B.C. child-care advocates say sector is in crisis

Comments

Sharon Gregson has observed firsthand some of the challenges facing parents with young children, and early childhood educators in B.C.

Poll

Do you support creating a publicly funded child-care system that would cost B.C. parents $10 a day?

Yes 82%
241 votes
No 13%
39 votes
Unsure 4%
13 votes

Common situations that the long-time child-care advocate, who’s the director of child and family development services at Collingwood Neighbourhood House, has seen include families being forced to leave licensed daycares because they can’t afford the fees, and early childhood educators leaving the field because they are still making $16 an hour after more than a decade of work.

It’s a reality that Gregson says is only getting worse, as costs continue to increase each year. And with the provincial election approaching, advocates are ramping up their campaign for politicians to address the issue.

“The biggest crisis for families with young children at the moment is childcare, and so that needs to be front and centre,” Gregson told the Georgia Straight by phone.

As a spokesperson for the Coalition of Child Care Advocates of B.C., Gregson is at the forefront of calls for a publicly funded child-care system that would cost parents $10 a day. Since the coalition, along with the Early Childhood Educators of B.C., released the $10-a-day proposal in 2011, Gregson said it has “taken off like a house on fire”. Supporters include labour organizations, more than 15 municipalities, and over a dozen school districts.

“What this has done now is increased expectations that it is going to be an election issue, and that the NDP has to put something better on the table than the Liberals have in their budget/election platform,” Gregson said. “And the message to those people who want to be elected in May is that if you commit to the goals of the $10-a-day plan, you’ll garner votes, and if you’re silent on it or ignore it, then you’ll lose votes.”

The plan calls for childcare to be moved under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education, and for early care and learning programs for infants, toddlers, and three- to five-year-olds to be integrated as part of neighbourhood and community networks. The groups also want to see fees capped at $10 a day for full-time childcare and $7 a day for part-time, with no user fees for families with an annual income of less than $40,000.

According to Gregson, the average daycare cost for a child under the age of three in Vancouver is $1,200 a month, while fees at large commercial centres have reached $1,900 a month per child.

“Unless you’re incredibly wealthy or incredibly lucky, nobody easily affords that, and the subsidy that’s available for very low-income families is so difficult to quality for and so low that, if you are poor enough to qualify for subsidy, it means you’re too poor to pay the difference between the subsidy and the actual fee,” she said.

Parents also face long waiting lists and extra costs to secure their child a daycare spot. Devyn Cousineau, a mother of two young children, is already paying for childcare for her seven-month-old daughter, even though she will be on maternity leave for another four to five months. She noted she only secured a spot after getting on waiting lists when she was pregnant with her son.

“I signed up for every wait list in the city, and that was the only call I’ve gotten,” she said in a phone interview. “We were quite lucky in our timing, but it’s still been a pretty expensive proposition.”

The groups behind the $10-a-day plan say the child-care sector itself is also in crisis, and is struggling to retain staff.

“After about five years, over half of the qualified staff that have education leave the field for something else,” Emily Mlieczko, the executive director of the Early Childhood Educators, told the Straight by phone.

The average wage for early childhood educators and assistants in B.C. is about $16.50 an hour, according to Mlieczko. The plan calls for a wage increase to an average of $25 an hour plus benefits.

At full implementation, the plan would cost an estimated $1.5 billion annually. But Gregson said initial measures, such as a commitment of $88 million to immediately reduce fees at infant and toddler centres to $10 a day, could be funded for less than the amount the B.C. government allocated to an early childhood tax benefit in its fiscal plan. The provincial budget also allocated $76 million for improving childcare over three years, including $32 million for the creation of new spaces.

The Coalition of Child Care Advocates plans to make its demand for a $10-a-day system heard as part of a march to B.C. premier Christy Clark’s constituency office on Saturday (March 9). The “noise parade” will begin at Jericho Beach at 11 a.m. 

Comments (19) Add New Comment
PJ
Child care ,homless,poor,parks in dissaray and climate change.There must be an election full of promisses coming ,no mony but prommises.Can you say TAX INCREASE
30
29
Rating: +1
Dianne
I once read: "Everytime you spend money, you are casting a vote for the kind of world you want."

Clearly the same can be said about everytime a government makes service cuts, you shape the community/province/country you live in.

The research fills the shelves when it comes to the + impacts of QUALITY LICENSED NOT FOR PROFIT child care, the evidence shows the short and long term benefits for children/families/communities/employers, parents cant work without it, and ALL governments find money for spending in other areas according to their priorities.

I say make some new decisions on spending AND YES if we need to increase some taxes for social programs, PLEASE count me in!
44
28
Rating: +16
cHriSTy
I don't really mind, just as long as I can continue to bilk the taxpayer for my expensive wine & restaurants, body
shop, etc.
21
22
Rating: -1
Green Billy
This would be terrible for the environment, it's simply encouraging people to have more children by subsidizing their daycare. Forget the money, what is the long-term carbon bill for this misguided project?
24
48
Rating: -24
RUK
I think the question of irresponsible parents emitting children that they have little practical hope of supporting is a good one, if an ugly one that raises horrific stereotypes and China-style extreme childbirth restriction.

However, you deal with what you got. Seems to me that parents who are overwhelmed with parenting have little way of upgrading their skills and getting work. Therefore, there is an obvious business case for public money to go to child care.

I do think it should be means tested.
31
21
Rating: +10
Kate
People have children. Many good people work hard to raise good children. Loved and cared for children who have access to education, healthy food, cultural and recreational opportunities, safe and warm places to sleep, become healthier adults. Your tax dollars stretch a lot further when you support children and families than they do subsidizing illness, poverty, and the justice system for adults. If you don't have or want children, no problem, but please be supportive and thankful for the many who do. One day, their children may be your nurse, doctor, plumber, or lawyer. You'll probably prefer that they were raised to be good ones.
56
19
Rating: +37
Jeff
^ here, here. Well said, Kate.
17
17
Rating: 0
Park Board Commissioner Constance Barnes
The Vancouver Park Board passed a motion unanimously last term to support the Early Care & Learning Plan. We not only see the value of working with the Education system to make this happen but the great opportunity for families to have safe and affordable child care. Our community centers have long wait lists and I hear time and time again that more spaces are needed. As a single mom I truly struggled to find ANY affordable care let alone child care in my own neighborhood for my 2 little ones.It made it almost impossible to provide all that was needed for them. Being able to be out in the work force meant that I was paying taxes which then gets put back into the "system". I was able to support my local eateries and buy local goods. All in all it is really about great safe and consistent support for families, children and our community! Keep up the great work Sharon and I look forward to making some noise with you on Saturday!
30
18
Rating: +12
Caroline
Investing in childcare makes sense - Child poverty in BC is the second highest in all of Canada. The cost of childcare is the second highest expenditure a family has besides housing. By reducing this cost you are lifting families out of poverty, letting women enter the workforce or go to school and increasing the local economy. It Makes Sense!
26
16
Rating: +10
NoLeftNutter
Anyone notice the dichotomy of users paying less and workers getting more in this grand $1.5 billion dollar plan. That means that every BC taxpayer gets dinged for another $1,000 per year just because lots of people without the means to afford to have kids continue to believe it is their right to do so...
15
27
Rating: -12
Pete
NoLeftNutter; I agree,a lot of children are born by girls lovers not wanting their to wear condoms,or the heat of the moment thing.Educating girls as to the cost and time needed to raise a child is needed in schools.First time perents probably have no idea what is required of them,then when they get pregnant they run to the parents or chidwelfare.Perenting is a large resposibility not to be taken lightly.
11
16
Rating: -5
abby house
I actually support early childhood learning and think it would benefit society. But there need to be changes to our system in order for it to work. We cannot fund all these social programs to the extent that is being proposed - how. Everyone is going to have to contribute at some level which would probably mean more taxes, no more child tax credits or family tax credits, and people will have to pay user fees to see the doctor or go to the hospital. That would be a start. It cannot be a "free" system because it is not a free system.
7
11
Rating: -4
babs
I have a PhD, both my husband and I work, we are well educated, working parents but with two kids 4 and under we still struggle to pay our mortgage AND childcare in this city. It's not a matter of parents that don't have education and have no money and need to be on welfare. we are talking also about young professional couples that choose to have children in their thirties and still try to balance having a family, careers and starting a solid life in this city. I'm lucky that we have a spot in an fantastic daycare that is a non-for-profit in east Van (Eaglets in the sky!) but still a lot more can be done for young families in this province. I strongly support the $10/day plan and I hope that together with other very important issues like the environment, the pipeline etc, this becomes a central topic in the next political election.
16
15
Rating: +1
Aldona
The cost of childcare is enormous for everyone. Single parents are really strapped as they need childcare to get to work. There is no option but to work, and put the children in childcare. At the moment, childcare is unaffordable, and in many cases costs more than a monthly budget to feed a family of three.
12
9
Rating: +3
Kids First Parent Association of Canada
Doesn't hurt to check the facts media - maybe get another view...

To help families, fund families directly, not daycare centres, bureaucracies, admin staff, builders, etc. Let parents freely choose the care we want - including parental child care, the hands down favourite that gives the most bang for the buck.

Sweden had the largest daycare system in the world - cost of about $25,000/yr/kids 1-5. OECD and Swed gov says "quality" is a problem, there are "unintended consequences". Teens there test way below Can on OECD PISA tests.

We are tired of subsidizing the economy and the daycare system with our (mostly mums') unwaged family care work. And yes it is work. Many low income families are 'low income' exactly because we have prioritized doing child care for our own kids.

The daycare fees do not reflect the actual cost - the full cost of centre care is at least twice the fee (CRRU ECE in Canada 1998). Most of the cost is paid for by taxes. BTW SFU and UBC daycare centres have all their admin, rent, land, capital, and janitorial costs covered by the university (taxpayers again).

All kids need child care 24/7/365. Those parents and kids who do not use daycare centre care have much higher child care costs mainly in the form of opportunity costs - forgone income - which do not get the massive subsidy.

Under 10% of kids 0-5 in BC are in centres - under 15% Canada wide (Stats Can 20006 child care study)

Subsidizing the daycare lobby's lobbying is another major cost that takes $ away from kids and families. The Human Early Learning Partnership (HELP) at UBC which came up with the $10/day promo is almost 100% tax funded.

Be fair.
10
11
Rating: -1
Chantel
You are kidding me right? What else should we ask the government to pay for? Because the money just falls from the sky right? Taxes don't ever increase to pay for things we want right? I am a licensed child care facility and don't charge outlandish fees. While I feel for people living in the lower mainland, this does NOT reflect the rest of the province. My parents pay me $50-100 per month above the subsidy rates; hardly difficult for parents to do. To fund an initiative for one city of an entire province is just plain ridiculous. Oh right, there is no other part of the province other than the lower mainland right?
5
12
Rating: -7
colleen moore
Chantel perhaps government reduce could reduce most of a corporations taxes you know corporations gotta eat "people up." That is right government did that already that is why there is little left for vital services so families can work so they can keep themselves and their children alive. Did you know it takes a community to raise a child? Or perhaps government could create a carbon tax the hurts business while rewarding the big corporate polluters with carbon tax dollars. Oh that is right done that. How about the HST for big business who can't seem to downsize enough while hiring foreign workers because BC isn't into education but advertising how great things are "NOT" as workers barely make enough to be alive.
7
6
Rating: +1
Be the Change
The government needs to encourage a climate,
where mothers can stay home to raise and nuture
and guide their chikdren, during the early years,
supplemented at age 3 by part-time preschool, which
is proven to help children adjust to Kindergarten
and address any red flags related to learning and
implement those supports for Kindergarten.

The economic climate forces both parents to work,
due to ever rising cost of living and raising a
family.

What happens to our precious children...they are left
to the care of others, sometimes left for hours at
Daycare, evenings are a rush for meals and homework,
many necessities done haphazardly, due to time constraints and an exhausted mother.......children
may be expected to do homework on their own and if
struggling..no time to see teachers or help child
at home.

Kids are left at home, after scvhool to play video games and no parent to greet them and ask how their
day has been going.

Parents missing special school events and milestone
moments and having to pay exorbitant day care costs.

I would like the government to provide a tax credit for
a parent, who looks after their children at home.
6
7
Rating: -1
Tara
To the child-haters: Too bad your parents didn't think about the cost of raising idiots.

To the thinkers out there: Look at the big picture. Subsidizing child care is good for the economy and families: Every dollar invested in high quality childcare programs increases our GDP by $2.30. Good child care will stimulate local economies, contribute to women’s equality and make Canada more competitive. We're well behind other OECD countries on childcare spending.

- Mum to a six month old who's trying to work and make sure her kid gets stimulating, quality care.
10
4
Rating: +6
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.