Gendered symbols should be removed from Vancouver community centres, report says

Trans and gender-variant inclusion working group releases draft recommendations

Those familiar gendered washroom symbols could eventually become a thing of the past at community centres, swimming pools, and parks in Vancouver.


Replacing them could be gender-neutral pictograms focusing on the function of the space: a toilet symbol for washrooms, a hanger for change rooms, and a shower for, well, showers.

As well, mixed-gender “family” spaces could be relabelled as “universal” in public recreational facilities overseen by the Vancouver park board.

These are just a few of the ideas floated in a new report by the city’s trans and gender-variant inclusion working group. On March 25, the advisory body announced the release of its draft recommendations, which pertain to public spaces, signage, human resources, and programs.

A few hours after reading the report, Trans Alliance Society secretary Morgane Oger told the Georgia Straight that she is “satisfied” with the work of the group, and she understands that the draft recommendations represent a “compromise”.

However, Oger was hoping the report would go even further and propose all facilities be made gender-neutral.

“I think a key in all of this is to be careful to not have transgender offered as a third gender—and this is the shortcoming, in my opinion, of the document,” Oger said by phone. “Rather than having a binary gender world of male and female—or man and woman—we end up with man, women, and exception. Exceptionalism for me is always difficult.”

On Tuesday (April 1) at 7 p.m., the working group plans to hold a community meeting about the draft recommendations at the Coal Harbour Community Centre. It’s also asking for feedback via an online survey.

Vision Vancouver park commissioner Trevor Loke told the Straight the working group’s final report is expected to be presented and voted on at the park board’s meeting on April 28. According to Loke, who’s the park board’s liaison for the group, the process leading up to the draft recommendations has been “successful and inclusive”.

“I think the recommendations are designed to be achievable, and they’re also designed to have a positive impact—not just for people that are trans and gender-variant,” Loke said by phone. “They’re designed to meet all the intersections of people who are having difficulty accessing spaces, whether those are seniors, persons with disabilities, people with body self-esteem issues who don’t access public spaces because of the criticism that they’re afraid of receiving from peers.

“The recommendations are designed to build bridges among various communities, so that we have a net positive impact for everybody. So I think, by the very definition of that, they are very realistic and they’ll be good for everyone.”

The draft report recommends that signage use symbols that emphasize function rather than gender.

The report’s stated goals are to reduce barriers, strengthen inclusivity, and increase the number of trans and gender-variant users accessing park-board facilities. Its dozens of draft recommendations include:

  • All community centres should have at least one universal and accessible single-stall washroom for each activity area.
  • The number of private stalls in men’s washrooms should be increased.
  • Multiple single-stall universal washrooms should be created “when possible”.
  • When new change rooms are developed at swimming pools, there should be separate men’s, women’s, and universal facilities.
  • “Gendered symbols of bodies” should be removed “as much as possible” from signage.
  • Men’s and women’s washrooms should indicate that trans and gender-variant users are welcome.
  • Trans-inclusive stickers should be placed at entrances to facilities.
  • A public education campaign, which would explain the use of the term “universal”, should be carried out before signage changes.
  • There should be mandatory training on trans and gender-variant awareness and sensitivity for staff.
  • Staff should be trained to have an increased ability to resolve conflicts relating to gendered spaces and to do so in manner that respects trans and gender-variant people and upholds their rights.
  • Job postings should explicitly state that trans and gender-variant people are encouraged to apply.
  • New drop-in programming times should be introduced for trans and gender-variant people and allies, with windows and viewing areas covered for attendees’ safety.
  • Instructors should avoid using gendered language (“ladies and gentlemen”) as well as dividing people into groups based on perceived gender in class.

“For many trans* and gender variant people, discrimination and the anxiety it creates are ongoing facets of life. Negotiating gender-segregated spaces, such as change rooms and washrooms, can in itself be an anxiety-inducing task due in part to previous experiences being confronted (i.e. gender-policed) in spaces where others feel they do not belong,” the report states.

“In this case, gender-policing can include a range of behaviours from blatant non-verbal and verbal expressions of disapproval, disrespectful harassment meant to shame people into leaving the washroom of their rightful choice, or, in the worst scenarios, physical assault. When no alternatives to gender segregated space exists, such as universal change rooms, safety decreases for many trans* and gender variant individuals, and consequently their use of these facilities.”

Gender-segregated spaces could get signs indicating that they welcome trans and gender-variant people.

Oger called the report a “good start”. The Trans Alliance Society secretary said she was especially pleased to see some of the draft recommendations addressing staff training.

“To make it clear that the definition of a man and the definition of a woman is actually not based on the body bits, but based on who you identify as and who you are as a person, I think that’s a very, very good step forward,” Oger said. “I’m very pleased to see Vancouver trying very hard to take a step forward in removing discrimination against anybody and especially when that anybody includes me.”

Chaired by Metha Brown and Drew Dennis, the working group was formed after the park board voted unanimously in May 2013 to provide for “greater inclusivity” in its facilities. The group’s other members are Gwen Haworth, Ayesha Ismail-Kanani, Theo Jakob, Danielle Jarvis, Kai Scott, and Blake Stitilis.

Reached by phone, Trans Alliance Society chair Marie Little told the Straight that the working group could have undertaken “a bit more outreach” in the months before the draft recommendations' release.

“But, on the whole, it was a fair enough process,” Little said.

Comments (53) Add New Comment
You know, this is way too much. I can't even.
Rating: +48
I'm all for gay and transgender rights, but this is a bit kind of ridiculous.
Rating: +56
This is very confusing. Where are the signs for 'Men'- or will there be any?
Rating: +33
Should just get rid of all the segregation and have a single change room for everyone to use.
Rating: -9
Oh for crissakes! This kind of crap has to stop? Cow towing to what, 0.01% of the population now? C'mon, who really thinks this idea makes sense? If you've got a dick you go into one washroom, if you sit down to pee you go into the other one. If you haven't figured out which one you are yet or want to be today then do your all your business in a stall. Nuff said.
Rating: +19
This non-gender thing would be GREAT if some men didn't rape and/or engage in acts of pedophilia. Until then, we need separate washrooms--bigger ones for women as they usually have to deal with the kids. There's no equality or safety yet. Protection has to be the MAIN concern.
Rating: -35
Ugh... all these reports and recommendations for like what, 1% of the population?
Rating: +32
I can't say that I support this. Most transpeople only wish to express their true gender and really don't want to be pointed out like freaks. The state of androgeny is a fleeting one and one that many of us curse. No one sane wants to stick out in the crowd and a freak

To remove gender specific signs would only irritate the public causing more public outlashing at us.

No thanks, I don't need that kind of crappy politics.
Rating: +28
That's just stupid
I'm not against being lgbt, but I think this has reached a stupid level of overthinking. Would ppl from the lgbt community really think this is offensive when they see the gendered signs on the bathrooms?

Second point is, would everyone be able to understand English if the signs say "trans women welcome"? I think in my point of view this is just a stupid overthinking from people who just want a publicity stunt in the name of "good cause"

It's a universal sign people, no one will get hurt seeing them. It has nothing to do we the sexual orientation... Just the anatomy. You don't feel comfortable in your own anatomy that is a different story, but doesn't relate to you going to use the bathroom. Keep it simple stupid, people!!
Rating: +50
Are you kidding me? This is goof use of resources? I cant image transgender people care about signs on washrooms. There is no way they could take offence.

This is going to far. We have two difference genders, not 3, so its fine to acknowledge that. If someone changes their gender then fine, but they are either one or the other.

Rating: +26
So how do I know which (Male) toilet to use? And no I don't have a problem with Trans people using the Men's washroom as I don't with Gay people either.

More Privacy in the stalls is welcome.

However removing Gendered symbols for Washrooms (when simply adding welcome to Trans Gendered) is silly.

After all we all walk around in Gendered Bodies all day and those can't be removed, changed yes but not removed :)
Rating: +29
A Guy
I can't wait to change and shower with women. You know just so no one gets offended.
Rating: +25
Just to put this in context, about 1 person in 300 is trans.
Rating: +9
Miranda Nelson
I'm finding a lot of these comments truly distressing. Why do so many of you have objections to making a more inclusive space for every human?

How many people have mobility issues in this city? Can't be that many. But we make sure sidewalks have cutaways and buildings have elevators and make sure doors are wide enough for wheelchairs so EVERYONE can fully participate in day to day life. This is about making sure trans individuals aren't excluded from society. They are our friends, families, and neighbours. Why would you be so ignorant to say that's a bad thing?

Opposing this measure speaks volumes about you.
Rating: -67
Ben Sili
When you got to go, most people do not have the time to read 2 pages of inclusion of every subtlety of sexual orientations and what will ultimately follow, its translation into every single language known to our planet in order to avoid discrimination.
Rating: +33
@Miranda Nelson I don't think the posters here are against trying to accomodate trans people in order for them to feel more inclusive. It's just that bathrooms are a contentious subject. That's not to say it's not a nobel cause because it is, however; as a society we simply can't concessions for everyones differences is simply impractical. I think by educating the public with trans concerns (regarding bathrooms anyways) rather than sticking labels on everything is a better use of resources. Trans individuals need to realize all their needs cannot be met in the public realm. Much like handicapped people can't simply go hang-gliding for instance. It's possible but not without a great deal of effort. Personally, trans people should use the bathroom based on their gender identity and as long as their expression matches that identity. In a way they are more fortunate potentially by using either option.
Rating: +13
Mr Hollywood
This is great. Why don't we also add signage for big and skinny people. Oh we can't forget about people with HIV, Crabs, Lice, Bed Bugs, bad body odor, too much perfume. They should get special signage as well Mayor.
Oh wait they already have the signage up. The male sign, the female sign, the family/everyone sign, handicap sign, and the exit sign. If you saw a universal sign, you would think Transgender or gender variant thus alienating and/or judging them further from society. If you don't know what sex you are please find out before going out your door.
Rating: +2
This is one of them.
Nice waste of resources.
More booths, less bullshit. Toilet solutions 101.
Rating: +19
Mrs Hollywood
Why don't we keep it simple. Signage of balls for guys, vagina for ladies, balls and vaginal for LGBT, and a butt hole signage for the a$$holes who waste our tax dollars on this garbage.

Rating: +16
MIRANDA NELSON, you are an idiot and every time you comment, I cringe!

I am an LGTB supporter, and i celebrate openness and the freedom of everyone to own their own sexual identity without prosecution or harassment.

That said, this idea is asinine and it's embarrassing that this non-issue is even getting attention from the parks board. Then again, Vancouver has become a city of political correctness gone awry.
Rating: +29


Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Draft Recommendations for Trans and Gender Variant Inclusion in Vancouver Recreational Facilities

PDF (6.55 MB)