The Window Seat: Bus drivers should think twice before stranding passengers

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      So there I was on the #135 Burrard Station semi-express bus last Tuesday (November 22) at about 9:30 a.m., heading downtown.

      Between Nanaimo Street and Main Street, the only stop is at Commercial Drive. Just ahead of me, another #135 blew through the stop, leaving a confused-looking woman frantically waving from the curb. The driver of the bus I was on was in the inside lane and didn’t change lanes to pick her up, although he could have.

      He just drove on. At the next light, he caught up to the other #135 and opened his front doors. The other driver opened her window and they yakked a bit. Then my driver wagged a finger at her and said with a smile, as best I can remember: “I saw what you did back there.”

      The other driver’s laughing response was that she was in a hurry and, besides, “There was only one person there.”

      I’m still berating myself mentally for not intruding into their little tête-à-tête and taking the side of the would-be bus passenger.

      I’m aware that schedules get tight and drivers are under pressure to get from X to Y and Z on time. But both of these buses were only half full, and there is no excuse for a pass-up (stranded passenger) like that.

      That woman could have been late for an appointment or work or classes at SFU downtown. As a driver, no matter how annoyed you are at being behind schedule, don’t you have any empathy with how she must have felt while watching two buses with plenty of room blow by?

      Apparently not.

      The drivers’ union, the Canadian Auto Workers, has campaigned for more buses to be added to the system. The CAW has also said, over the years, that Coast Mountain Bus Company figures for pass-ups are nowhere near the actual numbers because of how many go unreported by drivers. (Search “bus pass-ups” on the Straight site for much more on this issue.) But those strandings are supposed to be due to full buses being unable to safely take on any more passengers.

      An Angus Reid poll commissioned by the CAW this fall showed that 85 percent of Metro Vancouver voters want improved transit service. CAW Local 111 president Don MacLeod said in an October 6 news release that only 26 percent of Metro Vancouver’s bus runs have service as frequent as every 10 minutes.

      “Montreal and Toronto have service every 10 minutes or better on 58 percent of their bus runs,” MacLeod stated in the release.

      That is a state of affairs that is, quite simply, scandalous. At minimum, Vancouver’s bus runs should be brought up to 50 percent with 10-minute frequency as soon as possible.

      MacLeod figures that Metro Vancouver needs up to 800 buses added to its system to supply the necessary hours of service to approach that level of service.

      Pass-ups might make bus riders more vociferous in backing drivers' demands for more buses and higher frequency of service.

      But if passengers are being stranded for reasons as trivial as the one I witnessed this week, it’s going to be hard to convince them not to climb back into their cars in the meantime.

      Comments

      12 Comments

      Kevin J

      Nov 25, 2011 at 1:35pm

      some pass ups also occur because people don't stand by the actual stop, or don't make it clear that the bus approaching, is the one they intend to board.

      I'm not condoning the bus driver's behavior, but rider's can also do their part.

      Teresa

      Nov 25, 2011 at 1:38pm

      Passengers with smart phones might want to consider tweeting about such incidents, with the bus numbers & routes, to @Translink - they're quite responsive and the public attention to this sort of thing might help, too.

      MacKenzie Studer

      Nov 25, 2011 at 2:16pm

      This happens to me all the time. I absolutely hate it. Every time I send in a complaint, I get some sort of blow off response or no reply at all. The bus drivers in this city must think we ride transit because it's some sort of cute novelty but it isn't. I can barely afford my bus pass let alone a car. So I guess that makes me unimportant in their eyes.

      Rick Rockit

      Nov 25, 2011 at 2:27pm

      What fool uses the bus? I prefer my BMW or my bike!!

      Carolyn Ali

      Nov 25, 2011 at 2:31pm

      I agree with Teresa. I've tweeted @Translink in response to a similar situation that left me and a handful of passengers stranded as a half-empty bus went by late at night, waiting another 20 minutes. I was pleased with their response...at least it made me feel like it was on record somewhere, and like Teresa says, if everyone does it, it makes it harder for Translink to ignore

      GOT

      Nov 25, 2011 at 10:02pm

      I ride a particular route to UBC and back pretty well every day, and for a while the service was just getting horrible - and it was clearly because the drivers on the route just didn't give a shit. They drove when they felt like it, stopped if it suited them, frequently leap-frogged two or even three buses (where a bus leaves passengers standing, the next bus picks them up, then drives past several stops to catch up to the first bus, who stops at a few stops to let the other bus pass, etc.) This of course creates chaos with the service, as passengers can find themselves waiting for thirty or forty minutes for a bus that's supposed to have a ten-minute frequency.
      I wrote letters of complaint, complete with bus numbers, and could have supplied photos of three buses sitting at a Canada Line station that were supposed to be ten minutes apart! The service improved noticeably within a couple of days, so if you're being jerked around by drivers, don't hesitate to make a noise about it.
      On that subject, my most jaw-dropping experience was a daily commute a few years ago with a driver who talked - in fact shouted - on his cell most of the way down Granville from 16th to 49th Ave, regularly blowing by waiting passengers, running red lights, and forgetting to stop when people wanted OFF the bus, let alone on it! I'm pro-union in every way, but these guys need to be reported, so do it. Translink and Coast Mountain don't need them, and neither do passengers.

      SDB

      Nov 26, 2011 at 6:25am

      Hong Kong's bus service runs every 2-3 minutes on some major routes, very few people own cars due to the high cost of parking so everyone uses public transport. The bus companies actually make money.
      If Vancouver had a reliable, frequent schedule of busses, more Vancouver'ites would be tempted to use the bus and leave the car at home. More busses = more passengers = more money for the bus companies...

      A. MacInnis

      Nov 26, 2011 at 9:13pm

      ...then of course there's the idea of taking all this out of the hands of bus companies and making our buses a public service once again, like they always should have been. That way, routes with few passengers won't get screwed for service (because there's no money in it), routes where a lot of people are likely to cadge rides won't get screwed for service (because there's no money in it), and the government can be held to account, not some private corporation who has secret meetings, treats fare evasion like it's a menace to society, and places their own profit above public good.

      I'm just sayin'.

      Freddie

      Nov 27, 2011 at 12:16am

      "An Angus Reid poll" sponsored by the CAW is not biased? Look, I'm sick of the CAW posturing for more money for its drivers to drive empty buses all night.

      Go out tonight, how many buses are full or even slightly full? TransLink can do a much better job of bus scheduling to avoid pass ups but it would reduce its funding and that isn't what it wants.

      Laurence Grailles

      Nov 28, 2011 at 2:07am

      To GOT:

      I am a bus driver in Vancouver and I'd like to let you know something about this "leap frogging" you're talking about.

      Sometimes buses get behind schedule (yep it's true!). Sometimes it's because of passenger loads and once you get behind you won't generally catch up. Being behind schedule only creates more loads at each stop (as you pick up people that wouldn't have been there if you were on time). You can get behind schedule enough that the next bus catches up to you (which didn't pick many people up since you're doing all the work). When this happens the full bus will skip a stop if possible and allow the 2nd bus to pick up. This lets the full bus make up some time. If possible, the 2nd bus will pass the 1st bus and make the rest of the pick ups for the route. This gives the first bus a chance at getting back on time. It doesn't always work as there's always people wanting to get off the bus, traffic lights, pedestrians, etc that slow you down.

      You may think the full bus should stop and pick you up as it's first, but that isn't really reasonable. The driver of the full bus wants to get to the end of the line, use the washroom and get back out there and hopefully be on time for people travelling the other direction. Skipping the stops and allowing the 2nd bus to do the pick ups can make this happen. You're already late, and that's terrible but why should the line be behind the whole day and night? It only makes sense to allow the 2nd bus to do some of the pick ups. Contrary to popular belief, we do not get lots of time at the end of the line. Quite often I get to the end of the line and am already late for my next departure. Any tricks to get back on time, including "leap frogging" will be used.

      Can't speak for everyone but I never intentionally strand passengers. I have had people run toward the bus at the last second who were standing behind the bus shelter, facing away from the bus, walking down the sidewalk not looking towards me at all. I don't make up my mind about a bus stop the second I get there. I'm scanning the road well before I get there. I will gladly stop for you, just please look like you want a bus.