News for Youse: The word of the day is "misinformation"
Environment minister Peter "Piece of Shit" Kent would like all of those pesky environmentalists to stop being so damn mean to him.
Speaking on Thursday (June 21) from Brazil's Rio+20 summit, Kent said that environmentalists are only hyper-critical of the Harper government's record on environmental issues because of differences in ideology—not pausing to consider that perhaps environmentalists are interested in preserving the environment.
“Ideology plays a role certainly in the criticism,” Kent said, although he was quick to point out that some of his best friends are environmentalists, thus rendering his ham-fisted remarks about this group totally valid.
(As we all know, it's absolutely acceptable to knock a group of people as long as you know an individual that is part of said group.)
And while the sanctity and preservation of Canada's environment is important, Kent said that, “We have to remember... that environmental sustainability involves a balance of the environment first but also the economy and society.”
Sure, the environment is great! But making money? Also important. At least as important. Maybe even more important.
All we know is that Kent thinks these environmentalists are just misinformed jerks, spreading lies about the Best Country on Earth™, all in an attempt to unseat the current government. That must be it; couldn't possibly be concerns about the Canadian government pulling out of Kyoto or pipeline spills, which never happen happened just this week. (C'mon, crybabies. They only spilled 230,000 litres of heavy crude oil. That's hardly anything to get worked up about.)
However, Kent's not the only one whining about dastardly jerks who dare speak out against misguided, ill-informed, self-serving government practices. Backers of SOPA (you remember, y'all were protesting it in January by complaining that you couldn't access Wikipedia for 24 hours) are right pissed off that the people who use the Internet decided to protest legislation that undermined their ability to access information and enabled the government to do god knows what with it.
Stephanie Moore, the Democrats' chief counsel for the House Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet, told a panel at the American Constitution Society's 2012 National Convention in Washington last week that the opposition to the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect IP Act—which saw over 115,000 websites "go dark" on January 18—was totally overblown and "orchestrated by misinformation by a few actors". Moore went as far as saying “netizens poisoned the well," and that because SOPA and PIPA were shelved two days after the protest, that "the reliability of the Internet is at risk.”
When faced with claims that over 800,000 U.S. citizens got a hold of their local representatives to voice concerns over the SOPA/POPA behemoth, what did Moore say?
“We don't know what the numbers mean."
You don't know what the numbers mean? Here's a crazy guess: 800,000 people were really fucking pissed off and did something about it. But we're not the Democrats' chief counsel for the House Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet, so we are hardly an authority on "the numbers".
Looking to get pregnant? Well, other than staying away from crude oil spills and the American Constitution Society, hopeful mothers-can-be can now download an app that tracks their remaining days of fertility. Created by artist Mira Kaddoura, the app is part of an art exhibition examining a woman's biological clock. For just $1.99, women can track how long they have before their wombs dry up and they become completely worthless as breeding stock. (And, ergo, totally irrelevant to the Harper government.)
While Kaddoura hopes her work will inspire dialogue around fertility and conception, we here at News for Youse can't help but worry about the larger implications—like, say, if a federal government with a terrible record on women's rights decided to use such technology to forcibly track the remaining child-bearing years of its female citizens, ensuring that all women maximize the productivity of their wombs.
Ugh. We should really stop reading The Handmaid's Tale before bed.
Follow the misinformed Miranda Nelson on Twitter.







http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OBpib-hlE0&list=UUPVT5dwRLmPNkHH8CKCg7Dg...
"Mixed marriages" remain a real dilemma for those who want the bloodline to remain pure, but still have this niggling (that's "niggling") fear that we might end up with a strain of conservatives who almost-but-not-quite place a value on nature.
Then what? Eh? John Baird stopping to sniff the alpine wildflowers? Vic Toews stripping off to skinny dip in a remote lake? Rona Ambrose ... well, never you mind about Ms Ambrose.
But it's good to see Kent acknowledge the need for some sort of balance between economic development and environmental protection. He's lying like a bastard, of course, but these days a lie is almost refreshing.
Regards,
Two Nuts
You have hit the nail on the head. Stupid Conservatives exist because the liberal-female eugenic is to avoid conservative men, so they cannot be bred out of existence.
I work in the environment as an accreditted environmental engineer and not an activist..I personally dont care about politics..but in Alberta we have the toughest environmental regulations in North America and nobody violates them over my dead body. Anybody that denies that is a charlatan. Come see us work. Come see us nurse birds and other animals who are injured for a variety of reasons. Eagles, foxes, birds, deer, all get top attention. Come see us. Dont speculate. Dont exaggerate. Just judge us when you see us not when some propagandist says so. We teach kids in kindergarten about the real environment not the propaganda war that is meaningless. We have native engineers assisting us. Fish and Game. Ducks Unlimited. We have a partnership between industry and the environment. Of course if you dont want to light up or heat your home or gas your car then you dont need industry.
Leave politics to those capable intelligent thought and considering all the effects environmental policy has on Canadian citizens.
I suspect none of you pay any taxes and therefore are not really entitled to your whiney comments.
Your so-called article nothing more than a poorly written, foul mouthed, emotional outburst from a B Grade nobody.
Even if your point of view had some validity, you've done an excellent job of cutting the legs out from under it with your vitriolic temper tantrum.
I can't think of a better reason to support Peter Kent and the Government's position than the fact that someone like yourself is opposed to them.
Keep going and don't listen to the negative commenters up there. They obviously don't understand the purpose and spirit of News For Youse and come across as CPC and Tarsands employees. Their arguments consist solely of Ad Hominem attacks and shows that their ire is a result of your writing getting under their skin. Obviously you are doing a good job. Perhaps if they could cite evidence and strong arguments then they could be taken a little more seriously. But they don't.
I personally look forward to your columns for their insightfulness, hilarity, and informative links to current news stories. Thank you for doing a great job and for having to put up with conservative trolls.