Gwynne Dyer: The risk of miscalculation between North and South Korea

Comments

The joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises known as “Key Resolve” and “Foal Eagle” have got underway, and so far the heavens have not fallen.

The American forces have not launched an unprovoked assault on North Korea, despite the strident claims of Pyongyang’s media that the exercises are a cover for exactly such a plan. In fact, joint exercises on this scale—they only involve 13,000 American and South Korean troopshave been held every year of the past 40, and pose no threat whatever to North Korea.

Neither has North Korea chosen to “defend its sovereignty”, as it recently threatened to do, by launching pre-emptive nuclear strikes against both the United States and South Korea. It could certainly do huge damage to South Korea, bur despite its successful nuclear and missile tests in the past three months it still lacks all but the most rudimentary capability to hit the United States.

Pyongyang’s nuclear test in February had twice the explosive power of the last one in 2009, but nobody believes North Korea’s claim that it has also made its bomb small enough to fit on the tip of an intercontinental ballistic missile.

Nor does the Unha-3 missile, which Pyongyang used to launch a satellite in December, have the guidance systems and re-entry technology necessary to deliver such a nuclear weapon onto an American targetwhich would have to be in western Alaska, since that is the limit of the rocket’s range.

There is no doubt that Kim Jong-un’s regime is feeling extremely peeved about the international response to its weapon and missile tests, which has included tighter United Nations trade sanctions that got unanimous support in the Security Council. Even North Korea’s only ally, China, voted for them.

In a particularly peevish gesture, he has even cut the military hotline between the two sides at Panmunjom. (If you think there’s going to be a crisis, the last thing you want is a secure and rapid means of talking to the other side.) But it’s really just an empty gesture: an alternative military communications line, used to monitor cross-border workers at the Kaesong Industrial Complex, remains open.

But it’s a long way from feeling peeved to feeling suicidal. Any North Korean nuclear attack on an American target would be answered by immediate U.S. strikes that would annihilate the military and civilian leadership in Pyongyang, obliterate its nuclear facilities, and probably destroy much else besides. So North Korea’s threat to launch a “pre-emptive” nuclear strike against the United States, or even against South Korea, is totally implausible.

However, the young and inexperienced North Korean leader may feel the need to prove his mettle to his own military commanders by taking some more limited action against the US-South Korean exercises. That sort of thing can easily go wrong.

There is a widespread perception in South Korea that Seoul was caught off-guard by North Korea’s sinking of the warship Cheonan and its artillery attacks on Yeonpyeong island in 2010. North Korea paid no military price for either action, and South Korea’s newly elected president, Park Geun-hye, who took office only two weeks ago, needs to show South Koreans that she is not going to let that happen again.

She probably also hopes that a promise of prompt and severe retaliation will deter North Korea from any future attacks of that sort. So she has engaged in some rhetorical escalation of her own.

She has warned North Korea that any further attacks will be met by instant retaliation that targets not only the units involved in the attack, but also North Korea’s high command. No doubt this is only intended to deter any such North Korean attack, but in practice it means that there will be much more rapid and uncontrollable escalation if Pyongyang makes a token attack anyway.

Even a conventional war in the Korean peninsula would be hugely destructive. Just north of the “Demilitarised Zone” between the two countries is the largest concentration of artillery in the entire world, and the mega-city of Seoul is within long artillery range of the border.

North Korea’s population is considerably smaller than South Korea’s, but the North maintains the fourth largest army in the world. Its armed forces operate mostly last-generation weaponry, but the equipment is well maintained and the soldiers appear to be well trained. The last war between the two countries killed over a million people and left all the peninsula’s cities in ruinsand that was over sixty years ago.

If North Korea ignored Park’s warning and made some local attack to demonstrate its displeasure, and Park then felt obliged to act on her threat to go after the North Korean leadership in Pyongyang in retaliation, things could get very ugly very fast.

So far the U.S.-South Korean exercises have gone off smoothly, but the risk of a serious miscalculation first in Pyongyang and then in Seoul is real, and the exercises still have more than a week (until March 25) to run.

Comments (10) Add New Comment
Alex
Time to burst the abscess I say. This Stalinist regime, straight out of the fifties got its chances. Now, no more mister nice guy.
16
31
Rating: -15
Johncan45
North Korea can start a war but they can't win one since they are inferior militarily. They can't make peace either though, since they are as well so inferior economically and in every other aspect that they'd just get absorbed by South Korea. They remember what happened to East Germany, so they're keeping their wall up. Thus their policy is to bluster, threaten, say crazy things and occasionally draw some blood so the world takes them seriously. A very risky strategy but really it's the only option Pyongyang has. If you're holding a crap hand and you don't want to fold with all your chips on the table, you bluff. Bluff like a madman.
38
9
Rating: +29
Why Bother Thinking Before You Type ?
Alex

"Time to burst the abscess I say"

Get to it, keyboard warrior.

What, you havent enlisted yet ?

Exactly.

37
12
Rating: +25
DavidH
Unfinished business can be a terrible thing.

"We" didn't finish in Korea, and we will pay the price soon. "We" have also failed to finish in Afghanistan and Iraq ... which will also come back to bite us.

I don't support or advocate war and bloodshed anywhere, but once it starts, finish it or shut up.
19
15
Rating: +4
Your Mom
Oh yeah, we just forgot that magic "wipe up the enemy" wand to end wars and smite our enemies. Because, of course, the South Koreans and Americans (and Canadians) weren' really trying to win that war. Sheesh, if only the would have tried a little harder, and died a little less.

The only way to finish a war is to stop fighting. Subjugate your enemies, and you will have a nice, long, civil war to endure.
19
12
Rating: +7
duke30458
The insanity of this NK dialogue only emphacizes there is NO telling what this desparate leader and his Generals will do. U guess they will not elect nuclear annilation by provoking such a large response with a trigger act.

What IF a SK is sucker punched by a smuggled nuke? Will we nuke in response? Hmmmmm... they could shout WE did it or it was our nuke accident. These guys are not crazy...or insane... but power mad - a dangerous mind.

Toss in Iran (perhaps a friend to them) and the coming Israel assault on Iran IF that path is not altered by events, this is a very dangerous year for "getting out of control" on war. The nuke exchange started is NEW danger - the MAJOR powers with lots of nukes could be sucked in slyly by the minor nuke wannabe's.

Pray. This hangman's noose is getting tighter for our world. A minor appearing nuclear tit for tat may not be possible with major cities anywhere destroyed and millions gone. That is a lot of empowerment to those loved ones wanting eye for eye.

Go Figure... and pray some more ... believe in the power of prayer and I am very hopeful our new Pope will lead such a revival. And I am not Catholic, but you have to love the Man so far!
14
10
Rating: +4
Alan Layton
This is mainly a fight between US and China, especially China. NK is not only a buffer for China, but a land ripe for plucking. It has valuable natural resources and a very cheap workforce. Despite all of the sanctions the quality of life in NK has actually increased in recent years and China is the one to thank for that. China has been and will continue to be the main factor preventing the unification of the Korean Peninsula.
8
5
Rating: +3
nitroglycol
In the Globe the other day there was an article by someone who'd taken a tour of the DPRK with some Chinese businesspeople. One of those businesspeople remarked that the DPRK looked like China did in the 1970s. Depending on how you look at it that could be seen as either very bad, or somewhat promising (since China did improve, after all).
2
2
Rating: 0
Macsrw
Its just hot talk. Even if the North decided to attack the South, the South has immensely greater airpower, and within an hour of the guns firing on Seoul, those artillery positions would mostly be smoking craters, and the North would back off and devise a way to present the clash as some immense victory to its own people. The South wouldnt pursue it too much, because at the end of the day, they dont want the North Korean regime to suddenly collapse, because they know they are the ones who will be expected to pick up its mess. China certainly would not stand by NK in such a situation, so we can rule out a third world war coming out of this. Worst case scenario, there would be a week long conflict that would probably kill dozens, if not hundreds of people, but it would fall far short of anything on an apocalyptic scale.
9
2
Rating: +7
OceanEscape
I think after 50 years of Pyongyang rule you could bomb the North into suppression with food drops alone.

What horror stories do trickle out of the North suggest they are tired of eating tree bark.
4
2
Rating: +2
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.