Public funding sought for in vitro fertilization

Comments

It’s another busy day for Dr. Christina Williams at the Ambulatory Surgical Centre Vancouver. Wearing her scrubs and fresh out of surgery, she sits down for an interview with the Georgia Straight to discuss a subject uppermost in her mind on most days: endometriosis.

She explains that as a gynecologist in Langley in the 1990s, she developed a keen interest in how this poorly understood disorder contributed to pain and infertility.

“It was a very enigmatic disease,” she says, “and we didn’t have good answers. I could see that a lot of the treatments weren’t working.”

It’s also far more common than most people realize, striking 10 percent of women and present in 39 percent of women experiencing infertility.

Normally the ovaries generate hormones that send messages to the uterus’s endometrial cells to start swelling. During a woman’s period, these cells are removed from the body.

Williams, director of Williams Fertility at the Crossroads Clinic, explains that problems can arise when these endometrial cells become implanted elsewhere, such as the ovaries, fallopian tubes, or peritoneum, for example. This can lead to infertility, irregular bleeding, and severe pain.

She pulls out photos of the pelvic area that show tiny black dots with some whiteness in the surrounding area. To the untrained eye, there’s nothing remarkable. But Williams points out that the different vein patterns demonstrate something is awry. Endometriosis is confirmed by laparoscopy, which involves the insertion of a tube to withdraw tissue for biopsy.

“It’s like having an internal sunburn,” she says.

Williams emphasizes that even though these small lesions can cause infertility, there aren’t always symptoms. She and her team published a study last year in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada compiling the results of more than 400 laparoscopies at her clinic.

“It turned out that 20 percent of the patients had endometriosis proven in the laparoscopy—and those patients had not even one menstrual cramp—but they were infertile for no other reason,” she said.

According to Williams, one of the best ways to treat endometriosis is through in vitro fertilization, particularly for those with an advanced stage of the disorder, which can include tubal adhesions. That’s because the start of an IVF cycle suppresses estrogen, which is at the root of the problem.

IVF isn’t cheap. Williams says one cycle costs $5,000 to $8,500, depending on the fertilization method. Medications add another $3,000 to $4,000 to the bill if they’re not covered by insurance.

And that’s why she advocates public financing for the procedure in B.C., not only to help couples conceive, but also to address the effects of endometriosis. Quebec is the only province to make IVF funding available through its publicly funded health plan. It covers the cost of implanting one embryo at a time, thereby eliminating the likelihood of multiple births.

Williams suggests that reducing the incidence of twins or greater multiple births through the implantation of more than one embryo, as is common with IVF, saves taxpayers enormous costs of keeping these low-birth-weight infants in hospital for long periods of time. In addition, Williams says that premature twins have a higher likelihood of developing learning disabilities.

But not everyone is thrilled with Quebec’s approach. Julie Depelteau of Montreal’s Institut de recherche et d’informations socio-économiques noted in a paper last year that the private sector generates significant profits from public financing of IVF treatments and other procedures linked to reproductive health.

The Infertility Awareness Association of Canada, on the other hand, retained health-economics analyst Lindy Forte to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of publicly funding IVF in B.C. Her report noted that where assisted-reproductive technology is covered under a public health plan, “there has been a corresponding reduction in the rate of multiple births by at least 50%.”

Taking that into account along with an expected increase in IVF utilization, Forte forecast net savings of $13.5 million in the fifth year of publicly funded IVF treatment in B.C.

Williams says single-embryo transfers are having much better outcomes than in the past. “That’s because there is technology now to grow embryos longer—and to select the more advanced embryos—so you only need to transfer one and get the same pregnancy rates,” she states.

Comments (17) Add New Comment
Ray
Just what we need more things our health care system can't afford.
22
40
Rating: -18
cuz
NO NO NO. This is a private matter that should be paid for by the people who want to do this. This has absolutely nothing to with preserving public health and therefore should not be paid for by our tax dollars!!!
12
43
Rating: -31
Forest
...And the private sector will no doubt also reap great profits from the public funding of IVF treatments here, as in Quebec. I think that this proposal is a very bad idea, for many reasons.
13
30
Rating: -17
Visitor
Private.... I don't think so. Maybe the government should start making all the smokers for example or people with poor lifestyle choices start paying for their costly treatment. They made the choice for the poor lifestyle, people do not ask for infertility.
31
19
Rating: +12
Marilyn
Infertility and endometriosis are medical conditions - why wouldn't we pay for treatment especially if it saves the healthcare system dollars in the reduction of multiples. Seems more like a progressive save of healthcare dollars than spend to me.
28
17
Rating: +11
T
So the health care system can't afford to shift the funding? If any time was taken to do research, you'd note the proposal doesn't ask for NEW money. The hope is that by having funding towards IVF there would be a reduction in multiple births (twins & triplets) by placing a maximum of a single embryo transfer - so the money wouldn't have to go so heavily towards the NICU and other prenatal care. Your money is already in a sense going towards this every time a multiple pregnancy is conceived via IVF.

Secondly, nobody WANTS to do IVF. It's a last ditch effort after significant other measures have been taken. I still see our health system paying for bypass surgeries etc on people that have poor eating habits. Heart disease and other problems aren't always a result of lifestyle choices, but many times things like exercise and diet changes can have a great reduction in such problems. I see many people refuse to make the change and yet the health care system still covers that...

25
12
Rating: +13
Chris
This MEDICAL issue needs to be looked at, (as well as the mental health issues that this DISEASE creates for the the couples). While this is not a life or death diagnosis it is a medical issue that is creating issues in our communities and health care system.

For the idiots that say "well they should adopt, there are lots of kids out there" Adoption is not an option for alot of couples it is expensive (up to $20,000 for international adoption and can take up to 2 years) Infertile couples are placed at the bottom of the list to adopt children out of the local Ward children and because of the mental, emotional and physical disabilities that most of these children face, social workers dont place them in first time parent homes. Again this process takes at least a year to complete then the "waiting list".

Ignorant people argue that "if you cant afford $12,000 to have a kid (using IVF) you shouldnt have one" is ridiculous and thoughtless.

The the famous "it is Gods will" or "if you cant have kids you shouldn't try" is rude, hurtful and again ridiculous.

The government pays for abortions - NOT a life or death issue and is 100% avoidable, and for sex change operations - NOT life or death and is a personal choice, plastic surgery the list goes on and on... WHY is it that when people want to have a family to love and CARE for the mean, nasty people bully us!!!

WE pay taxes, healthcare and have feelings.. unfortunatly the bullies are winning and our voice is VERY quiet.

The medical system does enormous amounts of surgeries that are not life and death issues -- I had a government paid breast reduction! Things need to change..
28
16
Rating: +12
MB3
Infertility is a recognized medical condition by the world Heath organization that deserves treatment,I have but one question If this was your Son or daughter or perhaps your wife or husband that suffered from this medical condition and Safe treatment was available would you not want treatment for them?
20
14
Rating: +6
VEG
People who can not conceive of naturally should not try and have children. Over 40,0000 children need adopting. Science tells us this for a reason. Children born out of IVF tax our health care system even more by often been born premature and with lots of issues which we all end up paying for. I am not saying this because I am cold person but mother nature is telling us something.
11
27
Rating: -16
Visitor
@ VEG and all others who disagree, have you ever been in the shoes of someone who suffers from infertility? Maybe your turn is coming or someone you know, then you may be singing a different tune. And maybe you should all do your research on infertility and IVF because some of you have your wires crossed on risks and benefits, along with thinking about increased costs etc.
Maybe you should worry more about your tax dollars going to those sitting at home getting welfare, not paying into the system when some are more than capable. Sure hope ya all aren't using the health care system cause my tax bucks are paying for it.
21
16
Rating: +5
G.O.
Wait till infertility strikes you or someone you know, then respond to this article. Please do the research because some knowledge seems to be lacking on this subject. if we all could only choose where our tax dollars went to, now wouldn't that be fair. I am sure most people who want to do IVF would choose to keep their own tax dollars and pay for it themselves.
23
16
Rating: +7
crystal
I have suffered for 5yrs trying to conceive , and anyone who has went through the trials of pills,injections, hormoans and temp"ing can only understand how much of an emotional rollercoaster this process is. I have spent thousands of dollars trying to make our dreams come true and belive that I don't think just anyone should be able to become a parent because we all know that there are people out there that the system should protect from not having children but also belive that not being able to have children can cause more of an emotional issue and could be classified as a disorder that the goverment should help at the expence of out tax dollers, when in long run we would be saving money by not having muliples
14
13
Rating: +1
Melodee
Infertility rates are rising and so many more couples are affected than most imagine. Until it is you and all the hopes and dreams you have disappear in a moment, it's easy to see this as a private affair. May you not walk in those shoes, it's a difficult, painful and expensive path.
10
13
Rating: -3
Wondering
...and if IVF funding were approved, would there be a limit on the number of times the procedure was implemented in a patient? Yes, sex-change operations are funded, yes breast-reduction operations (when medically necessary) are funded...but can we as a society afford to pay for multiple procedures for patients who want to have very large families? This is something else to consider before we rush ahead and start funding IVF....
7
22
Rating: -15
Tammy
I have to say I'm disgusted by the harsh negative comments made here. Infertility is not a choice and not everyone is able to adopt. Yes there are many children out there up for adoption, an option we were considering but it was going to cost us more money than what IVF was going to cost us. So for those saying just adopt, do your research on that cost before before you just randomly make that comment and think it's an easy, cheaper process, it's not, it actually more difficult and more expensive.

I also agree with the previous posts who mention other sicknesses, if you chose to smoke and it caused cancer, then perhaps our health care shouldn't pay for that treatment because you actually caused your own health problems, if you play sports and injured yourself maybe you should have to pay to treat your injury, you chose to drive and got in a car accident, hey you're on your own to pay for you injuries because driving was your choice. Infertility is NOT a choice. In their lifetime, my daughters will be contributing to society and will more than payback what I paid to conceive them. For those against funding for IVF, if you have children, picture your life without them, or being told you can't have them or don't deserve them.

IVF itself does not cause babies with medical issues, having multiples does increase the chance for premature birth and having babies with issues. But if it's funded this will actually reduce the strain on the healthcare system because rules will be put in place specifically to reduce the chance of multiple births. If you think this would be a strain, what about people who are not working, not contributing to society, who do drugs or drink while pregnant and got pregnant easily? We pay for their child/children's healthcare and they end up in the system more often than not, those are the kids who need to be adopted. So because she can conceive naturally she is deserving of our tax dollars, yet you're telling me and my husband who work hard and pay our taxes that because we are deemed an infertile couple and need help to conceive we are not worthy?
20
12
Rating: +8
Danielle
First thank you to all infertility supporters because we know we need all the support we can get. Funding IVF is the only way to ensure equality within our healthcare system. Being bias and uneducated on the subject shuts the door in making the right decision. It saddens me you make harsh and irrelevant solutions for a disease in which you fail to acknowledge and understand when medically diagnosed and confirmed. Systematically each of you use my tax dollars for needs I may not find my top priority either yet you still have our tax dollar support when you require medical assistance for your procedures and to ensure quality of life. Funding IVF saves our healthcare system serious money this is proven with implementing areas where managed properly not an opinion.
6
8
Rating: -2
Guest
@Wondering. I think you have some misconceptions. Rarely is IVF used to create very large families. Most of us who suffer from infertility are just trying for our first. In Quebec, the province funds single embryo transfer and I believe 3 IVF cycles. You will find that there are no "Octo Moms" in Canada. She, in fact, did not use IVF but super ovulation. Here in Canada, REs do their best to reduce the complications of multiples pregnancy by transferring fewer embryos.

I endured 5 IUIs, 3 IVF cycles, 3 FET, and 2 miscarriages. These past 5 years have been emotionally, physically, and financially draining. I wouldn't wish this one anyone. If the despair I feel after every failed cycle couldn't be packaged, it would be the ultimate weapon.

If you get a chance, watch that opening montage of the Pixar film "Up." I think it gives those who have no clue how devastating infertility is a glimpse into our lives.
5
8
Rating: -3
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.