Will Ridley Scott’s Prometheus save the aliens from themselves?

Most great directors can’t resist the urge to mess with their own cinematic landmarks. Twenty-one years after Rosemary’s Baby, Roman Polanski thought he’d revisit its masterful air of supernatural dread, and came out with the quacking little demon that was The Ninth Gate. Likewise, Francis Ford Coppola eventually hawked up The Godfather: Part III, a blot on the family line. And then there’s George Lucas… oh, what George Lucas did.

And now it’s Ridley Scott’s turn. The man behind the 1979 space-bug tour-de-force Alien is stepping up with Prometheus, a quasi-prequel shrouded in hype and set to open next Friday (June 8).

Believe me, I’m as excited as anyone about Scott’s return to the vacuum-sealed nightmare of space. I’m pretty sure I’ve seen Alien more often than any other movie, and every single time I’ve been thrilled, spooked, and filled with admiration for its originality. But the risk attached to Prometheus—tightly, like some sort of slimy, face-hugging thing—is the same as in the cases above. There’s always the chance that it’ll throw cold, weak light back onto its classic predecessor, making the original appear smaller and dumber than it first looked.

Of course, the Alien myth has already endured years of systematic abuse, and not from Scott. It took the anti-genius of James Cameron to identify and erase all that was truly scary about the first movie: the fact, for example, that the monstrous threat hid in shadows and constantly changed shape, not to mention the fact that those being threatened were ordinary people forced to improvise.

Setting his controls on Stupid, Cameron designed his sequel so that the big bugs were well-lit and ran in packs. It pitted them against movie marines equipped with grenade launchers and wisecracks and an adorable child to protect. In short, he dragged the beast out of the brilliant, paranoid ’70s and into the witless, paranoid ’80s, where Reagan and Arnie ruled. At that moment, the depressing gimmick of Alien vs. Predator became inevitable.

So can Scott save his original with Prometheus? Can he use this new film to slice through the layers of suffocating goo that have formed, and free his 33-year-old work from its own dumb legacy? Perhaps. (Yes! Come on!).

But what Prometheus most likely can’t do is enhance the original itself. Arguably the eeriest, most unsettling moment in Alien comes when the ancient shipwreck suddenly appears on a video monitor (“Ash, can you see this?”). The static-broken image is of something towering, silent, purely uncanny because its presence cannot be explained.

Yet, to judge from the trailer, explaining that shipwreck is exactly what Prometheus is set up to do. And so I’m skeptical, if only to keep a lid on expectations and shield me from disappointment.

Then again, there’s no question: that trailer looks pretty kick-ass.

Which summer blockbuster are you most interested in seeing?

Snow White and the Huntsman 9%
20 votes
Prometheus 26%
61 votes
The Amazing Spider-Man 0%
0 votes
The Dark Knight Rises 26%
60 votes
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter 5%
12 votes
Piranha 3DD 3%
6 votes
other 1%
2 votes
none of them 31%
73 votes
Comments (8) Add New Comment
A. MacInnis
Let's be frank, here: has Ridley Scott made a truly interesting film since the days of Blade Runner and Alien? I mean, I made it through Black Hawk Down and GI Jane and Hannibal and American Gangster, but I don't CARE about any of these films, or consider them particularly important works of cinema. At least his brother's films lack the bloated import attached to these titles, are unpretentiously minor films, but often very inventive and entertaining; forced to pick, I'd re-watch Enemy of the State over any Ridley Scott film of the last 20 years. Pretty much the only work of any significance post-Blade Runner that I'll credit Ridley Scott with is Thelma and Louise - which is still a fairly minor accomplishment; and there are some truly horrible films in his career to offset it, beginning as far back as 1989, with the risible, cliched, wholly inaccurate treatment of Japan in Black Rain, which adds insult to injury by stealing with no justification the title of a Japanese film about the after-effects of Hiroshima... Given the achievement of Alien and Blade Runner, I suppose its inevitable that he's suddenly looking backward, hoping to recapture the magic of his past glories, but it's also somewhat sad, somewhat of an admission of failure, isn't it? And if Prometheus isn't enough, IMDB lists him as being attached to an "untitled Blade Runner project." How can THAT not be a bad idea?

I don't know. I'm much, much more enthused about Cronenberg's new film, Cosmopolis - opening next week, if my facts are right - than I am about Prometheus. Oh, and by the way, re: Alien's originality, many of its ideas were prefigured in Cronenberg's Shivers, enough so that someone at a film festival (so the story goes) once accused Cronenberg of plagiarising Alien, before realizing that Shivers was in fact the earlier film...
0
0
Rating: 0
Jason
Well at least he isn't directing Men in Cr$p 3....
3
0
Rating: +3
Martin Dunphy
Mr. MacInnis:

I saw Prometheus last night, and I will not preempt Ken Eisner's review. I will say, though, that it is a good example of emphasis of concept over character.
I do take exception, however, with the Ridley Scott/David Cronenberg juxtaposition. Most genre films are variations on a dear old theme, and I think it's a bit of a stretch to suggest that Dan O'Bannon had Shivers in mind when he banged out the screenplay for Alien.
Cronenberg's well-known early depictions of the loathing of contagion and the (literal and figurative) internalization of horror, evil, and human frailty, and anything else you care to throw into the mix, could just as easily be said to have been influenced by William Castle's The Tingler, a great late-'50s Vincent Price "shock-'em-in-their-seats" vehicle.
Ray Davies has always cheerfully confessed to subconscious plagiarism in his music, and perhaps the same could be admitted of almost any artistic inspiration. Of course, there is also always the inevitability of certain things cropping up in any genre exercise.
Like, um, chest bursters.
1
0
Rating: +1
Anton
A. MacInnis:

I agree that most of his more recent work isn't nearly as good as the Alien and Blade Runner; arguably he set the bar way too high for himself. Still, Gladiator a great flick.

I'm on the fence with Prometheus, though I will without a doubt be seeing it. I love the first two films (I know James Cameron helmed the second, of course) and at first the idea of exploring the mysterious backstory of the Alien universe sounded interesting... until I thought of another franchise that thought the same way, Star Wars, and we all know how that turned out.

But, this is all speculation of course, for all I know the film will be amazing... The previews thus far have all looked great and I feel like they capture that claustrophobic fear and panic that, after watching the movie as a kid, made me sleep with the lights on.
2
1
Rating: +1
A. MacInnis
Martin - To be honest, I'm not so sure there's anything untoward myself about what similarities can be found between Shivers and Alien, myself - I seem to have stated the case with more certainty than I actually feel. Who DOES seem sure, tho', is David Cronenberg - I've been reading lots of old interviews with him for a project of late, and he seems to bring this up in more than one place. Some of this is reported second hand at the bottom of this page - http://www.feoamante.com/Movies/STU/shivers.html
...or quoting Cronenberg from the Grunberg book of interviews, talking about Shivers (bottom of p.39) - ""I have to say that some of the images like this ended up in things like Alien, which was more popular than any of the films I've ever made. But the writer of Alien had definitely seen these movies, Dan O'Bannon. The idea of a parasite that bursts out of your body and uses a fluid and leaps on your face, that's all in Shivers." It's a very recent quote; there are older ones. Actually, I don't recall the parasites in Shivers USING fluids, and I'm not sure why he says "movies," here, it's just Shivers, really... but anyhow, I don't really think Alien should be considered a plagiarism of Shivers or such; maybe there's some sour grapes here on Cronenberg's part - that's what it sounds like. As you say, artists are inspired by other artists all the time.

Anton - to be honest, I didn't care at all about Gladiator. Saw it, forgot it, never been tempted to go back, not even for Oliver Reed.

Maybe y'all know this, but the extended "assembly cut" that's kicking around in a few different places of Alien 3 is really quite interesting, by the way. It's about 35 minutes longer than the mess the studio made, and though Fincher declined any involvement, it's really not that bad - some effective moments and deeper characterizations, good performances from Dutton, Dance, and briefly even Pete Postlethwaite (!)... It's still not GREAT, but Alien fans should seek it out, it's far better than the theatrical cut.
0
1
Rating: -1
Anton
A. MacInnis:

I've heard about the version but haven't actually gotten my hands on it, though I've seen different cuts of films that have more or less changed the film completely (Alexander, Halloween 6 producer's cut).

From what I've read the Aliens 3 mess was more or less the fault of the studio and Fincher was basically tossed in to direct last second... In my opinion it would have been a lot better if Michael Biehn wasn't killed off between films.
0
0
Rating: 0
A. MacInnis
3
1
Rating: +2
Dave G
Brian - I hope you think this film sucked. As I am sure you are aware Mike thought it was great. Great? This film sucked in so many ways I won't recount them because so many other people already have.
0
0
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.