Nuke watchdog gives okay to Fukushima ice wall

Underground barrier of frozen soil designed to divert groundwater around reactors

Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) has given the go-ahead to the operator of the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant to build a so-called ice wall around four reactors to prevent incoming groundwater from becoming severely contaminated.

Photos

The NRA, Japan’s nuclear watchdog agency, had been considering the plan by Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), which runs the Fukushima Daiichi plant, since last fall.

TEPCO, which announced the idea in May 2013, conducted limited tests of the relatively unproven technological fix in October 2013 and, most recently, two weeks ago.

According to Asahi Shimbun news on May 17, a spokesperson for Kajioma Corp., the construction company building the ice wall, declared the latest test a success.

The Japanese government has pledged $313 million to fund the project.

Project will take almost a year

TEPCO is expected to commence construction of the underground ice-wall—which, along with a recently implemented groundwater-bypass scheme, is part of TEPCO’s approach to reduce the amount of radioactive groundwater now being stored and treated in temporary tank farms on the site—in June and finish the project sometime in March 2015, according to the Japan Daily Press on May 27.

The wall is designed to operate for about seven years.

The ice-wall project involves sinking tubes carrying coolant, one metre apart, up to 30 metres underground and in a roughly 1.5-kilometre rectangular shape around four reactors. The piped refrigerant, at minus-30 ° C, would freeze groundwater and create an impervious two-metre-thick soil wall.

Up to 400 tons of water per day flows underground from nearby hillsides into the site, often mixing with contaminated water used to cool reactors that were severely damaged in the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami.

More than 1,000 storage tanks already built

The groundwater-bypass plan—which is expected to lessen this volume of water by piping up to 80 tons per day of diverted (as well as treated and moderately contaminated) water into the Pacific Ocean—was designed to reduce the need to build additional water storage tanks at the site. More than 1,000 tanks have been installed in the past three years.

TEPCO has said that if all goes according to plan, with both the bypass and the ice wall in operation, the outside-groundwater inflow will be reduced to 130 tons per day.

The ice-wall technique has been used previously in tunnel construction near watercourses, but not on such a large scale.

Contaminated-soil storage plan moves ahead

Meanwhile, the Japan Daily Press reported on May 28 that the Japanese government is putting the finishing touches on a plan to store the Fukushima Daiichi site’s contaminated soil prior to disposal outside of the prefecture.

The decontamination process is expected to take upwards of 30 years.

Comments (22) Add New Comment
spartikus
And let me guess - the guards will be known as "The Night's Watch"
4
10
Rating: -6
josh
The NRA is a newly formed group of nuclear experts, at least they said they are experts. So them ok ing anything is suspect. That they continue to withhold info about fukushima from the public is criminal.
7
12
Rating: -5
me
Why do they keep using the "before" picture? It looks nothing like that now.
9
9
Rating: 0
Martin Dunphy
me:

Thanks for the post. Pictures of the Fukushima Daiichi plant post-disaster are, for the most part, proprietary.

The international news agencies don't generally grant permission to use them, and TEPCO, the operator, restricts its own photos that it permits to be used.

Generally, we use a photo like the above (which is accompanied, by the way, with a current photo from the construction site) in order to demonstrate just how close the reactor site is to both the Pacific Ocean and built-up areas.
6
13
Rating: -7
Miki
So in other words ; we're going to be glowing ,. Sterilants for the foreseeable decades to come
6
14
Rating: -8
DAW
This is a very unfortunate decision. They know it will displace the entire sight into the ocean. Any attempt to erect a wall of anything other than porous material will push the land into the sea... but that's what is happen for the last 3 years and no one has stopped the behavior. Oh and but the way the energy needed to freeze the wall will require a new nuclear plant. We are sheep.
7
13
Rating: -6
kimberly davis
Martin, thanks for your prompt response re: the pre-2011 picture. Can't the cutline at least be precise? E.g., "Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear-reactor [plant], April 2010."

It is still stunning to me what you say about restriction on freedom of the press to use current photos - or even better, ones from the week of March 18, after the explosions, so people understand what they're dealing with in terms of groundwater.

Go here for the Geology of Fukushima published in 2010. Scroll down for a view in section: http://www.fukushima-blog.com/article-the-geology-of-fukushima-88575278....

They don't need nuclear experts any more; they can stand down, their job is done.
The need hydrogeologists, experts in soils in construction projects, and marine chemists and biologists.
3
7
Rating: -4
G.R.L. Cowan
Maybe the Straight can't run a recent Fukushima picture, but I can link one: http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site515/2013/0903/20130903_0...
4
8
Rating: -4
Dr. RH Bennett
The new NRA is anything but a watchdog. Its more like a lap dog. The idea of a frozen wall has been roundly critiqued by geotechnical experts. The Vancouver papers article make a misleading case that TEPCO et. al. know what they are doing. Rather its more of a case, we need to look good and do something, anything.
Three nuclear cores melted and burned releasing extremely radioactive microfine ash into the air. Japan, TEPCO, and the UN have ignored this fact in hopes that no one will notice. The US Navy noticed after it blundered and sailed into the ash ridden snow storm that contaminated the ship. It took months to decontaminate this carrier.

Thus my Canadian friends all is not well, ice wall or not... Question authority especially the nuclear types.
2
9
Rating: -7
Martin Dunphy
kimberly davis:

You are welcome, and, yes, we will in future make an indication as to whether or not the photo is pre- or post-2011.
Although media freedom in Japan is a growing concern in the past year or two (see http://www.straight.com/news/655491/japan-halts-criminal-contempt-case-a...),the legal restrictions against violating copyright are, more or less, buainess as usual.
Sometimes it is a question of having the time to be able to search for non-copyright images. Established news agencies often don't bother going after bloggers, but we can't count on such largesse.
4
7
Rating: -3
KEN
I THINK GE SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR NOT PROVIDING SAFETY MEASURE THAT WOULD HAVE STOPPED THIS FORM HAPPENING, FREEZER THERE ASSETS AND FIRE THE PREVIOUS USA NEAPOLITAN HEAD OF GE NOW IN THE US GOVERMENT
4
9
Rating: -5
Ronald Bushnell
This of course is complete nonsense, designed to give a warm feeling to those that would choose to place their head in the sand. Fukushima is an ongoing coverup, that one could safely assume this site is apart of; that may be a good thing, because people would begin to panic if they really new the extent of the nuclear danger, or how many people will die over the next thirty years. The worst has already happened at Fukushima, as the situation grows progressively unmanageable (it has never been manageable), in what reasonable people must now consider an act of war by the response, if not the cause; where evidence suggests both.
2
11
Rating: -9
Martin Dunphy
Ronald:

Thanks for your input. I can assure you, though, that the Georgia Straight is not part of any "ongoing coverup". I am highly skeptical of most of the information that comes out of Japan about Fukushima Daiichi (and even that is very little), but this is not an opinion piece. (See the link in the comment two above yours for a Charlie Smith story posted here just yesterday about Japanese censorship.)

Even the information that we do publish is not available from most mainstream news outlets, and we have made a conscious decision to not halt reporting on the situation simply because three years have passed.

Most of our readers are grateful for what information manages to make its way out of Japan. And we think most of them are intelligent enough to be able to read between the lines.
4
9
Rating: -5
Jason Mckenzie
…and this is the best they can come up with? Seriously, how can men play with technology they have no idea how to control? We have to be the dumbest, greediest, money grubbing creatures to ever walk any planet, any where, at any time. Couldn't we just round up all the greediest fools who love this technology and have them work directly on this site until their radiation contamination machine has been stopped completely.
3
14
Rating: -11
rich
so this stops 150 tons of water out of the 400 that can pour in per day?? Wow Im impressed...
2
9
Rating: -7
@rich

so this stops 150 tons of water out of the 400 that can pour in per day?? Wow Im impressed...


Essentially, but not exactly.

From the article:

Up to 400 tons of water per day flows underground from nearby hillsides into the site,

[...snip...]

The groundwater-bypass plan—which is expected to lessen this volume of water by piping up to 80 tons per day of diverted (as well as treated and moderately contaminated) water into the Pacific Ocean

[...snip...]

TEPCO has said that if all goes according to plan, with both the bypass and the ice wall in operation, the outside-groundwater inflow will be reduced to 130 tons per day.


So still 130 tons per day; an amount approximately 1 metre wide by 1 metre high by 130 metres.

Every. Single. Day.

The wall is designed to operate for about seven years.


For. Seven. Years.

Starting after another year of 400 tons per day (1m x 1m x 400m) needing storage & decontamination...


Oh, and after 7 years, then what? Will the site be decontaminated enough that the ground water can flow normally into the ocean?

I doubt it, as a lot of the site has had radioactive contaminants saturate the ground, they'll be in contact with the ground water again post ice wall.

And the worst spots will still be covered by damaged reactors and exposed "corium".
4
8
Rating: -4
Typo alert: ShimbuN
Hi GS,

Just a heads-up: Asahi Shimbun, not Asahi Shimbum.

Cheers
3
8
Rating: -5
Martin Dunphy
Thanks, Typo; it is fixed.
I'm not much of a touch typist, and my other frequent newspaper-name typo is New York Tines.
4
8
Rating: -4
New York Tines?
Better than "New Pork Rines"
2
8
Rating: -6
G.R.L. Cowan
I'd be interested if the person or persons who gave me the four thumbs-down for linking a recent F1 aerial photo, or who approve of this down-thumbing, would try to explain.
2
7
Rating: -5

Pages

Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.