Fraser River sockeye salmon "commercially extinct", Sto:lo advisor says

Are the Fraser River sockeye “commercially extinct”?

Ernie Crey, fisheries advisor to the Sto:lo Tribal Council, says so.

Crey explains in the following press release:

See also

Former fisheries minister David Anderson links fish collapse to climate change

Gerry Kristianson: We need to improve our ability to predict salmon abundance

Brian Riddell: Where have all the Fraser River sockeye salmon gone?

Fish biologist links fish farms to disappearing salmon

Hotter water linked to poor sockeye returns

B.C. tourism operators raise alarm over sea lice

August 28, 2009

For Immediate Release

Fraser River Sockeye Salmon Commercially Extinct

The fisheries advisor to the Sto:lo Tribal Council, Ernie Crey, says that Fraser River Sockeye is now commercially extinct. He says that in the summer of both 2007 and 2008 sockeye salmon failed to make it back to the Fraser River in large enough numbers to support commercial fishing in either U.S. or Canadian waters. “While it’s true that in 2008 Canada picked up a meager 16,100 sockeye in commercial fisheries and the U.S. fleet snagged 46,000 sockeye, these fisheries qualified more as an embarrassment than an actual fishery”, said Crey. And he says that the summer of 2007, in so far as Fraser sockeye was concerned, was a complete washout for both the U.S. and Canada.

Crey said that salmon experts at both the Pacific Salmon Commission and the Department of Fisheries & Oceans, predicted that 10.6 million sockeye would come back to the Fraser River this summer. “A fish run of that size would have permitted commercial exploitation of Fraser sockeye by both the U.S. and Canada, unfortunately the forecast was wildly optimistic with fewer than 2 million sockeye actually showing up”. He said everyone is now starting to count down the days to next summer when another big sockeye run to the Fraser is expected. “I hope next summer does turn out to be a banner year for Fraser sockeye, but there is a strong possibility 2010 will be a carbon copy of 2009 and we should plan accordingly”, said Crey.

“We need to face up to the facts about Fraser sockeye. The summer of 2010 could be a bust for Fraser sockeye and, we already know that the following two summers will take us back to two successive low cycle years for sockeye. And the fish from this year’s spawning population will come back to the Fraser in 2013. This means we are staring four straight years of no commercial sockeye fishing squarely in the face. There is no way to candy coat the next four summers, Fraser sockeye are now commercially extinct for the foreseeable future”, said Crey.

Crey said that both the First Nations Fisheries Council and the Sto: lo Tribal Council has asked the Fisheries Minister to help organize a salmon summit to address the Fraser River salmon calamity, but they have yet to hear from the Minister’s Office.

Comments (11) Add New Comment
robert lamb
but last month you said that first nations had already taken 37000 sockeye - how many eggs is that ?
1
0
Rating: +1
Stumpie
How many salmon are being sold on the black market out of the backs of pick-ups?
0
1
Rating: -1
Ernie Crey
I have no idea. Why not go and do a count? Report in when the count is done.
1
0
Rating: +1
Nick Kelly
The Williams enquiry determined that in 2005 there was 'rampant' poaching on the Fraser. So in four more years, gee, that's now...
1
1
Rating: 0
Ernie Crey
The Williams inqury was a sop to the fishing industry.
0
0
Rating: 0
Ernie Crey
And Williams was inquiring into the events of 2004, not 2005. In other words, he coughed up his report in 2005.
0
2
Rating: -2
Cool, E. Crey is posting!
It isn't too often an insider in any sector begins to publicly post under his own name (I assume it's him, anyway). Here's a chance to begin a dialogue on First Nation fishing that probably won't come around in a long time, provided the goofballs don't mess it up with their racist crap. Let's start with a question: Ernie, you are calling for a fish summit between the US and Canada, what would that accomplish besides more carbon dioxide, rhetoric, etc.? Or, same question, but what would you like to see come from it? Thanks in advance.
-CECIP
0
0
Rating: 0
Stacy
Forget everything else - just stop catching salmon. Everyone needs to do this - every country. This is what you do when there is an endangered species - YOU STOP KILLING IT. This isn't rocket science people. It's unfortunate that traditional ways of life and some people's livlihoods will suffer but SUCK IT UP.
0
1
Rating: -1
James
8 million salmon un-accounted for? Dont these fish swim up to Alaska and close to Japan before returning down the coast? Japanese restaurants all over seem to have abundance of Sockeye? Coincidence?
0
0
Rating: 0
R. Steen
It is about time the rea lissue is addressed, who is counting the smolts in river,in tidal , it just may be that they are just not getting the opportunity surviveiunder natural conditions, everyone is looking at returns, again who is counting smolts, it may be that toxic levels for smolts is having a cause and effect. Why not manage this fishery by historic levels ?
1
1
Rating: 0
Stryder
Lets just appoint another royal commission to find someone to blame for this all to common situation, hopefully they can find someone who's already dead to blame, and then we can just carry on as usual, till the next great cluster f--k.
0
1
Rating: -1
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.