Force Four Entertainment issues statement on Border Security: Canada’s Front Line

Comments

Vancouver's Force Four Entertainment issued today (March 22) the following statement on Border Security: Canada’s Front Line, which recently made headlines after Canada Border Service Agency immigration raids were filmed by the show's cameras:

There have been complete mischaracterizations and false information reported this past week about Border Security: Canada’s Front LineBorder Security is a documentary series – not a reality series and in absolutely no way are any situations orchestrated for the cameras. We only film events that are already taking place – and that would be taking place even if the camera wasn’t present.

No footage from the CBSA enforcement action on March 13th has ever been used in any television program or released publicly in any way. The names and faces of these men have not been shown to anyone by the Border Security producers, Force Four Entertainment, the National Geographic Channel or the CBSA.  However, these individuals have been identified in the media by themselves in interviews and press conferences, and by activists.

Very strict controls are in place to ensure that privacy rights are protected, and that only those people who agree to be on camera are identifiable if they are included in a program. Episodes go through a minimum of five layers of scrutiny before they are broadcast to make sure that no one’s rights are violated, no laws are broken, and no CBSA investigations or national security issues are compromised. Just because something is filmed doesn’t mean the footage will end up in the program. The identities of the individuals detained last week were only revealed by the detainees themselves to various news outlets.

Border Security: Canada's Front Line is currently in production of its second season. No episodes for the second season have been completed, much less aired on television.

We are proud of the series we’re making and the insight it has given millions of Canadians into the work of the Canada Border Services Agency.

The following addresses specific questions and inaccurate information that has been reported about the series and last week’s event.

About the Series

  • Border Security is a documentary – not a reality series.
    • The production does not influence events.
    • No situations are ‘created’ for the cameras.
    • We only film events that are already taking place – and that would take place even if the cameras weren’t present.
    • We don’t interfere or otherwise participate in the events we film. We do not speak to the officers, or the people they are interacting with, until after the examination is finished. This is strictly enforced by the CBSA and is dictated by our agreement with them. This is much more restrictive than the conditions under which most documentaries film.
    • Subject to national security, investigation and prosecution-related restrictions, final editorial control rests with the producers by written agreement with the Canada Border Services Agency (the “CBSA”).
    • Thirteen episodes of Border Security have aired since last September, telling sixty-four separate stories. Only three of these 64 stories involved Inland Enforcement, the team we were with on March 13, 2013.

Production Process

  • Very strict controls are in place to ensure that privacy rights are protected, and that only those people who agree to be on camera are identifiable if their stories are included in an episode.
    • Episodes go through a minimum of five layers of scrutiny before they are broadcast to make sure that no one’s rights are violated, no laws are broken, and no CBSA investigations or national security issues are compromised.
    • Just because something is filmed doesn’t mean it will end up in the program.  
    • The footage of this particular event has not been put in a program or broadcast anywhere.

About the Incident

  • In the event that took place last week, the CBSA’s Inland Enforcement team was pursuing one individual who is alleged to have repeatedly entered the country illegally, had a significant criminal history, and was wanted on a Canada-wide warrant.  
    • In the course of trying to apprehend him, CBSA officers went to the job site where he was working. Our crew was following the story of his apprehension only.
    • It was a coincidence that seven other people who were alleged to be working illegally were on that job site.
    • There was no violence, no one had a camera put in their face, and no one ever attempted to push the camera away as has been stated.  
    • There was only one job site investigated that day.
    • Our crew consisted of two people.
    • Our crew never went to the homes of the detainees, nor tried to film the detainees anywhere other than at the construction site
    • The production did not and has not identified any of those people, although some have subsequently conducted interviews and been shown by other media.

Release Protocol

  • Our director did not speak to any of the detained men until they were in custody at a CBSA facility. After explaining the program to them, the director asked six of the eight men arrested if they would sign a release.
    • To avoid any sense of pressure or coercion, no CBSA personnel or camera crew were present for this encounter. This is our standard procedure.
    • The releases were provided in Spanish; our release is translated into 16 different languages, and includes a short plain language summary on the first page.
    • Of the six men who were asked, three signed releases. One man requested a Spanish translator and this was provided.
  • From the beginning of the series, we and the CBSA agreed that the show would never use any stories or footage of refugee claimants.  And we haven’t.  We are never informed of who is or isn’t a refugee claimant; these stories are simply never made available to us.    
Comments (23) Add New Comment
RP
It's still government-aided propaganda, a tool to divide and a tool to soften us up to the presence of uniformed authority and control.

Where's Vic Toews' statement?
36
33
Rating: +3
ds
I, for one, am glad they sent this guy packing. Otherwise it is a slap in the face to all the honest, hardworking immigrants who follow the rules.

Having said that, they should bring an Employment Standards officer and a CRA trust compliance officer when they go to job sites, so that the unscrupulous employers hiring these folks can be punished as well.
40
24
Rating: +16
TheTruth
1. It is not a documentary. Documentaries aren't a weekly show.
2. You had more than 1 camera. You just happened to have 10 extra SUV's filled with Border Security and a full film crew on hand even though you were going to film one guy! ...and a detention centre ready to process people....

You also forgot to mention that one person who signed the release claims he did so under duress and that he has since revoked that release.

Oh, but I believe your version....Yeah, sure......
35
42
Rating: -7
rh
I am glad that Force Four has issued a statement to correct all the misleading reports about this incident. You would think that a trained reporter from the Canadian Press and major newspapers such as the Globe and Mail and TV stations would check their facts first before publicizing a story. Talk about grandstanding for higher ratings! I believe the border guards are doing a great job and should keep up the good work. First, there were outcries about bringing in foreign workers to work in the northern mines, now there are outcries from people because
we are harassing foreign workers. The employees of the government are paid by taxes that come out of your pocket. Why not do your best to support and assist them instead of always looking for fault.
36
33
Rating: +3
angel D
wait, is that Harpers name in the fine print?? This statement reeks like Vic Toews' sweat, was his hand the one penning this??
28
28
Rating: 0
CrockCity
Last week it was reported that ForceFour doesn't turn a camera on any individual until they receive their permission.

Obviously, the truth is less decent than that. They film people - then go to them for permission to use the footage.

With or without any border officials present for this permission requesting stage, the people have already been filmed and are in a position of being in duress.

It's not a documentary when the government of Canada is acting as producer and is also funding the process. That's propaganda. The lowest form yet of "reality" tv.
38
31
Rating: +7
Harold Smith
Just stop what you are doing. It is crap. You are sustaining the agenda of blaming those with little or no power for the ills of the world. Chase the powerful if you want to do something socially useful.
36
30
Rating: +6
Dylan G.
"The production does not influence events." The presence of cameras in itself influences events, and for the producers to say otherwise is disingenuous. Documentary filmmakers as far back as Robert Flaherty (Nanook of the North) have acknowledged this fact,, making the analogy to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle whereby the observation of particles changes the properties of those particles. People behave differently in the presence of cameras, and the fact of being filmed also alters one's experience of what is being happening and being filmed. In the case of interactions with CBSA officers, I don't imagine that being filmed makes the experience any less stressful, upsetting, and/or potentially dehumanizing.

As for the claim that the aim of the show is to provide insight into the workings of the CBSA, the production company's name makes it glaringly obvious that the show is entertainment and nothing more. The ethics and morality of selling these interactions as entertainment is a whole other discussion, but please don't pretend that there is anything noble about this enterprise.
31
24
Rating: +7
RealityCheck
It's shameful that the Georgia Straight & "activists" continue to call for the censorship of this documentary series. As this statement clearly proves that Force Four did nothing illegal or unethical, I expect the Straight will be correcting the obvious errors made in their "journalism".
38
34
Rating: +4
Cool Grandma
I love Border Security!!!
28
29
Rating: -1
Peter Hamil
"TheTruth" - Documentaries very often come in the form of a series.
"CrockCity" - Usually shows like this work by getting a verbal agreement first, which is then followed by a signed document. In this case you need to remember, that the cameras were following the work and activities of the Border guards who went in to apprehend a criminal they had been tracking for some time. The other illegal workers happened to be there and because they ended up on camera, they had to ask them to sign a release form after the fact. Some of the men said No, and translators were provided. I understand the concern of duress, but in cases like this, even if a person changes their mind after the fact, after signing a release, a production will likely tear the contract up.
30
16
Rating: +14
John Herbert
I, for one, find the Border Security Show very educational and I have greater respect for the work the border guards do. In the shows that I have seen, the officers were firm but exercised compassion and empathy with visitors to our country. I have never seen them exhibit any signs of racism. I believe that is is unfortunate that one show, that may or may not air, has garnered so much negative publicity from bleeding hearts. Shame on them for putting the rights of illegal workers above the rights of the TV production staff who could be out of work if the show is cancelled. What about their families? Are legal Canadians not as worthy as illegal immigrants?
37
27
Rating: +10
sfd
When you lay down with dogs, you get up with fleas.
13
15
Rating: -2
Animal Lover
Does sfd stand for Simon Fraser dropout? I happen to love dogs. They are man's best friend.If you happen to lay down with some of the protesters, you may get up with bedbugs or worse.
15
19
Rating: -4
Helesia Luke
WOW - the producers have a thin grasp on what the real issues are here. A few obvious points:
1) Knowing detainees were 'in custody' before being asked to sign releases is not helpful, in fact it confirms advocates worst fears that there was an obvious impression that CBSA and private producers were working in concert.
2) Five layers of review implies enormous public resources (staff time, possibly legal fees) are spent so a private company can make and sell tv programming and broadcasters can sell advertising.
3) Government documents clearly characterize the production as "documentary-style reality TV" the term "docutainment' is also used (previously on the producer's website). Hiding behind a fiction that this is journalism is an insult to real journalists and documentary producers.

Just for starters. I could go on.

Pretty amazing not one person at the ministry or government has offered an apology for this poorly thought out PR exercise.
27
30
Rating: -3
Stephanie
Oh, please - as though CBSA would have carried out this big showy raid if Force Four's cameras weren't there. Cameras always influence events, and anyone who operates a camera professionally and tells you otherwise is lying. Equally absurd is the assertion that someone who has just been arrested and thrown in jail is able to freely consent to the broadcast of footage of that arrest to the vulture who's followed him into cells.

Documentary filmmakers don't work as propagandists for CBSA, and Force Four needs to stop pretending that what it's doing is different from gutter television like Cops.
27
31
Rating: -4
DS
I think the biggest issue here is that the show in question has been on the air for a 13-episode season previous to this incident on National Geographic and Global without issue. How come this one incident gets the media attention? Because the Hernandez family "allegedly" lied and manipulated the original Vancouver Sun article to make it sound that this incident was a USA style raid.

Force Four released a press statement stating the facts from the incident, has anyone mentioned it in the news besides the GS, no because the truth isn't as sexy. I personally believe them for two reasons. 1. If they lie in that statement it opens them up to getting sued for libel by the Hernadez family and others. 2.They don't need the press to help them avoid deportation.

The people who should be ashamed of them selves; the many journalists who covered this story based on the "alleged" lies of the Hernandez family.

Sarah E Polley, Naomi Klien, Gregory Robertson and the many others that have been duped by the Hernandez family should also be ashamed that they did NO FACT checking first. Oscar Mata simply became the "No One Is Illegal" puppet that couldn't understand English but read prepared statements in English. And once they finished with him and gave him his 5 minutes of non-recognizable fame, he became the springboard for the "BCCLA".

If you have an opinion on the CBSA doing their job or Documentary TV like this show, fine, but before you support or comment on an issue that has grave consequences for families both legal (CBSA, documentary crew etc ) and illegal who have been affected by this, please check your facts. The Vancouver Sun, CBC and CTV should be the ones being investigated for reporting false accounts of a sensitive story, just so they can make the news cycle.
Personally I would like to see the originators of this mess sued by the Shaw network and CBSA for the "alleged" false accounts that has caused so much anger, comment and disdain in the media and online. Hopefully that would stop this type of media spin in the future.
14
12
Rating: +2
Response to Stephanie
Obviously you haven't watched any of the other episodes. If you had, you would know that the show is nothing like Cops. But tell me one thing, how is it that you can call a person doing their job a "vulture" and have sympathy for someone who has come into our country illegally? Would you feel differently if that "vulture" was your brother trying to make a living? We are lucky to live in such a great country. Canada is far more fair than many countries in the world. Have you ever seen the movie "Midnight Express"? Why don't you count your lucky stars instead of complaining about everything? If you really want to try and make a difference, become a public servant or run for government. Or volunteer to help immigrants complete the necessary paperwork to enter the country legally.
31
19
Rating: +12
DT
Today on the news. Illegal New Zealand immigrant wanted for rape and torture of vulnerable sex workers in Vancouver.
So, we want more of these people.
!000's do it the right way every year, why protect the ones that don't.
10
12
Rating: -2
iSheep
I support Law & Order as well as strong but fair immigration Laws / Enforcement.

However this is being done via Neo-Conservative to promote their so called 'Tough on Crine' or appear to be 'Tough'.

You know for all the 'Unreported Crime' even though Stats clearly show a steady decline of all types of Crime over the last Decade+.

It is also done to condition the public to the Private for Profit Jails Agenda by the Neo-Cons.

The irony is that the Neo-Cons have let the Immigration Flood Gates Wide open to support their Mega Corporation mostly Big Oil Corporate Masters.

There is no need to immigrate to Canada illeagally any Nanny from any Third World Country can come here and get Residency after a few short years.

Any Construction Trade or anyone from any Third World Country can come here to work in the Oil Fields.

Or even in Retail, Timmy's, McD, etc.

Anyone from the EU with a Degree however useless can get a Visa to Work in Canada taking semi-skilled & even skiled work away from mostly young Educated Canadians.

Meanwhile Canadians under EU regulations and/or Immigration regulations of most Countries can not go there even as highly skilled workers.

There are 500K+ Foreign Workers in Alberta, 60K+ & growing in BC.

I guess the Neo-Cons prefer to give Canadian Jobs to Communists (BC Mine Scandal) rather than Canadians.

LOL Neo-Cons working for Corporations & Communist China but not Canadians :).
14
14
Rating: 0

Pages

Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.