Rex Murphy leaves the Globe and Mail, according to Peter Mansbridge
Last July, I jotted down five ideas for how the Globe and Mail's new editor-in-chief, John Stackhouse, could improve his paper.
The first thing I wrote was "Less Rex Murphy, please". I was tired of reading Murphy's skepticism about the reality of climate change--a viewpoint we hear enough of in the National Post and other Canwest newspapers as well as on private radio stations.
This week, I was delighted to hear the CBC's chief correspondent, Peter Mansbridge, announce on the national news that Murphy will be writing his columns in the future for the National Post. It means no more Murphy on the opinion page of the Saturday Globe and Mail.
I don't know if Murphy jumped or if he was pushed by Stackhouse. Regardless, I'm looking forward to picking up a Saturday Globe and Mail without one of Murphy's typically ill-informed attacks on climate-change scientists.
I'll close with one scary thought. One of the five vacant seats in the Senate is for Newfoundland and Labrador. There are currently 49 Liberals, 46 Conservatives, two Progressive Conservatives and three others in the Senate.
If Harper fills all five vacancies with Conservatives, he will have a narrow majority in the upper house with the support of the two Progressive Conservatives.
And who best to represent Newfoundland and Labrador in the Senate than Murphy, a confirmed skeptic on climate change?
He has lost three provincial campaigns--once as a Tory and twice as a Liberal. That alone makes him a prime prospect for the chamber of sober, second thought.
In the 1980s, Murphy also worked for a former Liberal premier, Clyde Wells.
By appointing Murphy, Harper could burnish his credentials as a supposed centrist and win some votes from CBC viewers and listeners.
There's one other benefit: Harper would have a high-profile Newfoundlander who could serve as his attack dog against Premier Danny Williams.
Harper could also rest assured that this newest senator from Newfoundland and Labrador wouldn't create any problems for the Alberta oil and gas industry.
Of course, Murphy hasn't always been so fond of the Senate. Last August, he described it in a Globe and Mail column as "the ultimate patronage ATM", adding that "it extorts subservience and sycophancy from those appointed to it."
"It does not have second thoughts," Murphy declared. "A second thought would kill it."
But the public and the media have short memories. No doubt, all the other media hacks who've been appointed to the Senate have uttered their own criticisms of the upper chamber in the past, and it didn't stop prime ministers from presenting them with the ultimate retirement gift.
Besides, with Canwest Publishing going into bankruptcy protection, Murphy can't count on a great deal of job security as a National Post newspaper columnist.





Rex Murphy is very informed about climate change. It is the main stream media that is yet to do proper investigative reporting on this sordid topic. I assume the G&M could not handle the reality, having drunk Al Gore coolaid along with most of the other media outlets. It's hard to climb down from such a position once you have taken it. But this year will show people like Rex to be correct in their skepticism of the "science".
Lockem UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He alleged that, according to these emails, somebody had somehow deleted forever a huge climate dataset, as if all the world's climate data was entrusted to one person's USB memory stick. It shocked me that he could be so obtuse as to believe that, or he could believe that his audience would believe that.
I defer to him on English literature and arcane lexicography, but after this shining moment, I'll never think of him as any kind of scientist or eminent thinker beyond his narrow purview.
Now I get to enjoy Rex at my doorstep!
You are missing the point. Maybe it's under your hat.....
Science IS skepticism. Frightening children is not. Maybe you should try and find some honest work. Picking fruit in Washington state perhaps? You could start a trend.... Kanada could use a 15 degree increase in average temperature. The universe is quite chilly. Let me introduce you to the term "entropy". All your friends wishing for the same thing only works for Peter Pan. I'll burn 150 gallons of diesel in your honor today...... hope it gives you nightmares.
"the carbon dioxide level some 80 million years ago — back when our mammalian ancestors were evolving — was at least 1,000 parts per million. In fact, that is the concentration of carbon dioxide you regularly breathe if you work in a new energy-efficient office building, for that is the level established by the engineering group that sets standards for heating and ventilation systems.
So not only is carbon dioxide plainly not poisonous, but changes in carbon dioxide levels don’t necessarily mirror human activity. Nor does atmospheric carbon dioxide necessarily warm the earth: Ice-cap evidence shows that over the past several hundred thousand years, carbon dioxide levels have risen after a rise in temperature, not the other way around. "
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:Vf-Um3lqEQ0J:network.nationalpost.co...
They burned books to hide the truth from the people.
If silencing someone with a different viewpoint is good, what happens when someone disagrees with you?
Your world does not look too enticing to me Charlie Smith.
www.co2science.org
www.wattsupwiththat.com
AGW is the biggest scam in human history, and the people making huge profits from AGW are using the True Believers, like you, as pawns.
Pages