Cirque du Soleil's Michael Jackson THE IMMORTAL World Tour spans the absurd to the shallow

Comments

A Cirque du Soleil production. At Rogers Arena on Friday, November 4. No remaining performances

It can be hard to see, what with all the acrobats, aerialists, balloons, bats, bikinis, soldiers, statues, welders, whizzbangs, zombies, and wacko Jacko impersonators, but there’s a giant, star-shaped hole at the centre of Cirque du Soleil’s latest production. What’s missing is Michael Jackson himself.

It’s sad, and inevitable, but Michael Jackson: THE IMMORTAL World Tour is enormous, impressive, and utterly, devastatingly hollow. The problem was compounded on Friday night by the unexplained absence of the giant Giving Tree, the on-stage centrepiece which director Jamie King, interviewed in the Straight last week, called IMMORTAL’s “energy source”. (Confusingly, what’s left of the tree, which served as both a sturdy oak and a sprawling, tentacular alien life form when the show made its debut in Montreal, now resembles a scale model of a nuclear reactor’s cooling tower.)

IMMORTAL tries to deliver a stadium-worthy rock spectacle, but there’s no emotional core to hold it together. Jackson’s outsized charisma might have done the trick—but he’s not there. Instead, there’s his voice, liberated by digital technology from his studio mastertapes, and his songs. There are dozens of dancers, all of whom seem to have learned his moves step for step. There are archival images from his iconic videos. But the only sparks are those ignited by pyrotechnicians.

It would be easy to lay the blame on the narrow shoulders of the hip-hop dancer and mime playing the Jackson role, but that would be unfair to Salah Benlemqawanssa. He’s a small, slight man who, off-stage, comes across as naturally humble, even shy—but he does have a gift for embodying emotion, and a supremely flexible body to do it with. The moment towards the end of the first set, when he rises from lying on his back to a standing position without the use of his arms, defies all of the known laws of physics.

But Benlemqawanssa is not served well by King’s penchant for nonstop sensory bombardment. At times, he’s so swamped by squadrons of flashily clad dancers that, in his simple-but-spangly white jumpsuit, he seems a lonely ghost. And in general, the Franco-Moroccan artist’s performance is on too small a scale for an undertaking of this size. (Hint: bring binoculars.)

Miming that could have been impressive in a cabaret setting was lost at Rogers Arena—although it might have been effectively transmitted to the crowd were Benlemqawanssa given a more prominent place on the giant video screen that backdrops the stage. That, though, would take away from digital Jackson, whose beamed-in-from-beyond-the-grave presence looms way larger than any of the carbon-based cast members.

In terms of that cast, during “Scary Story-Is It Scary”, contortionist Baaska Enkhbaatar delivers further mind-boggling physical feats, but the rest could be automatons, so perfectly faceless is their work. Musical soloists Desireé Bassett on guitar and Tina Guo on electric cello fare better; both should be able to use their “Beat It” showcase to win a place in a real rock ’n’ roll stage spectacular. Former Jackson sideman Greg Phillinganes’s band is impeccable: big and splashy and perfectly integrated with the prerecorded singing—which is less of an accomplishment in this age of lip-synching than it used to be, but it’s still not easy.

It all adds up to the kind of awesomely absurd spectacle that’s long on wow but short on satisfaction, however. The defining moment for this viewer came near the end of the show, when an image of Jackson is projected onto the remnant trunk of the Giving Tree. With his arms spread wide, it looks like the King of Pop is being crucified—and then the lights come up on a catwalk above the stage, where Bubbles the Chimp and his turntables are rocking a “Mega Mix” of Jackson hits.

There’s something beautifully bizarre about Michael Jackson being born again as a chimpanzee DJ, but it’s probably not quite what the show’s creators had in mind.

Comments (20) Add New Comment
Karen Gibson
Typical. Couldn't do a review without including reference to "wacko Jacko" and using the word "bizzare". Wow, such originality! Only, this is the type of trash talk that Mr. Jackson had to endure his entire life. It moved from tabloid to mainstream decades ago and so-called 'journalists' like you, who are only to happy to jump on an old put-down bandwagon than to have an original thought. I guess you are male, given your name. Men have always been threatened by MJ...
1
2
Rating: -1
Tina Blackburn
Really?? I cant believe that a Canadian paper would use the racist term "Jacko" and if you did a bit a research you would know what Im talking about.
I saw this show on opening night in Montreal and it was FANTASTIC!!! A true tribute to the Man and his Legacy.
1
1
Rating: 0
Carine
Please don't use the name Wac*o Jac*o in reference of Michael. He hated that name and the fans hate it too. His actual name, Jackson, is shorter to write, you should give it a try.
1
1
Rating: 0
Nanor.
Tonight, im going to a circus show to the sound of jackson tunes, which is apparently a bit of a tribute to the deceased star. Im not sure what show the reviewer is writing about, but it reads like he expecting to review a symposium on this particular artists's contribution. He must have gone to the wrong arena.
1
1
Rating: 0
greggron
How can people be seen in public at a tribute to a child molester...hang your heads in shame!
2
1
Rating: +1
MJ fan
We saw the show tonight and were extremely disappointed. We have seen all the travelling Cirque shows and a few in Vegas and we love the performances. We bought 2 $175 tickets to this last year and were really looking forward to the show. I'm not sure what happened here, this was the worst cirque show we have ever seen. The choreography was too simplistic, not in sync, and performed by amateurs that brought no energy to the stadium. The light suits were malfunctioning and the curtain was getting stuck when they tried to lower it. It looked as if they were still in rehearsal mode, as if the show was not ready for an audience. The second half brought talented, traditional cirque performers, however, there wasn't enough of these acts to carry a spectator through the entire show. A lot of the time was used up watching projections on the screens / curtains and we were disappointed by how much money we spent to watch lip syncing performances and people walking around the stage with globes or doing "stunts" like summersaults or one handed cartwheels. It wasn't up to cirque standard and we were hoping for longer versions of Michael's best (Beat It only played for about 90 seconds, where as they did longer routines to less popular songs, some we had never heard before). There was no flow to the performance and it was definitely lacking the magic that cirque and Michael Jackson never fail to bring. Knowing how much work, effort, and energy Michael put into his performances to create a magical, flawless, and spectacular show for his audiences, it was disappointing to see this tribute fall short. We feel ripped off =(
2
2
Rating: 0
Sue Adams
A very typical media-orientated review and by using the name Michael hated so much; "W**** J****' you show yourself so obviously to be a hater anyways so it's obvious you WOULD choose to review this show from your own very limited and narrow framework reference! @greggron - are you the same person who wrote this article?!
2
1
Rating: +1
walker
Woah, the MJ police are out in force for this one.
2
1
Rating: +1
topnotch
I saw the show on friday and it was mind blowing. When you read this review it's like there are many more things better than this out there. Name me one that we can see here at home? and yes Michael Jackson is dead so YOU WONT SEE him in any show idiot!
2
2
Rating: 0
uknow
P-E-R-V
1
0
Rating: +1
Natascha
Of course Michael is missing.. he will always be missed!!
But it's not a Michael jackson show, but a TRIBUTE and they are doing great!!
Thank god they do this for all his fans!!
And please, don't call him W J.. it's very rude.. He got a name when he was born and that is MICHAEL JACKSON.. we don't call you A**hole either!!!
2
1
Rating: +1
fuckyouallhatersMJFOREVER
who ever write that BS is idiot! and who ever call him "pedo" is sick f*uck retard! he was proven innocent you morons! kids loves him like he loves kids. i love kids too and what makes me pedo? lol! AND HIS RIGHT NAME IS MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON! NOBIDY TODAYS SHITTY ARTIST CAN'T BEAT MJ! NEVER! MJ MADE THEM ALL! U MAD HATERS? MJ FOREVER ;)))) BILLIONS FANS WILL KICK HIS LITTLE FAG HATERS ASS . ;p
2
2
Rating: 0
Marky Mark
Agree with what "MJ fan" said.
Extremely disappointed with the show, felt like watching "So you think you can dance", or a concert rehearsal without the star.
1
1
Rating: 0
mr jimmy
I saw the show last night.Definatley not up to the cirques usual standard. very short on the mind boggling acrobatics that have made them the sensation that they are , it to me was basically a dance review which I was not expecting.
1
1
Rating: 0
DrRoot
Michael Jackson was a true artist and impeccable performer. What he may or may not have done in his personal life has never changed my deep admiration for his work as an artist/performer. Cirque offered their own very original dedication to a fellow performer that was admired and now missed on a global scale. I spend my money (2x$250.00) for a 'once in a lifetime' event and enjoyed this opportunity to see such a deep felt dedication to the late Michael Jackson. I believe we can all be greatful for such artistry and passion that both MJ and Cirque offer the world we know.
2
2
Rating: 0
Akonite
Funny, I was at the same performance and remember the entire stadium giving a standing ovation to the entire cast. Guess you were the only one who didn't enjoy it.
2
1
Rating: +1
R Userious
Apparently I have been mislead, as I was under the impression that artistic reviewers have a keen eye for artistry and the sense to critically analyze their thoughts prior to print. After having read this article, I must concede that I may have been wrong.

So let me get this “straight” (pun intended). According to this article, Cirque Du Soleil’s posthumous tribute to Michael Jackson, MICHAEL JACKSON: THE IMMORTAL: A) misses the mark and lacks that “je ne sais quoi” because Michael isn’t in it (Excuse my colloquialism, but….HUH?! Wasn’t Michael’s passing the impetus of the show?) B) manages to overshadow Salah, the “dancer and mime playing the Jackson role,” by featuring screens of Michael Jackson and not Salah himself. (Again…. HUH?? Isn’t it Michael Jackson’s name in the title?) and C) is bizarre, chaotic and so replete with larger than life entertainment that it is hard to see the emotion behind the show. (Hmmm....really Alexander?? Must I blatantly pose the question, “doesn’t that encompass Michael’s life in a nutshell?)

Shouldn’t a keen artistic eye be adept in seeing the entire vision (the “big picture,” if you will) while also appreciating the nuances of irony and symbolism behind it? Shouldn’t a keen artistic eye realize that the art itself IS an expression of the creators’ emotional journey while also appreciating that art is intended to evoke the viewers’ emotions. In your statement, “it’s sad, and inevitable, but Michael Jackson: THE IMMORTAL World Tour is enormous, impressive, and utterly, devastatingly hollow,” the implication is that the show failed you; paradoxically however, those words capture the very intent of the entire production. THAT WAS MICHAEL JACKSON! His life was an over the top production, yet (to use your words) “at times, he’s so swamped by squadrons of flashily clad dancers that, in his simple-but-spangly white jumpsuit, he seems a lonely ghost.” Your criticism is ironically eloquent,…..yet seriously lacking intent.
1
2
Rating: -1
Darius
WOW wacko jacko? really? is this 1993? no one says that any more you disrespectful jerk!!!!
0
1
Rating: -1
Etvlan
R.I.P.
Mr, Jackson surely was a great entertainer but like hundreds before him he left the stage for other great performers to do their stuff.
It is time to move on.
2
3
Rating: -1
ChristyDisappointed2
I have to agree with "mjfan" I saw the 3rd show in Las Vegas, Dec 4th. I was excited to go to it and left very disappointed. I've been to other tribute shows and this was not satisfying in the least. There seemed to be a half staff of performers on stage which I thought was odd, and they paid more attention to one of their performers who was 1 legged, than to Michael himself. The music was choppy and sped up and many complained of the volume. The people who paid the $175 floor seat price couldn't see the stage or what was going on up on it. Many many seats were empty and many others in the 2nd tier seating level couldn't see due to the mass of audio/video equipment between the floor seats and the 2nd tier seating.

The video played on extremely large screens at the back of the stage played clips of MJ's music videos and pre-recorded video of the stage performance -- but it was totally out of synch. They borrowed a clip from the This is It video of the metal soldiers marching and their few metal soldiers (not the same costume design - looked much more like Robbie the Robot from Forbidden Planet) and they did not all march together.... different drummers and such.

I had only seen Cirque shows on TV, but have to say that this didn't make want to see any other Cirque shows. It was not their usual caliber of performance... and like others have said, the performers were more about holding globes than to Michael's music and dancing.

They had a large expensive program (only being sold BEFORE the show of course) and you read all about how potential show dancers were told they had to do their best Michael Jackson style dancing or they could just forget auditioning.... I don't know why because no one danced that way in the show.

The advertising and tv interviews (shown in Mandalay Bay/MGM hotels) is deceptive as well. They push Michael Jackson and look alikes in your face and very large lettering MICHAEL JACKSON, saying you'll feel like you spent the evening with him... no, you don't. I felt 3 things actually. 1. the huge gaping hole in the production where you don't see anything that resembles him nor dance routines with a group of Michael Jackson style and caliber of the dancers he always had with him on concerts and videos; 2. felt like I paid $135 to watch some bits and pieces of MJ's music videos; and 3. very disappointed and empty

if you really want to see it, don't bother buying the expensive tickets - the floor seats in Phoenix I saw were going for upwards of $1000!!! This is not worth that by any means.

I absolutely loved the Blue Man group show in Vegas, but I'd never pay that much for that, nor any show, especially when you want something as great as a real tribute to Michael should be. They say this is straight out of his head and will feel like he created it -- no. His performances are first class. This was steerage.
1
1
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.