Victor Wong and Sid Chow Tan: Seeking a just and honourable redress
The B.C. Liberals' Multicultural Strategic Outreach Plan was controversial for its blunt language, cynical approach to community engagement, and misuse of public services for partisan objectives. The Chinese Canadian National Council and the Head Tax Families of Canada expressed our disappointment with the outreach plan and the language around "quick wins", and we accepted Premier Christy Clark's apology.
We welcomed the probe by deputy minister John Dyble which concluded that while the outreach plan was not fully implemented, there was a misuse of public resources and an attempt to hide the activities through personal email communication. There were also complaints from community-based groups and some staff transferred government and private information to personal email accounts, presumably for partisan purposes.
The Dyble report also observed that the activities to achieve an apology for the Head Tax had been "underway for a number of years" and was an "appropriate use of government resources".
The CCNC and HTFSC have sought a meaningful B.C. apology since 2006 when we wrote to then-attorney general Wally Oppal and subsequently to the B.C. Ombudsman.
It was B.C. politicians who lobbied for the Head Tax and Chinese Exclusion Act and enacted a litany of anti-Chinese legislation. The federal government collected $23 million in head-tax levies from 1885 to 1923 and transferred an estimated $8.5 million to B.C. This unjust enrichment of the B.C. treasury must be reversed and these monies must be returned to the families who paid it.
B.C. must not be seen to be profiting from racism—it would be harmful to our image at home and overseas. During the 2009 B.C. election, we issued a questionnaire to all four political parties and the most promising response came from the B.C. Green party. In April 2011, we met with MLA Richard Lee to present a framework for redress. In May 2012 and early February 2013, the CCNC and HTFSC rejected overtures of a stand-alone apology from the B.C. government.
The federal apology in 2006 was supported by all four federal parties and accepted by some of the head-tax families. The federal apology offered a partial redress, which included direct redress to 785 living head-tax payers and surviving spouses, and a community education fund.
An estimated 3,000 head-tax families—in which the head-tax payer and spouse had passed away—were excluded and did not receive any direct redress, yet these families had the same experience. We are proposing that B.C. return the head-tax monies to these families in order to achieve a complete redress.
The CCNC and HTFSC understand that there may be different views on redress. However we express our disappointment with the individuals and community groups who have supported a stand-alone apology. There were rumours in mid-February that the B.C. government was mobilizing community representatives and party supporters to accept an apology motion in the B.C. Legislature on March 14, the last sitting day of the legislature.
We submit that had the outreach plan not been made public, these community representatives would have been seen as validating the government's "quick win" strategy. It should also be instructive to all political parties that these validators were nowhere to be found during this controversy because they and their families were not directly affected by the past racist legislation. Redress cannot be genuinely achieved without the acceptance of all of the affected families.
We also understand that some community groups have suggested some community-based and collective measures. These suggestions include improving the education curriculum and protecting heritage sites. We would encourage groups to contact the relevant ministries as these suggested actions are not contingent on an apology.
In fact, the B.C. education system already includes some instruction on B.C.'s racist past with teachers utilizing Asian Heritage Month and the numerous community education resources to teach B.C. history.
A complete redress is the foundational lesson and sets in place the healing and reconciliation process, which will take years if not decades to ferment. A just and honourable redress is restorative, especially for the direct victims and affected families. he CCNC and HTFSC will continue to lobby the B.C. government to do the right thing and to negotiate a meaningful apology.
Victor Wong is executive director of the Chinese Canadian National Council. Sid Chow Tan is president of the Head Tax Families Society of Canada.





A lot of events happend during the wars and old goverments,are we supposed to go back how far to say sorry and pay for things that we had no control over and was the norm.The Chinese came to Canada to work on the railways willingly to earn mony ,they could have stayed at home as no one made them come,Now they want appologis (money) for things only history remembers.
Give it a breake you got a sorry from the prime minister and BC MPs .
However given that a full refund with accrued interest might reach $300,000 - a symbolic redress payment would be more appropriate, reasonable and economically viable. Japanese-Canadian redress was estimated at 10 cents to the dollar that was confiscated in property.
The unfair tax was always protested against when first imposed, and even moreso in 1923, when all Chinese immigration was outright banned - preventing unification of families. And the topic of redress was introduced in Canadian Parliament in 1984 by MP Margaret Mitchell.
The Harper Conservative Redress only "apologized" to less than 1% of total head tax certificates and ignored all "pre-deceased" head tax payers, by ignoring their surviving sons and daughters. Mrs. Der, a head tax widow, died at age 102 before her redress ex-gratia payment could be delivered to her. Mr. Ralph Lee, received his redress cheque on March 10 2006, only 5 days before he passed away at age 107. http://www.gunghaggis.com/2007/03/20/mrs-der-oldest-living-head-tax-spou...
Move on and contribute to making Canada an even better country for true Canadians who want to be here, not just because its a nice place to live.
Bob
The people who came here and paid the tax were not press ganged or brought here as slaves. The came here in spite of the tax because they felt it was worth paying the tax. I guess It helped their descendants however, like Ida Chong and others who are now professional trough manipulators.
The issue is symbolic and meaningful direct individual redress to the families of Chinese head tax and exclusion.
This would included a symbolic refund of an unjust tax paid by individuals and families. How Canadian is that?
If the government takes a dollar from my family or me unjustly and says sorry, does that mean the government doesn't have to give me the dollar back?