B.C. Civil Liberties Association celebrates 50th birthday

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      Canada was on edge when the B.C. Civil Liberties Association had its defining moment, says author Herschel Hardin.

      It was October 1970. The Front de libération du Québec kidnapped a British trade commissioner, James Cross, and a provincial cabinet minister, Pierre Laporte. The separatist group later killed Laporte. Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau invoked the War Measures Act, suspending civil liberties in Quebec. Police arrested and detained hundreds without warrants.

      Even though the nation wasn’t at war, Canadians overwhelmingly supported the federal government’s action. But the BCCLA protested and declared that invocation wrong.

      “I underline how courageous this was because there was such massive public opinion in favour of what Trudeau had done,” Hardin told the Georgia Straight on the eve of the organization’s 50th anniversary. “The BCCLA wasn’t intimidated by this and did point out that this was an unjustified infringement of people’s liberties.”

      Hardin, a BCCLA board member from 1965 to 1974, was recounting some of the early years of the country’s premier human-rights organization during an interview in his West Vancouver home.

      Founded in 1962, the BCCLA marks its golden anniversary this year.

      According to Hardin, during the 1960s people weren’t used to an organization taking positions on principle, especially in ways that might have been contrary to public thinking. “When the BCCLA took a civil-liberties position to defend the liberties of an unpopular group or unpopular cause, it had a jolt it may not have today because people are used to hearing from the BCCLA,” he said.

      The formative years weren’t easy.Novelist William Deverell came onboard as executive director shortly after the BCCLA was incorporated. Then a law student, he ran it from the basement of his rented home in North Vancouver. “I remember we were constantly being ridiculed, if not harassed, by judges,” Deverell told the Straight in a phone interview from Pender Island.

      The courts then were housed at the police station at 312 Main Street in Vancouver. Deverell said that these were actually called police courts, and that there was no real division between them and the police.

      As a lawyer, Deverell got himself in trouble after commenting on TV that judges tended to take the side of the police. “I got my ass hauled in court the next day by one of the provincial judges who called me up,” he related. “And [he] said I should be cited for contempt of court but what I said on television was beneath the judge’s contempt, so he decided not to.”

      Deverell also recalled defending the Georgia Straight against obscenity cases aimed at shutting down this independent paper that started in 1967. “The Georgia Straight, to give it credit, was at the forefront in the fight for freedom of expression,” he said.

      Years later, in 1994, the BCCLA joined Vancouver’s Little Sister’s Book & Art Emporium in launching an epic legal battle against the censorship of allegedly obscene printed materials by Canada Customs. In December 2000, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that customs agents must prove that the publications they are going to seize are obscene in advance of confiscating them.

      When the BCCLA was just a fledgling organization, vagrancy laws gave police a lot of power, legal muscle that they flexed against young people and so-called hippies in particular. Then there were court fights over prison sentences for the possession of small amounts of marijuana.

      The animosity between young people and police boiled over one summer when cops violently stormed a peaceful downtown public gathering to protest restrictive drug laws and police raids. The clash, which took place on August 7, 1971, has since become known as the Gastown Riot. During the inquiry that followed, the BCCLA focused on police accountability. It’s an issue the association has focused its attention on throughout the years.

      David Eby wasn’t yet born at the time of the Gastown Riot, but during his second year as executive director of the BCCLA, in 2010, the provincial government announced that it would scrap the controversial practice of police investigating misconduct among their own ranks.

      “That was a big victory,” the 35-year-old lawyer told the Straight in a phone interview. “It was a sustained campaign [by the BCCLA], and it was hard to believe when it actually happened.”

      The Independent Investigations Office—established by legislation which will conduct criminal investigations into incidents involving B.C. police that result in death or serious harm—is expected to set up shop mid 2012.

      In the case of Paul Boyd, a bipolar man shot dead by Vancouver police in 2007, the BCCLA persisted in demanding a thorough investigation into the incident. Recently, an eyewitness video surfaced showing the already wounded man crawling on the street before the last shot was fired.

      With an institutional memory reaching back to its founding to defend the rights of the Sons of Freedom, a radical wing of the Doukhobor religious sect that engaged in acts such as arson, the BCCLA is watching with concern the federal government’s rhetoric about environmental groups. Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver has characterized environmentalists opposed to a planned pipeline from Alberta’s tar sands to B.C.’s west coast as radicals. “It looks very familiar to us,” Eby said. “It looks a lot like what we used to see in relation to people labelled as potential terrorists. It looks similar to language used in Quebec to round up activists around the War Measures Act.”

      According to Eby, the BCCLA is also watching with disappointment the federal government’s introduction of mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug offences. “We’re following the failed path of the United States in building a huge potentially privatized prison-industrial complex in Canada,” Eby said.

      Hardin noted that in the early days, a lot of the work BCCLA did was prosaic but very important. It dealt with cases of discrimination by landlords against visible minorities. “Cases of discrimination were very much in our mind and a very basic part of the BCCLA’s work,” he said.

      In addition to civil-liberties principles like free speech, antidiscrimination, and government accountability, the BCCLA also holds that personal autonomy is important.

      Hardin recalled that during his time on the board, a male baggage handler at Pacific Western Airlines was fired by the regional carrier because he wore his hair down to his shoulders. The BCCLA put out a poster that had an image of Prime Minister Trudeau with his long hair. The poster asked a question along the lines of: “Would you hire this man to handle your baggage?”

      “Civil liberties are pretty fundamental,” Hardin said about why BCCLA has endured through the years. “And important enough that people who believe in them will give it their time and their money and will make an effort to see that civil liberties of Canadians, of British Columbians, are protected. It’s a kind of ongoing cause that is inherently compelling, inherently moving.”

      The BCCLA celebrates its 50th anniversary with a symposium on Friday (June 1) and a gala dinner on Saturday (June 2). Details are at bccla.org/.

      Comments

      We're now using Facebook for comments.

      3 Comments

      2nd Nation

      May 31, 2012 at 12:05pm

      The public: May you continue to exist for another 50 seconds!

      The criminals: BCCLA forever!

      cosmicsync

      Jun 2, 2012 at 8:42am

      As a member of the public who should be doing more personally to maintain my own liberty, I want to thank the BCCLA for their commitment and hard work, as well as the people who make it possible by volunteering or giving their financial support.

      Greg Klein

      Jun 2, 2012 at 1:31pm

      On the issue of police accountability, the B.C. Civil Liberties Association does good work – up to a point. The BCCLA showed that when they tracked down and released surveillance video of a Vancouver cop shoving a disabled woman to the ground. Good work BCCLA, except why didn’t you question the more than six weeks of silence from the VPD and Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner? They only acknowledged the assault after the media got the video. They did say they learned about the assault soon after it happened. In other words, they kept it secret.
      When will the OPCC come clean about New Westminster Police Const. Sukhwinder “Vinnie” Singh Dosanjh? He recently returned to work following a three-year, seven-month paid suspension after very serious off-duty allegations including entering a house illegally, assaulting a woman and illegal possession of a gun. His penalty was a 15-month demotion. The media found out about this only by accident. A New West cop then told a reporter that the OPCC “signed off” on the matter. The OPCC has said absolutely nothing publicly about the case. Neither has the BCCLA.
      David Eby’s criticism last week about police complaint commissioner Stan Lowe’s decision in the Paul Boyd shooting was a blue-moon event. Lowe and his crew of ex-cops lack scrutiny from anyone and they operate accordingly. As much as possible, the OPCC operates in secrecy. Yet the OPCC will hold investigative authority over B.C.’s new Independent Investigations Office.
      Sure, I know you guys are busy. But you did find time to repeatedly congratulate the BC Liberals for the way they set up the IIO. But for several reasons the new agency will fall far short of its supposed model, Ontario’s Special Investigations Unit. The SIU isn’t perfect, but it’s widely considered Canada’s most effective police accountability agency.
      The IIO has been compromised from the start, for these reasons:
      The IIO will not answer to the provincial Ombudsperson, seriously detracting from its transparency. Ontario Ombudsman Andre Marin has been crucial to keeping the SIU relatively transparent and effective.
      The IIO’s transparency will be limited to a “monitor” who can review its investigations. But the monitor will be appointed by the IIO director.
      The IIO won’t be able to lay criminal charges against police, as the SIU does.
      The IIO will simply present evidence to Crown attorneys, who have been notoriously reluctant to charge police. The BC Liberals say they will ensure impartiality by having Crown lawyers handle cases from outside their own region, or by hiring special prosecutors. But neither ploy worked in the Robert Dziekanski case.
      The IIO will answer to the attorney general/justice minister, leaving it open to political interference.
      The IIO will come under the investigative authority of the OPCC, itself a product of police culture and accountable to no one.
      Police will continue to investigate police accused of “less serious” offences, which will actually include some very serious assaults. The cop-on-cop investigations will then be reviewed by the cop-friendly OPCC.
      If anyone could have brought these problems into public discussion, it was the BCCLA. The NDP fully supports the BC Liberals on this issue and B.C.’s media know sweet F-all about the subject.
      Instead, you’ve kept quiet about the OPCC and congratulated the government for the way it set up the IIO. Oh well, happy birthday anyway.