Force Four Entertainment issues statement on Border Security: Canada’s Front Line
Vancouver's Force Four Entertainment issued today (March 22) the following statement on Border Security: Canada’s Front Line, which recently made headlines after Canada Border Service Agency immigration raids were filmed by the show's cameras:
There have been complete mischaracterizations and false information reported this past week about Border Security: Canada’s Front Line. Border Security is a documentary series – not a reality series and in absolutely no way are any situations orchestrated for the cameras. We only film events that are already taking place – and that would be taking place even if the camera wasn’t present.
No footage from the CBSA enforcement action on March 13th has ever been used in any television program or released publicly in any way. The names and faces of these men have not been shown to anyone by the Border Security producers, Force Four Entertainment, the National Geographic Channel or the CBSA. However, these individuals have been identified in the media by themselves in interviews and press conferences, and by activists.
Very strict controls are in place to ensure that privacy rights are protected, and that only those people who agree to be on camera are identifiable if they are included in a program. Episodes go through a minimum of five layers of scrutiny before they are broadcast to make sure that no one’s rights are violated, no laws are broken, and no CBSA investigations or national security issues are compromised. Just because something is filmed doesn’t mean the footage will end up in the program. The identities of the individuals detained last week were only revealed by the detainees themselves to various news outlets.
Border Security: Canada's Front Line is currently in production of its second season. No episodes for the second season have been completed, much less aired on television.
We are proud of the series we’re making and the insight it has given millions of Canadians into the work of the Canada Border Services Agency.
The following addresses specific questions and inaccurate information that has been reported about the series and last week’s event.
About the Series
- Border Security is a documentary – not a reality series.
- The production does not influence events.
- No situations are ‘created’ for the cameras.
- We only film events that are already taking place – and that would take place even if the cameras weren’t present.
- We don’t interfere or otherwise participate in the events we film. We do not speak to the officers, or the people they are interacting with, until after the examination is finished. This is strictly enforced by the CBSA and is dictated by our agreement with them. This is much more restrictive than the conditions under which most documentaries film.
- Subject to national security, investigation and prosecution-related restrictions, final editorial control rests with the producers by written agreement with the Canada Border Services Agency (the “CBSA”).
- Thirteen episodes of Border Security have aired since last September, telling sixty-four separate stories. Only three of these 64 stories involved Inland Enforcement, the team we were with on March 13, 2013.
Production Process
- Very strict controls are in place to ensure that privacy rights are protected, and that only those people who agree to be on camera are identifiable if their stories are included in an episode.
- Episodes go through a minimum of five layers of scrutiny before they are broadcast to make sure that no one’s rights are violated, no laws are broken, and no CBSA investigations or national security issues are compromised.
- Just because something is filmed doesn’t mean it will end up in the program.
- The footage of this particular event has not been put in a program or broadcast anywhere.
About the Incident
- In the event that took place last week, the CBSA’s Inland Enforcement team was pursuing one individual who is alleged to have repeatedly entered the country illegally, had a significant criminal history, and was wanted on a Canada-wide warrant.
- In the course of trying to apprehend him, CBSA officers went to the job site where he was working. Our crew was following the story of his apprehension only.
- It was a coincidence that seven other people who were alleged to be working illegally were on that job site.
- There was no violence, no one had a camera put in their face, and no one ever attempted to push the camera away as has been stated.
- There was only one job site investigated that day.
- Our crew consisted of two people.
- Our crew never went to the homes of the detainees, nor tried to film the detainees anywhere other than at the construction site
- The production did not and has not identified any of those people, although some have subsequently conducted interviews and been shown by other media.
Release Protocol
- Our director did not speak to any of the detained men until they were in custody at a CBSA facility. After explaining the program to them, the director asked six of the eight men arrested if they would sign a release.
- To avoid any sense of pressure or coercion, no CBSA personnel or camera crew were present for this encounter. This is our standard procedure.
- The releases were provided in Spanish; our release is translated into 16 different languages, and includes a short plain language summary on the first page.
- Of the six men who were asked, three signed releases. One man requested a Spanish translator and this was provided.
- From the beginning of the series, we and the CBSA agreed that the show would never use any stories or footage of refugee claimants. And we haven’t. We are never informed of who is or isn’t a refugee claimant; these stories are simply never made available to us.







Where's Vic Toews' statement?
Having said that, they should bring an Employment Standards officer and a CRA trust compliance officer when they go to job sites, so that the unscrupulous employers hiring these folks can be punished as well.
2. You had more than 1 camera. You just happened to have 10 extra SUV's filled with Border Security and a full film crew on hand even though you were going to film one guy! ...and a detention centre ready to process people....
You also forgot to mention that one person who signed the release claims he did so under duress and that he has since revoked that release.
Oh, but I believe your version....Yeah, sure......
we are harassing foreign workers. The employees of the government are paid by taxes that come out of your pocket. Why not do your best to support and assist them instead of always looking for fault.
Obviously, the truth is less decent than that. They film people - then go to them for permission to use the footage.
With or without any border officials present for this permission requesting stage, the people have already been filmed and are in a position of being in duress.
It's not a documentary when the government of Canada is acting as producer and is also funding the process. That's propaganda. The lowest form yet of "reality" tv.
As for the claim that the aim of the show is to provide insight into the workings of the CBSA, the production company's name makes it glaringly obvious that the show is entertainment and nothing more. The ethics and morality of selling these interactions as entertainment is a whole other discussion, but please don't pretend that there is anything noble about this enterprise.
"CrockCity" - Usually shows like this work by getting a verbal agreement first, which is then followed by a signed document. In this case you need to remember, that the cameras were following the work and activities of the Border guards who went in to apprehend a criminal they had been tracking for some time. The other illegal workers happened to be there and because they ended up on camera, they had to ask them to sign a release form after the fact. Some of the men said No, and translators were provided. I understand the concern of duress, but in cases like this, even if a person changes their mind after the fact, after signing a release, a production will likely tear the contract up.
1) Knowing detainees were 'in custody' before being asked to sign releases is not helpful, in fact it confirms advocates worst fears that there was an obvious impression that CBSA and private producers were working in concert.
2) Five layers of review implies enormous public resources (staff time, possibly legal fees) are spent so a private company can make and sell tv programming and broadcasters can sell advertising.
3) Government documents clearly characterize the production as "documentary-style reality TV" the term "docutainment' is also used (previously on the producer's website). Hiding behind a fiction that this is journalism is an insult to real journalists and documentary producers.
Just for starters. I could go on.
Pretty amazing not one person at the ministry or government has offered an apology for this poorly thought out PR exercise.
Documentary filmmakers don't work as propagandists for CBSA, and Force Four needs to stop pretending that what it's doing is different from gutter television like Cops.
Force Four released a press statement stating the facts from the incident, has anyone mentioned it in the news besides the GS, no because the truth isn't as sexy. I personally believe them for two reasons. 1. If they lie in that statement it opens them up to getting sued for libel by the Hernadez family and others. 2.They don't need the press to help them avoid deportation.
The people who should be ashamed of them selves; the many journalists who covered this story based on the "alleged" lies of the Hernandez family.
Sarah E Polley, Naomi Klien, Gregory Robertson and the many others that have been duped by the Hernandez family should also be ashamed that they did NO FACT checking first. Oscar Mata simply became the "No One Is Illegal" puppet that couldn't understand English but read prepared statements in English. And once they finished with him and gave him his 5 minutes of non-recognizable fame, he became the springboard for the "BCCLA".
If you have an opinion on the CBSA doing their job or Documentary TV like this show, fine, but before you support or comment on an issue that has grave consequences for families both legal (CBSA, documentary crew etc ) and illegal who have been affected by this, please check your facts. The Vancouver Sun, CBC and CTV should be the ones being investigated for reporting false accounts of a sensitive story, just so they can make the news cycle.
Personally I would like to see the originators of this mess sued by the Shaw network and CBSA for the "alleged" false accounts that has caused so much anger, comment and disdain in the media and online. Hopefully that would stop this type of media spin in the future.
So, we want more of these people.
!000's do it the right way every year, why protect the ones that don't.
However this is being done via Neo-Conservative to promote their so called 'Tough on Crine' or appear to be 'Tough'.
You know for all the 'Unreported Crime' even though Stats clearly show a steady decline of all types of Crime over the last Decade+.
It is also done to condition the public to the Private for Profit Jails Agenda by the Neo-Cons.
The irony is that the Neo-Cons have let the Immigration Flood Gates Wide open to support their Mega Corporation mostly Big Oil Corporate Masters.
There is no need to immigrate to Canada illeagally any Nanny from any Third World Country can come here and get Residency after a few short years.
Any Construction Trade or anyone from any Third World Country can come here to work in the Oil Fields.
Or even in Retail, Timmy's, McD, etc.
Anyone from the EU with a Degree however useless can get a Visa to Work in Canada taking semi-skilled & even skiled work away from mostly young Educated Canadians.
Meanwhile Canadians under EU regulations and/or Immigration regulations of most Countries can not go there even as highly skilled workers.
There are 500K+ Foreign Workers in Alberta, 60K+ & growing in BC.
I guess the Neo-Cons prefer to give Canadian Jobs to Communists (BC Mine Scandal) rather than Canadians.
LOL Neo-Cons working for Corporations & Communist China but not Canadians :).
Pages