Finally, SFU has plan for student union building, but it'll cost $65 million
Like a lot of our readers, I spent several years at the hilltop prison known as Simon Fraser University. Actually, unlike some of my fellow alumni, I actually appreciated the imposing campus architecture there.
But something many of us could probably agree on was that a student union building was sorely missing on Burnaby Mountain. This was an issue that student politicians and activists bemoaned constantly, but it was always just talk back then.
Now, talk has turned into action. The Simon Fraser Student Society has just taken the wraps off a proposal to build a $65-million student space on campus. The Build SFU project would see the construction of a student union building and a stadium—yes, a stadium—funded by the student body.
The SFU SUB would have a gross area of 100,000 square feet and a net area (excluding spaces like hallways and walkways) of 70,000 square feet, with room for clubs and social space. As for the outdoor stadium, it would contain 2,500 seats, with about 500 of them covered, and be used for SFU sports, concerts, and other events.
From looking at the architectural renderings of the project, it appears that the SUB will be built on the site of the SFU swimming pool. Indeed, the Build SFU site states: "The building itself is starting off environmentally friendly as we are repurposing an old building’s frame instead of using new materials and constructing from the ground up."
From March 20 to 22, undergraduate students will vote in an online referendum on the proposal. If they vote yes, they'll be paying for the project for years to come. Students would be charged a new semesterly levy, starting at $10 in January 2014 for full-timers. The fee would increase by $10 every January, taking it up to $20 per semester in 2015, $30 per semester in 2016, and so on.
If the SUB and stadium get approved, it'll take four or five years to complete the project. It's up to SFU students to decide whether it's worth it.
You can follow Stephen Hui on Twitter, Facebook, and Pinterest.







During the summer months, the AQ is our SUB.
And having been at other universities where they do have student buildings--they're overrated. Loud, distracting places that mostly first years hang out at.
Student space is lacking, and in a student survey done months ago, the number one complaint by students is the lack of social space and food options. One only needs to be on the campus on any weekday afternoon and see that the entire campus is packed. A new SUB would easily take care of that problem.
Getting student engagement in SFU sports teams has been difficult without a stadium. This is the only university in Canada in the NCAA, and we don't even have a stadium? That's pretty embarrassing and partly attributable to no seating at Terry Fox Field. SFU is in a world-class sports league, and we need our sports facilities to keep up.
Some people seem to have a misconception that SFU is spending money on this. It's the Simon Fraser Student Society that's investing and providing the money, meaning it's completely funded by students. What I think they should do, however, is have SFU administration take on some of the costs. Right now, the SFSS is taking on a $65 million dollar loan to fund this. The university should take part in some of the costs. UBC is building a new SUB, and the university is picking up about 1/4 of the tab. SFU should do something similar to relieve the burden on students.
Tacking on extra fees to tuition at a flat rate is regressive. Poor students don't need the extra concern of 20 or 30 extra bucks per semester on top of tuition. When is enough?
Is this the same group that locked out workers for months?
That'll be $38,000 for consulting fees.
Rod Smelser
This unconscionable garnering of student money by the university to build a stadium is disgusting. Those student fees are a big pool of money the administration has been looking to chug for a long time. Student society leaders have been duped and filled with self-importance by a cunning group of administrators. Oh, well.