Chief Bob Chamberlin warns that Bill C-51 will shred Canadians' democratic rights

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      It's been dubbed the Secret Police Bill C-51.

      That's because the Conservative government's new antiterrrorism legislation vastly expands the state's power to monitor and arrest Canadians.

      It creates two new statutes and amends three other acts. Despite its broad scope, the Conservative-controlled parliamentary committee on public safety and national security only allowed six hours for witnesses to come forward with their concerns.

      Yesterday at a demonstration on the front lawn of the Vancouver Art Gallery, the vice president of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs raised the spectre of Bill C-51 being used to stifle democratic dissent.

      Chief Bob Chamberlan held up a photo of UBCIC president Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, which had appeared in the Prince George Free Press.

      Chamberlin noted that the newspaper had asked if Phillip, an antipipeline campaigner, could be called a terrorist under the Harper government's legislation.

      "This is what Bill C-51 is going to do to Canadians," Chamberlin said. "For when you want to be the ones to stand up and engage in civil disobedience or stand up in a protest and say what the government is doing is incorrect, you run the opportunity of being branded a terrorist."

      The legislation gives policing powers to the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and expands authorities' ability to detain people without charges.

      "We, as citizens of a democracy, fully expect the government to look out for our best interests, to safeguard our rights, to ensure that we have opportunities in order to express our concerns in whatever venue, in whatever manner that we see fit," Chamberlin, chief of the Kwikwasut'inuxw Haswa'mis First Nation, told the crowd. "But when we turn and look at Bill C-51, it's extremely troubling for all of us to know that the government is expanding the role for CSIS and the RCMP, the sharing of information beyond what they're originally intended for, and to know that there is not oversight at the privacy commission to meet that broadening scope of work from CSIS and the RCMP."

      Chamberlin also criticized the bill for involving the judiciary with CSIS and the RCMP in authorizing the infringement of democratic rights. (Through the issuance of judical warrants, CSIS can take measures to reduce "threats to the security of Canada" even if they contravene the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms).

      He said that those who have concerns about how their rights are being violated would have to go before the same judiciary for a ruling on this.

      "This absolutely lays waste to democracy in Canada," Chamberlin declared.

      He also pointed out that First Nations have constitutionally protected rights embedded in various court rulings and in Section 35 (1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, which affirms existing aboriginal and treaty rights.

      In addition, he noted, the Supreme Court of Canada delivered the first declaration of aboriginal title in Canada with the Tsilhqot'in people.

      "In the very beginning of Harper's governance, he made it very clear that the development of resource-based projects were primary and key and foundational to his government—to the point where he's deemed them to be in the national interest of Canada," Chamberlin said. "Which what I understand places it in a higher level where if we stand up and we have issue with something that they're doing, it is something that they can come down extremely hard upon us as Canadian citizens. And Bill C-51 will broaden out that tool. It will allow the government to shut us down as citizens."

      Chamberlin claimed that the government had previously scanned legislation and regulations and removed all impediments, including environmental barriers, to achieving the prime minister's objective of developing the resource industry.

      "So the very issue of balance from government is now done away with," Chamberlin said. "Those balances are what gave us confidence in this government to look after the environment, to look after the very land, which supports us as human beings in Canada."

      Comments

      4 Comments

      Stalinesque

      Mar 15, 2015 at 2:04pm

      Books like "Harperland', "Harperism", "Party of One", "Kill The Messengers"...recount many Stalinesque moves by this PM. No wonder people are worried.

      Blergh

      Mar 15, 2015 at 3:05pm

      Much ado about nothing.

      You know that the USA does huge amounts of SIGINT the whole world over, right? If it is in the USA's interests (Canada = USA Client State) they will share any intelligence necessary with domestic law enforcement, etc. About the only real change this bill could introduce is that the SIGINT can now be used in courts. But don't be stupid. They're not going to arrest people who protest peacefully. This has nothing to do with crossing a line on Burnaby mountain. This has to do with arresting people who plan acts of violence, as well as, generally, creating a climate of fear and paranoia, which is what Government thrives on. That is probably of infinitely more value than any specific pieces of SIGINT (how many terrorist attacks have there been in North America? How many have been "prevented"?), a climate of fear of dissenting. But we already have that in Canada---ever heard of Human Rights Tribunals? You better not say the wrong thing, you'll lose your job! Ever heard of "sexual harassment" law, which was made up last century by feminists? Didn't exist before then. Whether or not we think it is a good idea doesn't change that fact. There are already plenty of expressive actions that Canadians cannot undertake, but that's doubleplusgood, right? It's only doubleplusungood when expressive actions that the _left_ disagrees with are prohibited or chilled. This is a problem of hypocrisy and double standards.

      Believe it or not, lots of people in the intelligence community value democratic values like protest, dissent, etc. even if they do not engage in them. They see them as good release valves---if people can march impotently in the street, they're far less likely to do something that actually causes trouble. So they want people marching impotently in the street, which does fuck all.

      Power

      Mar 15, 2015 at 7:20pm

      Power is in the ability to enforce. Statutes are meaningless in the face of people who disobey them, unless the police/military are willing to do the bidding of those who wish to enforce the statutes. If the police/military are willing to enforce statutes that are against the interests of the people who the statutes are putatively meant to benefit (i.e. the general citizenry as opposed to the ultra rich), then we have no democracy whatsoever. In such a case, the general citizenry are entitled, and even obligated, to revolt against the repression being foisted upon them in their name.

      hmmm

      Mar 15, 2015 at 9:59pm

      The job of the Canadian Senate is to veto bad legislation like C-51. If we had a non-political process for selecting smart competent non-partisan trustworthy Senators, none of Harper's omnibus legislation would have received Senate approval, and neither would C-51.