Delta mayor Lois Jackson accused of muzzling candidates on Southlands

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      For Richard Kunz, it’s the “most egregious” action ever taken by Delta mayor Lois Jackson.

      He is an organizer with Southlands the Facts, a community group that wants to protect an iconic tract of agricultural land, the former Spetifore farm, from being torn up by developers.

      Kunz was reacting to Jackson’s recent pronouncement that she is seeking a legal opinion on what councillors and candidates for council in this fall’s civic election can and cannot say about a new proposal to develop Delta’s Southlands.

      “It is just unbelievable that she would even contemplate…muzzling public opinion,” Kunz bristled in a phone interview with the Georgia Straight on September 21. “And to think that voters should not have the right to know the position of any candidate for council or mayor is ridiculous! How are voters supposed to make an educated, informed decision and vote accordingly?”

      The 217-hectare land parcel in the Tsawwassen area has long been a hotbed of contention. It was removed by the province from the Agricultural Land Reserve in 1981. Tsawwassen Development Ltd. submitted a proposal in 1988 to develop the land, and this became the subject of the longest public hearing in the country’s history.

      In 2009, developer and landowner Century Industries Ltd. put forward an application to amend Delta’s official community plan and zone the property for various uses. It wanted to build 1,900 houses on about a third of the land. Century also offered about 81 hectares to the Corporation of Delta for community-based
      agriculture, including an urban farming education centre. According to its proposal, the remaining portions of the land would be used for public amenities like parks and trails.

      This summer, Century indicated that it is scaling down its proposal to 950 housing units.

      For Kunz, Jackson’s move is actually quite late. Referring to statements made by Delta councillors at a meeting on September 12, Kunz said: “It was very evident that the council members, most if not all, expressed opinions that were clearly in favour of development. So what’s that old saying about closing the barn after the horse has escaped?”

      Jackson, who is running again for another term, vigorously defended her action.

      “My understanding is if you go into a public hearing with your mind already made up and you publicly declared, you could be in jeopardy of not being able to vote on the issue,” Jackson told the Straight in a phone interview. “You could be in court with either the developer who had said he’s not had a fair opportunity to present because everybody has already made up their mind, or from the public who say everybody made up their minds already on behalf of the developer so we didn’t have a fair hearing.”

      Jackson stressed that the legal opinion should serve as a guide for municipal politicians.

      “If the lawyer says we would strongly suggest you do not make a firm opinion publicly on this issue, then, I mean, you do that at your own peril,” she said. “If…the municipality was sued by either the people or by the developer, those people in turn, those councillors that were seated, may not be defended at the public purse. In other words, they’re on their own hook. The corporation would not indemnify them.”

      Coun. Heather King is challenging Jackson for the post of mayor but she doesn’t completely disagree with the incumbent on this matter.

      “What she’s trying to say is that when we go forward with a public hearing, if we go into a public hearing with our minds already made up, then that creates an image that is not fair governance, and I have to agree,” King told the Straight by phone. “However, we can certainly be free to speak our minds on what we have gathered in terms of concerns or information.”

      Sylvia Bishop, a candidate for council, wants Jackson to withdraw her request for a legal opinion. In a statement, Bishop declared: “The idea that a candidate for elected office should not take a position on such an important issue contradicts some of the most basic principles of our democracy.”

      Comments

      6 Comments

      RonS

      Sep 22, 2011 at 7:52am

      Geez I didn't think we are communist here! So you can't have an opinion until the Lois Jackson says so? Well guess what Lois, I have one and it's against the proposal!

      monty/that's me

      Sep 22, 2011 at 8:24am

      Cancel FREE SPEECH? Time for this Mayor to retire!

      Debbie McBride

      Sep 22, 2011 at 9:40am

      I cannot believe Jackson would waste taxpayers money on this. No, I take that back, I can believe it, Our 74 year old mayor has been doing very strange things lately. She stated at a councIl meeting the previous week that Aea Plans, were worthless because they can be changed the day after they are passed. She has stopped 2 public hearings and then held private behind closed door meetings with the developer and a few selected community members. That resulted in the developer being encouraged to bring a development proposal before Council just months after the Tsawwassen Area Plan kept it in agriculture. The others at this summit were totally disregarded. All of this was done on advise by their lawyers.
      It's typical that King would side with the mayor on this one. She has habit of going along with the mayor eventually, so her weak response is not surprising.
      At least we've got mayoral candidate Engelland and and council candidate Sylvia Bishop
      speaking out against this attempt at censorship. Jackson and her DIVA team are antidemocratic and of course they don't want to tell people where they stand. This is tantamount to a gag order and it's time our mayor is rstored along with the rat of her pals on council.

      muzzle

      Sep 22, 2011 at 6:33pm

      What Lois is doing is typical of the majority of politicians these days. They try to keep the voting public in the dark as much as they possibly can, even to the extreme of using the courts to do it.

      Wake up people, we are losing our democracy at an alarming rate. Start paying attention, rather than voting for a candidate just because your neighbor is. Dumping Lois, and others, should be a no brainer.

      Douglas

      Sep 23, 2011 at 3:13pm

      This issue has already been resolved at the Supreme Court of Canada in a decision called Save Richmond Farmland Society v. Richmond (Township), [1990] 3 S.C.R 1213 in which a Richmond BC councillor named Mawby went on TV, radio and in the papers and based his municipal election campaign on stating that he favoured residential development on a piece of Richmond BC farmland. Despite all of that, the Supreme Court of Canada was not able to find that he was, in fact biased or that he ought to have been precluded from voting on the matter. The judgment went on to say that one is able to come to a decision making process with a closed mind so long as the closed mind is not a result of corruption, but rather, of honest opinion, strongly held.
      Lois Jackson is aware of this case yet she persists in getting an outside legal opinion, likely because she does not like this decision. If she would like someone to read the judgement to her, I am sure that Greg Vanstone, attorney for the Municipality of Delta, can read it to her without resorting to ourside legal opinions at tax payers expense. Loid Jackson is not the boss of council. She is a councillor like all the rest and can;t tell other councillors what to say, despite what the "bought and paid for" legal opinion she seeks says. If councillors or councillor elects allow themselves to be stifled by her, none should be re-elected, or elected, as the case may be.

      Simon Truelove

      Sep 23, 2011 at 5:06pm

      Thanks to Douglas (and Hugh Mawby) for the legal precedent. Voters need to know opinions of candidates on this important issue BEFORE the election. If candidates wish to sit on the fence and study the matter for years without doing anything voters should know that too.