Conservatives’ RCMP legislation may violate charter of rights, critics say

Comments

Before the House of Commons approved third and final reading of a bill that amends the RCMP Act, Winnipeg Centre NDP MP Pat Martin brought up the name of Edgar Schmidt.

Schmidt is a senior justice department lawyer, and the reason why he’s relevant to the debate has something to do not only with this specific measure but also with the way Ottawa has been crafting legislation in general.

Schmidt has sued the justice department, claiming that since the 1990s, the federal government has been introducing legislative bills that likely violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

“The Conservatives cannot tell me that they are not launching stuff into this House of Commons that may not have been vetted properly by the Department of Justice officials, as according to whistleblower Edgar Schmidt,” Martin said during the debate on March 6.

“In actual fact, bills arrive here in a state that should not be passed, that deserve to be analyzed further, criticized and scrutinized and have the merits of their arguments tested by legitimate debate in the House of Commons, the way God wanted it,” Martin continued.

To this, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews sarcastically retorted: “Mr. Speaker, I know that member is closer to God than I am, and so I will have to take his word on that.”

For ex-Mountie Rob Creasser, the point about legislative measures being introduced in Parliament despite the risk that they run afoul of the charter is important.

The Mounted Police Professional Association of Canada, of which Creasser is a spokesperson, believes that certain provisions of Bill C-42, or the Enhancing Royal Canadian Mounted Police Accountability Act, go against the charter.

According to Creasser, included in Bill C-42 are provisions that compel RCMP officers to provide incriminating evidence against themselves, which ordinary Canadians being investigated for wrongdoing are protected against.

The measure will also allow searches of officers’ homes for non-criminal proceedings, the former Mountie said.

It’s the Senate’s turn to debate Bill C-42. With Conservative enjoying a majority in the chamber, the measure is headed toward becoming law.

“This government seems to be boldly carrying on knowing full well that it probably isn’t charter-compliant but basically saying, ‘Take us to court’,” Creasser told the Straight in a phone interview.

Public Safety Canada didn’t grant the Straight’s request for an interview.

Comments (14) Add New Comment
bowser
Members of the RCMP should have the same rights as all Canadian citizens. I know that's expecting a lot in a country where criminals have more rights than victims.
45
8
Rating: +37
Snicker
The CONs don't believe in rights and freedoms for individuals. It hinders totalitarianism and the rights and freedoms of corporations. They did little, if anything to acknowledge the last anniversary of Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But sure like to spend money on celebrating wars.
29
7
Rating: +22
PJ
Snicker: The high court has already said that the chrter of rights has so many GREY areas,and it should have been scrutinized better,but the Mr,Finger Trudo pushed it through anyway.Thats why the courts are over used becouse of charter of rights being so OVER USED to sue for the stupitest things,as someone looked funny at me eg.
11
22
Rating: -11
Gordon Chamberlain
Harper has again shown disregard for the Charter and to preforming their duties to the best of their ability. Negligence and lack of integrity are become common occurrences of this government. On the subject of negligence despite having written to PM Haper 12 times since 2009 on the concern that large scale long term damage of our environment posed a threat to effort to live sustainably and should be recognized as ecocide and subject to criminal prosecution and eventually by the international Criminal Court. Stephen Harper has never responded or taken action to protect Canadians from a group that can be described as radical fundamentalist capitalist. To find out more visit Eradicating Ecocide . Com
16
7
Rating: +9
Snicker
PJ. The more times it goes through the courts the more presidents are set and the fewer holes there are. And, it wasn't just Trudeau that created the Charter, every province had a say in it's creation. If you need to blame one for poor scrutiny, blame them all.
18
5
Rating: +13
neil
This act would allow the RCMP to search a member's home for something non criminal...for example if a member sent an email from their residence that was considered offensive by anyone (and I know that's no excuse for that behaviour), the RCMP could obtain a search warrant and enter the person's home, seize their computer and use it in a discipline hearing where no criminal court would have the opportunity to scrutinize that warrant for it's veracity. The courts have always been the buffer to rein in abuse of power in these matters but they would be left out of the loop. How is that fair?
12
4
Rating: +8
Doug
This is shameful. Both the Commissioner of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety undoubtedly know that the Charter of Rights applies to us all. The rest of us better be very worried if the RCMP can search the homes of its police officers for non-criminal matters.....us normal folk don't stand a hope in hell now if this is what they will do to their own. How dare they? What about the families and children in the homes when the Mounties bust into their own officers' homes. This is outrageous that the Government will allow this bill to proceed. Is this Canada?
10
4
Rating: +6
Peter
re Gordon Chamberlain : WHAT are you blabbing about.Look in your own back yard at the loony gov of BC non of these parties has ever done any good for the province and they are reelected all the time.Maybe next time you write to the paper stay off the whacky tobbaco a while.
5
7
Rating: -2
Forced out
This piece of Legislation will also be used to eliminate Sworn Civilian Members from the RCMP and force them to be part of the Public Service. This will negatively effect their benefits, pay, and pension. Civilian Members have been an integral part of the RCMP for over 50 years and now with little consultation or media attention they will be forced out.
10
4
Rating: +6
ACMESalesRep
@bowser: “I know that's expecting a lot in a country where criminals have more rights than victims.” Such as? What rights do criminals have that victims in this country don't? Simple: None. Criminals have no rights that aren't shared by the rest of us, forty years of “tough on crime” brainwashing notwithstanding. It's an utterly ridiculous myth that needs to be put to bed once and for all.
6
7
Rating: -1
JUDITH HARROWER
The implemenation method used to pass this Bill C-42 is yet another masive one encompassing huge changes hidden within. The process for this bill started with Galliford's orchestrated sexual harrassment, eliminating one of the three candidates, the second too outspokenand head strong leaving one whom the PM could manipulate, muzzle and who would be made to tow the line. The RCMP are becoming Harper's own private force, 18 TAVs given to the RCMP but not the forces fighting in Afghistan, another terrorist unit set up in Edmonton, and now within this bill the consent to break Canadian and International laws by using information obtained by torture - next step using torture to obtain information. RCMP are to be at arm's length from thr gov't, but as with so many chiefs all lack clout, controlled by the PM, including the GG who has over 20 international trips spouting Harper's agenda - trade. That is not the role of a GG but hey Harper is king undo himself. Ever wonder how dictators/autocrates rise to power? The passing of this bill was orchestrated in 2011 with utter disregard for the rank/file, or impact on crime reduction.
Obama has indicated the war on terrorism is ending but as with so many other matters, Harper carries on as though he is at the forefront. Lacking any credibility on the world stage Harper has focused on power/control at home, the typical bully approach. As the Commissioner has been dominated by the gov't, so he will in return treat his officers deplorably in the months to come - not only in the name of discipline but the all under the cover of National Security. Officers will function as robots doing the bidding of Harper via Toes via the Commissioner. Good luck living up to your Core Values.
5
7
Rating: -2
anonymous111
George Orwell's 1984 comes to mind. Why would anyone want to join the RCMP now? You cannot legislate away the endemic corruption by bullying the members like this.
5
4
Rating: +1
john worley
It is now very clear that RCMP officers have less rights in Canada than your average criminal especially in BC. Criminals are stabbing people and getting community service while folks want to throw RCMP officers in jail for everything from forcibly putting handcuffs on people to spitting on the street. Completely ridiculous. Meanwhile, in the States security guards are tasering people right, left and center and no-one says boo.
9
5
Rating: +4
Ambivalent Cynic
@ACME: How about the right that a criminal has the entire case against him disclosed, yet the victims of their crimes cannot even have the statements they provide read back to them? How about a criminal justice system that routinely writes off minor offenses as being 'not in the public interest', but that a murderer on welfare has his entire legel defense paid for by the state? Victims of minor crimes are written off as though that B&E or assault didn't matter, but there is always enough to fund the bad guy's legal fees?
3
3
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.