Strathcona residents demand viaducts decision come with plan to calm traffic

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      Today a group of Strathcona residents used the occasion of April 1 to tell city hall that they’re not joking around.

      “Were holding an April Fools' Day protest to let the city know that we’re not going to be played for fools,” said Pete Fry, chair of the Strathcona Residents’ Association.

      Speaking amidst a noisy demonstration at the intersection of Prior Street and Hawks Avenue, Fry said that the community is demanding the City of Vancouver implement a plan to calm traffic in the area.

      Fry also called attention to the possible removal of the Georgia and Dunsmuir viaducts, and the impact that change could have on the Strathcona community.

      “The city’s plan, currently, is to remove the viaducts and make a ramp that is going to take all of that viaduct traffic and put it down a new, six-lane Pacific Boulevard,” he explained. “That’s also going to be collecting False Creek traffic and Yaletown traffic, and that’s a lot of traffic.”

      Ahead of the protest, Vision Vancouver city councillor Geoff Meggs published a blog post expressing frustration about the residents’ association’s decision to go ahead with the protest, “despite the city’s repeated efforts to meet their concerns.”

      In an interview with the Straight conducted shortly after the demonstration wrapped up, Meggs said he was “puzzled” by some of the group’s demands.

      “Staff have met with the Strathcona Residents’ Association as recently as last week,” he explained. “I think the city is doing everything it can to acknowledge their concerns and negate the problems.”

      Meggs maintained that studies have indicated that the deconstruction of the viaducts will not increase traffic on Prior.

      Back at the demonstration, East Vancouver's Carnival Band set a festive atmosphere while dozens of residents hoisted placards with slogans such as “Safer Park Access” and “Liar Liar Gregor on Prior.”

      The Strathcona Residents’ Association employed the Carnival Band to keep things lively at a rally for traffic control.
      Travis Lupick

      Strathcona resident Elana Zyselat said that the day’s action was called because a similar rally held in July 2012 failed to prompt a meaningful response from the city.

      “Mayor Gregor Robertson said that we had a good case,” she recounted. “And he directed staff to take immediate measures to calm Prior....But the new plan, which was presented to us in February, showed no such thing.”

      Zyselat continued: “This street isn’t designed to be an arterial. The houses are too close, there are children and seniors here, and it is not safe.”

      Graham Elvidge, a representative of the Strathcona Residents’ Association, emphasized that the traffic issue dates back to the viaducts' construction in the 1970s.

      “We’ve waited 40 years,” he said. “It’s time to get some traffic-calming measures now.”

      In June 2010, Vancouver city staff outlined six proposals for the viaducts’ future. City council is expected to vote on the fate of the overpasses in June 2013.

      You can follow Travis Lupick on Twitter at twitter.com/tlupick.

      Comments

      7 Comments

      Steve

      Apr 1, 2013 at 5:00pm

      City of Vancouver staff only showed one out of 7 proposals for the viaducts' future. The other 6 options are secret. The City has refused a FOI request from a resident who asked for the release of the 6 other options. Why the secrecy?

      Ralph

      Apr 1, 2013 at 6:19pm

      You move next to a busy street. You pay less for living next to a busy street. Now live next to a busy street or move away from a busy street. Besides unless you are a developer selling "green" image condos city council will not help you.

      Alan Layton

      Apr 1, 2013 at 8:45pm

      I'm a firm opponent of tearing down the viaducts because they continue to serve a valuable purpose. Although initially the old and new viaducts were built because there was no other way to get traffic safely through the train yards, now it allows two important feeder roads to exist without traffic lights interrupting the flow. The council's decision is purely based on their grand plan for high density and they can put up more towers if the viaducts are gone. I don't believe for a second that large green space and water features are going to materialize in the actual build and if they expand Malkin then the Strathcona community garden and part of the park may be lost. Of course as with the new stadium roof I'm sure the people of Vancouver will have this forced on them without much fuss. It's like they've decided this is going to happen and we only get to choose the project and 'surprise' there's only one project to choose from.

      Lee L.

      Apr 1, 2013 at 10:58pm

      That's right Allan Layton.

      It's called Agenda 21 and we are the guinea pigs.

      Lee L.

      Apr 1, 2013 at 11:00pm

      And traffic calming? Music to Gregor's ears. ANYTHING to obstruct the flow of automobile traffic.

      Nelson100

      Apr 2, 2013 at 12:18am

      As other neighbourhoods have learned the hard way, any attempt to change or even question one of Vision’s backroom developer deals will be like talking to a concrete wall. There only one way to influence the developer greenwashing machine masquerading as our city council is to give Vision Vancouver a much needed democracy lesson in the next civic election. Neighbourhood associations like the Strathcona Residents Association should understand that Vision has absolutely no interest in their concerns. Their only option to influence how things turn out is to focus all energies at removing Vision from power.

      Hazlit

      Apr 2, 2013 at 9:02am

      The goal should be not traffic calming but traffic removal. Less car traffic more "green" traffic--pedestrians etc. Tear down the viaducts and tax vehicular traffic. Simple, elegant, good for all.