News and Views » Straight Talk

Rock for Tibet benefit plans are a first in Canada

Dermod Travis (left) of the Canada Tibet Committee and Montreal musician Xavier Auclair.

Matthew Burrows
By Matthew Burrows,

The series of benefit concerts for exiled Tibetans that Dermod Travis and Montreal musician Xavier Auclair are planning is a first in Canada.

“Of the non-Tibetan music variety, yes, I think so,” Victoria-based Travis, outgoing executive director of the Canada Tibet Committee, told the Straight during an interview in a Broadway coffee shop.

Tentatively titled Rock for Tibet, any money raised from the concerts, which will feature Auclair’s Montreal band, Sunrise and Good People, will go toward the federal government’s recently announced resettlement program to bring 1,000 exiled Tibetans to Canada from the remote Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh.


Dermod Travis on the Tibetan resettlement program.

Auclair said he’s always cared about issues facing Tibet, occupied since 1959 by China. He said going to Dharamsala, the place of residence for the exiled Dalai Lama and home to Tibet’s government-in-exile, moved him. Auclair was there for work and visited a museum, run by the exiled Tibetan community, that documented the plight of Tibetans since occupation. While there, he got chatting to Tibetan Buddhist lama Tenzin Bagdro. Footage of a praying Bagdro is featured in the video for the song “I Won’t Fall Down”, which is what got the CTC interested in aligning themselves with the band.

“You can read lots of stuff on Tibet, but once you actually meet someone who has gone through something that is intense, you know?” Auclair said. “I have seen documentaries about monks being in prison, but when you really meet one, and I read his book Hell on Earth, you get the feeling that this is very strong.”

Travis said he envisions a series of shows in Canada starting next spring—most likely evening concerts in smallish venues. Nothing is confirmed yet, but both men are excited about what could transpire with greater awareness of Tibetan issues in Canada.

“I guess it’s just a long walk,” Auclair said. “Getting more talks with the Chinese government long-term is the goal. I guess the Dalai Lama states that he wants a strong Tibet within China. I guess the goal of the CTC is to get that vision implanted here in Canada. But I guess it [CTC] is going to have to be very patient, but still get the word out there.”

Auclair said that, politically, he can peg one possible source of change.

“Maybe it’s the Chinese people,” he said. “Maybe they will change.”


Xavier Auclair talks about Rock for Tibet.

Comments

Ke Dongshan
Tibet has been a part of China for 900 years. When the Qing Dynasty fell in 1911, and the Tibetan theocracy declared independence, no country recognized its sovereignty. NO country in the world. Therefore, the Tibet theocracy was relegated to being a semi-autonomous part of China. Had the KMT and not the Communists won in 1949, they would have "occupied" Tibet just the same. It's not an "occupation" but a re-establishment of central government rule. I don't understand how any leftist, who should be on the side of logic and enlightenment ideals, can back an ousted theocratic regime which is contrary to their ideals. It boggles the mind. If there are human rights abuses, it is all over China, not just Tibet. And abuses exist in Canada. If you want to fight for human rights, stick to your own backyard.
 
2nd Nation
Hey guys - maybe it's time to move on?
 
Gyame Kyakpa so
It is interesting to listen to the China apologists parroting Beijing. How can China claim Tibet when China was herself under foreign rule of the Mongolians (Yuan) and the Manchus (Qing). China's claim over Tibet was a myth created by Sun Yat Sen in the early 20th century. If Mongolian influence over Tibet is the basis of Chinese claim over Tibet, then why stop only with Tibet? Why not the other countries too? And if China indeed had control over Tibet for "900 years", why does China still need to hold Tibet with brutal force?

Tibet was never a part of China. In the age of decolonisation, Tibet was just the first of many countries to be colonized. China's colonization continues today into Africa and other parts of Asia including Nepal.

If China came into "liberate" the Tibetans from "theocratic regime" then why did they sign an agreement with the Tibetan government in 1950 promising to maintain the same social and political structure in Tibet?

China's revisionist history will not hide the 1.2M Tibetans killed by the Chinese regime. I am just appalled at people like "Ke" who chose to stick their head in the sand and repeat the propaganda of the Chinese regime.
 
Jeremy Klein
Just found your video online.
Sounds good and looks good!

http://youtu.be/nS4qBYD9KPg

Best of luck with the tour!

 
D S
Gyame, your opinion is irrelevant. China will never let Tibet go. The world doesn't give a damn about Tibet. Business doesn't give a damn about Tibet. The Chinese could slaughter every ethnic Tibetan and the United States and Germany would still do business with Beijing. TIbet is irrelevant. Western agitation and provocation only makes the Chinese clamp down harder on Tibetans. The Dali Lama knows this and why he publicly says that Tibet does not seek separation. Do gooder idiots like Travis and Auclair only make things worse for ethnic Tibetans in Tibet.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.