Chief justice of B.C. Supreme Court says judicial system "threatened, if not in peril"

One of B.C's. top judges believes the province's court system is being "slowly eroded by a lack of funding".

Now, Chief Justice Robert J. Bauman of the Supreme Court of B.C. has spoken out on the issue.

According to the judge's prepared remarks for his address to the November 19 meeting of the Canadian Bar Association's B.C. branch—held in Las Vegas—Bauman asked lawyers to help him defend a court system that's "going over the cliff in slow motion".

Here's how his speech began:

Our judicial system is one of the best in the world. But it is threatened, if not in peril.

In nature, the process of erosion takes time- sometimes its pace and impacts are barely perceptible.

Then comes a tipping point when that gradual, insidious process of incremental damage yields its dramatic finish -- the structure is diminished and collapses.

The stability and integrity of our courts and judicial system are being slowly eroded by a lack of funding.

Inadequate funding of courts in British Columbia has been the reality for the last number of years.

We are not at the tipping point yet- but we are steadily edging towards it.

I appreciate that the legislative and executive branches of government have an exceedingly difficult task in balancing the demands on the public purse.

And I respect the fact that there are many competing demands. I also respect the fact that the Court Services Branch, led by the Deputy Attorney General and the Assistant Deputy Minister of Court Services are doing the best they can in our challenging economic environment. But I question whether we have the full attention of the Treasury Board.

As Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, it is my role to protect the institution of the court. And so today, I want to encourage you to reflect on how critical and integral our courts are to the functioning of our democratic society.

I ask you to think about the harm that flows from diminishing the court’s effectiveness through underfunding.

I urge you to consider and speak out to your constituencies concerning the critical importance of this issue, and, as members of the Bar, to take whatever steps you can to defend and protect our judicial system.

Bauman closed his address by urging the lawyers in attendance to "Bring this issue to the attention of our fellow citizens".

You can follow Stephen Hui on Facebook and Twitter.

Comments (5) Add New Comment
I respect the Law
I also have a great deal of respect for what you have to say but it will mean little until governments can show a little respect for the Law and the people who voted them in to do the right thing.
Governments and corruptions get lawyers to twist and turn the justice system so things work out the way they desired with little concern for how much reality had to be distorted. It is intrinsic in human nature to put great value on the truth which to me is what justice is all about.

0
1
Rating: -1
Taxpayers R Us
If it weren't for the way the courts deal with family law (whatever happened to equity??), I'd actually listen to what he had to say.
0
0
Rating: 0
Can't Keep Paying
The courts are a system built by lawyers for lawyers. It's all about greed and billable hours. Most trials are run strictly so defense lawyers can get the higher hourly rate for court time and then a deal is cut. Shame on our court system. Defense lawyers salivate to get a major case. (ie: Basi - Virk, Picton etc.) because they will make enough to retire on one case at the expense of the taxpayer....that is why the courts are broke. They need to fix themselves before they come to me asking for more money. Shame on you. We certainly do not have the best system......
1
0
Rating: +1
e.a.f.
What the judge is speaking about is the lack of funding to actually run the court house system. If there are insufficient court houses, judges, sheriffs, and crown prosectors, trials are not held in a timely manner. When that occurs criminals can go off scott free because they did not get a "speedy trial" as they are entitled to.

This has nothing to do with greedy defense lawyers. Family court is back logged because there are insufficient resources to deal with the number of cases which need to be heard.

Our constitution provides for legal assistance for those who can not afford it. To do other wise would be an injustice because then only the wealthy could afford lawyers. The majority of lawyers who handle legal aid cases do not make the type of money paid to the lawyers representing Basi/Verk. I would suggest Basi/Verk's lawyers were paid what they were because the Lieberals didn't want the trial to go forward.

Campbell closed a number of court houses in B.C. when he came into power. They haven't been re-opened. A few months ago some judges and lawyers refused to proceed with trials because there were insufficient sheriffs in the court houses to provide security. The lieberal government simply isn't putting sufficient funds into the legal system. The money flows to their pet projects which benefits their friends, i.e. new roof for B.C. Place, P3 bridges, $100 Million a yr for 25 yrs for the highway to Whistler, contracts awarded without being put to tender and awarded to the usual, unnecessary advertising, bonuses to executives who should simply be paid their regular salary for doing the job they were hired for, etc.

I certainly support the Judge's statement and consider it long over due.
1
0
Rating: +1
GZLFB
Maybe it's all the waste in the areas of art grants and all the political pay raises self voted. Every growing government leaving out the essential needs of our sort-of civilization. Maybe till it's the people's court maybe the crown should pay for it. Put it on that rich bitch.
1
0
Rating: +1
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.