in eight chance of dying. The following year, a Lancet report on maternal health found that a primary factor in the global decline in maternal deaths in recent decades is decreasing fertility rates.
“It is important to make contraception available, whereas our government’s policy is not to include reproductive health in any kind of maternal-health program,” Banerjee said. “That I consider to be a major drawback.”
Banerjee, who worked for CIDA for more than three decades, isn’t the first to suggest that the religious beliefs of senior Conservative politicians could be affecting Canadian foreign policy. In her book The Armageddon Factor: The Rise of Christian Nationalism in Canada, veteran journalist Marci McDonald argued that the Harper government’s unwavering support for Israel is a manifestation of evangelical “dispensationalist” theology.
McDonald also wrote that upon moving to Ottawa in 2003, Harper began attending the East Gate Alliance Church, successfully muting his evangelical ties until outed almost three years later by a correspondent for a Christian news service.
Banerjee’s remarks come on the heels of the federal government declaring on November 16 four new “themes” that will define Canada’s role in Afghanistan from 2011 to 2014. One of those themes, helping children and youth, will include assisting the Afghan government in “improving maternal, newborn and child health”, a backgrounder states.
“We have three paths that we’re going to follow: that’s nutrition, diseases and illnesses, and health-systems strengthening,” Geetanjalee Khosla, a senior development officer for CIDA, told the Straight. “It is too early for us to say right now what exactly our programming is going to look like. But those are the paths that we’re headed towards.”
When pressed on whether the new focus on maternal health would include family-planning components such as contraception, Khosla responded, “I don’t think the doors are closed.”
Speaking to the Straight from Ottawa, John Rafferty, NDP critic for international cooperation and CIDA, recalled remarks that U.S. secretary of state Hillary Clinton made in Canada in March of this year.
“You cannot have maternal health without reproductive health, and reproductive health includes contraception and family planning and access to legal, safe abortions,” Clinton told a meeting of G8 delegates.
Rafferty noted that those comments were made at a time when the Conservative government was refusing to talk about birth control and foreign aid. Since then, Rafferty suggested, the Harper government may have softened its position.
“I suspect that the Conservatives see the wisdom of providing a full spectrum of family-planning services but will not be making any big announcements about it,” Rafferty said. “And I think the reason they would be quiet about it is that they don’t want to stir up their base.”
Other groups on the ground in Afghanistan aren’t so guarded. In an e-mail to the Straight, Kieran Green, a spokesperson for CARE Canada, wrote that his development organization’s programs include providing oral contraceptives and condoms.
“There is actually high demand for condoms from the men in the Kabul communities where the program runs,” he emphasized.
In an earlier telephone call, Green said that maternal mortality rates in Afghanistan are so high that strategies to bring the numbers down must be comprehensive.
“The leading cause of death in Afghanistan is not bombs; it is not bullets—it is pregnancy,” he said.
You can follow Travis Lupick on Twitter at twitter.com/tlupick.



Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Comments
I am astounded at the ignorance and double-talk of supposedly knowledgeable people like Ms. Banerjee. Their idea of "maternal health" is providing abortions but they don't want to use the A word, couching their ideas in euphemisms like "reproductive health."
The Conservatives' idea of "maternal health" on the other hand is providing prenatal and post-partum care to mothers and their babies, as well as providing contraception and family planning information.
Maybe Ms. Banerjee should stop pushing her own agenda. Citing Hillary Clinton's POV is irrelevant, given the US government may be in contravention of its own federal laws if its NGOs are providing and/or pushing the abortion agenda:
"If federal money is indeed being used to support the expansion of legalized abortion in a foreign country, the Obama administration could be in violation of the Silijander Amendment, which prohibits the use of foreign assistance funds from being used to lobby for or against abortion. ..."
http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/14/usaid-report-u-s-government-using-taxp...
Furthermore, Ms. Banerjee is apparently unfamiliar with the United Nations Population Fund http://www.unfpa.org/rh/planning.htm
“Guided by paragraph 8.25 of the Cairo Programme of Action, UNFPA **does not support or promote abortion as a method of family planning.** It accords the highest priority and support to voluntary family planning to prevent unwanted pregnancies so as to eliminate recourse to abortion. ...”
Finally, providing abortions in foreign lands would probably open our country to accusations of paternalism or even genocide. Is that what Ms. Banerjee wants to expose Canada to?
Are we trotting out the "hidden agenda", still?
What a joke that this passes for news. Next!
It is a war-torn nation! What woman in her right mind would plan a pregnancy while living like that?
In any country where a woman's human rights are completely ignored, traumatized by war and poverty, and without husbands to provide for and protect their family; it's a wonder that there's anyone left but fighters. It's a miracle if the women and children survive. If a wife or daughter is raped, do you think she is safe at home in that kind of society?
The reason safe legal abortions are allowed here, is because, when desperate, a woman will have one, safe or not!
It's even riskier there.
No... of course not... it's obviously because Harper is both evil and religious.
The author of this article has put zero effort into actually thinking things though. Typical smear job.
This insult is uncalled for.
--
the issues of Maternal health are not a priority to the Muslim world. Heck, the plight of the Palistinians are not the consern of many nations around their area who could easily taken them in.
--
Do you know why the People in that area don't want a 2 state solution? Because there are better living conditions and fair laws under Isreals Gov't than a Muslim Gov't.
--
The same can be said for Harper. While this isn't a "christian country" or a bold "Christian Gov't" we have the kindest, giving Country per person in the world when it comes to maternal health, in africa and around the world.
Harper, not Obama, not an Muslim Jew or other, pushed for Maternal health.
Your article is terrible.
This was nothing more than a hit piece by a petty partisan.
Besides, one can also say Harper's born-again values lead him to support Afghan refugees or equality rights for women (the Christian beliefs, unlike those beliefs in some other countries, include the idea that both men and women are created in God's image and that both are given liberty to serve Him) . Would this be news abortion advocates start trumpeting as an example of the big evil boogeymen of religion?
Let's call this for what it is: anti-religious bigotry based on willful ignorance.
As I see all of mankind go after their own passions. If you look at it from any side there is a problem with some thing or another. Even if some demons are not seen as some aren ´t, they are there. Fertility rate? The world ´s got enough fertility. We should pass an education law where each woman, if schooled, are schooled correctly and do not have to committ ill will to their bodies/vessels. Even though we are more than the animals we make not haste to understand that... and sometimes...religion will not solve the problems in everyone ´s world but it ´s a good place to try to start, if that doesn ´t work then we need to follow a pure educational venture and give things a chance. Isn ´t this the way of Islam? as is it is of the christian?. Observe each thing, then focus on survival of a nation .... look for a different Mustakeem for peace comes from making a correct decision
iss mee
Salim 3:23
Thoughts are like many waters, but some actions can make the mightiest of rivers dry up just like that and just like that disappear... a city...... God is God, we are all ..... the genealogy of a beloved Humanity... let ´s survive 2010,11,12,13, get it...
Few Evangelical churches would ever comment on this (contraception) issue, to members or non-members. This media notion that there is consensus in Evangelical beliefs, articulated by one central governing body or person, is poor research. There are as many different ways of being an Evangelical Christian as there are Evangelicals - there is no one person who speaks for Evangelicals, no specific set of rules to follow, and as many interpretations of the Bible as there are Evangelical Christians.
Don't mix up a movement that is strongly influenced by fiercely independent, gun owning, rural Americans with Catholicism. Evangelicals do not appreciate being equated with Catholic views on this issue, they stand and fall on their own principles. Contraception is up to the individual.
Most Evangelicals do not view abortion as a form of contraception, it is a separate issue.
Afghanistan needs peace and development, not abortion.
he is a religious nutbar. seriously dangerous.
Why is it that you feel the need to push women and their needs behind the mens needs? If you look after the women providing health, education and opportunities they bring those values to their culture. Those women are the Grandmothers, mothers, sisters, wifes, daughters and granddaughters of men. When will the women be worthy in your opinion?
No? What do you mean, no? So this is fiction? Maybe the title of the article should indicate this detail then.
Harper, a former computer programmer, is not a religious guy, never has been. He noticed, correctly that the Liberals and NDP are so anti-Christian that he could pick up a lot of support by playing up his (fake) Chistianity. Christians have been fleeing the coalition parties in droves and this is the single reason why Harper has won two elections and will win a third.
This is borderline hate speech dude, knock it off.
I don't like Harper but this strikes me as the kind of thing a little girl would do when she doesn't get her way with her dad.
Also,for an educated woman, I'm pretty surprised at the amount of pure fiction and conjecture she vomited into this article.Not a good tactic trying to guilt trip a guy into funding a pet project.