Eoin Madden and Torrance Coste: Salish Sea at risk of becoming a global carbon corridor

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      By Eoin Madden and Torrance Coste

      The Salish Sea, stretching from Metro Vancouver to the southern tip of Vancouver Island, is one of the world’s most hospitable and bountiful bodies of water. The region’s mild climate and abundant resources make it an ideal place to live, and it has been home to thriving Indigenous nations since time immemorial. For the same reasons, Europeans and others settled here in great numbers, and the Salish Sea is now one of the most densely populated areas in western Canada.

      A key strength of the region is the inherent ease of transportation that’s possible given its geographic and maritime position. But as we see unprecedented industrial and political prioritization of fossil fuels above all else here in British Columbia, this status as an ideal transport corridor poses a problem for the Salish Sea.

      Vancouver, the region’s largest municipality, has taken effort to brand itself as the world’s “greenest city,” and civic leaders here seem to understand that we can no longer afford to be so reckless when it comes to industrial development and its impacts on the environment. At the same time, there are proposals on the table from industry to dramatically increase exports of both coal and diluted bitumen—two of the most carbon-intensive fossil fuels—from the Lower Mainland.

      These two objectives are in direct contrast. Vancouver cannot be both a green city and one of the world’s biggest fossil fuel exporters; it just doesn’t work. If efforts to become sustainable don’t apply to exports, we are simply shipping away our impact on the climate, which isn’t a solution at all.

      With regard to coal shipments, proposed port expansions at Fraser Surrey Docks—combined with an approved expansion at the Neptune facilities in North Vancouver and recent upgrades at Delta’s Westshore Terminal—would increase the Salish Sea’s export capacity to the equivalent of around 90 million tonnes of carbon emissions per year. That amount of climate-changing pollution is equal to almost six years’ worth of emissions from every vehicle on the road in B.C.

      The Salish Sea is also facing a massive increase in tar sands exports. Texas-based corporation Kinder Morgan plans to build a new pipeline alongside its existing Trans Mountain pipeline, which terminates in Burnaby. The proposed increase from 300,000 to 890,000 barrels per day means a jump from around 80 to over 400 tankers full of dangerous tar sands bitumen per year in the Salish Sea—a further 100 million tonnes of carbon exports.

      So what does this mean?

      Well, if all current proposals go ahead (coal port expansions and the Kinder Morgan pipeline), the Salish Sea will be transformed into a global carbon corridor. Green initiatives undertaken at the municipal or regional level will essentially be nullified by the fact that they all exist within a climate change superhighway.

      We believe many people who live here want to find innovative solutions and more sustainable ways to operate our economies. If we become a carbon corridor, we’ll be clinging to an archaic and destructive system, and contributing to the climate crisis like never before.

      Fossil fuel apologists tirelessly push the “if they don’t get oil/coal from us, they’ll get it somewhere else” argument. This thinking is worn out, uncreative, and cowardly. North America holds major fossil fuel reserves—leaving them in the ground is simply better for our future.

      Increasing carbon export capacity is about more than just expanding trade opportunities, it’s a major long-term investment in an unsustainable and harmful system, one that will compromise the health of our communities and our global climate.

      Instead of subsidizing the fossil fuel sector (currently $1.4 billion per year in federal subsidies), we should be supporting jobs in sustainable sectors, including increased processing in our timber, agriculture, and fishing industries.

      Additionally, directing revenue from a smarter, more efficient carbon tax towards green initiatives like the expansion of electrified public transit and freight transport, as well as the construction of energy efficient buildings, will help speed up the transition to a green economy.

      If the Salish Sea becomes a corridor for unprecedented levels of climate-changing pollution, Canada’s global reputation as a climate laggard will be solidified. Acting now to prevent this is a much more positive declaration to the world. 

      The Salish Sea can be a symbol of our desire to take responsibility for the well-being of our children and grandchildren. Let’s respect the legacy of the region and its potential for the future—not turn it into a major catalyst for climate change.

      Comments

      4 Comments

      paul magnus

      May 8, 2013 at 9:00am

      add wind, solar, hydro, efficiency, smart grid and research.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Pat Crowe

      May 8, 2013 at 9:32am

      At risk for becoming a carbon corridor?
      To late. The shipping traffic on the American side already has what we could and or would do on our side as negligible.

      0 0Rating: 0

      PJ

      May 8, 2013 at 10:36am

      Just add all the raw sewer that is being pumped into the ocean by Victoria,with NO sewage treatment facilities and the carbon will sink away.
      Putting the carbon into the sea was one of the suggestion of scientists to get rid of it,so keep on it

      0 0Rating: 0

      Lee Leeman

      May 8, 2013 at 10:46am

      The analysis and conclusions regarding the magnitude of climate sensitivity ( re CO2) is far from in. It may not be necessary to reduce carbon emissions AT ALL. We just don't know. Better to take a more measured, less hysterical approach until we do. And yes, if the bitumen is not shipped from Canada, the refineries that await its arrival will get a replacement from Venezuala or other source. The demand for their products is just too high overseas for anything else to happen. And even if that were not the case and you COULD starve a refinery in Texas by blockading tanker traffic on our coast, that would only force China to build its own replacement refinery which will need to be fed crude from another source. Possibly from Russia drilling in the Arctic?

      0 0Rating: 0