What the Vancouver park board isn't telling you about its smoking ban

Media commentators often treat smoking as though it's a lifestyle choice.

It might explain why the Vancouver park board has not encountered a great deal of opposition from newspaper columnists over its decision to ban smoking from beaches and parks.

But for many mentally ill people, nicotine provides relief for their brains.

A paper published in 2000 in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported that people with mental illness are "about twice as likely to smoke as other persons but have substantial quit rates".

According to the Web site schizophrenia.com, almost 90 percent of people with schizophrenia smoke.

For those with bipolar disorder, the rate is between 60 and 70 percent.

It's why people with schizophrenia are more likely to die of cancer than those in the general population.

"Certain thinking patterns are affected in schizophrenia including sustained attention, focused attention, working memory, short-term memory, recognition memory and even processes that are preattentive (eg reflexes)," the Web site states. "Some studies have suggested there may be improvements in these areas after treatment with nicotine."

A schizophrenia researcher at the University of Maryland, Dr. Gunvant Thaker, studies genetic links between schizophrenia and nicotine addiction.

Schizophrenia.com cited a 2004 article in the Baltimore Sun in which Thaker talked about a faulty gene. People with this gene cannot tune out repeated noise, like a car alarm, which might explain why people with schizophrenia display confusion and fear in harmless situations.

This same faulty gene is also a nicotine-receptor gene.

"When schizophrenia patients smoke, or are given nicotine gum, this deficit of sensory gating is reduced or normalized," Thaker told the paper.

Yale researchers learned that cognitive functioning improved in people with schizophrenia after they smoked. This didn't occur in people without mental illness.

Other research has indicated that auditory processing improves for people with schizophrenia when they use nicotine.

"In addition, schizophrenic patients have fewer nicotine receptors in their brains than normal people," schizophrenia.com reports.

Cigarettes contain hundreds of toxic chemicals, which is why some nicotine replacements, such as the patch, have been recommended to people with schizophrenia.

But not everyone with schizophrenia is going to walk into a pharmacy to buy a patch.

By banning smoking from beaches and parks, the elected commissioners have basically put up a "not welcome" sign to many people with schizophrenia.

That's because the vast majority of people with schizophrenia smoke because it provides some relief for their symptoms, which include psychosis.

They may be less likely to go to Oppenheimer Park or English Bay to relax if they know they'll get harassed about lighting up a cigarette.

Because society loathes smokers, nobody will raise a fuss about this.

Doctors don't want to be seen to be supporting smoking. No local politician will question the ban.

I don't expect to see any deep-pocketed downtown lawyers rushing to the defence of people with schizophrenia. There won't be a charter challenge against the nonsmoking bylaw even though it discriminates against people on the basis of their disability.

If you know someone with schizophrenia who smokes, here's something you can do to help: tell them that they're still allowed to puff on a cigarette in regional parks.

Capilano River Regional Park and Pacific Spirit Regional Park are just two examples.

The joggers and the dog walkers might not like it, but for people with a serious and chronic mental illness, it sure beats hanging out in an alley in the Downtown Eastside.

Follow Charlie Smith on Twitter at twitter.com/csmithstraight.

Comments (80) Add New Comment
CanNurse
Absolutely true, every word of it! As a Psych Nurse, I want to thank you for bringing this issue up, Charlie! It's very very tough for people with mental illness not to smoke, as a rule. it's a strong method of self-medicating. I think the parks could have been split up more - like 1/3 smoking, for eg. considering the incredibly low number of smokers overall that exist in Van, even if mentall ill people smoke in the parks or beaches, there aren't going to be more than 1 or 2 smokers at any time. Hardly life-threatening considering the size of the outdoors. Van is a little anal about this issue. Next time you see someone with a smoke, just think for a second about how lucky you are that you don't have a mental illness, as s/he very well may have.
3
4
Rating: -1
van in japan
really?

I can't believe I wasted my time reading this.
2
3
Rating: -1
bentguy
Wow, that's crazy. This is your argument? Don't quite your day job.
4
3
Rating: +1
Bryce P
I'm calling BS. Correlation does not equal Causation. This is armchair psychology at it's worst.
4
4
Rating: 0
Megan
This article is downright crazy.

I have nothing against people who suffer from schizophrenia, but let's get real here. You can obtain nicotine other than smoking... gum, patch, etc. You said "but not everyone with schizophrenia is going to walk into a pharmacy to buy a patch". I sure know I would take that route if my physical AND mental health depended on it. Making non-smokers suffer because those with a disability "need" to smoke? Please.
3
4
Rating: -1
Burnabarian
A nicotine patch will resolve that issue.
3
4
Rating: -1
To Megan
"I sure know I would take that route if my physical AND mental health depended on it. "

I somehow doubt that, if you really were put in their shoes. How high and mighty of you.
2
3
Rating: -1
Kate B
I have a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and NRT does not work for me (it doesn't work for 95% of people). I am excluded from healthcare because if I get locked up in a psychiatric hospital I will be forced to withdraw from smoking because of the smokefree policy.

There is no reliable evidence that second hand smoke is harmful, no matter what vested interests say and using it as an excuse to exclude smokers is a farce.

3
3
Rating: 0
Chris Rapson
Maybe they should ban music from the parks too. I shouldn't have to suffer listening to music that offends me. And maybe they should ban frisbee from the parks in case I get hit with one. I shouldn't have to suffer an injury because some one wants to have fun and get a little exercise. And maybe they should ban babies that cry, dogs that urinate, and people who generally annoy. Then I can finally enjoy those PUBLIC SPACES in peace and quiet, safe and alone. Don't I have a right to that?

Please note the sarcasm above. And please stop the parks board from over-regulating the parks. They are public spaces intended for use by ALL members of the public. If you can't handle someone smoking next to you in the park, then speak to them about it directly like a human being. Failing that, move ten feet away from where you are in the park. Failing that, go home and blog about it.
3
3
Rating: 0
Sheesh
Leaving aside the questionable proposition that mentally ill people need to smoke - they don't need to smoke in public parks. People need to urinate as well - should we just let them do it anyplace, anytime, anywhere?
3
3
Rating: 0
Darren T
Great piece, Charlie. My mother is bipolar and clinically depressed and is a smoker. She's tried to quit many times, with all kinds of methods - hypnosis, the patch, the gum, Zyban, Chantix - she just can't do it. With her illness, it's hard enough for her to function normally anyway, so trying to kick such a tough addiction on top of that is just too much.

Now, with these laws, she can't do one of her favorite things, and one of the few things that gets her outdoors - enjoying an afternoon at the beach. She used to find a quiet spot, away from kids, and didn't litter her butts. Now, thanks to a parks board that wants everyone to live according to their very narrow view of the world, all she will do is sit at home. Just great.
2
2
Rating: 0
E Jackson
My peaceful enjoyment of public space should not impede anyone else's enjoyment of public space. The example of peeing in the park is a good one, actually. If people want to smoke, they can smoke at home. Not in my airspace. Please.
1
2
Rating: -1
Elaine Keller
Several people have suggested the nicotine patch, gum, etc. as a solution. Unfortunately the dose of nicotine in these products is purposely kept low by the government--too low to control the symptoms of many of the patients discussed in this article. I have Attention Deficit Disorder and cannot take the usual medications prescribed for the condition. I'm allergic to the glue used in the patch and if I try to use more than 5 or 6 pieces of nicotine gum or lozenges per day, my digestive system is totally hosed. And those 5 or 6 pieces don't provide enough nicotine fior ne to maintain alertness, concentration, and short-term memory. My solution has been the electronic cigarette. I had to order a higher level of nicotine liquid (24 mg) and refill my own cartridges, but the benefits have been tremendous. I have been smoke-free since March 27, 2009. Because I no longer inhale smoke, my wheezing has disappeared along with the "productive morning cough." According to Health New Zealand the vapor is "harmless inhaled or exhaled." There's no smoke to bother bystanders, no unpleasant smell, no ashes, and no butts.
0
2
Rating: -2
Darren T
The example of peeing in the park is indeed a good one. Peeing is not banned in parks, we just have designated peeing sections, often known as "washrooms". Why not designated smoking areas too?
2
0
Rating: +2
Kate B
I wouldn't want to be near intolerant bigots, that's why I never go out of the house any more.
2
2
Rating: 0
Alana Smithee
I was just discussing this with my doctor during my last visiti. I am a bipolar, and I quit smoking in 1998. I have never stopped craving it though. I've always had a heavy guilt hanging over me regarding the shame I would feel if I restarted smoking, and it has primarily been the health of those around me and the smell that has kept me from doing so. I just recently started using a nicotine inhaler and a vaporizer, however, and I have to tell you, I feel 100% better. I started because I knew I was going to go out and buy some cigarettes when I was left alone for a couple weeks, and this seemed like a much better choice. I use one cartridge a day - a box of 42 lasted me 2 months. This is anecdotal evidence, obviously, but my husband noticed an immediate improvement in my mood, my attention span, my abilitiy to be around people without getting totally stressed out and weird on a constant basis. I don't have to take sedatives anymore when I go out. And I'm not hurting anyone. Smoking may be bad, but nicotine is just a drug, like lithium, haldol, or aspirin. It's ridiculous to colour all your opinions of it with traditional uses and interpretations of uses for it.
1
2
Rating: -1
Alana Smithee
Darren T: your point about it being hard enough to just function on a daily basis with bipolar disorder is a very good one. You might want to try your mom on a nicorette inhaler and see if she does well with it.
0
1
Rating: -1
Max
For a great many people, clean air, space away from noxiousness and noise, communing with nature, finding time for grieving, getting to know ones self, getting some sacred time alone....is synonymous with maintaining ones sanity, clearing away mental clutter and these are but a few of the benefits of nonsmoking areas.

We should be preaching this view not acting as if mentally ill people (supposed) are stupid,blind,deaf and dumb and in wheelchairs and scooters and do not have the capacity to see or understand.

Help enlarge the view, not shrink it down to a myopic issue about self-medicating, , include them in the right to clean air, widen the fold, not treat them like lepers to be sent to a smokers colony. The right to clean air is not exclusive: please enjoy!

We can only but help people with 'other' mental conditions in addition to addictions in asking them to see the bigger picture of how much a contribution access to clean air really is: for the lungs, brain and entire circulatory system.

I support the non-smoking ban in public places like parks and I thank and appreciate the smokers who follow the rule and by-law. Supposedly mentally ill or not: your participation is noted and appreciated. Thank you.
2
2
Rating: 0
Alana Smithee
Max: there is no "supposedly" about schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. You are showing your own inability to see or understand. Do some reading about mental illness, beyond CNN and popular media, and you'll learn a lot. Lots of people here are talking about being ill but still managing their nicotine intake without infringing on anyone's fresh air, me included. Please don't belittle the problems that others have with casual comments that aren't founded in understanding.
1
2
Rating: -1
Jerry Smith
"But for many mentally ill people, nicotine provides relief for their brains"

I am mentally ill and know that smoking isn't necessary for relief from my problems. That is what a psychologist is for. We should be clear, people who are mentally ill are twice as likely to smoke, but that doesn't mean it gives them any relief. The article goes on to talk only about schizophrenia lumping all other mental illnesses in. Do you honestly think smoking would be a good therapy approach to OCD? You do not overcome your problems by avoiding them, blocking them, or running from your fears. Face, embrace, and erase your fears. Cognitive Behavior therapy is the way to help.
1
2
Rating: -1

Pages

Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.