I sued my deceased dad's wife almost half of his estate. I was awarded a shit ton of money. I gave my mom a portion of it..
Photos: Vancouver activists encircle Canada's Olympic pavilion with call for action on homelessness
On Saturday (February 27), dozens of supporters of the Red Tent campaign surrounded Vancouver's LiveCity Downtown celebration site with 142 red tarps.
The site is the home of the Canada Pavilion for the 2010 Winter Olympics, and activists wanted to send Prime Minister Stephen Harper a message that he must bring in a national housing strategy and work to end homelessness.
Here are some scenes from the protest.
Story and video: Housing protest surrounds Vancouver Olympic celebration site with message for Stephen Harper
You can follow Stephen Hui on Twitter at twitter.com/stephenhui.
















meters and meters of red plastic, loads of chemicals sprayed in the air, plastic ponchos that cant be recycled.
I assuming that you are an advocate of the environment. A little bit of plastic that is intended to save lives pales in comparison to 100,000 trees clearcut for the Olympics, not to mention that VANOC had to truck and helicopter snow from about 100 km away. Did the media forget that VANOC was spraying chemicals on the snow to prevent it from melting.
Further, if the government had a housing strategy there would be nothing to protest. I don't know what you are laughing about, people are dying in the streets due to the lack of safe affordable housing. People who live in the streets have higher risk of disease such as Tuberculosis, which eventually spread through the population. TB doesn't care where you live or how much money you make it will come to affect you.
People like you get the gold medal for ignorance, your thinking is small, selfish and doesn't reflect the Olympic spirit. Ironically you are the one being laughed at.
This doesn't apply to all homeless people. How about a national strategy for the mentally challenged (who genuinely need help) before we worry about housing and paying welfare to everyone who thinks it's a better option than working an entry-level job?
Human beings need a home, security, rights, nutritious food, education, health care, and that's about it! Give them even a rudimentary but adequate version of those simple and relatively inexpensive things, and voila - like magic - they generally take off. Because people are actually designed to enjoy being productive, happy members of society. Deprive people of any of these basic requirements of life, and people fall apart, subject to misery, discomfort, fear, sleep deprivation, stress, malnutrition, disease, etc. Under these circumstances, they often turn to drug abuse, prostitution and crime to try to ameliorate their misery.
The cost of all this drug abuse, crime, disease, mental illness and misery is huge - much higher than just providing all the citizens with their basic needs so that they have a necessary foundation for getting on with a happy and productive, fulfilling life.
It is bad economics not to provide every citizen in society with their fundamental requirements for health and personal development from the moment of conception.
And on top of this, it is not the loving, responsible, sane thing to do either, when our society could easily afford to end all this misery and provide joy to the lives of millions.
Our priorities are wrong. Our politicians are the wrong people. They represent the interests of the largest multinational corporations. This is very bad for the people of Canada. Canadians, please reflect on this for a minute. We need new politicians. We need you - normal, healthy, caring people to get involved in a political party and make it a better party. Or run as an independent candidate for office and speak up. Or support someone else who is running as an independent. Whatever in your analysis will be the most productive way to get involved in the political life of your country.
Are you proud of Canada because some Canadian athletes did well? Are you proud of Canada because our troops are willing to kill and die or be horribly injured to defend it? Then you should be willing to participate in the political life of your country. Find meaningful, independent sources of information like Agora, the Tyee, GlobalResearch.ca, etc. Try to develop informed opinions about a few topics. Then contribute your time, energy, enthusiasm, and ideas to making Canada a better place, a place with more happiness and fewer miserable, frustrated lives.
The current crop of politicians will never do this, because that is not what they are paid to do by their taskmasters - the big banking, armaments, oil, pharmaceuticals, agribusiness and mining interests. But please get involved. This is the only way the situation will change, so that we as Canadians can be proud of more than our athletes, but can also be proud of the true Olympic spirit that moves through us all - for the betterment of our entire society and the world.
Tent-cities do not need funding at all. Government/municipalities act like money is needed because they want a measure of control. The real issue with the coming of the new social phenomenon of the right to sleep without being taxed is the breaking of the monopoly on sleep that has plagued our country since its inception.
We're talking big things, people. Some would argue that ending the enforcement of anti-sleeping laws will catalyze total economic collapse- the truth is tent-cities will not cause the end of civilization, but be the exact thing that will see us survive through it.
If sleeping for free means money becoming useless and mass starvations, then Oh Well. We don't have the right to be slaves and a fear of dieing is a cowardly excuse--- our children's lives are not worth Hell.
David Arthur Johnston (named defendant on the Adams ruling and currently appealing a conviction of having a 'temporary abode' during the day)
Victoria, BC, Canada
Hatrackman@Gmail.com
journal of the 'right to sleep' campaign that lead to the Adams ruling- http://www.angelfire.com/apes/hatrackman/welcome.htm
"In 1949, PIT [personal income tax] rates ranged from 15 to 84 percent and there were 17 brackets. In 1994, the range was 26.35 to 46.4 percent and there were 3 brackets." In 2009, there were four federal brackets: 15 percent, 22 percent, 26 percent, and 29 percent on an income over $126,264.
Throughout the ten year period from 2000 to 2010 there have been huge tax cuts, both personal and corporate ($100 billion over five years by Paul Martin -- and a further $100 billion, including GST, by the Harper government) there has been an aggressive rejection of any criticism of this gutting of the federal purse. Anyone talking about tax increases would expect to be immediately attacked and ridiculed.
My group consisted of myself my 6yr old daughter and around 5 near senior citizens-are you even looking before you speak-open your friggin eyes before you let your lips flap people! Check out the Red Tend Campaign site and take the homelessness survey before you consider yourself expert enough to comment like that!
Honestly i have nothing personally against homeless people. But these homeless have ways of getting out of their situation. They have the ability to Do something about themselves. It is a choice to do the drugs and waist their lives away, not an inevitability.
Ive personally seen a society where people are BORN into homelessness, and they not only have Zero welfare, they have Zero change to get out of their poverty.
So no its not a meaningless statement, nor hatred and classicism. Its certainly not cruel, but it is cold. Its cold logic, Why would i pay for some body else to have a home, when they cant even support themselves? When i have myself and my own to look after?
I dont know them, and if they are unable to support themselves, then they need to make some serious life choices. Like get a job.
and then Get a home.
Pages