Vancouver hockey riot is a symptom of a larger problem
We've heard a lot of reasons (excuses?) batted around as to why last night's post-Cup riot happened. A very outraged man on the radio this morning blamed the whole thing on faulty parenting. Others look at the idiocy of city politicians for inviting 100,000 people into the downtown core, TransLink for ramping up service to a peninsula with limited escape routes, and the provincial order to close downtown liquor stores at 4 p.m., ensuring that those in attendance would be drunk before they even arrived. You can also look to the mainstream media for hyping up this series to unheard-of proportions and constantly reminding the populace of the infamous 1994 Stanley Cup riots.
But maybe what we have is just a sick fucking culture. Maybe as a society, we've simply become borderline psychotic. You only need to ride a bus to see what an angry group of people we’ve become. We're rude, we're snotty, we don't talk or engage with each other. We've created the stupidest generation: a barely literate group of narcissists who don't know how to take care of themselves, but are like military-trained experts when it comes to tagging themselves in Facebook photos.
From all reports, there was a small group of young hooligans determined to riot and smash 'n' grab no matter what the outcome of the game was. Several sites have been set up to post pictures, Facebook screencaps, and video of morons proudly declaring their involvement in the violence. Should we be surprised? And doesn’t it seem a little obvious that there was never going to be a good outcome, regardless of who won? At 4:30 p.m. the streets of the downtown core were already simmering with the dangerous and hair-trigger emotions of the mob, and all that emotion—good or bad—was going to be purged, somewhere, somehow. In the weeks leading up to the final, the magnitude of our bizarre, tribal attachment to a hockey team became more and more clear. And it exceeds far beyond a natural and healthy spirit of competitiveness or an appreciation of the beauty of the game itself. It’s pathological. It’s monstrously unhealthy. And it speaks to a monumental emptiness at the heart of our culture.
So, why are there so many hungry souls out there, ready and willing to bring chaos down on the so-called most livable city on the planet? In reality, matters have only gotten much worse politically and economically since 1994, and Generation Y has been delivered into a beyond-callous world facing a perfect storm of crises. They know it. What does the future look like for the average 20 year old? It's a depressing, empty place where they can't get decent-paying (let alone secure) jobs or ever have a hope of owning property. Can you imagine how much more fearful and angry they would be if they fully comprehended the seriousness of peak oil?
And yet despite the terminal condition of a socio-economic superstructure hurtling towards the edge of a cliff while wondering if it even has enough gas to get there, the market rolls on, plundering the public coffers and starving the arts and education, producing a society that is spiritually malnourished but not sensitive enough to ask why. Meanwhile, we have dissonant messages relentlessly beamed into our heads: wealth is good, the poor have nobody but themselves to blame, personal devices make you happy, war is peace, “Save money, live better”, Don Cherry deserves your attention and respect, and have some pride in your Canucks. Because what the fuck else have you got going for you?
The market practices institutional violence on every single one of us, every day, just by virtue of existing. It's not the game of hockey that's the problem; it's the capitalistic appropriation of our national pastime. It's the myriad of advertisers trotting out the "I am Canadian!" sentiments in order to sell products. It's the message we are force-fed that if we don’t pay attention to the spectacle, we are somehow disenfranching ourselves. That's the way advertising has always worked: make people insecure about a fictional problem, and then sell them the fix.
This isn’t to excuse the rioters, and we should remember and praise those who were there, and who resisted, and who did the right thing. There's a powerful clip on YouTube right now of two men—one in a Canucks jersey, one not—trying to prevent assholes from smashing out the windows of the Bay downtown. They have some initial success, but then the non-jerseyed man pushes a rioter back and gets beaten for his efforts.
But we can’t just blame a few “bad apples.” This riot didn't happen on its own. Society as a whole ensured that it was the only outcome, starting with the assumption that our over-amped if not war-like passion for something as inconsequential as a hockey game is appropriate to begin with, let alone officially sanctioned. But hey, it’s a fucking goldmine for advertisers and a hell of a vacuum to suck in a growing population of bored, distracted, disassociated, and quietly despairing Lower Mainlanders marinated in the hegemony of cheap sensation, and governed by institutions hostile to art, truth, and beauty. It’s a problem that, as always, starts at the very top.
The wrong questions will inevitably get asked in the wake of all this, and the wrong solutions applied. Expect “tougher policing”, and a ramped up culture of intolerance in a city that already turns a blind-eye to a tsunami of social ills. The VPD—which was quick to blame the violence on "criminals, anarchists, and thugs"—is encouraging anyone with high-resolution pictures to email them to the department, but is that really what we want to become? Yes, last night's violence was inexcusable and the offenders should be prosecuted, but the slope towards becoming a Big Brother-like society where we tattle on our neighbours is already slippery enough. Wouldn't it be preferable to live in a society in which we actually knew our neighbours to begin with? To know and trust the people around us to act like responsible individuals? To enjoy a culture of mutual respect rather than suspicion, hyper-competition, and meaningless interaction mediated through our phones and iPads? All we're doing right now is gawking at city-sanctioned spectacles—or plugging in our headphones so we can ignore each other.
There was a beautiful outpouring of love and support for our fair city this morning as hundreds of volunteers took to the streets to help clean up the terrible mess from last night. We do have the capacity to be kind, gentle, thoughtful individuals, and, hopefully, we can begin to repair the damage to our tarnished reputation. Unfortunately, there's no simple band-aid solution that will fix a sick society. The symptoms are clearly manifesting but, without facing up to the fact that there is an overarching problem, there is absolutely no chance for us to heal. But perhaps the first step towards solving this systemic problem is to acknowledge the fact that there is actually something wrong with us.
You can follow Miranda Nelson on Twitter at @charenton_. Adrian Mack is too cool for Twitter but you can read his extensive archive of articles here.






I'm going to assume the authors have read The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement, and for those who haven't it's brainy but a great report, well worth the read.
Perhaps I'm naive to think, that the advent of social media, the ability to share such pictures, video and commentary is a positive stride in our technology.
Or maybe I'm just thankful that there are those that use it with the right intent? I think you dubbing those who merely want to help as people emulating Big Brother is a bit much though. I'd rather have my neighbor or my fellow, law-abiding, Vancouver loving citizen have a handle on Big Brother tactics than my own government.
Just sayin'.
He's exactly right - The Coast Salish People should have never let us move here in the first place.
- "Yes, last night's violence was inexcusable and the offenders should be prosecuted, but the slope towards becoming a Big Brother-like society where we tattle on our neighbours is already slippery enough" - Thanks for basically writing, "I am now making a slippery slope argument [which is a logical fallacy]." Submitting video of hooligans does not equal ratting on our kids for being leftists, etc.
- "It's the myriad of [sic] advertisers trotting out the "I am Canadian!" sentiments in order to sell products." Hmm.. I only remember one advertiser using that slogan. Hardly myriad. But if you mean it's somehow morally incorrect for advertisers to mention our country's name or culture, what ISN'T 'evil' in advertising?
- "a sick fucking culture.. borderline psychotic" That's quite the hyperbole, and judging from the comments, I'd say very effective at getting a rise out of readers. I'll assume you didn't really mean to say that a western, liberal, progressive, democratic society is inferior or evil compared to basically anywhere else. That'd just be psychotic.
First, there were a lot of commenters and authors bashing Chief Chu for "making it political" when he blamed so-called anarchists. Now this author is reinforcing that idea by blaming what the anarchists would blame: all of society, in the vaguest of vagueness, and with equally vague suggestions for solutions. I prefer the pragmatic, concrete assignments of blame heard in almost every other article, whether it falls upon faulty parenting, hockey fights, media hype, etc.
These echoes of a failed hippie culture are getting old, "man".
I recommend that anyone who wants to really understand all this that they watch a documentary called The Advertising World and the Human Ego.
To the parents -- is this how you raised your kids? I hope that you do the right thing and march them down to the police so that they can take responsibility for their actions. Don't let them get away with this -- soon, some of these hoodlums might actually become real members of society, so teach them right...now.
Finally, to the schools and employers -- look at the pictures... if any of these idiots work for you or go to your school: (1) turn them in; and (2) get rid of them. These aren't people that deserve your support.
Most of us are law-abiding citizens that truly love our city and our country. It's time to take a stand against those that certainly don't.
The cops have an easy target with the "anarchists" claim, this is total BS. The anarchists who "rioted" during the games had a political agenda and targeted corps they felt were adding to the problems of our social ills. they are not hockey fans, looters or thieves. They had a political agenda, right or wrong, and Im sure they couldnt have cared less about the play offs. You dont become an anarchist by the mere virtue of covering your face! The VPD made them an easy scapegoat when the truth is they were overwhelmed and underprepared and did almost nothing to stop the violence.
I agree with your statement about our culture becoming "borderline psychotic". This obsession with fake reality and gadgets have left most young people completely disconnected from who they are, it truly is a sickness.
BC has a myriad of problems and 99% of us are apathetic to them. When people protest in public they are often taunted, mocked and ridiculed even for things like human rights or budget cuts. These young guys were the same dudes who had to be restrained from attacking peaceful protesters during the 2010 games. Shouting slurs and giving people the finger as they walked by. How ironic that RIOT 2010 became RIOT 2011.
Most of us are living life through a thin digital veil pretending that our facebook page is the real representation of who we are while the real person is often unfulfilled, angry and frustrated. Vancouver can be a shallow, image/wealth obsessed city. Our insecurities are masked with indifference and a cold attitude to others. These riots are an expression of that. Young people who so desperately want to be a part of something, anything, to feel like they belong. Thats what this whole playoff experience was about and this was how it played itself out.
Vancouver has a society of mental illness, Ive been saying it for years, there is really something wrong here.
So I don't agree one bit with that article - It was a few inciting a mob to act. I'm more interested in the good that is being under-reported.
Walk down the street and smile at those you don't know, engage in at least a few conversations outside of your realm of comfort every single day just for the sake of expression and something completely new. What if we all took part? Imagine attending an event so big as 100,000 people gathering together and at some point you realize that through yourself, through the string of others that you have shaken hands with, you have had contact with at least half of these people, possibly even all of them. Imagine.
Pages