Gwynne Dyer: Russia, the Maldives, and short-term thinking on climate change

Short term beats long term most of the time, even when people understand where their long-term self-interest really lies. Take, for example, that well-known pair, Russia and the Maldives.

Five years ago, it was hard to find senior people in the universities and scientific institutes in Moscow who were even willing to discuss climate change. But the great heat wave of 2010, which killed one-third of the Russian grain crop, seems to have changed all that.

It was Russia that insisted on putting a reference to geo-engineering, the highly controversial array of last-ditch measures to combat global warming, into the last paragraph of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s recent report. The Russians get it now. And yet....

On September 18, the Greenpeace ship Arctic Sunrise stopped near the drilling platform Prirazlomnaya, the first rig to drill for oil off Russia’s Arctic coast, and launched four inflatable boats. Their aim was to hang a banner on the platform denouncing Russian plans to exploit the oil and gas reserves of the environmentally sensitive Arctic, especially since burning all that extra oil and gas will speed up the warming process.

There were no weapons aboard the ship, and Greenpeace’s protests are always non-violent. None of the protesters tried to climb up the legs of the platform or damage it in any way. But armed Russian security forces abseiled down from helicopters and took them all prisoner. The ship and all its crew were arrested and taken to the nearest Russian port, Murmansk.

A month later, all 30 crew members, volunteers who come from Britain, France, Canada, Russia, Brazil, New Zealand, and 11 other countries, are still in prison. Half of them have already been charged with “piracy”.

It sounds ridiculous, but piracy carries a prison sentence of 10 to 15 years, and the Russian state is deadly serious. The crew have all been refused bail, and it will probably be months before they even stand trial. The Russian state has a long tradition of reacting badly when it is challenged, and the platform belongs to Gazprom, a state-owned firm, but even so this is an extreme over-reaction.

Besides, knowing how hard climate change will hit Russia, why did Moscow let Gazprom start drilling in the Arctic seabed at all? Because Russia’s relative prosperity in the past decade has depended heavily on exports of oil and gas. Because President Vladimir Putin’s rule depends on the continuation of that fragile prosperity. And because Russia’s onshore reserves of oil and gas are in decline.

Russian scientists are well aware that the frozen seabed of the Arctic Ocean is already thawing and releasing huge plumes of methane gas that will accelerate warming further. President Putin is concerned enough about climate change to spend serious diplomatic capital on getting geo-engineering into the IPCC report. But warming is a long-term (or at least a medium-term) problem, and his political survival is short-term.

Short-term comes first, so drill away, and if people protest against it, charge them with piracy. And if you think this is as stupid as politics can get, consider the Maldives.

The Maldives are several hundred tiny islands in the Indian Ocean where most of the land is only about a metre above sea level. As the sea level rises, most of the country will simply disappear beneath the waves.

You would think that the prospect of national extinction in two generations would concentrate anybody’s mind, and in the Maldives it did— for a while. In 2008, the long-ruling dictator Maumoon Abdul Gayoom was ousted in the islands’ first free election by Mohamed Nasheed, a young politician who put great emphasis on fighting climate change.

Nasheed knew that his own country’s actions could have little direct effect on the outcome: China emits about 2,000 times as much carbon dioxide as the Maldives. But he also knew that the extreme vulnerability of the Maldives gives its decisions a high publicity value, so he pledged to make it the world’s first carbon-neutral country. He even held a cabinet meeting underwater, with all the ministers in scuba gear, to dramatise the country’s plight.

Then, early last year, Nasheed was overthrown in a coup by senior police officers closely linked to the old regime. International pressure forced fresh elections early last month and Nasheed came in well ahead of the other two candidates.

Various interventions by police and judges linked to the former dictator have complicated the issue, and the election will now be re-run early next month. Nasheed will doubtless recover the presidency in the end, but here’s the thing. In the whole election campaign, he didn’t mention climate change once. Neither did the other candidates.

This is a country full of people whose grandchildren are going to have to live somewhere else because the whole place is going underwater, and they still don’t want to hear about climate change. You can’t just blame the politicians for the neglect. It’s just too uncomfortable for people to stay focused on the issue for long.

And by the way, opinion polls reveal that a majority of Russians approve of the piracy charges laid against the Greenpeace crew.

Comments (17) Add New Comment
Forest
I find uncanny similarities between Russia and Canada.
64
43
Rating: +21
Laughing
Yes indeed, "it's just too uncomfortable" to support policies that are backed by model-generated projections and hard data that doesn't support the earlier projections.
37
64
Rating: -27
kiskatinawkid
Glad to see 'Laughing', obviously a highly qualified scientist giving his 2 cents worth. Keep up the good work mighty genius!
But what I'd really like to see is some Canadian athletes announce they're going to boycott the Olympics over this.
It would also be nice to see some Canadian politicians grow some stones and get involved in this issue, but now I'm being totally out to lunch. Feeling kind of Russian like!
44
28
Rating: +16
Dennis Ryan
In 1995 actor Kevin Costner starred in a movie called "Waterworld", about our planet basically drowned. The movie was a dud; welcome to the reality show!!!
37
32
Rating: +5
Colorado Bob
The 2010 Russian heat wave killed 56,000 people.
30
28
Rating: +2
Lee L
@Laughing

Yep the word is out.

27
29
Rating: -2
martin
The people that disagree with Forest are wrong. Its pretty much the exact same thing going on. But us Canadians just can't mentally process that we are literally the worst country in the world on this issue. I tell people all the time that we have gotten the fossil of the year award 5 years running. The reaction is always the same.... flat out denial or a very defensive "who are they to tell a nice country like Canada what to do with its oil.
42
27
Rating: +15
scissorpaws
Indeed, I was just noticing how similar Harper looks to Ted Cruz, and how I've never seen them in the same place at the same time. Canada under "We Don't Need No Stinkin' Data" Harper will never get it, but after hurricane Sandy you'd think the American Public would get it (the Insurance Companies certainly do) but they just motor on, SNAFU. So I'm still on track to win the unwinnable bet. This is how the world ends. Laughing all the way.
39
28
Rating: +11
Ernest Payne
Apparently production trumps common sense and caution. In the Huffpost, of all places, there was a report on the involvement of the Koch brothers in Alberta and the Keystone project. Worth a read.
37
28
Rating: +9
DR-Montreal

We're no better than the Chinese really--pimping the environment for short-term gains, the ghost of the execrable Mulroney's *Free Trade* cackling and rattling its chains.

Canada's chance to be a leader in some sort of green revolution has steadily slipped away and is now over the cliff. Instead of green we have a semi-solid toxic sludge pumped from the black heart of the Tar Sands through an aging sclerotic skein of pipelines. or creaking quietly through towns at night in railroad tanker cars, like some legion of the damned seeking escape to befoul your rivers and fields. And the petro-bankers and CEOs celebrate their Faustian Pact with a BBQ in Edmonton--prime Alberta sirloin... cooked rare over burning tires.
39
29
Rating: +10
John-Albert Eadie
As usual, Dyer is right. If no responsible people soon take charge, our children will be doomed to a red-hot world rife with combat for food.
36
27
Rating: +9
Leslie Graham
@laughing

20 years ago the models projected that the Arctic ice would last until around 2080.
We've lost 75% of summer Arctic sea ice volume already in just the last 35 years.
That's the thing about 'uncertainties' - they cut both ways.
By the way - the slow down in one part of one surface temperature only graph is just a bit of noise in the system and we will see a new record temperature spike during the lnext El Nino - same as we ALWAYS do.
The way the denialists are clutching at that graph even as the oceans hit new record highs is a classic indicator of their desperation now that climate change is simply obvious.
I hope you're young.
28
26
Rating: +2
Leslie Graham

"..We're no better than the Chinese really..."

Worse - the Chinese have at least cut their coal plant building programme by half in the last six years and are also now the largest investors in renewable enegy on the planet.
28
25
Rating: +3
John Matlock
It reminds me of the chart in "The Limits to Growth" that shows the numbers of people interested in the future. All of us are interested in what happens this afternoon. Very few are interested in what happens fifty years from now.

This was all predicted in that book, which was written 40+ years ago.
30
29
Rating: +1
James Van Leeuwen
On the nature of willful blindness:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn5JRgz3W0o

19
21
Rating: -2
McRocket
I do not worry about climate change - even though I believe it exists.
I do my part to not pollute (so my conscious is relatively clear), I have no children (and plan to keep it that way) and I will be dead long before it will probably effect me to a noticeable degree.
Plus, if humans are pathetic enough to cause their own destruction...then they were not worth worrying about in the first place.
27
23
Rating: +4
gotohell
how would whoever wrote this article feel if someone says your country is stupid? stop criticizing small countries just because you can.
15
10
Rating: +5
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.