News and Views » News Features

Stephen Harper’s religion clouds aid in Afghanistan

Federal government health programs may be failing young Afghan women.

Spozhmai Atash / Aina Photo Agency Afghanistan
By Travis Lupick,

The former head of Canada’s aid program in Afghanistan has expressed concern that Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s religious beliefs are hampering humanitarian efforts.

Speaking to the Straight from Kabul, Nipa Banerjee noted that Harper is a born-again Christian, and she argued that his religious beliefs could be adversely affecting the Canadian International Development Agency’s efforts to help Afghan women.

“It has been said that reproductive health would not be a part of the government and CIDA’s aid programs,” said Banerjee, who led CIDA’s mission in Afghanistan from 2003 to 2006. “And the reproductive-health issue is a major problem in the context of Afghanistan because the maternal mortality rate is very high.”

A 2009 United Nations release stated that if you were a woman giving birth in Afghanistan that year, you had a one in eight chance of dying. The following year, a Lancet report on maternal health found that a primary factor in the global decline in maternal deaths in recent decades is decreasing fertility rates.

“It is important to make contraception available, whereas our government’s policy is not to include reproductive health in any kind of maternal-health program,” Banerjee said. “That I consider to be a major drawback.”

Banerjee, who worked for CIDA for more than three decades, isn’t the first to suggest that the religious beliefs of senior Conservative politicians could be affecting Canadian foreign policy. In her book The Armageddon Factor: The Rise of Christian Nationalism in Canada, veteran journalist Marci McDonald argued that the Harper government’s unwavering support for Israel is a manifestation of evangelical “dispensationalist” theology.

McDonald also wrote that upon moving to Ottawa in 2003, Harper began attending the East Gate Alliance Church, successfully muting his evangelical ties until outed almost three years later by a correspondent for a Christian news service.

Banerjee’s remarks come on the heels of the federal government declaring on November 16 four new “themes” that will define Canada’s role in Afghanistan from 2011 to 2014. One of those themes, helping children and youth, will include assisting the Afghan government in “improving maternal, newborn and child health”, a backgrounder states.

“We have three paths that we’re going to follow: that’s nutrition, diseases and illnesses, and health-systems strengthening,” Geetanjalee Khosla, a senior development officer for CIDA, told the Straight. “It is too early for us to say right now what exactly our programming is going to look like. But those are the paths that we’re headed towards.”

When pressed on whether the new focus on maternal health would include family-planning components such as contraception, Khosla responded, “I don’t think the doors are closed.”

Speaking to the Straight from Ottawa, John Rafferty, NDP critic for international cooperation and CIDA, recalled remarks that U.S. secretary of state Hillary Clinton made in Canada in March of this year.

“You cannot have maternal health without reproductive health, and reproductive health includes contraception and family planning and access to legal, safe abortions,” Clinton told a meeting of G8 delegates.

Rafferty noted that those comments were made at a time when the Conservative government was refusing to talk about birth control and foreign aid. Since then, Rafferty suggested, the Harper government may have softened its position.

“I suspect that the Conservatives see the wisdom of providing a full spectrum of family-planning services but will not be making any big announcements about it,” Rafferty said. “And I think the reason they would be quiet about it is that they don’t want to stir up their base.”

Other groups on the ground in Afghanistan aren’t so guarded. In an e-mail to the Straight, Kieran Green, a spokesperson for CARE Canada, wrote that his development organization’s programs include providing oral contraceptives and condoms.

“There is actually high demand for condoms from the men in the Kabul communities where the program runs,” he emphasized.

In an earlier telephone call, Green said that maternal mortality rates in Afghanistan are so high that strategies to bring the numbers down must be comprehensive.

“The leading cause of death in Afghanistan is not bombs; it is not bullets—it is pregnancy,” he said.

You can follow Travis Lupick on Twitter at twitter.com/tlupick.

Comments

Teya Tamsen
Lots of conjecture in here, low on facts.
 
Willie
The former head as well as a political opponents knocking the PM? Wow what a surprise. Great drive by journalism folks. Lots of balance in the story etc. LOL!
 
glen p robbins
Since then "softened his position" - well is he born again or Catholic?
 
John Stamp
This article is the purest example of smear and slander I've ever read. The Harper government is opposed to taxpayer funded abortion to respect the wishes of millions of Canadians who oppose it. Funds for hygenic birthing, contraception, pre and post natal care are there to be spent.
 
Gabby in QC
" “It is important to make contraception available, whereas our government’s policy is not to include reproductive health in any kind of maternal-health program,” Banerjee said."

I am astounded at the ignorance and double-talk of supposedly knowledgeable people like Ms. Banerjee. Their idea of "maternal health" is providing abortions but they don't want to use the A word, couching their ideas in euphemisms like "reproductive health."

The Conservatives' idea of "maternal health" on the other hand is providing prenatal and post-partum care to mothers and their babies, as well as providing contraception and family planning information.

Maybe Ms. Banerjee should stop pushing her own agenda. Citing Hillary Clinton's POV is irrelevant, given the US government may be in contravention of its own federal laws if its NGOs are providing and/or pushing the abortion agenda:
"If federal money is indeed being used to support the expansion of legalized abortion in a foreign country, the Obama administration could be in violation of the Silijander Amendment, which prohibits the use of foreign assistance funds from being used to lobby for or against abortion. ..."
http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/14/usaid-report-u-s-government-using-taxp...

Furthermore, Ms. Banerjee is apparently unfamiliar with the United Nations Population Fund http://www.unfpa.org/rh/planning.htm
“Guided by paragraph 8.25 of the Cairo Programme of Action, UNFPA **does not support or promote abortion as a method of family planning.** It accords the highest priority and support to voluntary family planning to prevent unwanted pregnancies so as to eliminate recourse to abortion. ...”

Finally, providing abortions in foreign lands would probably open our country to accusations of paternalism or even genocide. Is that what Ms. Banerjee wants to expose Canada to?
 
Condoms are used to protect the weapons
I'd be very suspicious of the usage of condoms in Afpak... the Taliban use them to protect the muzzles of their AK-47's (and to abuse young boys). Telling the PM of the country that funds your organization that he's a religious bigot isn't the smartest way to get funding. I wouldn't spend a nickel on this organization as they seem to want to interfere with Canadian politics more than they want to help Afghans.
 
Susaan
This is a pathetic smear article.
 
Bob Bullard
Let's be honest here. Harper and the Conservatives don't just have religious issues with the people in Afghanistan, here in Canada if you are not Conservative and do not subscribe to the Conservative ideologue base then you are NOT treated as a Canadian by this government. The Harper Conservatives are partisans in whatever arena they appear! They are un-democratic and practice a "my way or the highway" approach to leadership!
 
Rob Schouten
Don't worry about Harper's religious beliefs. He may be professed Christian but his determined inaction on the issue of abortion in Canada shows that he is apathetic in applying his faith to his politics.
 
Scared Todeath
Harper is no "evangelical Christian"! The latest evidence of that fact is his voter AGAINST Bill C-510, the "Roxanne's Law" - a bill to protect pregnant women from abortion coercion. Video proof: http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Hot+News&id=23
 
Bill
What a bunch of Bullsh0t, I've never seen religion come into Harper's politics, and rightly so.

Are we trotting out the "hidden agenda", still?

What a joke that this passes for news. Next!
 
couteau24
A lot of people commenting seem to be drawing parallels between abortion in Canada and abortion in Afghanistan. The reality is that in less developed countries like Afghanistan, abortions need to be part of maternal health planning. Why? Because in Afghanistan, women (and men) do not have consistent access to contraception. Women do not have the political clout to refuse sex. Unwanted pregnancies happen all the time, and women do not have the economic means to raise several children. To deny access to safe abortions to Afghan women is not only unfair, it contributes to keeping the country poor.
 
Loretta R
Never mind 'unwanted' pregnancy, what about rape!
It is a war-torn nation! What woman in her right mind would plan a pregnancy while living like that?
In any country where a woman's human rights are completely ignored, traumatized by war and poverty, and without husbands to provide for and protect their family; it's a wonder that there's anyone left but fighters. It's a miracle if the women and children survive. If a wife or daughter is raped, do you think she is safe at home in that kind of society?

The reason safe legal abortions are allowed here, is because, when desperate, a woman will have one, safe or not!

It's even riskier there.

 
Jamie
Has anyone thought that maybe... just maybe... the federal government doesn't want to give religious and traditionalist young men in Afghanistan another reason to try and kill our soldiers and usurp the central authority? Does anyone here believe now is the best time to try and push our sexual and reproductive values on a state that has a significant and active insurgency and who's central rhetorical rallying cry is the "western invasion" of their culture?

No... of course not... it's obviously because Harper is both evil and religious.

The author of this article has put zero effort into actually thinking things though. Typical smear job.
 
Scott_G
Harper has been the head of a Gov't that leads the way in Humanitarian efforts.
This insult is uncalled for.
--
the issues of Maternal health are not a priority to the Muslim world. Heck, the plight of the Palistinians are not the consern of many nations around their area who could easily taken them in.
--
Do you know why the People in that area don't want a 2 state solution? Because there are better living conditions and fair laws under Isreals Gov't than a Muslim Gov't.
--
The same can be said for Harper. While this isn't a "christian country" or a bold "Christian Gov't" we have the kindest, giving Country per person in the world when it comes to maternal health, in africa and around the world.
Harper, not Obama, not an Muslim Jew or other, pushed for Maternal health.
Your article is terrible.
 
Jamie
Maybe not giving religious extremists in a highly religious country more rhetorical weight to their "the West is invading us with their values and are destroying Islam" argument... the argument that motivates most of the Taliban... is a better idea. How about we get them to stop shooting at our soldiers and THEN worry about giving Afghan women abortions. The Conservatives are right not to include this. It's not about Harper's religion, it's about the greater mission. Rome wasn't built in a day... neither will Afghanistan.

This was nothing more than a hit piece by a petty partisan.
 
Joshua Simpson
I am quite cetain that if Islam would change its views towards woman as being worse than an infadel and less than a dog the women would be able to speak for themselves. My quess is they would say that after their 'female circumcision' sex doesn't hold the alure for them as it does in our oversexed west. Putting the power in the woman's hands by raising them to their equal worth and in many ways superiority would go much further to lowering mortality rates. Abortions? They have nothing to do with it but a band-aid administered by people with no real answers that will only help a society continue to keep the status quo of oppression while appearing to have come ahead.
 
couteau24
"If Islam would change its view towards women"... Now, Joshua Simpson, how do you suggest that "Islam" change its view? The problem here is as much cultural as it is religious, and it is tremendously easier said than done. For women to be the equals of men, they must have at least a shot at the opportunities that are education, health care and employment. How can women go to school and earn diplomas if they are stuck at home with too many children? How will they work to earn a living if they are stuck at home with too many children? Only when women have an education, know their rights, get organized will society maybe allow them to be treated as equals. You say abortion is a band-aid, that may be so, but it still a much-needed solution to allow women who would otherwise lead desperate lives to have at least a chance.
 
Canbuhay1
Again such little research. Born-again Christians don't oppose contraception (at least for married people); Catholics do. So even if this person's attacks were true, that doesn't explain anything to do with condoms.

Besides, one can also say Harper's born-again values lead him to support Afghan refugees or equality rights for women (the Christian beliefs, unlike those beliefs in some other countries, include the idea that both men and women are created in God's image and that both are given liberty to serve Him) . Would this be news abortion advocates start trumpeting as an example of the big evil boogeymen of religion?

Let's call this for what it is: anti-religious bigotry based on willful ignorance.
 
really?
So enlightening that pure unfounded speculation is news enough for "straight". Let guess at some more headlines for next week! Perhaps we would include some more religious discrimination, maybe throw some racism and sexism in there. Perpetuation is fun!
 
LogicGuy
Yeah, what are the statistics on their claim that pregnancy is killing more people then bombs or bullets?? However going along with that, is abortion the answer? Could it be that they are just not receiving the proper medical attention and nutrition during pregnancy for a healthy birth? I don't have a problem with providing condoms & birth control pills and counseling, but we should not be subsidizing abortions. Not to mention that abortions probably go against the strict Muslim beliefs.
 
Holly Hansard
Not believing abortion to be a cure for poverty or crisis pregnancy is only an Evangelical Christian belief? Hmm...
 
salim

As I see all of mankind go after their own passions. If you look at it from any side there is a problem with some thing or another. Even if some demons are not seen as some aren ´t, they are there. Fertility rate? The world ´s got enough fertility. We should pass an education law where each woman, if schooled, are schooled correctly and do not have to committ ill will to their bodies/vessels. Even though we are more than the animals we make not haste to understand that... and sometimes...religion will not solve the problems in everyone ´s world but it ´s a good place to try to start, if that doesn ´t work then we need to follow a pure educational venture and give things a chance. Isn ´t this the way of Islam? as is it is of the christian?. Observe each thing, then focus on survival of a nation .... look for a different Mustakeem for peace comes from making a correct decision

iss mee
Salim 3:23
Thoughts are like many waters, but some actions can make the mightiest of rivers dry up just like that and just like that disappear... a city...... God is God, we are all ..... the genealogy of a beloved Humanity... let ´s survive 2010,11,12,13, get it...
 
Lethal E
This is just another fine example of why there needs to be a clear and definite separation between religion and politics. However, I am reminded of the words of Mahatma Ghandhi, “Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is.” Even better are the words from Tom Wolfe, "A cult is a religion with no political power."

 
Coastlife
I hate to have to enlighten the media on the basics here, attending an Alliance church tells us nothing about Harper's views on contraception. Catholics have clear, published views on a wide array of topics, Evangelical Christians have no such direction, in fact, it is each for their own on this issue.

Few Evangelical churches would ever comment on this (contraception) issue, to members or non-members. This media notion that there is consensus in Evangelical beliefs, articulated by one central governing body or person, is poor research. There are as many different ways of being an Evangelical Christian as there are Evangelicals - there is no one person who speaks for Evangelicals, no specific set of rules to follow, and as many interpretations of the Bible as there are Evangelical Christians.

Don't mix up a movement that is strongly influenced by fiercely independent, gun owning, rural Americans with Catholicism. Evangelicals do not appreciate being equated with Catholic views on this issue, they stand and fall on their own principles. Contraception is up to the individual.

Most Evangelicals do not view abortion as a form of contraception, it is a separate issue.
 
JeffHHH
I support Canada's position on not funding overseas abortions. There is enough death and destruction in countries like Afghanistan without us using our taxpayer dollars to fund more.
Afghanistan needs peace and development, not abortion.
 
Russell Barth
there is more. Harper considers marijuana "sorcery". that is how his church views marijuana and it's users, as pagans.

he is a religious nutbar. seriously dangerous.
 
Strong New Democrat
Jamie - this is the same government that chose to use the rescue of women and girls as their excuse for being in Afganistan in the first place.

Why is it that you feel the need to push women and their needs behind the mens needs? If you look after the women providing health, education and opportunities they bring those values to their culture. Those women are the Grandmothers, mothers, sisters, wifes, daughters and granddaughters of men. When will the women be worthy in your opinion?
 
andre1958
Wow. So someone has actually interviewed the PM and got all that info from him.

No? What do you mean, no? So this is fiction? Maybe the title of the article should indicate this detail then.
 
Neil Edmondson
Here, let me fix that headline for you: Travis The Pinko Propagandist's Viciously Ant-Christian Hate Clouds Preposterous Article On Harper, Afghanistan.

Harper, a former computer programmer, is not a religious guy, never has been. He noticed, correctly that the Liberals and NDP are so anti-Christian that he could pick up a lot of support by playing up his (fake) Chistianity. Christians have been fleeing the coalition parties in droves and this is the single reason why Harper has won two elections and will win a third.

This is borderline hate speech dude, knock it off.
 
Taxpayers R Us
Still curious as to why sexists such as Naperjee put women's needs before the people as a whole. If people like her got their way, they'd have hospitals for women and nobody else.

I don't like Harper but this strikes me as the kind of thing a little girl would do when she doesn't get her way with her dad.

Also,for an educated woman, I'm pretty surprised at the amount of pure fiction and conjecture she vomited into this article.Not a good tactic trying to guilt trip a guy into funding a pet project.
 
RunningFrog
www.populationconnection.org
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.