Dermod Travis: Election campaigns don't come cheap in B.C.

Comments

They're off. The start to B.C.'s official precampaign period for the 2013 election campaign is well underway. 

Day one of the precampaign would have been an easy miss, coming as it did on the same day a meteor crashed to earth and the Canucks fell to the Dallas Stars. 

Heck, Elections B.C. didn't even post a news release to honour the occasion on its website.

But as of February 15, B.C.'s political parties are now restricted to spending no more than $1.15 million each and their 85 candidates a combined $6.2 million before the actual election writ is dropped in April. At that point they'll be able to spend a further $4.6 million and their candidates another $6.2 million.

All told, B.C.'s 24 political parties can theoretically spend $18.2 million each leading to the May 14 election. That's some serious coin.

Looked at from another angle, each party can spend $5.95 per voter through the precampaign and campaign periods trying to win their hearts and minds.  

Compare that $5.95 to what candidates at the federal level can spend. 

In the 2011 federal election, candidates could spend $2.07 for each of the first 15,000 voters in their riding, $1.04 for each of the next 10,000, and 52 cents for each of the remaining voters. Their party could spend a further 70 cents for every voter in every riding where they ran a candidate. 

For Vancouver Centre that would have translated into $100,555 for the candidate and a further $70,000 for the party. Nothing to sneeze at, but all of $1.71 per voter. 

To put the difference between the federal and provincial limits into better context, had the provincial limit been in place in Vancouver Centre for the federal campaign, candidates and their parties could have spent just shy of $600,000 each.

By way of a provincial comparison, Quebec just lowered its spending limit from $11.5 million to $8 million, or $1.35 per voter. A province with twice the number of registered voters has an overall limit that is less than half the limit in B.C. 

If a party can raise $18.2 million—there are only two parties in B.C. that conceivably can—they'll likely spare no expense. And as a result voters might begin to feel a teeny bit inundated with TV ads, robocalls, lawn signs, and campaign paraphernalia over the coming weeks. 

But nothing in the Election Act says that a party has to spend its entire campaign war chest equally across all ridings or split it equitably among all registered voters. 

With $5.95 per voter available, party strategists have the luxury of being able to afford the latest technologies, voter ID systems, and get-out-the-vote software to get the absolute best electoral bang for their buck. 

And as some B.C. voters are about to find out, not all voters are created equal in the eyes of those  strategists. Some are about to be more inundated than others.

The B.C. Liberals will run candidate Gurjit Dhillon against NDP leader Adrian Dix in Vancouver-Kingsway, but they won't run a real “let's win this one for the Gipper” campaign. And the NDP will run a candidate against Andrew Wilkinson in Vancouver-Quilchena, but they won't be holding their breath in the hope of eking out a victory, fully funded or not.

Of course, party leaders will say all the right things to deny the obvious: we're campaigning for the votes of all British Columbians, we don't take any vote for granted, or we're running to win in all 85 ridings. 

But after all that voter identification, statistical analysis, and polling, strategists know very well that there's likely less than 250,000 voters living in less than half of B.C.'s 85 ridings who will actually count on May 14. And the two main parties will fish where the fish are.

One of the other unfortunate consequences of narrowcasting campaign resources on fewer and fewer voters is a steady decline in voter turnout, as more and more voters feel they've been taken for granted or just plain ignored. 

And when the price of admission is set so high as almost to bar pretenders, is it any surprise that third parties like the Greens and the Conservatives or independent candidates find it difficult to break through?

With two parties on the prowl for $18.2 million each, there's not much left over for the also-rans. Just a bit of loose change and pocket lint.

Dermod Travis is the executive director of IntegrityBC. www.integritybc.ca.

Comments (6) Add New Comment
Stephen Rees
While I did know that, reading it has made me feel a lot better about my poor showing for the Green Party in Richmond East last time. It never occurred to me to work out how much each vote cost the campaign - but then I did not think I was "buying votes". I had this silly idea that people voted based on what the cadidates' policies were. Naive wasn't I
2
5
Rating: -3
Argulion
I suggest people take note of who funds a political party because that is who the party executive actually works for. IMO, most politicians place constituents first only in election years and the rest of the time they are under party executive orders to support the party/funders interests.
5
3
Rating: +2
iSheep
Yes Elections are expensive but compared to the size of the BC Economy + the Government Budget & the Gross mismanagement with large deficits by the Con-servative BC Lie-berals its Chump Change compared to the...

* BC Rail Fiasco + Legal Fees

* $565 Million for a leaky Tarp Roof

* Billions in Enron style off Balance Sheet PPP Power Contracts force fed to BC Hydro to pay via you & I the BC People, aka Corporate Welfare,

* Billions in deficits for the OWE-lympics brought to you by a convicted Drunk Driver.

So $18 million is relatively cheap for a chance at Democratic reform once every 4-5 years.
7
4
Rating: +3
Ted Campbell
The people of B.C. are fed up with both the Liberals (who really aren't Liberal) and the N.D.P. Christie Clark is the most inept Premier this province has ever had and people Adrian Dix is untrustworthy. At first glance one might think we're caught between twiddle dum and twiddle dee but there is a third alternate. We keep hearing about Independants. This could be the opportunity for British Columbia to end up with good governance. An honest person with Harry Truman-like qualities could run a low-cost campaign, just a few hundred plastic road signs and a campaign slogan "If you don't want more of the same vote Independant" The right person could walk right up the centre with a promise to give short term support as long as whoever gets the nod runs a clean show. And the Legislature must sit three times a year. What a shock it would be to have a government that actually answered to representatives of the people.





1
4
Rating: -3
Slappy
Ted,

Are there more than two party choices on the ballot?

The voting public cannot help it if they are dumb.
2
2
Rating: 0
Ted Campbell
Slappy
The Greens and that cranky old man live in a fantasy world. They don't have a hope of being the balance of power. The reality is that half-a-dozen good people could put us back on track no matter who is the nominal Premier.
1
4
Rating: -3
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.