Diesel exhaust responsible for thousands of lung cancer deaths

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      An estimated six percent of lung-cancer deaths in the United States and the United Kingdom—11,000 deaths per year—may be due to diesel exhaust, according to a new study.

      Emission standards for diesel engines have become more stringent in recent years, but their exhaust still plays a significant role in lung-cancer deaths among truckers, miners, and railroad workers, the authors wrote.

      In addition, diesel exhaust still poses a major cancer threat for people living in dense cities or near highways, they said.

      Truckers and miners exposed over their careers to diesel exhaust face a risk of deadly lung cancer that is almost 70 times higher than the risk considered acceptable under U.S. occupational standards.

      The scientists calculated the lifetime risk for these workers at up to 689 extra lung-cancer deaths per 10,000 workers exposed. In comparison, one cancer death per 1,000 workers is used to set federal workplace standards.

      In addition, people in urban areas face a lifetime risk of lung cancer that is 10 times higher than the acceptable risk used in U.S. health standards, according to the study. An estimated 21 per 10,000 people exposed to the amount of diesel exhaust commonly found near U.S. highways would be at risk of dying of lung cancer over their lifetime.

      That compares to the risk of one death per 100,000 people that is used to set air-quality standards.

      To come up with their calculations, the researchers from Emory University and several other U.S. and European institutions used data from three previous studies of workers—two of truckers and one of nonmetal miners—as well as national death statistics for the United States and United Kingdom.

      They estimated that 4.8 percent of lung cancer deaths in the United States and the United Kingdom is due to occupational exposure to diesel exhaust, while 1.3 percent is due to environmental exposures to the exhaust.

      "With millions of workers currently exposed to such levels, and likely higher levels in the past, the impact on the current and future lung cancer burden could be substantial," the authors wrote.

      The researchers said their estimates "are far from precise and depend on broad assumptions." But they said their findings are "generally consistent" with past findings. Other factors, such as smoking, were not taken into account. They used the assumption that smoking does not modify effects of diesel exhaust.

      The World Health Organization concluded last year, after reviewing health data for workers, that diesel exhaust is carcinogenic.

      Diesel emissions have declined substantially over the past few years in the United States and Europe since new engine standards were initiated. More than 50,000 high-polluting diesel engines were cleaned up or removed from U.S. roads between 2008 and 2010, according to an Environmental Protection Agency report. About 230,000 tons of soot and smog-causing pollutants were eliminated, according to the report.

      However, while buses and trucks have largely adopted cleaner technology, it’s taken longer for off-road engines, such as farm and construction vehicles.

      The above study synopsis was written by Brian Bienkowski, a staff writer for Environmental Health News, a foundation-funded daily news service that also publishes its own enterprise journalism.

      Comments

      6 Comments

      Evil Eye

      Nov 28, 2013 at 4:36pm

      This is very old news as the Brits knew this in 1974 and made strenuous efforts to curb diesel emissions. With the trucking lobby in firm control of the BC Liberals, look for no change or improvement here. The BC Liberals do not give a damn about public health.

      Adrian Mack

      Nov 29, 2013 at 10:07am

      This is why cyclists need to wear helmets

      Donald

      Nov 30, 2013 at 4:48pm

      Helmets? Surely Adrian meant gas-masks.

      What are the odds that Gregor and his greenest city fantasy, will put up the money to get trollry buses back on Cambie street, or elminate diesel bus routes from the city?

      Alan Layton

      Dec 2, 2013 at 8:31am

      I'm sure property values along Knight and Clark dropped after the report made the media rounds.

      p lg

      Dec 2, 2013 at 9:56am

      One remedy to reduce diesel particulate. In the region's airshed is to ban large commercial truck traffic from the major regional roadways during the peak 2 hours of the morning and evening rush periods. Seeing lines of semi trailer trucks sitting in traffic is not the best way to reduce diesel impacts on the human population. Some US cities already do this rather than spend $billions of public dollars.

      p lg

      Dec 2, 2013 at 10:02am

      Allan, property values dropped long time ago once Knight street was widens to 6 lanes along a once residential street. The City has allowed further encroachment on Knight by widening the road further and removing more of the front yards of houses. There are 2 elementary schools. Along Knight-Clark and Vancouver Health refuses to test air quality and diesel particulate at these 2 schools.