Global emissions elevate the chance of climate change wreaking havoc this century

Come on Charlie, give it a rest with the Big Oil bullshit. Everyone now knows that the "carbon credits" in BC simply take money from the public school system and GIVE IT TO OIL COMPANIES. "Big Oil" loves the climate hoax, that's why they fund it from top to bottom.

Here's a link from a hippy-dippy green blog explaining it. I thought maybe it would be more palatable for you to hear it from a left/green source.
http://thetyee.ca/News/2011/05/09/EncanasFix/

Another interesting tidbit:
1% increase in global Co2 levels = 8% increase in global food crop yields. It works in reverse too. No wonder all the population reduction obsessed globalists in these elitist international organizations want to reduce Co2.

As far as the sea level goes, even the IPCC itself says "No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected" (The sea level has been rising 1.8mm a year for the last 8000 years and it's not changing)

In conclusion, the sky is not falling, and a biblical eco-pocolypse is not around the corner. Cheer up!

Nope, we don't need to worry about global warming. That's because we'll run out of oil before it matters. And at that point--when there are no more petrochemicals to make plastics, rubber, other chemicals, and well, pretty much everything modern--society as we know it will collapse.

And "climate hoax". You kill me. Whether the world is heating up or not, do you really think we're going to have decent air to breathe even ten years down the road?

THere is no Global Warming Stevie Harper

The Stern report author? I think Charlie, you should get a more balanced view: why don't you interview Suzuki? LOL keep your green agit prop courtesy of BC Hydro...

Oh Charlie, give it up already!

AGW as a theory has completely collapsed... and is solely reserved for the incessant bleating of the few, brain-washed sheep that remain.

"Let me summarize how the key issues appear to me, a working scientist with a better background than most in the physics of climate. CO2 really is a greenhouse gas and other things being equal, adding the gas to the atmosphere by burning coal, oil, and natural gas will modestly increase the surface temperature of the earth. Other things being equal, doubling the CO2 concentration, from our current 390 ppm to 780 ppm will directly cause about 1 degree Celsius in warming. At the current rate of CO2 increase in the atmosphere—about 2 ppm per year—it would take about 195 years to achieve this doubling. The combination of a slightly warmer earth and more CO2 will greatly increase the production of food, wood, fiber, and other products by green plants, so the increase will be good for the planet, and will easily outweigh any negative effects. Supposed calamities like the accelerated rise of sea level, ocean acidification, more extreme climate, tropical diseases near the poles, and so on are greatly exaggerated." - William Happer, Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University.

I am more concerned with destroying the earth by over use of resources and pollution especially of water; the absence of resource planning leading to careless waste. Greed and pursuit of power by the few wealthy who control government and dictate where they invest (oil sands, arctic oil etc), unfair distribution leading to impoverishment of the majority of the world's people. We must take the power to destroy away from the few and start to implement a plan that will support a healthy life for all the living plants and animals that depend on our earth.

The bleating climate change deniers get more pathetic every day. That they can still deny scientific fact in the face of overwhelming research and real-life, real-time observation shows that they are either shills for the fossil fuel industry or are just moronic enough to swallow the oily spin. Either one is not pretty.

The old Percy Shelley chestnut we all learned in school says it best...

“OZYMANDIAS

I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: "Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown
And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.
And on the pedestal these words appear:
`My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!'
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

Al Gore hypothesis-testing junk science.

Harold Camping stuff for people who don't know the difference between predictive modeling and hitting the thumbs-down vote button.
.