Sheryl Fink: Canadian election offers reasons for hope that seal hunt will end

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      The Canadian federal election was held on Monday (May 2) and the political landscape is now like no other ever witnessed in this country. Canada now has a Conservative majority government with an NDP opposition.

      Although Canada’s Conservative party generally brings to mind policies and positions that are unfriendly to animals, there is some good to be found in the election outcome.

      And while Fisheries Minister Gail Shea held on to her seat in Atlantic Canada (possibly thanks to her “publicity garnering announcements” on the seal hunt?), some of the strongest pro-seal hunt politicians were dumped out of office.

      So long, seal-haters

      Former fisheries ambassador Loyola Sullivan (the man who led the delegations in support of the seal hunt to the EU and elsewhere, wasting millions in Canadians’ taxes) did not win in the Newfoundland riding of St. John’s South-Mount Pearl. During the election, Sullivan launched a vicious and public attack against Liberal MP Hedy Fry, condemning her support for ending the commercial seal slaughter. But guess who won their seat? Congratulations to Hedy Fry!

      Seal meat gourmand and Liberal party leader Michael Ignatieff also lost his riding and has resigned.

      The seal-clubbing-happy Bloc Québécois held on to a mere four seats in Quebec and leader Gilles Duceppe lost his seat and has also resigned. Seal supporters may remember the ridiculous and rejected Bloc Québécois idea that the Olympics be used to promote the Canadian seal slaughter, and perhaps recall the equally silly Bloc-supported event in Ottawa last year that served seal meat and showcased a film that criticized groups like IFAW which dare to speak against the hunt.

      Welcome, seal defenders

      While we are still going through the list of newly elected members of Parliament, it appears as though compassionate Canadians can now count on at least 14 MPs—NDP, Liberal, and Green—who have indicated their opposition to the commercial seal hunt.

      Of course, the most prominent of these is Green party leader Elizabeth May. The Green party has been courageous and vocal about their opposition to the cruel and unnecessary slaughter of seal pups and IFAW congratulates Elizabeth May on the historic achievement of being elected the first Green party politician in Canada—indeed, in North America!

      Hope for the future?

      Having the Greens with a seat in the House of Commons will hopefully provide a strong voice for seals. But for those of us who tend to fear a Conservative majority might take heart in remembering that—current government aside—historically, the Conservative party has not been entirely bad for Canada’s seal populations.

      For example, it was under a Conservative majority in 1961 that closing dates were implemented to limit the length of the sealing season and help conserve harp seal populations. This was done in response to scientists’ concerns that the population had been halved been 1950 and 1960.

      Under a Conservative majority in 1987, the prohibition on the commercial hunting of whitecoat seal pups was implemented and the use of collector vessels over 65 feet was stopped. (The Liberals had refused the recommendations of the earlier Special Advisory Committee on Seals and Sealing in 1972.) In 1988, the Conservatives upheld the position that there was no scientific basis to kill grey seals to protect fish stocks and continued to ban the hunting of this species for three more years.

      And according to those who have been working on this campaign for longer than I have, Conservative majority governments are more willing to meet with groups like IFAW when in power.

      There is also hope in the NDP, which currently does not have an official policy on the commercial seal hunt. However, in their replies to IFAW supporters a number of NDP candidates noted the party’s progressive stance on animal welfare issues, concern about the impacts of climate change on seals, and committed to holding stakeholder discussions on the commercial seal hunt. We remain optimistic that when presented with the facts on this issue—that not only is it cruel and inhumane, but does not even provide a decent living or economic opportunity for fishermen—that they too will realize that the best solution for both animals and people is to phase out this industry and support transitions to alternatives. In fact, among all Canadian political parties the NDP has the largest number of MPs who are on record opposing Canada’s commercial seal hunt.

      IFAW will continue to work with Canadian politicians from all parties to encourage them to bring an end to the seal slaughter and we encourage our supporters to do the same. We need to remind our politicians that this is an issue Canadians care about every day, not just during spring elections or during the commercial seal hunt.

      Sheryl Fink is the director of the seal program at the International Fund for Animal Welfare.

      Comments

      10 Comments

      Ray I

      May 4, 2011 at 5:03pm

      Why does the author state "Canada’s Conservative party generally brings to mind policies and positions that are unfriendly to animals"? Can you name the specific policies to which you are referring?

      Taxpayers R Us

      May 4, 2011 at 9:37pm

      Until you offer them a way of life that's a viable way of feeding their families without it coming out of the public purse, leave it alone. They have deeper and more immediate concerns like feeding their families and keeping their homes warm.

      Denise Perrin

      May 5, 2011 at 9:04am

      Taxpayer R Us, you sound as if you've bought into the lie that the seal hunt by indigenous and the commercial seal slaughter are one int he same.
      Commercial fishermen kill 97-99% of those killed in Canada. They HAVE full time jobs and even they admit there is no money in killing seals.
      No one puts a roof over their head or pays the electric bill by killing seals.
      It's time to think for yourself.
      http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2011/04/11/seal-hunt-slow-s...

      R U Kiddingme

      May 5, 2011 at 9:59pm

      Can someone who knows answer: is the seal-clubbing biz a viable one currently? I mean, is anyone buying real fur these days? I am all for stopping the grotesque industries but it would be preferable to let the dumb things stop of their own accord rather than move the machinery of state, if at all practicable. Otherwise people will ask logical questions like, if hunting seals is cruel, isn't catching fish cruel?

      Taxpayers R Us

      May 6, 2011 at 4:43pm

      @ Denise

      There's a lie in place that supports seal clubbing? Are you trying to tell people that while sealers "admit" there's no money in it, they do it anyway? Just for fun?

      Sorry chickie, the math doesn't add up. I haven't heard any commentary from the sealers whatsoever, but your commentary would suggest any kind of lie is coming from, well, you.

      Martin Dunphy

      May 6, 2011 at 5:49pm

      Taxpayers R Us:

      If I may be so forward, I think Denise Perrin wanted readers such as yourself to click on the link to get the information to answer the question that seems to be puzzling you and RU Kiddingme.
      We try to check all links before publishing, and that one appears to provide the desired details.

      Have a nice day.

      scissorpaws

      May 7, 2011 at 5:49am

      Ray I

      For one it was a Conservative Senator, fearing viable effective animal cruelty laws that preempted its passing by interjecting his own pro forma toothless legislation - bill S-203 (S for Senate) - happily abetted by his own PM and effectively torpedoing a piece of very good animal welfare law. Last thing they want is to compromise the farm/rancher vote. You might also look up Canada's position on the Blue Fin Tuna "harvest". I wouldn't be surprised if The Harper Government were to rejoin Japan and Norway and get back into whaling.

      lola lawton

      May 7, 2011 at 6:12pm

      do we stop deer hunting, moose hunting bear hunting duck hunting, pheasants, turkeys, fishing cattle pig chickens rabbitts sheeps goats do we get to dictate who can eat what, not everyone lives by a wal-mart some people still use the animal and feed and clothe traditionally some collect eggs, shear wool, use fur for warmth we use inuit, native representation to promote the international tourism to give a internnational indenty to canada but yet threaten the lifestyle of these peoples with pictures that try to dipict animal cruelty but zoos are appropriate and aquatic parks with clapping seals that's o.k. meat processing plants that's not cruel? please, live and let live includes all people cultures and lifestyles we accept cultures from all parts of the world but allow this protest to kill a culture of indinginsts canadains from the harshes regions these people keep this territories alive, keep the true north poster alive.

      Denise Perrin

      May 9, 2011 at 2:43pm

      Martin Dunphy,
      YOU obviously took the time to read.

      It's evident by 'Taxpayers R Us' writing that he's a 'scimmer', is rude uncouth, using phrases like 'chickie', and is clearly a willing victim of government's rhetoric.

      TAXPAYERS R US, here it is again. Just the latest seal killer admitting that their is no money in killing seals.

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2011/04/11/seal-hunt-slow-s...

      R U Kiddingme

      May 10, 2011 at 9:54pm

      Thanks for the link, and the snarkiness -- what internet board is complete without that? Anyhoo, like I thought, seal clubbing is not a viable industry. You can club 'em for sport but not to make money. So, what is the problem? It is a lost cause, relic industry, like video stores. All the government should do is, I guess, not promote seal meat in China. We should instead promote pigeon meat -- everywhere I go I see those filthy sky rats.