Activists plot how to block new pipelines in B.C.

At night, around campfires under a New Brunswick sky, Ambrose Williams thought about imminent battles back home.

Last November, the young Vancouver man and nine others travelled more than 5,000 kilometres east to the town of Rexton. Their mission was to reinforce the Mi’kmaq of the Elsipogtog First Nation who had clashed the month before with the RCMP. The confrontation happened on October 17, 2013, when heavily armed police dismantled a highway blockade by Natives opposing a gas-exploration project.

“I saw it as a staging ground,” Williams told the Georgia Straight about his journey during a December 27 interview—the day he returned—near Vancouver’s downtown waterfront.

According to the 25-year-old former president of the Aboriginal Life in Vancouver Enhancement Society, it was “good training to see how police tactics are used against aboriginal people and protesters”.

That knowledge may become valuable later.

Williams’s Gitxsan and Dene ancestors are from northern B.C., where lies the path of the Northern Gateway oil pipeline proposed by Enbridge Inc. This is also where planned gas pipelines to the west coast will pass. These will cross pristine forests and waters as well as traditional Native territories.

“It was a good starting point because I saw Enbridge coming…like, four or five years ago,” Williams said about his involvement in New Brunswick. “I was talking about it with people, and people were, ‘Oh, yeah, that’s not going to go through; that’s not going to go through.’ But now they’ve got the green light.…It’s only a matter of time.”

About a week before he returned to Vancouver, a federal joint review panel endorsed for cabinet approval the 1,177-kilometre pipeline that will carry diluted bitumen from Alberta’s oilsands to the port in Kitimat, B.C., for shipment to foreign markets.

Williams echoed the vow by Native and nonaboriginal activists that Northern Gateway “will not be built”.

He expects “protection” and “decolonization” camps rising, blockades going up, and occupations. He cited as an example the 1990 crisis in Oka, Quebec, where Mohawks, some of whom were armed, came face to face with police and the military.

“We’ll hit them on all fronts and just keep on hammering,” Williams pledged.

He stressed that he neither encourages nor condones sabotage and other acts of destruction. But the soft-spoken Williams also said that “anything like that is acceptable if the cause is just. And stopping the pipeline is a just cause.”

“Everyone has their line, and once they cross it, then they’re accountable for themselves and the actions that they’ve caused,” Williams added. “We can’t go around telling people what to do, what to say. But everyone needs to realize they will come up to this line at some point, and they have to be willing to cross it or not.”

Acts of sabotage in the name of the environment are rare in B.C., according to Zoe Blunt (her activist name; legal name Tracie Park), a veteran of antilogging protests. Not only rare, but most people are also reluctant to talk about them, the Victoria-based activist noted.

“It’s difficult for anyone who is speaking out publicly in favour of sabotage, or even in, like, a neutral way…because they’re facing not only condemnation and denunciation from the corporations, the police, [and] the government but also the mainstream environmental groups,” Blunt told the Straight in a phone interview.

But she maintained that actions like tree-spiking and monkey wrenching—the destruction of property and machinery—helped stop the clear-cut logging of ancient forests in Clayoquot Sound on Vancouver Island and in the Elaho Valley near Squamish during the 1990s and 2000s.

Although acts of civil disobedience during the Clayoquot Sound conflict are celebrated, Blunt said, there’s hardly ever a mention that 20,000 trees are believed to have been spiked to ward off chainsaws.

That’s one reason why she’s working on her first book—a slim one, she said—with the tentative title The Pros and Cons of Tree-Spiking: The Secret History of Eco-Sabotage in British Columbia.

“Radicals assert that our society is founded on violence and coercion, much of it invisible,” Blunt writes in a draft she forwarded to the Straight. “Social critics note the accepted order of things is for the strong to abuse the weak. But when those lower on the hierarchy push back, the reaction is fear and horror.”

Her research material includes writings by former Vancouverite Paul Watson, world-renowned founder of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, a direct-action group operating on the high seas to protect whales and other marine wildlife.

In one 1990 manuscript titled “In Defense of Tree-Spiking”, Watson recalled organizing a “small cadre of concerned eco-activists” in 1982 when the Grouse Mountain Ski Resort announced that it was selling timber rights on a part of the mountain overlooking Vancouver.

Armed with hammers and metal spikes, they spiked 2,000 trees. They also posted warnings in the area. Watson and his companions then drove across the bridge to Vancouver and delivered news releases about their action, which generated front-page stories.

They followed up with TV interviews. Wearing masks, they all identified themselves as Wally Cedarleaf.

“Within a day, the sawmills stated flatly that they would not buy logs from the spiked lot,” Watson wrote. “The deal was off. Grouse Mountain Resort people were furious. We were denounced as terrorists and criminals by those we thought were our allies—the North Vancouver City Council, Greenpeace, and assorted other eco-bureaucrats.

“We didn’t give a damn—the trees were saved,” Watson continued. “Grouse Mountain would remain intact. The tactic worked.”

In the same document, Watson commented on civil disobedience, a symbolic and peaceful violation of the law, like sit-ins.

According to Watson, civil disobedience is “costly to its participants both financially and physically”.

The “establishment loves” civil disobedience, he stated. “The authorities are trained to deal with it. There are no surprises.”

Oil and gas pipelines are part of the energy-and-utilities sector, one of 10 sectors identified by the federal government in its 2009 National Strategy for Critical Infrastructure.

It defines critical infrastructure as “processes, systems, facilities, technologies, networks, assets and services essential to the health, safety, security or economic well-being of Canadians and the effective functioning of government”.

The strategy sets out a collaborative approach by the national government, provinces, territories, and private infrastructure owners and operators to protect these assets against “natural, intentional and accidental hazards”.

Critical infrastructure is also mentioned in a major security document released in 2012 and updated in 2013 by the federal government titled Building Resilience Against Terrorism: Canada’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy.

The government identifies “domestic, issue-based extremism” as one of three sources of terrorism threats in the country.

Noting that “domestic issue-based groups remain a reality in Canada”, the document states that these revolve around issues that include “environmentalism”.

“As part of this Strategy,” the paper notes, “the Government works closely with the owners and operators of critical infrastructure to identify risks and to understand what in practice can and should be done to reduce security vulnerabilities.”

It also states that under new legislation related to terrorism, the definition of “harm to Canadian interests” includes “interference with critical infrastructure”.

The document further notes that the RCMP “operates a Critical Infrastructure Intelligence Team examining physical and cyber threats to critical infrastructure”. This effort includes a “Suspicious Incident Reporting system to gather information from private industry and local law enforcement about suspicious incidents”.

In 2000, Wiebo Ludwig, a Dutch immigrant and leader of a Christian community in Alberta, was convicted on five charges related to bombings and vandalism of oil and gas wells in that province; he received a 28-month sentence.

Ludwig was also suspected by the RCMP of bombing six gas pipelines in B.C. in 2008 and 2009. He died in 2012.

The RCMP, Enbridge, and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers refused Straight requests for interviews. The Canadian Energy Pipeline Association did not respond to an interview request by the Straight before deadline.

Joe Alaimoana is the general manager of All Peace Protection, an Alberta-based security-guard company with clients in the oil industry. A Samoan from New Zealand, he is also the company’s First Nations economic-development officer, working to provide security jobs to aboriginal people in B.C. and Alberta.

According to Alaimoana, remote sites are a big challenge.

“It’s very easy for people to hide in there and start stealing and tampering with equipment,” Alaimoana told the Straight in a phone interview.

Safety for oil-and-gas employees and contractors working in isolated areas is also a concern, he added.

Services offered by Alaimoana’s company include pipeline security. He said that increased oil-and-gas activity will mean more employment for security guards, especially for pipeline patrols.

From East Vancouver, Gord Hill followed events in New Brunswick as the Mi’kmaq battled the police and employed various tactics against SWN Resources Canada, the company exploring for shale gas that will be extracted by means of hydraulic fracturing, a controversial method also known as fracking.

The Kwakwaka’wakw man noted that in court filings for an injunction against protesters, SWN stated that several company vehicles had been damaged and more than 1,000 geophones sabotaged. Geophones are devices for mapping gas deposits.

The Mi’kmaq also set fire to RCMP cruisers during the October 17 clash. A few days later, the RCMP abandoned its detachment in the Elsipogtog First Nation community following an arson attempt. The Canadian flag at the Mountie outpost was replaced with a Native warrior flag.

“With the Mi’kmaq struggle, you saw a lot of sabotage occur,” Hill told the Straight in a coffeehouse interview.

Turning to Enbridge’s Northern Gateway in B.C., Hill said he expects legal challenges and a massive mobilization of public opinion against the project.

“But then beyond that…what I think is really important is…a grassroots Native movement,” he said. “It’s the only one that really has the capability of engaging in more radical tactics or the willingness to engage in more radical tactics. Something like what happened in New Brunswick with the antifracking struggle from the Mi’kmaq. I mean, that’s an example for Native communities to look at as to how grassroots Native people can resist these kinds of projects.”

He sees one grassroots movement emerging with the Unis’tot’en clan of the Wet’suwet’en First Nation in northern B.C.

The Unis’tot’en have set up camp in the way of the planned Pacific Trails gas pipeline. The project was granted an environmental-assessment certificate by the B.C. government in 2008. It is expected to be operational in 2015.

In a 2012 interview in Vancouver, Unis’tot’en spokesperson Freda Huson told the Straight that Pacific Trails will clear the route for Enbridge’s Northern Gateway oil pipeline and other gas pipelines.

When asked how her people will deal with a potential violent confrontation, Huson replied: “We’ll do what we need to do.”

Hill has visited the Unis’tot’en camp in the path of Pacific Trails. “It’s going to be the first pipeline that’s going to be really challenged,” Hill said. “That’s going to be a critical part of the Enbridge struggle.”

While growing up, Ambrose Williams spent many summers with his Gitxsan and Dene relatives in northern B.C., where they live next to the Unis’tot’en clan of the Wet’suwet’en Nation.

When Williams returned to Vancouver on a bus from Calgary in the early morning of December 27, he didn’t bother with a rest. He went straight to meetings with people opposing oil and gas developments.

One of these was Shannon Hecker, a UBC anthropology student. They got acquainted through social media when Williams was in New Brunswick and Hecker was organizing rallies in Vancouver in solidarity with the Mi’kmaq.

Williams and Hecker met personally for the first time on that day he came home, and he invited her to join the interview with the Straight.

According to Hecker, resistance to oil and gas pipelines in B.C. and antifracking protests in New Brunswick are “all related…a case of people standing up to defend Mother Nature from desecration as a result of unsustainable resource extraction. The pipelines is just like another sort of front on that same war.”

As to how far people should go, Hecker said: “That depends on your willingness to commit. I don’t want to tell anyone what they should or shouldn’t do. But we all need to be aware that this is a war.”

Comments (30) Add New Comment
Evil Eye
To block a pipeline? It's called C-4.
23
50
Rating: -27
cuz
I'm sorry, but anybody that thinks tree spiking is a good idea is full of stupid!!
47
55
Rating: -8
Native restistance
Do any of the pipelines cross native reserves? If so then I would think that those bands should have the legal authority to deny access to their land.
46
39
Rating: +7
Soda pop
I was with Amberose during the protests in Rexton, didn't know he would bring the fight back home and even harder.
37
31
Rating: +6
City Boy
By any means necessary.
44
56
Rating: -12
Lee L
Block away.

The Chinese will then be buying more fuel from Russia instead of Canadian bitumen refined in the Gulf of Mexico. Russia will accelerate drilling under he Arctic seabed to meet the demand if China doesnt actually drill there itself.

A bitumen mine managed on solid LAND and piped to a marine terminal is a much safer option than Arctic seabed oil pumped to a tanker all at sea and transported to a refinery.


30
52
Rating: -22
HellSlayerAndy
Pipeline is stupid for a lot of very good reasons.

But no one seems to account for the geo-political reality.
Canada IS part of the American Empire. Our energy policy ultimately is approved by them.
So we build it and Sino-American relations deteriorate; Congressional nutbars agitate for sanctions and pass sanctions and POOF! we lose the only customer that makes the thing even viable. (As if those Congress critters didn't know;-)

Upshot is...all that tankers traffic will go south to the US and we'll get jack all for the resource other than getting the nod for being a good friend to America.
A Empire isn't much of an empire if it is giving away advantage to it's potential rivals and competitors.
The US hasn't done it in the last century and it has NO intention of doing now.
So let's wait until the US states publicly, as opposed to behind the scenes, that it's a strategic asset, so we can at least get them to kick in some cash to build it.
18
35
Rating: -17
Anne
"The Mi’kmaq also set fire to RCMP cruisers..." It has never been proven who set the fires.

“With the Mi’kmaq struggle, you saw a lot of sabotage occur,” Hill told the Straight in a coffeehouse interview." It has also never been proven that "sabotage" was the work of the Mi'kmaq or allies in Rexton or elsewhere in NB.
37
38
Rating: -1
CitizenJane
"But we all need to be aware that this is a war.”

Never been to war. Never been a protester. Not an activist. I'm just a hard-working British Columbian who pays taxes on times and never gets a speeding ticket. I've also spent time visiting those beautiful coastlines. I do not want more pipelines or tankers carrying bitumen in B.C., and if the Harper government thinks it can cram it down our throats; it is war and I'm in.

And, yes: I'd be willing to give up my car and support a different fuel source and lifestyle if it means less dependence on oil.
48
28
Rating: +20
out at night
Here's my comment:

Hello RCMP. Hello CSIS. Hello CIA. Despite using a pseudonym to post this comment, I'm pretty sure you've got some way to figure out who I am. So, "Hi!"

That's it.
29
28
Rating: +1
John
@Lee L
The pipeline isn't the major issue here in BC. A leak on land can be cleaned - assuming the powers to be have the balls to make the company do it. It is the spill at sea that is the major problem. Where they want to ship out of has an incredibly tight and twisted passage to get to. With the traffic that will be needed to be added to that route, it is not a matter of if there will be an accident, but when.

The mess from Exxon Valdez is still not cleaned up, and it never will be. One of those tankers dropping its load will destroy the area for generations. The pipeline safety propaganda is being pumped out at us to distract us from the fact that Enbridge will have no legal responsibility to clean up any mess made from any spill from a ship.
27
23
Rating: +4
the Dude
Should've asked how many Gitxsan people know who this guy is. There is a grassroots movement in Gitxsan territory, but the entities making deals with industry are full-steam ahead. Transparency is not present.
11
25
Rating: -14
the Dude
@Native resistance: Band Offices are a creation of Canada and have no right and title to land. It is the traditional/ hereditary chiefs and their house members that have right and title or true claim to land.
20
27
Rating: -7
BCBill
Okay, war it is. I would recommend that pipeline builders and operators do "whatever it takes" (to borrow from a commentator in the article) to protect their infrastructure, equipment and personnel. Saboteurs and other eco-terrorists should know that their lives are at risk.
20
52
Rating: -32
out at night
Give a fire oxygen and it burns hotter. The pipeline isn't all about spills on land or at sea, though those are of course major concerns. For me it's more about the tar sands themselves. Every pipeline outta there is more oxygen for a fire that needs to be put out. I know it's not de rigeur to talk about shutting down the tar sands altogether (and I know that's not about to happen), but let's at least try to think of ways to keep the operation from growing any faster.
28
27
Rating: +1
RUK
By any means necessary.

Right. Well, now we have reached the inevitable stupid part of protesting - the starry eyed romantic dreamer, imagining the flashing eyes catching the light of glory, pipebomb in one hand, flag of the revolution in the other....

It sounds pretty cool until you realize that spending the eight years in jail does nothing good for you, your movement, your band, the taxpayers, or ecology.

Then you start making deals, turning informer, naming names, desperately naming names!

Smarten up. The state knows far, far more about "whatever it takes" and "any means necessary" than you can possibly imagine. That's what they do.

Instead, keep up the boring, unromantic task of educating Canadians and making it politically unpopular to risk despoiling the water we drink, the air we breathe, the food we eat. Offer some alternatives to the massive economic implications also.

Otherwise it's just posturing and noise - at best.
26
21
Rating: +5
War It Is Then
"Okay, war it is. I would recommend that pipeline builders and operators do "whatever it takes" (to borrow from a commentator in the article) to protect their infrastructure, equipment and personnel. Saboteurs and other eco-terrorists should know that their lives are at risk."

Absolutely right, these terrorists think they're going to war then the companies and police (do their jobs for once) will do whatever it takes to protect themselves. Long prison sentences for those that survive as well.
21
27
Rating: -6
Walter
The Northern Gateway proposal is a very divisive issue. It is dividing people of Coastal BC from Alberta's oil supporters, and from the Harper Government. The fight is on but it has gone from being a fight to being an all out war. When the NEB's Joint Review Panel recommended that this project go ahead, they attached 209 recommendations. If they needed to attach 209 provisions, that tells me the project should never proceed past the consultation stage.
19
17
Rating: +2
teth adam
ironic the protesters in the photo at the top of this article are taking a ferry powered by fossil fuels and probably wearing clothes at least partially made from petroleum/heavy industry.

26
21
Rating: +5
Defender of Canada
The only reason this kind of sabotage was successful in the past was because most people were indifferent and were too busy working and enjoying their lives and it didn`t really affect them all that much. These people were seen as a fringe element that consisted of people who were well meaning and nobody was killed and they were pretty well isolated incidents. And being Canada, those who committed these acts knew they could get away with it because of our non-violent and accommodating ways, unlike certain other countries like Russia and Saudi Arabia for example. Their arrogance and conceit blinded them as they proudly gloated about their actions thinking they were so tough and clever. But todays situation is different. Oil and gas is important to all of us with the income and jobs and the economy. Development of these resources will bring a new era of prosperity and wealth and great lives with the arts and culture and health care and all that goes with it. Those who try to destroy our civilization this way will awaken the sleeping giant. Any saboteurs will be hunted down and dealt with harshly. Canadians will rise to the occasion and defend our families and our way of life. Many of these saboteurs have already exposed themselves and so the authorities will have a good start. And I also can see the potentialof a rise in vigilantism as everyday Canadians take it upon themselves to dish out a form of frontier justice on those who would try to destroy what we hold near and dear. So the message to the fanatics and zealots is that this time, there will be consequences so you had better think hard before you decide to act.
27
26
Rating: +1

Pages

Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.