Municipal Election | Arts Notes

NPA arts platform includes creation of endowment funds and three-acre Vancouver Art Gallery site

NPA mayoral candidate Suzanne Anton.

Stephen Hui
By Jessica Werb,

The NPA would give the Vancouver Art Gallery free rein over the entire block of land at 688 Cambie Street for a new gallery, mayoral candidate Suzanne Anton announced today. The NPA would also create two endowment funds for cultural infrastructure through community amenity contributions from developers, and develop a strategic plan for growth in Vancouver’s arts, tourism, and entertainment sectors, she said.

“We are going to give this entire site to the art gallery so that it can avail itself of the proceeds of development at this site to fund both the capital of the gallery and an operating endowment for the gallery,” said Anton, speaking on the site of the parking lot the gallery has earmarked as its preferred new home. “My proposal is to give the gallery the entire site, let them develop it to its maximum potential,” she continued.

“That could be a difference of $100 million, $200 million. It’s a very, very significant difference. That can go to fund both the capital and to fund an operating endowment for the gallery. Because the gallery has to have an operating endowment or it will fail—I shouldn’t say that—to make it really sustainable, so it can support its own collections.”

Last February, council voted to reserve two-thirds of the three-acre lot for cultural use, for up to two years, and work with the gallery on developing a strategy for its potential relocation there. The remaining acre on the site is earmarked for office towers and would be used to help pay off the $40 million encumbrance on the site.

NPA council candidate Sean Bickerton—who, along with NPA council candidates Elizabeth Ball and George Affleck, joined Anton—added: “We had two police cars burnt right over here during our recent riot. This park has had an extraordinary history but it has devolved from a marshalling ground and a sports field, to a bus depot and now a parking lot. And to see a site of that, where those police cars were burned, converted into one of the leading cultural institutions of the city for all of us, I think, is just extraordinarily exciting.”

Anton said developers would provide a reliable source of funding to build up cultural endowment funds. The NPA plan is to create an Infrastructure Financing Fund for capital improvements, and an Infrastructure Endowment Fund for operating costs.

“I’m proposing to take a steady stream of that [community amenity contribution] funding and put it into a capital fund for capital projects for the arts around the city,” she explained. “And the art gallery won’t need the funding, but the Museum of Vancouver, for example, the Maritime Museum…they’ve been abandoned by the city. I’m proposing a steady stream of capital for those facilities that will allow us to develop a capital infrastructure.”

Elizabeth Ball said the NPA would develop a cultural tourism strategy that would go over and above the strategy developed by cultural services staff at the city that was approved by council in 2008 as part of its 10-year cultural plan.

“There is not a master tourism strategy which involves tourism and all the infrastructure you need to move forward,” she said. “We know that all the tourism agencies do wonderful work, but it would be wonderful to bring everything together and to move forward to 2020.…the cultural tourism strategy will be a blueprint to expand our tourism industry, cultural infrastructure, organizations, facilities, services, festivals, museums and marketing.”

Comments

Gentleman Jack
Perfect!
And once the Art Gallery moves, Occupy Vancouver can take possession of the Old Courts and begin administering Justice!
 
Not a large arts organization
This is an okay plan for the Vancouver Art Gallery and for the small, small fraction of artists and cultural workers employed by the largest of arts organizations in the city.

Unfortunately there is nothing here for Vancouver's massive community of individual artists, collectives, and small/medium/emerging companies, who represent the majority of arts in Vancouver.

Capital grants and operating funds are great for big players who need large buildings and a staff- but that's not what is needed most by the community as a whole.

What is really going to benefit artists across the board in our city and lead to an improved sector is increased grant funding administered through an arms-length arts council.

Juries of fellow artists and culture workers are best positioned to assess the merit and value of projects. It's a system that has been working at federal and provincial levels for decades, as well as in other cities across the country. Vancouver is long overdue to have it's own.

Vision has promised this and the arts community needs to: 1. Get Vision back in, because what's being offered by the NPA isn't what is needed (especially the parts involving clueless NPA bureaucrats deciding what projects to fund and devising a strategy to represent us).
2. Keep on Vision to follow through and deliver on municipal arts council (starting with the arms-length funding immediately- and coming to the rest of the advisory council stuff later).
 
sleepswithangels
Quelle surprise. The NPA wants to throw dollars at their buddies in the Vancouver Art Establishment.

I can't think of an organization more culturally moribund than the VAG.
This is where creativity is more about perks for the annoited than actual talent.

There are community art groups and co-ops out there that are more deserving than the Very Artless Graftmongers at the VAG.
SMBs
 
Jacked
Who going to pay for the actual Gallery? More taxes?
 
GZLFB
Why don't they spend NPA funds on it? I guess we can't expect more freedom and trust of individual taste from them any more than we can Vision or COPE or any Party.
 
GOT
3 acres? wow! that's a BIG tent city! Thanks NPA - we didn't know you cared!! What's that? You don't? It's just a cheap attempt to appear like you do, but it's really a plan to get rid of the VAG forever? Oh.
 
james green
Hell, there are a number of viable programs to help the arts in this city.
Anton and Robertson do not have the one characteristic to make the life of the artist better. What's that you say? Yes, you win the car.
It's leadership and they are devoid.
 
flora-jean
I'm sorry. At the moment, the city funded VAG (operating funds granted to VAG by city taxpayers of approximately $ 2 million per year) leases its current site and building for a token fee of $1 per year.....
For a city with impoverished senior citizens who are being shuffled and renovicted, families in Strathcona going to foodbanks and without weather resistant clothing for their children, city run day cares poorly managed, First Nation teenage girls being thrown out of hotel windows by drug dealers... DO YOU THINK MAYBE YOU HAVE THE WRONG PRIORITIES??? And I am completely in support of true, local, and struggling Vancouver musicians, performers and visual artists. I am really tired of the VAG and how they harp on their blue chip Walls and Ardens and cabal of preppy photo-conceptualists as I'm sure the rest of aware Vancouverites are. What's going to happen if their developer controlled board starts throwing their support behind the sexy local institution ripe for a new building? They're going to dump the VAG.
 
GOT
You know the NPA is grasping at straws when they propose that 'developers' will fund Vancouver's cultural future. In exchange for what? And if that unanswered question isn't a bit scary all by itself, then we can also fall back on tourism! Art for developers and tourists - that sums up the VAG already. And we should be happy with dumping probably hundreds of millions of dollars into offering more of that?
How about a REAL plan to fund the REAL arts in Vancouver, instead of the on-again-off-again-maybe-we-will-maybe-we-won't scenario that has arts groups begging and hoping to be allowed to survive, rather than being encouraged to thrive? That would be leadership.
 
flora-jean
I meant to write "next" sexy institution ripe for a new building (sorry).
 
Jonathan Baker
The City of Vancouver has had plenty of experience in financing cultural programs through zoning. We did this a lot through the Social Planning Department in the seventies and eighties.

Let's say a developer wants an up-zoning of his land so that he can put up an office tower. The City normally decides on the density by considering the burdens that the development places on the community in terms of such things as schools, roads, environmental impacts etc. It then has a public hearing and makes its decision taking all of these things into account.

The proposed cultural contribution is a form of sale of zoning. It puts the cultural sector on the side of development and developers. Generally the Developer gets the better end of the deal. They were used in this way by the Casino's as partners in gambling. It was only when the government cut back cultural groups as recipients of cultural grants that the arts sector decided to withdraw their support for gambling.

The better approach is for the City to consider cultural organizations as a part of our infra structure. The City should purchase cultural services or provide grants. It should be the patron of the arts. Vancouver should not be using the arts to help it sell development, gambling or anything else.
 
C, Van Ihinger
Sounds like NPA wants to try another Triple P, this time to allow private developers to cash in on a new art gallery building. Didn't the NPA learn anything from their last Triple P, the one that was supposed to cost us nothing to build the Olympic Village, then turn it into low cost housing?

We can't afford to make that mistake again.

Much more better if we concentrate our municipal energies on sorting out the underlying problems that make the Downtown East Side the Downtown East Side.

Do the basics first, luxuries second.
 
William P
Saw a load of NPA-candidate posters plastered all over local arts community advertisements on streetlights.

Good to see the NPA’s priorities and how they really feel about the arts.

Any politician who says they support the arts and then puts their own material over timely messages supporting local artists should be ashamed.

As most people know, performing arts groups don't have much money to spend. A lot of their budget goes on marketing to bring in audiences to keep them afloat and to contribute to the community in the city.

By essentially making it impossible for people to see these posters, candidates are showing their lack of respect for arts groups.

Actions speak louder than words. Not impressed.
 
GZLFB
The Press want to treat Anton as the only option as a way to keep Gregor in office. Treat it as a multiple Candidate option and Anton may be third in the election with a new Mayor. Council may still have 3 parties, maybe an Independent. I think the cultural sector should be the private citizen's duty and the state should stop standing in the way of wealth creation and individual rights making sure people have the expendable income and to act on their own individual tastes and maybe going directly to artists not quangos and special interest groups via the tax department maybe going to a few artists of buddy system censorship, for if Government funds and influence goes to some artists and not all then the ones left behind are censored. Less government and more freedom.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.