Is nudity the new normal?

On warm days, a topless Kimberly Parrott casually walks her Lab cross, Underdog, in the parks of New Westminster and Burnaby. Sure, she gets stared at. Shocked-looking moms sometimes cover their children’s eyes, she said. But only once has a police officer “harassed” the software engineer and mom. The officer slowed down his patrol car, she recalled, and leaned out the window. “Ma’am, you want to put something on?” he asked. Parrott said, “No, thank you. I’ve got something on,” referring to her shorts. Parrott explained to the officer that she was perfectly free to bare her breasts on the streets of Vancouver’s suburbs. After calling in, she said, the officer conceded that she was right and she continued on her way, naked on top, in the sunshine.

“I think women have big, big hang-ups about exposing any part of their body,” Parrott told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview from her home office, explaining why she’s normally the only topless dog walker around. “I wish I could take their hands and say, ”˜It’s okay. You’re not a slut if you do it.’ ”

Even if you are a slut, there’s no limit to go-nude events this summer. (See this sidebar for details.) Naked is in. Or at least it’s not out. In recent decisions, B.C. courts have stood behind the right of naturists to bare all, virtually anywhere, from the parks of Maple Ridge to Surrey’s Newton Wave Pool. The Lower Mainland is home to Wreck Beach, the lesser-known Crescent Rock Beach in White Rock, and a mind-boggling number of pro-naturist event-organizing groups. One can swim nude in public pools, bowl nude, camp nude, yacht nude, and even dance nude in a barn. Oh, those wacky naturists.

But beyond the aesthetic thrill of bouncing one’s bits in the surf, public nudity in Vancouver is a measure of progress, according to Parrott. First, it’s about physical freedom. Second, she said, it’s a resistance to mainstream-media-driven propaganda about what bodies are supposed to look like.

“I’m very lucky to have in my past a woman who put on one of these newfangled bathing suits at the turn of the century,” Parrott said. “She was marched off and put in jail. How far we’ve come in 100 years. If people continue to say ”˜Look, bodies aren’t shameful!’ and teach their kids that there’s nothing wrong with nudity, then maybe in my lifetime”¦the children will be able to say, ”˜There’s nothing shameful about my body.’ ”

Are we there yet? On June 7, 200 cyclists rode naked through the streets of downtown Vancouver in the World Naked Bike Ride. Parrott, who helped organize the ride through NIFTY (Naked Iconoclasts Fighting the Yoke), said the riders received applause and smiles only.

So, Vancouver may be “there” in spirit, if not in law. Those participating in the WNBR were still committing an offence under Criminal Code Section 174, according to Vancouver lawyer David Butcher. However, the chances of being charged with public nudity in Vancouver are extremely low, he said. That’s because the prosecution would have to prove that the community is not tolerant of public nudity, he explained, and get the consent of the attorney general to proceed with a case.

“It appears that our community is accepting of the naked bike ride,” Butcher, who represented nudist Linda Meyer in a groundbreaking 2000 Maple Ridge case, told the Straight. “Trying to measure that [community tolerance] is very hard.”¦Prince George, for example, has much more conservative traditions than Vancouver. I don’t know if there are any traditions in Vancouver.”

Just because no one is booing doesn’t mean there’s tolerance, says Dave Quist, the executive director of the Institute of Marriage and Family Canada. Born on the West Coast, the spokesperson for Canada’s conservative family lobby said the Lower Mainland does have a tradition of modesty.

“If we could poll 1,000 people across the Lower Mainland, we would find a smattering who would say, ”˜Yup, I’m all for naturists’ rights,’ but I think you’d still find a considerable number of people who would say, ”˜No, I’d not be comfortable with that,’ ” Quist told the Straight in a phone interview from the highway between Calgary and Red Deer. “I recognize their right to go do that [be naked], but I don’t want their rights to interfere with my rights not to be offended, not to have my children see that, and so that’s where we run into conflict.”

Quist noted that even if naturists believe that public nudity is nonsexual, the rest of the population doesn’t necessarily see it that way. And sexualized flesh is something that’s prevalent in our culture, he argued, and detrimental to it.

“You can’t look at car commercials or a beer commercial, and many other things that are advertised, without a scantily clad man or woman,” he explained. “When we don’t have any modesty left, we characterize sex and sexuality as being just a crass thing without talking about intimacy or love, or the very nature of what intimacy is intended to be. So when we lose modesty, we lose a lot of the other things that go with it.”

Surrey is far from being as nudity-friendly as Vancouver, according to the president of the Surrey United Naturists, Don Pitcairn. He explained that the city has refused to officially recognize Crescent Rock Beach as a clothing-optional zone, which leaves skinny-dippers vulnerable to public complaints and police intimidation. That’s despite the area’s having been used by naked swimmers since at least 1947, he said.

“The City of Surrey has a long history of opposing any form of nude recreation,” he said. Pitcairn noted that in 1972, the GVRD and the District of Surrey used red tape to harass the Sunny Trails Nudist Club almost out of existence. Later that decade, he recalled, officials tried to shut down nude entertainment in the city’s bars. More recently, after just one complaint, city hall ordered Crescent Rock Beach’s clothing-optional signs to be taken down. In May 2007, nude swimmers went to court to defend their right to rent Newton Wave Pool—and won. Now, Pitcairn’s SUN has threatened to take Surrey’s World Oceans Day Festival organizers to the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal for barring the naturists’ group participation in the June 8 event.

“Surrey is 20 years behind the times,” Pitcairn said, recalling Vancouver alderwoman Bernice Gerard (1977 to 1980), who would conduct walks on Wreck Beach to shame naturists into putting their clothes back on. “Surrey, anything to do with nude recreation, they just stonewall, put up their defences.”

Even Parrott admits that though she does her part in normalizing nudity around the Lower Mainland, it’s far from normal. For the naked bike ride, which sought to raise awareness of fuel consumption and climate change, the shock associated with nudity worked in the cyclists’ favour, she said.

“When you’re doing any kind of protest, you can raise your voice and have signs and everything, but to get exposure, you have to rattle people,” she said. “And, well, unfortunately in this society right now, nothing rattles people more than seeing a lot of people nude.”

For the greater good of society, public nudity is worth pursuing, according to Brian Ferris, a clinical psychologist in private practice in North Vancouver. All this bare skin is a good sign of the city’s mental health, he said. Vancouver has a playfulness drought, Ferris believes, and being naked in a group not only is playful but can break down feelings of social isolation.

“Most recreations for adults are like golf—work hard, try hard,” the psychologist told the Straight from his office. “There’s no silliness. I think it’s time that the world was more silly. And nudity is one of the ways you can be silly.”¦The people having fun are not the ones to worry about. The people you have to worry about are”¦the people who are really serious and feel threatened. When people are frightened, they’re not playful. When people are laughing and having fun, they don’t do harm to others. The world needs more play. The world needs more laughter and fun.”

In North America, public nudity is mainly about pleasure, according to UBC sociology lecturer Chris MacKenzie. However, he said, in the Germany of the 1920s, it was “a bit of a social movement, a panacea to the early urban-industrial social pathologies that were cropping up all over the place”¦a way to get the working and middle classes to connect with nature. Not in an ecological sense but in generating some solidarity in the face of some of the problems that urban living was creating.”

Although the naked bike ride was a consciousness raiser, and various local fundraising efforts regularly rely on titillation to draw attention to themselves, MacKenzie thinks the practice may be getting a little tired.

“It’s losing its novelty,” he said. “Will it stop? Probably not.” As for recreational naturists, “It seems that nudity is not the main attraction. It’s the social aspect of getting together, sunbathing, skinny-dipping.”

In other words, pleasure.

So with all this legal freedom, groovy nude events, 100 years of naturists pushing the limits, and the seemingly limitless tolerance of Vancouverites for naked spectacle, why is topless dog walker Parrott still such a rarity?

“I wish I could identify that,” she said. “There’s so many mores.”¦If women cover their child’s eyes, I think that’s kind of sad. Why not take the opportunity to explain to your kids, ”˜Those are breasts, and just like that guy over there, she’s got her top off.’ Have a discussion about body parts.

“Like, I’m not going to go to an opera house top-free. I’m a clothing-optionalist. We believe that everyone has the right to wear as much or as little clothing as they want without being thrown in jail.”

Well, we’re certainly there in spirit, if not in the dog parks.


See also, No shortage of nude events.

Comments (31) Add New Comment
urbanstrain
Ladies: If you look like this woman, please keep your shirts on!
35
44
Rating: -9
sarababe
To me, being nude is being the same person but in a sensually charged ambience that is very pleasurable. Indeed I prefer being with my family and other sociable mixed gender naturists in clubs and resorts for all of our recreation or relaxation. My personal best was three weeks vacation at a resort in France, with everything except sandals put away for the entire duration. The strangeness of shirt and shorts to depart there was almost as strange as becoming a naturist many years before. As regards sex-life; being nude together promotes an appreciation of the pleasure that can be given one to another.There is a difference in nudism or naturalism and pornography. Nudism believes in the freedom from the restrictions of clothing, Porn is for sexual gratification.


Enjoy our clothing free lifestyle!

http://www.naturistmingle.com
46
37
Rating: +9
kokoro
I think, like Dave Quist, that we should ban scantily clad men and women in ads. Advertisers should be lawfully compelled to completely uncover these men and women to remove all the titilation. Our perverse views of the body come from covering it up; not from exposing it.

Please add to your nude events, Kokoro Dance's 13th annual Wreck Beach Butoh performances on Saturday, July 5 @ 1:30 PM and Sunday, July 6 @ 2:15 PM at the foot of the #4 trail below the Museum of Anthropology.

Jay Hirabayashi
Executive Director
Kokoro Dance
27
36
Rating: -9
kokoro
Urbanstrain: Intolerance is a sign of acute imbelicity.
39
40
Rating: -1
Korky Day
Korky Day

The commenter "urbanstrain" is mistaking the whole world for his own private strip club. Unlike him, I am man enough to accept women instead for what they are and for what they choose to be. Our nudist movement is the alternative to strip clubs, instead promoting the rights and acceptance of everyone and everyone's body, not some jerk's self-centred fantasy.
Coming nude events: www.korky.ca/nfirc.html
29
36
Rating: -7
urbanstrain
Kokoro: Using words that don't exist in the English language to insult someone is a sign of stupidity.
51
32
Rating: +19
urbanstrain
Korky: Your assumption that I am a man could only be a result of your own stereotypical gender-bias.

Nudism/naturism is nothing less then a mask for voyeurism and a branch of the past paganesque rituals which were weeded out by moral progress.
Rating: -531
okanagan
There are lots of casual situations where guys feel free to take their shirts off. It is just common sense that it shouldn't be different for women. It is interesting that urbanstrain jumped in with a first comment not on gender-inequality, but on body-types. It sounds like somebody has bought into the supermarket tabloids' idea of "ideal" bodies and missed the article's point that it is time to relax and just enjoy life. Personally, I don't care what people choose to wear (or not), but I am offended by misbehavior. like making rude and hurtful remarks about somebody. It seems to me that "moral progress" comes precisely from discarding things like insult and "voyeurism" and instead treating each other with respect regardless of gender or clothing. It sounds like wherever "nudity is the new normal" that "moral progress" is indeed being made, thanks to an atmosphere of cheerful tolerance, civic confidence and inter-personal respect.
34
34
Rating: 0
John Lucas
"There are lots of casual situations where guys feel free to take their shirts off."

Am I alone in fervently wishing this were not true? When did all sense of decorum go out the window in our society?
35
55
Rating: -20
phantastik
You list your (print) article many planned events this summer for those that enjoy the nudists lifestyle.

While I am not sure what side of the fence I am on towards this issue, I do think that mooning an Amtrack train as one of your highlighted events is downright rude.

Why is there such a need to be rude towards Americans in this part of the county, including offering synopsis and theory towards 9-11?

Sure, their government has not made the best decisions in recent years, but to blame every American because of it is just wrong.

British Columbians are the most judgemental people I have ever met, and ironic as your own backyard is a mess.

Grow up British Columbia, and you might just see more of those Americans reappering in your province with dollars to spend.

46
25
Rating: +21
uli
urbanstrain, your ignorance almost exceeds your insolence: "imbelicity" IS a proper word and is defined as "mental retardation"
43
32
Rating: +11
John Lucas
No, uli, "imbelicity" is not a word. You're thinking of "imbecility".
49
45
Rating: +4
Pieta Woolley
I'm interested in why, of all the questionable things people do in public in this city, being nude even rates at all.

Here's a short list of things I'd like to see become criminal offenses, rather than public nudity:

1. Spitting great horks of phlegm on the sidewalk
2. Refusing to give up seats to elderly / disabled people on public transit
3. Designing ugly buildings - and building them!
4. Walking with umbrellas under awnings
5. Boosterish events of any kind (ugh)
6. Barking espresso orders at baristas while half-talking on a cell phone
7. Staring
8. Too much make up and self-grooming (gives me the willies. Do you think you're in New York, or something? Geez. Relax)
9. Fitness activities that take up too much room on the sidewalk
10. Carrying status bags
31
27
Rating: +4
Craig Takeuchi
As for Parrott not understanding why more women won't expose their bodies, well, a lot of women don't want to be harassed, ogled, or stalked by men.
That's why it's okay for men to take their shirts off. They won't be harassed by women.
Yet if a woman can't go topless, why is it okay for man with bigger boobs than some women to go topless?
Or men with hairy backs that look like they could use a weedeater?
49
30
Rating: +19
Jeeves.Jeeves
Hey, a cow is a cow. Regardless of one's opinions on nudity, FAT and UGLY are concepts anyone can observe. This hideous woman can be as naked as wants, just not in our face.
32
39
Rating: -7
toolbin
toolbin
I welcome all opportunities for nudity in an appropriate settings. Beaches, pools, hot springs, hot tubs, private and semiprivate settings in general. The human body should be celebrated not shamed. I salute Kimberly for her attitude and conviction. That said, indiscriminate public nudity is a more complex question as it does impact on others' sensibilities. There is a time and place for everything!

The use of 'nudity' for it's 'shock value' in protests may actually be counter productive to the acceptance of nudity more generally. You can't always have it both ways!

I also agree that there are an untold number of disgraceful public behaviors so much more objectionable than nudity. Among the most shocking to me is discouraging or harassing a woman wishing to (breast) feedd her child in a public place.
41
42
Rating: -1
nekid4u
good for Kimberley. Bravo!! she is absolutely within her rights to go topless, just as men have had that same freedom for hundreds of years. I hope there is more woman that follow Kimberly's example of excercising a woman's rights and baring it all topless in Canada,
27
37
Rating: -10
Sovereign
In the article: “I recognize their right to go do that [be naked], but I don’t want their rights to interfere with my rights not to be offended, not to have my children see that, and so that’s where we run into conflict.”

But check your charter of rights and freedoms. Even look at the US bill of rights. Nowhere does either say you have the right "not to be offended". Grant that right and all of society would come to a screeching halt, because whatever it is, someone will be offended by it.

What people DO have is the right to look away. The right to teach their children "that's not what we do in our family, but in their family it's ok - why? we have different values."

A person going nude in public isn't forcing anyone else to go nude. Why are the clothed always trying to force others to cover up? Liberty is full control of yourself and the very small space immediately around you. That's it.
29
25
Rating: +4
Arthur Harland
Freedom in choice means just that. If a lady want to go topless that is not the laws concern.
33
62
Rating: -29
Servant
God's wrath is coming to Canada! Soon, you will notice what areas of Canada He judges most harshly. The public has not listened to the Lord God of the heaven and the earth, but has gone after the things that are not of this life, but after the things of the spirit of the devil!
21
39
Rating: -18

Pages

Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.