City of Vancouver finds serious problems with Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain pipeline application

The City of Vancouver wants to hit the brakes on Kinder Morgan’s application for an expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline until its concerns can be addressed.

Photos

That’s the takeaway from a May 13 presentation that deputy city manager Sadhu Johnston delivered after staff reviewed the 15,000-page proposal filed with the National Energy Board.

“Our findings were that a major spill would be catastrophic to our environment, our economy, and our international reputation,” Johnston told city council. “As a region, as a community, we are not ready for a spill. The levels of insurance are inadequate, the emergency response systems are inadequate. And so we have some grave concerns.”

Following Johnston’s presentation, Vision Vancouver councillor Andrea Reimer said the NEB process limits the city’s options for dealing with the pipeline.

“The tangible step, at this point, appears to need to be political,” she said. “We very much feel that we need to go to the prime minister. He gave himself unprecedented powers to be able to interfere in the National Energy Board not that long ago. So this is an opportunity for him to get involved and ensure that there is an appropriate technical review and much expanded public access to the process.”

Reimer said she did not support a plebiscite on the Trans Mountain pipeline held in conjunction with November civic elections, an idea that has been proposed by Green Party councillor Adriane Carr. Reimer cited concerns over a lack of spending limits in such votes.

“There is no requirement for third parties, corporations, unions, or individuals to report on their spending in a plebiscite,” she said. “I just don’t see how it would serve this issue to allow for a no-holds-barred, Wild West-style vote on an issue.”

Delivering an update on the city’s status as an intervener, Johnston systematically argued that Kinder Morgan’s application is incomplete and inadequate in scope.

Number one on his list of concerns is the proposal’s lack of a “qualitative human health risk assessment”.

“They do not consider health impacts from a spill, which seems crazy to us,” he said. “We need to look at the potential impacts of a spill and understand the health impacts.”

Johnston, former chief environmental officer for the city of Chicago, also found problems with the project’s plans for emergency management. For example, he said, spill-response preparations have only been submitted for calm water, and long daylight hours, and assume that all required responders will be available.

Another area of concern for city staff is the proposed project’s potential contributions to climate change.

“The NEB does not intend to consider upstream and downstream climate change impacts,” Johnston said. “We are already facing real costs from climate change…and at this point, that’s not allowed to even be discussed during the NEB process.”

Four hundred oil tankers a year

A twinned Kinder Morgan pipeline would triple the amount of diluted bitumen transported from the Alberta oil sands to the Lower Mainland, increasing the number of oil tankers moving through Burrard Inlet from some 60 ships per year to more than 400.

A Kinder Morgan representative could not immediately be reached for comment. An emailed statement supplied by Scott Stoness, vice president of regulatory, emphasized that Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain application was “determined complete” by the NEB.

“We understand there are many questions about our project from the City of Vancouver and as an Intervener the City has full process rights and has asked questions within the regulatory process,” it reads. “We are reviewing these questions and we are confident that our Application, which will undergo extensive review by the NEB and Intervenors, will address those interests within the review process over the next 14 months.”

In addition to problems with Kinder Morgan’s application, the city is taking issue with the process through which the NEB is assessing the proposal. Those concerns relate to what Johnston described as “unreasonable timelines” and a “lack of public input”.

“There is no public forum for expressing concerns on this,” he said. “There is no public hearings, there is no webcast, there is no opportunity for the public to express its concerns.”

City of Vancouver staff have called attention to differences between the National Energy Board review of Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain application and that of the Enbridge Northern Gateway project.
City of Vancouver

Johnston added that while the NEB process for the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline was far from perfect, it was significantly more inclusive than the process through which the Trans Mountain project is moving.

For example, he noted that while Northern Gateway evidence hearings went on for 37 months, Trans Mountain hearings concluded after 11 months.

“Folks that really want to participate are being told that there is no way for them to be involved in that process,” Johnston said. “To us, that seems a little undemocratic and really inappropriate for the magnitude of this decision for our communities, for our region.”

Answers sought on 400 questions

Mayor Gregor Robertson weighed in on Johnston’s presentation via a May 13 media release.

“Today’s report exposes alarming flaws and gaps both in Kinder Morgan’s proposed expansion and the National Energy Board’s process to evaluate it,” that message states. “This new information reinforces why a seven-fold expansion of oil tanker traffic through Vancouver’s local waters is not in Vancouver’s interest and poses an enormous threat to our economy and environment.”

The City of Vancouver has used its status as an intervener to submit more than 400 questions about the Trans Mountain project to the NEB.

In a question-and-answer session that followed Johnston’s presentation, most councillors in attendance expressed criticisms and concerns about the NEB application process.

The Green Party's Adriane Carr called attention to risks associated with loaded oil tankers navigating the Burrard Inlet.

“In emergency preparedness, I cannot imagine that you choose to only analyze a risk that is under best conditions,” she said. “Is not the practice of risk assessment to look at the potential and weigh the timelines for extreme events?”

NPA councillor George Affleck’s questions focused on how much staff time the city is devoting to the Trans Mountain issue.

Vision Vancouver’s Kerry Jang expressed alarm for Kinder Morgan failing to present information on the potential health impacts of an accident or serious oil spill in the Lower Mainland.

“Really, they've left human beings out of the equation,” he said. “It’s all about money or something else.”

Comments (11) Add New Comment
flapacor
Well, good to hear that the Mayor of Vancouver and city council are thinking the way the majority of Vancouverites are regarding this highly risky proposal of having 7 times more tankers moving through Burrard inlet - 400 tankers, more than 1 per day on top of the ships and other vessels already moving through this area. It's a disaster in the making and one way too costly in terms of economy and environment to pursue.
17
33
Rating: -16
Lee L
"there is no public forum for expressing concerns on this".
And this coming from Vision Vancouver. POT..meet KETTLE.

16
14
Rating: +2
TedCamp
You want Straight Talk - I'll give you straight talk. Vancouver's present City Council are a weird combination of NIMBYISM and a Canadian version of Kim Jong Un Robertson. We have decreed! Everybody ride bicycle! Everybody walk! Close all necessary road! No ships in our beautiful harbor! Industry go away! Now! Nobody collect paycheque! All go on welfare! Work bad! Dole good! Liberal in Victoria bad! NDP good! World end at Vancouver City Limit! I have news for you Mr. Mayor the world doesn't end where you say and the reason Vancouver was founded is because it was the water front terminus of a rail road. That meant jobs and shipping and use of foreshore. Get over it fella your time is running out and not a minute too soon for the rest of Canada. We want to move forward.
18
18
Rating: 0
Bruce
@Ted

You don't live in the lower mainland at all, do you?
11
17
Rating: -6
TedCamp
Damn right I do, I've worked, lived and invested in the Lower Mainland over 30 years. Note the word WORK. My family & I have work ethic and still take care of the environment. It is impossible to ride a bike from the Fraser Valley to downtown Vancouver. Your Mayor and his council are a bunch of half wit dreamers.
13
17
Rating: -4
bobo
Funny how the application is about the pipeline, but the thing everybody is against is more tankers. While the two are joined at the hip, the pipeline is not responsible for the tankers. I guess everybody will be happy to have a substantial increase in rail traffic. It's coming one way or another. But as usual, out clueless mayor thinks it's his world.
10
17
Rating: -7
TedCamp
Amen Bobo, I gave you a thumbs-up
11
17
Rating: -6
Save Vancouver
Someone remind us of the number of spills we've had in the decades since oil has been shipped out of Vancouver harbour.

Hint: None.
10
13
Rating: -3
Jordan Bober
Here's the real story: Today, Vision had the opportunity to give Vancouverites a chance to express their opinion on Kinder Morgan on the civic election ballot by supporting Councillor Carr's motion, and instead they decided to scrap that idea in favour of asking Stephen Harper to do something they know he would never do. All because they seem to have an ideological barrier against voting across party lines. I don't know how they sleep at night.
6
15
Rating: -9
carl shalansky
Kinder Morgan better located in Port Simpson !
Marc Eliesen tells us the economics case for the expansion project is bunk – - http://www.burnabynow.com/news/kinder-morgan-s-economics-case-under-fire...

More “bunk” ; BC public do NOT want bitumen laden tankers ,UNNECESSARILY , bobbing around in Burrard Inlet; Gulf Islands and their busy narrow passes; the island bound Douglas Channel and the wiggly path remaining to find the open Pacific ! The bitumen transport projects are planned for the WRONG locations— having heard of major oil spill calamities ,one would expect the proponents to recognize and care that the BC public DO NOT WANT BITUMEN LADEN TANKERS in our waters ,when there is a near ideal location , that provides open ocean access to world bitumen customers—Port Simpson provides such an opportunity. GO THERE ,before it’s too late ! ! Unless we see some consideration by the NEB for the BC ‘PUBLIC INTEREST’ these the pipelines, as proposed ,may become a legal/political impossibility..as we LOTUS LANDERS waken ! ! With some leadership,we could turn this BC PIPELINES MESS into a BC/Alberta winner..easily..our leaders need to LEAD ,by ‘allowing’ a joint venture (Enbridge and KM) to build a combined pipeline system from Alberta to Port Simpson and remove practically all the concerns/fears about that bitumen spill in our waters ! Ultimately ,the ‘REAL ’NEB’ (National Election Ballot) will listen and DECIDE ...in October 2015 !
6
11
Rating: -5
TedCamp
I'll throw another log on the fire. I don't hear much (try nothing!) about changing the way we produce and use energy. Take a few moments to look up the possibilities of graphite. It will bring all the talk about pipelines and pollution to a standstill. Elon Musk - he of Tesla Motors has a team working on next generation batteries and switches and electric motors using graphite. It'll be nice to wake up one morning in the near future & realize he's done an end-run around us. His biggest challenge isn't technology it's the corporate giants their unions that are working equally hard to stop it. "It's the way we've always done it" is the bane of the future.
4
12
Rating: -8
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.