Homeless in Vancouver: Does Big Brother really know where I am?

    1 of 3 2 of 3

      As I wrote this blog post while sitting in a McDonald’s in the 1400 block of West Broadway Avenue, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Google thought that I was sitting somewhere in Quebec.

      In fact, Google Maps told me that the exact address of my Wi-Fi connection is 5265 Chemin Queen Mary, Montréal, QC H3W 1Y3, Canada—latitude: 45.4841, longitude: -73.62889999999999.

      Which is to say that just because Google can see everything that we do, doesn’t actually mean that it has very good eyesight.

      The Internet doesn’t care about you as a person like the NSA does

      Depending on the route taken, Google's fix on my location is off by over 4,800 kilometres!

      In fact, Google cannot map my location independently; it has to rely on information supplied by the network that I’m using—in this case, the telecommunications  infrastructure of Bell Canada, which provides McDonald’s Canada’s free Wi-Fi.

      Bell’s national system doesn’t appear to care beans about where I am physically, just where, logistically speaking, the significant point of my contact with the Bell network is.

      If today it sees me in Montréal, Quebec, it’s a fact that Bell usually places me somewhere in Toronto, Ontario, which may go a ways to explaining why Facebook keeps emailing me lists of people that it thinks I may know who work at Humber College and in Toronto City Hall.

      The point here isn’t to say that the Internet hasn’t been turned into one giant spy eye, focused inwards on the day-to-day activities of people—it certainly has!

      But people really do overestimate how accurate this automated spying is or how much the powers that be care about our every move.

      The Internet certainly doesn’t care where poor people are

      If the interests and methods of say, the NSA and Google, seem to overlap, that doesn’t make them collaborators more than it makes them competitors. Both are spying on people to get similar data but for very different reasons. National spy agencies like the NSA want to put people in prison. Google and the rest of social media just want to sell them stuff.

      The distinction is significant. For example, unlike the NSA, Google and Facebook don’t actually care where a person is every second of the day but they do care where where someone is when they are seen to be spending money.

      And no social media player shares the NSA's interest in seeing anyone go to prison (people in prison don’t generate a lot of salable metadata and neither are they the best consumers).

      Of course, there is always the danger that the various national SIGINT services (the U.S. NSA, the Canadian CSE, the British GCHQ, the Australian ASD, and New Zealand's GCSB—the so-named Five Eyes, et cetera) are accessing social media metadata and usefully using it—or at least trying to.

      But this danger is somewhat offset by the generally useless nature of some of the user data that social media collects, as well as the fact that a growing quantity of such data is being encrypted.

      In 2013, Google began encrypting the internal traffic between its data centres—specifically to stymie the NSA—and with the release of Android 5.0 (Lolliipop), the Nexus phone models, which are controlled by Google, have device-wide encryption turned on by default.

      And in 2014, Apple began offering device encryption both in its desktop operating system, Mac OS X, and the iPhone iOS; a move which has made both the FBI and the NSA quite unhappy.

      Naturally, in true dog-eat-dog fashion, it’s Google that’s been caught helping developers to get around Apple’s encryption, predictably to help them maintain their ad revenues.

      But, fight amongst themselves as they will, Google and Facebook and Apple, et cetera, will actually work together to protect user data from government agencies such as the NSA—in much the same way that lions will protect their kill from hyenas.

      And the scraps that these lions of the Internet leave lying around, en clair as it were, will be such useless things as my current location, which both CSIS and the NSA are welcome to have.

      Have Wi-Fi—will travel

      Sunday evening update: Using my Wind Mobile Huawei Internet stick in my parkade, Google at least placed me in Vancouver, B.C. but in the wealthy neighbourhood of Shaughnessy, near Osler Street and Shaughnessy Park in the Crescent—a nice place but a little over a kilometre from where I actually was.

      Stanley Q. Woodvine is a homeless resident of Vancouver who has worked in the past as an illustrator, graphic designer, and writer. Follow Stanley on Twitter at @sqwabb.

      Comments

      2 Comments

      E Snowden

      Aug 31, 2015 at 6:20pm

      Disinformation...

      and so

      Sep 2, 2015 at 4:44pm

      There's no getting away from the human aspect that microtargetting your consumers is creepy; and over time is just static that becomes easier and easier to ignore, and less effective. Does this mean we can expect the advertisers to become more intrusive and louder?
      The government tracking is more insidious though. They can probably get more from our cel phones than we realize, and transit cards are another resource for them. With all of that, every time a terrorist event happens in the western world, the offender turns out to have been on a watch list, and able to commit the crime anyway.