Gwynne Dyer: What happens if Libya splits in two?

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      The Red Wadi (Wadi al Ahmar) lies a bit to the west of the old Roman border between Tripolitania and Cyrenaica, but if Libya splits in two it will serve quite well as the new frontier. The deadline for the fighting to resume there was yesterday (March 27), but neither side is very good at organising a battle and we will have to wait for a bit. It will probably happen in the end, though.

      Libya has been a chaos of rival militias holding down local fiefdoms ever since the overthrow of Moammar Gadhafi’s 42-year dictatorship in 2011, but in the past month the disintegration has accelerated. A formal division of the country into two successor states is now a real possibility, but it’s unlikely to happen without some further fighting.

      There has been some already. Much of the eastern half of the country, Cyrenaica, has been under the control of a coalition of tribal militias led by Ibrahim Jathran since last year. He seized control of the terminals on the coast through which two-thirds of Libya’s oil production is exported, and set up the “Cyrenaica Political Bureau”, which is acting as a proto-government in the east.

      The central government in Tripoli, which was led by Prime Minister Ali Zeidan, was powerless to stop him. The government has been paying $1,000 per month to about 160,000 members of various militias (out of a total population of only six million) in an attempt to make them servants of the state, but they don’t feel obliged to obey government orders. And the army that obeys Tripoli is too small and weak to take on a powerful warlord like Jathran.

      Months of stalemate followed, while the country’s oil exports, which account for 95 percent of government revenues, plunged from 1.5 million barrels/day to only 200,000 barrels. (The Zintan militia in western Libya was also cutting pipelines and occupying oilfields from the western oilfields from time to time.) But matters came to a head when Jathran’s militia started trying to export oil itself from the eastern oil terminals in early March.

      If he could sell Cyrenaica’s oil with impunity that would be the end of a united Libya, so Prime Minister Ali Zeidan threatened to sink a rogue tanker, the North Korean-flagged Morning Glory, that arrived at one of the terminals controlled by Jathran to load oil valued at $30 million. Libya’s navy had been sunk by NATO planes and its air force was near mutiny, however, so all Zeidan had to stop it was a tugboat jury-rigged with Grad rockets.

      Morning Glory managed to get away, and the Islamist-dominated Congress that passes for a final authority in Libya fired Zeidan for his failure. Morning Glory was stopped later in the week by a U.S. Navy warship and handed over to the government in Tripoli, but it was too late for Zeidan, who fled the country fearing assassination.

      Congress then ordered the most powerful militia in the west of the country, the Libyan Shield, to seize the rebel-held ports in the east, but after some clashes they were stopped east of Sirte. Since then the two sides have glared at each other across the Red Wadi, waiting for the deadline set by the speaker of Congress and de facto president, Nuri Abu Sahmain, to expire.

      Now it has expired, and nothing has happened yet, but neither has there been any sign that the two sides are talking. Besides, it is misleading to talk of “two sides”: the country has become a jumble of militia-run city-states with rapidly shifting alliances. But the east-west split is real, and it is getting worse.

      It goes back a long way. Even 2,000 years ago, in the heyday of the Roman empire, Tripolitania and Cyrenaica were two separate provinces, quite different in language and religion. Cyrenaica was Greek-speaking, and Tripolitania spoke Latin. After the empire became Christian in the 4th century AD, Cyrenaica became Orthodox while Tripolitania was part of the Roman (Catholic) church.

      The Arab conquest of both provinces in the 7th century erased those differences of language and religion. All Libyans now speak Arabic, and the vast majority are Sunni Muslims. But the regional and tribal divisions of the country are very deep, and the residents of Cyrenaica have long resented the fact that most of the oil income flowed to the capital, Tripoli, and the rest of Tripolitania, while most of the oil was actually in Cyrenaica.

      The Cyrenaica Political Bureau says it is a “federalist” organization that wants only the decentralization of the country and a bigger share of the oil revenues for the east, but in fact it is already halfway out the door—and the army units and air bases in the east support the rebels.

      “We are assembling a large force to protect the ports,” said Senussi al-Meghrabi. “If they are attacked, it will be civil war.” But not a long civil war, probably, for there is virtually no chance that forces from Tripolitania could conquer Cyrenaica—especially when they are facing their own revolt back home from the powerful Zintan militia, allies of the exiled ex-prime minister Ali Zeidan. And they control the oil of Tripolitania.

      Comments

      9 Comments

      I Chandler

      Mar 28, 2014 at 4:42pm

      Some of the rent-a-jihadis might have been moved back to Libya:

      "Given the failure of the anti-Assad rent-a-jihadis, Israel may soon intervene to destroy Assad’s air force and armored formations. Israel is getting ready to massively attack Hezbullah in Lebanon in yet another attempt to eradicate the Shia resistance movement."

      http://ericmargolis.com/2014/03/war-in-syria-set-to-intensify/

      cassius

      Mar 29, 2014 at 5:28am

      Guess who supported the use of force by NATO in Libya? The Liberals and whoever was leading them at the time and the NDP lead by the sainted Jack Layton as well as the Harper government, of course. And now they all support the Ukraine over Russia. Notice a pattern here? By the way, Dyer supported intervention. He argued that the Libyans were far too sophisticated, too cosmopolitan to give in to tribalism.

      DR-Montreal

      Mar 30, 2014 at 7:19am

      I am very surprised Dyer did not even mention the fact that in WW I, Cyrenaica, their Senussi tribesmen armed with rifles brought in by the Kaiser's zeppelins (yes, really), successfully defeated the Italians and established their own separate state. This is an important precedent very much alive in the Senussi in Cyrenaica today.

      doconnor

      Mar 30, 2014 at 11:24am

      Libya may have problems, but they pale in comparison to Syria's where we didn't interfere.

      Interference

      Mar 30, 2014 at 4:53pm

      Actually western powers did interfere in Syria by arming the rebels and letting them know that the West will support them.

      I Chandler

      Mar 31, 2014 at 5:10am

      Eric Margolis figured Western special forces covertly supported anti-government forces in Syria – just as the west organized overthrow of Khadaffi. As for NATO's bombing of Libya, a commenter succinctly pointed out that our motives were suspect:

      "Dyer says it's "lazy thinking" to suggest that oil is the reason for the West's attack on Libya, but he is equally guilty of lazy thinking in not investigating the monetary motives and Resource Control as legitimate reasons for Western intervention.

      He ignores the following motives:

      1. To control the Central Bank of Libya
      http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MD14Ak02.html

      2. To confiscate Libya's Sovereign Wealth Funds
      http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article27990.htm

      3. To stop creation of a single African currency, the gold dinar
      http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=24639

      4. To prevent Gaddafi from nationalizing oil companies
      http://english.pravda.ru/hotspots/crimes/25-03-2011/117336-reason_for_wa...

      5. To control other African countries and their resources
      http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MD20Ak02.html

      6. To stop possible unification of African countries
      http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/articles/in-the-theatre-of-the-absurd-lib...

      It seems uncharacteristically naive of Dyer to believe that Gaddafi wasn't threatening western interests, and that "protecting civilians" was anything other than a convenient excuse to intervene. "

      MD

      Mar 31, 2014 at 1:12pm

      If you are going to argue that the existence of a single African currency is even possible, let alone probable, or a reason for Western intervention, it becomes simple to dismiss the rest of your flights of fantasy.

      A unified African currency makes absolutely no economic sense.

      Period.

      May as well argue that Western powers intervened to try and alter the gravitational constant. I don't doubt there is a crackpot website for that as well