Homeless in Vancouver: Homeless counts are all the rage at this point in time

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      This year, Canadian cities seem to be counting on their homeless people more than ever before.

      On March 24, the same day that the City of Vancouver held its fourth stand-alone homeless count, Montréal conducted its first-ever homeless count. The one-night effort, dubbed I Count MTL 2015 Montréal Homelessness Survey, was conducted by the Douglas Mental Health University Institute Research Centre, in collaboration with the Québec YMCA and involved some 800 volunteers.

      Two weeks ago, the City of Halifax carried out a Point-in-Time (PiT) homeless count on May 12th.

      The next day, both Regina and Yellowknife carried out first-time PiT homeless counts.

      Regina’s homeless count was carried out under the auspices of the YMCA of Regina on behalf of the Homelessness Partnering Strategy and Yellowknife’s count earlier the same day was coordinated by its Community Advisory Board on Homelessness.

      A sentence from the Yellowknife CABH website explaining the count may also help explain why these so-called Point-in-Time counts are suddenly all the rage across Canada:

      “In coming years, PiT Counts will be required for communities to be eligible to receive federal homelessness funding”.

      In order for a Canadian municipality to qualify to receive monies over $200,000 under the federal Homelessness Partnering Strategy programs (either Designated Communities or Aboriginal Homelessness), the Canadian government is requiring that they have completed a Point-in-Time count of homelessness: the 10 largest municipalities in Canada by April 1, 2015, and the smaller ones by April 1, 2016.

      Of Canada’s 10 largest municipalities, only four appear to have completed PiT counts: Montreal, Edmonton and Calgary (part of Alberta-wide count October 2014), and Vancouver, while Winnipeg has been planning since 2014 to conduct a 2015 PiT count in order to qualify for HPS funding.

      I may have missed it, but I’ve found no evidence of Canada’s largest city, Toronto, counting its homeless population in 2015 (though it does a daily shelter census and it's expecting HPS funding in 2015) or, for that matter, the other three Ontario municipalities in the top 10: Mississauga, Brampton and Hamilton.

      Looking at homelessness the American way

      Back in 2003, when Metro Vancouver began a once-every-three-years regional count of homelessness, its methodology and its results were unique to the region. In the 12 years since, other municipalities across Canada have variously counted their homeless populations—but in such dissimilar ways that it has proven impossible to reliably combine them into anything like a national picture of homelessness in Canada.

      It would appear that the federal government of Canada is finally following the lead of the United States in harnessing municipal homelessness counts in order to build a relatively trustworthy annual national count of Canada’s homeless population.

      As directed by the the U.S. Congress in 2001, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires communities to alternately conduct a standardized Point-in-Time count of sheltered or unsheltered homeless every year in February. This year, the 2015 national U.S. Point-in-time count of homelessness covered both sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations.

      Point-in-Time counts neither yield the total number of people living in homelessness, nor do they give anything like the whole picture of homelessness; what they can do is cut through the fog of supposition and provide a brief moment of clarity.

      Requiring identical methodology of all PiT counts across the United States at least ensures that they are equally imprecise and in the context of nationally coordinated counts, the annual, or bi-annual, frequency gives the United States a useful tool: an empirical, year-to-year snapshot of the homeless state of their union.

      Clearly, a similar nationwide snapshot of Canadian homelessness is in the works and it’s long overdue that we have one. I think Canadians will be shocked, especially by the bleak picture it paints of aboriginal homelessness.

      Stanley Q. Woodvine is a homeless resident of Vancouver who has worked in the past as an illustrator, graphic designer, and writer. Follow Stanley on Twitter at @sqwabb.

      Comments

      2 Comments

      kootenaygirl

      May 26, 2015 at 7:24am

      The accuracy of the Vancouver count has long been questionable.
      Persons struggling with homelessness in Kerrisdale, Marpole, near Commercial Drive and in Stanley Park don't seem to be included. In the mid-1990's some were sleeping in entrances of buildings at Arbutus and Broadway. There is no evidence to assume this has changed. One needs to beware of politicians who pretend there
      is no such thing as homelessness in their region. Delta is an example of this.

      Stanley Q Woodvine

      May 26, 2015 at 11:57am

      @kootanaygirl

      The Greater Vancouver Regional Steering Committee on Homelessness (RSCH) has been vary clear about the limited value of its three-yearly regional Point-in-Time count of homelessness.

      The RSCH explains that the PiT method only takes into account a percentage of the visible homeless, which it describes as just the tip of the iceberg compared to the uncounted number of hidden homeless.

      For example, the final report of the RSCH's 2014 count

      http://stophomelessness.ca/homeless-counts/2014-metro-vancouver-homeless...

      unfavourably compares its own finding of only 381 couch surfers across Metro Vancouver with a 2008 estimate that there were up to 23,500 hidden homeless across the region.

      It's been the city of Vancouver, I would argue, with their redundant stand-alone counts (2010, 2012,2013, 2015), between the RSCH's regional counts, that has tried to pass off a PiT count as an accurate measure of homelessness.

      Now it looks like the feds are favouring annual PiT counts.

      It's a mistake though to think that counting solves anything by itself. Over a decade of such counting in the U.S. hasn't begun to end homelessness in that country.