B.C. election platforms stake out the issues

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      When B.C. Liberal leader Christy Clark released her party’s election platform on April 15, it contained several items of interest to voters.

      For students, there was a promise to limit tuition-fee increases to a maximum of two percent through the next term of office. There was also a pledge of some free textbooks for university and college students.

      This is not as dramatic as the B.C. Green party’s proposed 20 percent reduction in tuition. But it still marks a significant change from the Gordon Campbell era, when double-digit increases in student fees were often the norm.

      What attracted far more media coverage, however, was the B.C. Liberals’ call for a vote on public transit in the 2014 municipal elections.

      “We’ve always said that any transit plan for the Lower Mainland must be regionally sourced, it must be affordable, and it must be supported,” Clark told reporters. “What better way to make sure that it’s supported than to put it to a referendum?”

      B.C. NDP leader Adrian Dix has since responded that the B.C. Liberals’ proposal “denies” the provincial government’s responsibility to provide funding for public transportation. “I think at least some carbon-tax revenues need to go to support transit initiatives,” Dix said to reporters.

      The B.C. government expects to generate nearly $1.24 billion in carbon taxes this year as part of its overall $44-billion operating budget. The B.C. Liberals say they’d freeze the carbon tax at $30 per tonne. The Greens would raise it to $50 per tonne while exempting British Columbians living below Statistics Canada’s low-income cutoff, which is often described as the poverty line. The B.C. Conservatives have promised to axe the carbon tax over a four-year period.

      Even though B.C. NDP MLAs haven’t called for an end to the controversial oil-and-gas drilling technique known as hydraulic fracturing—or fracking—the B.C. Liberal platform document suggests otherwise. It cites opposition from one unelected B.C. NDP candidate, George Heyman, who’s running in Vancouver-Fairview.

      Meanwhile, the Green party is calling for the reform of the environmental assessment office and for a “fair price on fresh water”, which is used in huge quantities in fracking operations. In addition, the Greens’ policy document—Green Book 2013—supports “a moratorium on new gas exploration and drilling” and establishing “industry responsibility for repairing the environmental damage from fracking operations”. That’s in addition to eliminating all subsidies on mining and a new tax on mining-industry profits.

      B.C. NDP MLAs support the export of liquefied natural gas, which will likely require extensive new drilling. However, the B.C. Liberals have claimed in their platform that the B.C. NDP will “endanger our province’s LNG opportunity” with a tax on natural-gas extraction.

      As the Georgia Straight went to press, the B.C. NDP had not released an election platform countering the B.C. Liberals’ claims.

      During the campaign, Dix has tried to play up his party as a moderate alternative to the B.C. Liberals.

      “It’s time for a government that lives within its means, accepts that it can’t do all of the things that it would like to do at once, and tackles priorities thoughtfully, one practical step at a time,” he told reporters.

      He has also eschewed personal criticism of his rivals, even as B.C. Liberals supporters continue financing damning attack ads targetting him.

      Clark has attempted to portray the campaign as a titanic battle between two vastly different political philosophies. She rarely admits that her government has already implemented several of the B.C. NDP’s more progressive proposals.

      After becoming premier in 2011, Clark hiked the minimum wage significantly to $10.25 per hour, provided a $200 monthly earnings exemption for employable welfare recipients, raised income taxes on those earning more than $150,000 per year, and slightly increased corporate taxes.

      The B.C. NDP has proposed a provincial review of the Northern Gateway Project, whereas the B.C. Liberals have set five conditions before they’ll give their blessing.

      B.C. Conservative leader John Cummins often points to similarities between the B.C. Liberals and the B.C. NDP, emphasizing that both parties have repeatedly run deficits in government.

      To address spending, Cummins wants to grant legislative committees the authority to “review actual and planned line-item expenditures by government ministries and agencies, Crown corporations, and the so-called SUCH sector—schools, universities, colleges and hospitals”.

      He has also proposed a year-round “Legislative Budget Office”, modelled on the parliamentary budget office, to monitor provincial revenue and spending.

      The Conservatives like pointing out that in 1971, B.C. ranked first in the country in average weekly earnings. The province ranked third in 2001, when the B.C. NDP left office, and placed fifth under the B.C. Liberals in 2011.

      “It all starts with people,” the B.C. Conservatives state in one campaign document. “And over the last several decades, under both the New Democrats and BC Liberals, more and more people are leaving our province for greener pastures elsewhere, or rejecting B.C. altogether.”

      That’s not to say there aren’t key differences between the B.C. NDP and the B.C. Liberals, who are still far ahead of the B.C. Conservatives and the B.C. Greens in the polls.

      If the NDP wins the election, Dix is expected to restore a secret ballot for workers voting for union certification. He hasn’t stated whether or not he’ll reinstate the last B.C. NDP government’s policy that required unionized labour on publicly financed construction projects.

      Comments

      4 Comments

      RickW

      Apr 19, 2013 at 4:34pm

      LNG is a farce - especially if the entire economy is hinged on it. Look (for instance) at how Alberta "suddenly" went into a nosedive because Tar Sands bitumen pricing went "soft", and a deficit budget became "necessary".

      And the infrastructure that will be needed, years before there is ANY return, will cost billions - and knowing governments (of any stripe) they will be sure to borrow the money at inflated interest.

      So I say "nay" to any party that endorses LNG, at least as an economic lynchpin.

      Chris George - Green Candidate, Shuswap

      Apr 19, 2013 at 8:47pm

      Government should be the manager of the commons, looking out for the interests of the people of the province. Too often, in the rush to fill the pockets of their friends via policy, they forget that.

      Proper stewardship of resources in a capitalist system means assigning them value. Corporations who require the resources and are willing to invest should be allowed access to these resources, but only after the public interest has been satisfied.

      This means government should be focused on receiving the maximum the market will pay for access to those resources, not the minimum. The fluff about there being a shortage of capital and that we need to bend over if we want companies to invest in our province is exactly that, fluff. World markets need our resources. They need oil, gas, timber, minerals and especially they need water. Right now we bundle the water into many different products for export. The water required to ship a million board feet of lumber, a billion tonnes of grain or car load after car load of coal is staggering. As shortages of these goods begin to bite in world markets, prices will naturally rise and keep demand for our resources high. There will be no shortage of capital.

      The challenge for the people who live here, as opposed to those who own the place, will be to make sure that this happens by electing a government that can see the responsibility to act in the public interest. We also need to begin the transition to a more productive economy. How many people in our economy actually make things any more? We should be wresting every dime of value that we can out of the natural resources we have at our disposal. The "rip and ship" model of exploitation and the short term maximization of shareholder value over the public good needs to stop.

      We also need to ensure that in our haste to rush our resources off to the foreign markets where people will use them to actually create the wealth, we do not allow the corporations involved to stick the taxpayers with more re-mediation work, like the federal government is currently involved with at the Giant Mine in the NWT.

      People need good paying, productive work that they can be proud of. They need it in the communities where they live. We have the resources, the technology and the skilled people to be a force in the world economy.

      We just need the leadership and the vision to make it happen.

      Just Wondering

      Apr 19, 2013 at 9:03pm

      The only credible parties her are the Conservatives, The Greens and the NDP so at least we have three to choose from.

      RickW

      Apr 20, 2013 at 7:42am

      Chris George:
      "The fluff about there being a shortage of capital and that we need to bend over if we want companies to invest in our province is exactly that, fluff."
      Exactly! Where are our own home-grown millionaires (such as Jimmy Pattison) when it comes to long-term investing in BC or any other part of Canada?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadians_by_net_worth