Idea of citywide Wi-Fi network finds some support in Vancouver

Comments

Armed with her black computer bag, Caitlin Leepart makes her daily journey to find Wi-Fi in Vancouver. Leepart is studying makeup artistry at the New Image College of Fine Arts. She says that as a student, she can’t afford the expense of having an Internet connection. So, in order to log on, she treks back and forth between coffee shops for a few hours of Internet access.

“It’s annoying and it’s really frustrating,” Leepart told the Georgia Straight as she walked home through the rain. “You’ve got to buy coffee that you don’t really want, just to have two hours of Internet.” Leepart said that, although she understands the City of Vancouver has other issues to deal with, it would be nice to have free wireless Internet hot spots she could count on.

“I guess that’s the way coffee shops are making their extra money,” Leepart said. “I have heard so many people complain about it. If they could just put in a central Wi-Fi, it would be great. I mean, we live here, we support the city, so why not?”

City hall first began looking into the idea of bringing free wireless to parts of Vancouver in 2005. The goal was to have a municipal Wi-Fi network up and running by 2010, in time for the Winter Olympics.

The plan involved finding a partner from the private sector to operate and maintain the wireless network. According to a 2007 city staff report, to “blanket” Vancouver, 2,000 antennas would need to be installed on light standards at an estimated cost of $10 million. “Council decided to go that route in 2007,” Vision Vancouver councillor Andrea Reimer told the Straight by phone. “It issued a request for expressions of interest, and it got none. So the final report to council was just that—that there is nobody interested in doing this.”

While Vancouver looked in vain for a partner, Wi-Fi pilot projects were appearing in cities across North America. Some turned out to be failures, but some cities did have success.

In Seattle, a Wi-Fi network was established in 2005 to provide free Internet access to small businesses and university students. In 2008, over 20,000 unique users logged on to the system that now covers business districts, City Hall, and parks.

Meanwhile, in Fredericton, more than 600 unique users log on each day to the city’s free Wi-Fi network, called Fred-eZone.

Michael Richard is the senior project manager for information technology with the City of Fredericton. He said the idea of taking on a Wi-Fi project was originally pitched to council by his department as “intellectual infrastructure” akin to traditional infrastructure such as roads and sewers.

“It’s infrastructure that the city provides in the form of an amenity,” Richard told the Straight by phone. “You come to the city of Fredericton, we expect that people should be able to access the Internet at places that you would reasonably be able to access it.”

Richard said the city has been successful in the endeavour, allowing people to access Wi-Fi in malls, libraries, and the airport. But he said free public Wi-Fi does come at a cost.

“We are government and even though you are offering it for free, citizens have a certain expectation of that type of infrastructure—that it is always available, high-quality,” Richard said. “So, our biggest job has been to set the expectation as low as we can. This is an amenity, and if it works and you get on it, great.”

According to the Vancouver Economic Development Commission, an agency of the city, getting a free Wi-Fi network up and running should be a top priority.

“What we are doing right now is we are working with a task force in the industry to see how we can develop a strategy to improve service throughout the downtown and throughout the city,” John Tylee, director of policy and communications for the VEDC, told the Straight by phone.

Tylee insists that there is the potential for a profitable Wi-Fi network in Vancouver. He believes the city and private companies need to branch out and explore new business models in order to make that happen.

“Wireless is a very important part of any city’s infrastructure. It is important for business; it is important to keep our city competitive with other cities, particularly in Asia, who are much more advanced in that area than we are; and it is also an important part in the quality of life,” Tylee said.

In Reimer’s view, “It is an interesting discussion because there is a very clear correlation between economic development and access to the online world. There is already so much coverage in the city. It is not universal, but there is enough of it that there is not a business model there.”

However, she said issues such as social housing and becoming the world’s greenest city take precedence on council’s agenda. According to her, free public Wi-Fi is not on the city’s radar anymore. “The city has a pipeline of policy it can do, and that pipeline is pretty full right now,” Reimer said.

Comments (16) Add New Comment
David S
WiFi offered by coffee shops is a convienance. It is not supposed to be for people to hang out for 2 -4 hours for $4.00. Others would like to sit and enjoy a coffee, but no you are there sipping that coffee to justify not being able to afford internet access. I would think if you went to a coffee shop 20 days a month and spent $80.00 on coffee you might be able to afford $50.00 for internet a month. Coffee shops were also not meant to be home offices where you conduct your business meetings. Coffee shop owners have expenses and high overhead including municipal taxes. They try to keep their establishments clean and offer up decent washroom facilities. Believe me one coffee a day does not warrant the extra expense.
3
3
Rating: 0
Kim Chol
Did anyone consider the math that buying a $2.25 coffee, twenty-two days a month is actually more expensive than getting dry loop 3Mbps DSL service for your apartment? I guess that's why Caitlin is a makeup artist and not a business professional.
3
2
Rating: +1
RF
I won't rest until I can surf the net even while I'm sleeping. Somebody get on this and cater to my every whim.
4
1
Rating: +3
oltimer
No more saturation coverage Wi-Fi until we have more detailed research into the potential health hazards of WiFi on human health and in particular, Neuro-health.
1
5
Rating: -4
Tom Poe
We're last on the list of countries ranked for broadband. We pay far more for less speed. The only conclusion one can make is corporations think wifi is an amenity. Those who believe that need to realize the world thinks we're stupid.
4
4
Rating: 0
Peter Dimitrov
There is a lot of electro-pollution in GVRD, cellphones everywhere, buses, skytrain, cellphone towers, wifi in schools, libraries, coffee shops, soon whether you like or not there will be wi-fi smart meters reporting your electrical consumption back to BC Hydro, er, Accenture. We are witnessing an incredible electronic experiment on human biology, dna, neurohealth, etc., with lots of uncertainty and risks being shifted from the corporate sphere onto vulnerable populations, such as children, the chronically ill, seniors, in our society. The air space through which all this electronic zip passes is common property not corporate property. Surely there needs to be space not just for free access, but zones where one can escape from constant exposure to these energies. There are good reasons why quite a number of cities, counties and municipalities in USA, including CA, have place a moratorium on smart meter installation, and why parents in many schools in Canada/USA are demanding that wifi be removed - as constant exposure is allegedly making some children ill and hypersensitive to electronic pollution.

Whilst I think a GVRD wifi net is an idea worth examining, perhaps implementing in some public areas, will there be respect for those, likely a minority, who do not want to be impacted by such a scheme, especially if there are risks and uncertainties. Further, looking ahead, if future scientific study definitely proves that cells/wifi etc is a signficant causal factor in health disease such as cancers, a city owned wifi utility may well attract legal liability. IMO, I think we need to pause, slow down with the implementation of new technology, gather more info, consider the views of divergent scientists on this issue and not make 'group-think' public policy. Check out: www.bioinitiative.org, international-emf-alliance.org, campaign for radiation free schools, dirtyelectricity.org, electromagnetichealth.org, guineapigsrus.org, lisanagy.com, microwavenews.com.
3
4
Rating: -1
seth
Today those same 2000 antennas/routers routers would cost about $200K with each one connected to start) to a Big Telecom business class high speed modem at $80 a month or the closest city network node (school) - $400K up front and $220K per annum installed and maintained.

Like Fredericton it would be a best effort network and home/business owners would be encouraged to make their indoor connections work better and spread it around buying their own modems for $60 a pop.

The city could run it free for a few months and then start charging users 5 bucks a month or so.enough to pay for it .

As interest built up expansion to a $5M fibre optic network to connect all the nodes with a 1 GigE could begin neighborhood by neighborhood. Subscribers would cover off the city's small investment in each neighborhood within a few months of cutover in that district. The city would never be out more than a $100K or so as the network built up.

Households could connect wired for 1 GigE service with CAT 6E or fiber to the closest node for roughly $100 or continue wireless access as before but with much better service.

The fibre optic network would be used by city utilities terminating existing Big Telecom contracts and leased back to BCHydro for smart meters - covering almost all costs.

The costly Big Telecom network contracts would be dumped and connection to the internet would be peered at the BCNet transit exchange downtown.

With 50% subscriber uptake, Vancouver's roughly 400K business' and households would have 1 Gbs internet access available for a $40 one time up front network charge, a few bucks a month for maintenance and a $100 or so one time connection charge for wired in users. Cost to the city - zilch. Cost to Big Telecom - they would soon be out of business in Vancouver.

Ain't happenin folks!!!

The last time in 2007 they bought off city council for the usual under the table campaign donation stipend. I suspect this time the councilors are just looking for more donations.
seth
3
2
Rating: +1
Dan Clay
Just what we need more of, electromagnetic pollution... does anyone care or are we just too accepting of our technology, and blinded by some corporate take on next cash cow...even if it causes health problems down the line....
2
5
Rating: -3
bigdee
I have been reading the comments and I have a couple of questions. Some people I know that could use the free Wi-Fi can't afford to sit in coffee shops and have coffee as their money is going towards rent and food. I myself use the public library when I can but there isn't one near me so I don't go very often.
Another question is why don't we have the free Wi-fi in one area to start with and then see how it goes. That may be an option that might work.
3
1
Rating: +2
J XCheck
“I guess that’s the way coffee shops are making their extra money,” Leepart said. “I have heard so many people complain about it. If they could just put in a central Wi-Fi, it would be great. I mean, we live here, we support the city, so why not?”

Prime example of sheer ignorance. If she can't afford to pay for internet connection, she is likely being supported by fellow taxpayers. Now it's not enough - she wants her free wi-fi. Poor little girl.

As someone who has travelled a lot, I have used wi-fi in public spaces, both free and paid. It is a convenience, meant to quickly check an e-mail, your flight status, and such. Not a thing to hog the bandwidth (and a coffee shop seat) for hours. Perhaps she's been on wi-fi too much and it fried her brain.
3
3
Rating: 0
Symbian_net
WiFi radiation is and has been looked after by scientists for years now for 1, For another radiation in which could cause illnesses are only caused by people who constantly have their cellular devices in their pockets constantly active and of course there are other factors to play as well like: how efficient are you at eating right? what enzymes are currently actively being fed the proper amount of vitamins? other than that there should be no health problems without vitamins you are likely to form a cancer anyhow! the ellectro-radiation produced by wifi have a much lesser chance to give you any kind of illness than that of the smaller cell frequencies that of what are used by cellular networks operating in the 900MHz and below! anything above the wave cells are much to large to penetrate the body the same way 2.4 GHz does, Furthermore if you payed attention to the hype of wireless exposure you would know that anything lesser than 1GHz are the major problem! As for these teens getting ill from exposure I think that making sure they are not on their phones when going to bed to wake them up in the morning will keep them from getting ill. I restrict My kids from having their cell phones around their bedrooms. some people just need to get their facts strait. further more WIFI does not emit Gama radiation and Gama radiation is where illnesses are produced from more common to nuclear power plants and lazer diodes much used in lazer pointers and cd/dvd roms. brains are agnolaged by those who obtain proper information and factual information, However propaganda are stated by idiot fools who don't know the first thing about their own health rather than that of ellectro-radiation as apposed to Gama radiation or the noise levels between the two. did you know that certain light-bulbs produces more radiation than a wireless WIFI broadcasting device? there is a pretty fact for ya!
1
2
Rating: -1
Symbian_net
and the amount it would cost to start a city wide WIFI hot-spot comes to approximately 8.8 million cash! and most likely will not cost a single tax payers dollars! but would cost about $18 CAD/mo for use around the whole city. without losing even a second of connection time .5 ms to be exact.
2
2
Rating: 0
internets
Before council considers doing something like this they seriously need to secure it, and hire people who know what they are doing. No, not white hat phonies but hackers experienced in poisoning arp cache, man in the middle attacks and other wireless attacks because it will be huge target for ID theft. I suggest they contact the VHS vancouver hacker society.

Should also take note of what they're doing in Austria, by running a mesh network 'funkfeuer' that's completely uncensored and cheaper to run than I bet anybody here comes up with. Berlin has one as well.

There used to be a freethenet.ca society doing this but then it's unlimited internet access was lost when some company sponsoring it was bought out. I don't know if they're still around but they also were planning a city wide mesh network

1
2
Rating: -1
anonymous canada
breaking WEP (yes, it's still around) or WPA is easy 90% of the time. simply download the backtrack live CD and run a few commands to capture a pcap file, then upload it here and crack away cloudcracker.com/dictionaries.html a site run by Moxie Marlinspike creator of TextSecure and Redphone encrypted voice for android.

if it's WEP, then you can crack it in under 2 minutes everytime through aireplay injection.

If you can't figure out how to do it look for tutorials on youtube search 'Backtrack crack wpa' and there ya go. Ignore the whole part about using your own dictionary, just upload it and pay for a few hours on an Amazon GPU cluster brute forcing it millions of times faster than anything your home comp could do.

great success ^_^ just don't do something stupid like suddenly leeching and seeding huge torrent files off your now pirated wireless. oh, and only follow a tutorial that includes MAC changing which is also simple.

information should be free
2
3
Rating: -1
bobo
I like the quote from Michael Richards "the senior project manager for Information Technology with the City of Fredericton". "Free public wifi does come at a cost". No sh*t Sherlock. But that doesn't stop the spoiled class from wanting the government to provide even more services "free". Try the library lady. The city is already providing you with free public wifi access. I guess it must be too far too walk - Waaahhhh.... Now if you were a junkie, you might get free wifi with your hookup down at Insite. Caitlain Leepart just adds to the proof that this city has the biggest whiners in the world.
3
1
Rating: +2
fidel gastro
man, the straight needs some new articles. more of the same old stories regurgitated from one or two years ago.

should taxpayer money be used for funding free wi-fi? i think not.
3
2
Rating: +1
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.