There's a simple rule in politics: either fire people's
imaginations or those imaginations will turn around and fire at
you. Unable to project a compelling image of himself, [Gordon]
Campbell wound up wearing a negative image designed by his
enemies. He became known as a suit in the nastier sense of the
word; i.e., a greedy, sleazy, conniving, heartless corporate
type.
-- Kenneth Whyte, Saturday Night,
September 1996
MAY 17, 2005--It will go down in Canadian political history as
the biggest choke of all time: the defeat of the Gordon Campbell
Liberal government that had won 77 of 79 seats in the legislature
just four years ago.
Stunning, shocking,
unbelievable--tonight, journalists were left searching for
hyperbole strong enough to convey what seemed impossible to even
the most optimistic New Democratic Party supporter.
Premier-elect Carole James could have scarcely looked more
like Alice in Wonderland as the final election results flickered
across television screens across the province: NDP 41 seats,
Liberals 38.
What happened? How did Premier Campbell squander one of the
most overwhelming victories in B.C. history?
Like most failed politicians, the premier sowed the seeds of
his own demise. Campbell, a leader who was never personally
popular and almost always trailed his party's level of political
support, was nonetheless seen as a necessary evil to voters who
desperately sought an end to the beleaguered NDP government in
2001.
But those same voters became increasingly chagrined as
Campbell appeared to actually relish slashing programs for B.C.'s
neediest, creating confrontations with everyone from hospital
workers to doctors to women's groups, and governing with an aloof
arrogance that reinforced his negative ratings.
The first clear signs of Campbell's impending defeat came on
December 9. An Ipsos-Reid poll released that day showed that the
most important issue to British Columbians, at 58 percent, was no
longer the economy but health care, followed by education at 30
percent.
And who did B.C. voters believe would do a better job dealing
with health care? The NDP, by a 50-percent to 25-percent margin
over the Liberals. On education, the NDP led the Liberals by a
47-percent to 24-percent margin, and on social services the NDP
cleaned up by 59 percent to 18 percent.
Shortly afterward, on December 14, Campbell's number-two man,
Gary Collins, suddenly quit the government to take a job in the
private sector. Collins's departure shocked the Liberals and was
followed in early 2005 by other key cabinet ministers and MLAs,
including Attorney General Geoff Plant.
Observers now believe that there were two key flaws in the
Liberal strategy that caused their upset defeat: focusing on the
economy to the exclusion of all other issues and highlighting
their unpopular premier.
As the economy improved, voters felt less need to support
Campbell and more desire to fix the deteriorating health-care
system, improve education, and deal with the ever-present
evidence of poverty throughout B.C.
Campbell's fatally strong negatives were also clear in
December 2004. Although the Liberals held a statistically
insignificant lead of 44 percent to 41 percent over the NDP,
Campbell himself was a touchstone for discontent.
Six in 10 voters surveyed by Ipsos-Reid disapproved of
Campbell's performance as premier, and 57 percent said the
Liberals did not deserve to be reelected; 58 percent said
Campbell was a liability to his party, including 36 percent of
committed Liberal voters.
Worst of all for a politician going into a campaign where
promises are made daily, the polling showed Campbell was simply
not to be believed.
In response to the statement: "You can't trust Gordon Campbell
and the B.C. Liberals to keep their promises," a deadly 63
percent agreed, including even 36 percent of Liberal voters.
So despite blanket pro-Campbell television advertising by the
business community, the disapproval ratings continued throughout
2005.
In fact, NDP insiders secretly cheered on the
multimillion-dollar corporate advertising campaign because in
their view it cemented negative views that Campbell was merely a
business puppet.
But an unloved premier and an incompetent campaign strategy
were not the only cause of the Liberals' demise. B.C.'s labour
movement refused to rise to desperate Liberal attempts to bait it
and instead worked an intensive but low-key organizing campaign
that had only one goal: to ensure the maximum turnout possible on
election day of the province's 555,000 unionized workers.
Results showed that 65 percent of union households had voted
NDP, the same percentage as in that party's successful 1991 and
1996 elections.
And the release of NDP leader James's long-awaited election
platform defied media predictions that it would give the Liberals
lots of opportunities to attack the rookie politician, who has
yet to sit in the legislature.
The NDP learned from the successful 2002 Vancouver municipal
elections that saw Larry Campbell elected mayor by pledging to
deal with escalating drug problems through both harm reduction
and enforcement.
The key campaign promise by James was a guarantee that anyone
attempting to end their drug or alcohol dependency would get into
a detox centre within 24 hours.
By combining urban voters' concerns about increasing poverty,
food-bank usage, and homelessness into one positive program that
also addressed addiction as the root cause of street crime, James
narrowly won key ridings in Vancouver, Surrey, and Victoria that
had been expected to stay Liberal.
Campbell's election-night resignation as Liberal party leader
will spark a wide-open leadership campaign. Former deputy premier
Christy Clark, who quit Campbell's cabinet in a surprise move in
September 2004 and began publicly criticizing the Liberals' move
to the social-conservative right in 2005, is expected to face off
against newly elected Liberal MLA Mary Polak in a left-right
battle to determine the party's future direction. *
Bill Tieleman is president of West Star Communications and
a regular political commentator on CBC Radio One's Early
Edition. E-mail him at weststar@telus.net.