Vancouver Aquarium beluga whales used in cross-continent breeding

Following a vote by the park board on July 31 to effectively end whale and dolphin breeding at the Vancouver Aquarium, president and CEO John Nightingale has denied that the nonprofit was engaged in such activities to begin with.

“The park board’s use of the word breeding implies that we carry out some sort of planned, regulated or artificial reproduction program,” he wrote in an August 1 open letter. “We don’t do that at the Vancouver Aquarium.”

While this may be an accurate statement, records obtained by the Straight, combined with interviews with park commissioners, reveal that the aquarium has participated in organized breeding at locations beyond its walls in Stanley Park.

It assisted a U.S. facility with an application for a permit to import 18 beluga whales previously captured from the wild off the coast of Russia, that document shows. And according to U.S. court filings, those efforts were for the explicit purpose of expanding a cross-continent breeding program run by aquariums.

The application for the Russian whales was filed by the Georgia Aquarium with the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in 2012. An addendum states that the Vancouver Aquarium participated in a meeting convened to discuss how best to integrate wild-caught whales into a breeding pool shared by some North American aquariums.

“The Georgia Aquarium, and other North American beluga whale holders, will be managing the North American collection of beluga whales in order to optimize social integration and to take advantage of appropriate breeding opportunities,” the document reads. “Toward that end, veterinary and animal care staff from the Georgia Aquarium, Vancouver Aquarium, SeaWorld, Mystic Aquarium, and Shedd Aquarium met on August 6, 2012 to further consider the best social groupings for the whales subject to the permit application and how to best integrate these whales into the existing collections.”

The addendum goes on to note that at the meeting, it was decided that three of the 18 wild-caught whales would be held at the Georgia Aquarium, where two belugas owned by the Vancouver Aquarium currently reside. Another eight were marked for SeaWorld facilities in the U.S. The Vancouver Aquarium owns five beluga whales presently held at SeaWorld parks.

According to a July 23 report commissioned by the park board, the Vancouver Aquarium’s breeding-loan agreements specify that “every other offspring will go to each of the facilities involved.”

Jeffrey Matthews, Vancouver chapter coordinator for the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, told the Straight he views the aquarium’s participation in such arrangements as a loophole in its 1996 pledge to never again procure whales or dolphins caught in the wild.

“While the Vancouver Aquarium is not directly obtaining cetaceans from the wild…it is actively supporting others to do so by participating in this North American breeding pool,” he said in a phone interview. “This means they will capitalize on these captures for their own benefit.”

NOAA denied the Georgia Aquarium’s application in August 2013.

According to a NOAA Fisheries application overview, it was found that allowing the Georgia Aquarium to import the whales in question for the purpose of public display “would contribute to the demand to capture belugas…resulting in the future taking of additional belugas from this stock”. NOAA also found that five of the 18 whales were “approximately 1.5 years old at the time of capture, were potentially still nursing and not yet independent”.

The Georgia Aquarium subsequently launched a lawsuit against NOAA to have the denial of its permit overturned. In that complaint filed in September 2013 in a U.S. district court, the Georgia Aquarium states that the wild-caught animals are needed for breeding.

“One purpose of the proposed import is to increase the breeding population of beluga whales held at accredited North American public display facilities such that no further permits for importation or collection will be sought by such facilities in the foreseeable future,” it states.

The case remains before the courts. The Vancouver Aquarium’s role in the process today is unknown. The aquarium declined to grant an interview.

Park board chair Aaron Jasper told the Straight that the aquarium’s breeding arrangements with the Georgia Aquarium and other U.S. facilities were a key factor in the park board’s vote to ban captive mating in Vancouver.

“They say that they will not breed any of their whales directly with a wild-caught whale,” he said. “But what about a grandchild [of a Vancouver whale] with a grandchild [of a wild-caught whale]? Who’s going to track that?”

Jasper noted that before examining the park-board report on the aquarium that was made public on July 23, commissioners were under the impression that the aquarium owned five beluga whales when, in fact, it owns nine.

“Then through our questioning, we learned that of the nine that they own, four are offspring from mating Vancouver Aquarium whales with other whales,” Jasper continued. “And then in addition to that, we discovered that there are another five young beluga whales owned by other aquariums that are the direct result of breeding involving our belugas.”

He called attention to one Vancouver beluga, Nanuq, that the aquarium has transferred via airplane to four different facilities, each time for the purpose of breeding.

Jasper recalled that while he was questioning Nightingale on the matter, it appeared the CEO could barely keep track of the whales the aquarium now has spread out across North America.

“I was asking, ‘Who is related to who? And whose is that one? How old is that one?’ ” Jasper recounted. “They couldn’t even really tell me.”

Speaking during the July 31 park-board meeting, commissioner Sarah Blyth said it’s troubling that the majority of the aquarium’s belugas are housed outside of Vancouver.

“I think that people have questions about that and how we fit into an international breeding program,” she said. “Do we want to be a part of this?”

Interviewed alongside Jasper after the vote, commissioner Niki Sharma conceded that the ban on whale and dolphin breeding won’t apply to animals the aquarium has loaned to U.S. facilities. But she revealed that the park board hopes to bring those animals under a degree of public supervision. To that end, Sharma continued, the park board has resolved to create an “oversight committee”.

“We’ve directed it to be a line of oversight consisting of animal-welfare experts that will be able to take a look at all of the cetaceans that are owned by the aquarium and report to the public to provide that level of transparency and openness,” she said.

Jasper interjected: “We still want to shed some light on that,” he said.

Comments (21) Add New Comment
Barbara McClure
Thank you Travis for bringing this story to the public.

The practice of keeping others in captivity for the amusement of humans is disgusting, to say the least.

Any flimsy "conservation" excuse cannot possibly justify such cruelty.
Rating: +13
Christopher Porter
Thanks for bringing this important information to the public. Transparent and open dialogue on the true workings "behind the tanks" is what Vancouver needs to make an informed and responsible decision on what truly Ocean Conservation looks like in BC.
Rating: +20
"The practice of keeping others in captivity for the amusement of humans is disgusting, to say the least. "

Do you own any pets?
Rating: -5
Tommy Khang
I find the above to be much more of a commentary then an article. Travis, how you can infer from one mention in an addendum that the Vancouver Aquarium is thus guilty of some nefarious breeding program is hardly investigative journalism. Can anyone please tell me why the Parks Board is trying to assert themselves beyond their purview.
Rating: -3
Jeff Matthews
Vancouver Aquarium will dance around trying to explain this, but Nightingale himself confirmed in the Park Board hearings that they NEED wild belugas if they are to continue their captive program. There is no doubt that any breeding of captive belugas will result in more captured from the wild. Video is here:
Rating: +23
Alison Banks
TRUTH AND TRANSPARENCY!!! The age of keeping sentient beings in captivity for profit and entertainment is OVER!!
Rating: +2
Nicholas Ellan
Nightingale can't even keep track of his whale collection, and Park Board only knew about half of it before they started their investigation? Time for some independent oversight of this circus.
Rating: +5
Rescue and conservation is important.

Public display is a by-product of rescue and housing, and helps fund research and conservation - it also provides education (and for those who aren't aware, those "shows" happen with or without an audience, it helps the animals and the research, which in turn helps the wild animals).

Breeding is not rescue or conservation (assuming no plans to release back into the wild) - so I don't understand how they can justify it. "Natural" doesn't come into anymore, I don't think many belugas "naturally" get on a plane and fly to San Diego to breed.
Rating: +6
If you've been to the Vancouver Aquarium then you, more than likely, will understand what they do, how they do it and why they do it.

Rating: -1
XB - I have been to the Vancouver Aquarium and I understand that they do what they do because it makes them money. They are traffickers in whales and purveyors of entertainment. That is why I have never returned to the Vancouver Aquarium.
Rating: +9
The issue is why aren't the conservation groups targetting these other aquariums? Making Vancouver stop everything will have little to no impact on the overall program in North America (or the world), or reduce the capturing of whales. Plus, it will take a lot of effort and do a lot of damage to Vancouver Aquarium, which isn't even a for-profit organization. However, getting these other much larger for profit aquariums to agree to stop whaling will have a far bigger overall impact than making the Vancouver Aquarium stop breeding or stop keeping whales. People should put their effort into something that will MAKE a difference. Yes, it will take effort on their part...but if they TRULY care about the whales, then they better make sacrifices fighting for the whales. It's not about convenience.
Rating: -8
Tim Ford
So let me get this right, this is basically an attempt to link the Vancouver Aquarium to the Georgia Aquarium's application for importing captured whales based on one line in an addition to a formal application process which was ultimately denied? This is about as good as that article about Marineland seals from 2003!
Rating: -2
Daniel Tanner
After trumpeting for so long how they don't capture wild cetaceans anymore it is despicable to hear of the aquarium's involvement in the capture of wild belugas. Just because it wasn't their hands that committed the act does not mean that they are free of responsibility. In fact all that is coming out about the aquarium now shows that these people have NO sense of responsibility or accountability. The aquarium execs are out of control with their half truths and hidden activities. Park Board looks like superstars now in their call for more public oversight as that is obviously what is needed there to keep them honest for a change.
Rating: +10
Jon Q. Publik
@Daniel you and other commentators seems to be frothing at the mouth to jump at a conclusion. No where is it mentioned that the Vancouver Aquarium was a party to the application by the Georgia Aquarium to import these belugas. The addendum which I read is relatively vague and only mentions that the Vancouver Aquarium was at a meeting to discuss social groupings. I have yet to see any half-truths, following the issue, even the consultant stated that the Vancouver Aquarium willingly provided all information requested of it. The only people interested in half truths and drawing conclusions from these half truths are those on the outside looking in. When an independent consultant says that the care that these animals receive is excellent and the parks board who commissioned the report decide to create more bureaucracy I as a voter and tax payer take issue.
Rating: -3
Daniel Tanner
Considering the third party consultant clearly stated that the Vancouver Aquarium intentionally breeds its belugas, the aquarium is very obviously stretching the bounds of credibility by saying they have no such program. There is a problem of accountability when they speak obvious untruths about an issue the public is concerned about and there are no consequences.
Rating: +8
Save Vancouver
Free the Sea Cucumbers! Who is with me?
Rating: -14
Jon Q. Publik
@Daniel I have read the report and there in no mention of intentional breeding, the consultant states "all breeding attempts used
by the aquarium are done by pairing likely animals and not by artificial insemination". If two whales are planning to get it on, how do you stop this?
Rating: -4
@ Jon Q
"all breeding attempts used by the aquarium are done by pairing likely animals and not by artificial insemination". If two whales are planning to get it on, how do you stop this?"

A good way to stop this would be by not shipping the whales across the continent to another facility.

And "pairing likely animals" implies a direct attempt to breed.

"We put whales in the same tanks so they are in a suitable group, and breeding just happens" is not what being said.
Rating: +1
Daniel Tanner
LOL, take the part of the paragraph taht says nothing about their breeding. Maybe be a little less selective in your cutting and pasting and you'll find the truth:

Page 17, para 1: "Animals are moved between the Vancouver Aquarium and other facilities for
reasons such as breeding..."

Page 17, para 2: "The Association of Zoos and Aquarium’s (AZA) Marine Mammal Taxon Advisory
Group guides breeding of belugas at the Vancouver Aquarium and has the goal of
maintaining genetic diversity in captive belugas."
Page 17, para 2: "When animals are sent from the Vancouver Aquarium to another institution, the
breeding loan agreement specifies who will have ownership of the offspring. Generally,
every other offspring will go to each of the facilities involved."

Rating: +12
This ban does not mean anything meaningful if not articulated further. It will business as usual via their Sea world partnership where the remaining 7 VA belugas are be currently warehoused. The ban is not going to stop what happens at Sea world nor which belugas will reenter into the park. They really should of limited the numbers. Because with more intended expansions with larger tanks @ VA they really should of been more explicit & meaningful.

I went to sea world last year and saw how our belugas looked very thin and sick. The real issue is who is going on check on that? We have no jurisdiction. I don't think one successful calf in 50 years and 3 infant death in 5 years is success here. They are going to do the breeding else regardless given the business of it.

There must be transparency & public consultation as a true democracy in these process so not sure why everyone is so upset that the parks board made a decision where public thinking is now. Hello!! The park board is the landlord!!! This is not a corporate sea world. Get your own land then but if it's in Stanley Park we have a right to know. We must not hand over land for further expansions if it's no longer in the public interest.

How about the belugas that are "on loan" 9 bit to other aquariums? This is a profitable business, being run by a charity....For all those nay-sayers. You live in Vancouver, there are a multitude of whale watching companies out there. Go take your kids out whale watching instead of Disneyland, connect them with the natural environment. See what the whales and dolphins live like in the real world and suddenly that small pool looks like a very lonely place. These are highly sentient beings, not some fish.

Note that the Aquarium does some very good significant science and marine conservation above and beyond the captive cetacean program. They do very good marine mammal rehabilitation work. This doesn't mean any of that has to stop. Monterey Aquarium doesn't have whales in captivity and has constantly rising attendance numbers. With good marketing, there is no reason Vanaqua can't do the same.
Rating: +9


Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.