Park board defends breeding ban and says it will meet Vancouver Aquarium in court

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      The chair of the park board has said that the city has no intention of backing down in response to a court challenge launched by the Vancouver Aquarium.

      “At the end of the day, they are a tenant,” Aaron Jasper said by phone. “They are in a park which is governed by the park board and the City of Vancouver. And we will defend our right and our authority to regulate the activities that take place within our parks.”

      On August 27, aquarium CEO John Nightingale held a press conference to announce his organization was requesting that the B.C. Supreme Court conduct a judicial review of park board motions passed on July 31.

      That evening, Vision Vancouver commissioners voted in favour of four motions related to the aquarium, which sits on public land in Stanley Park. (Two Non-Partisan Association members were absent.)

      They ordered staff to draft a bylaw that would ban the breeding of whales, dolphins, and porpoises (the ban includes exceptions, such as in cases where a species is endangered). The park board also provided for the creation of an “oversight committee”, and it called for the aquarium to submit biannual reports that describe the wellbeing of cetaceans in its care.

      Nightingale has since argued that those directives exceed the park board’s mandate.

      “Vancouver Aquarium objects to the resolutions on the legal grounds that the resolutions serve no legitimate municipal purpose and are beyond the jurisdiction of the park board,” states an August 27 media release.

      According to the aquarium’s written petition to the B.C. Supreme Court, the park board’s actions will have “a significant, adverse, impact on the Aquarium”.

      The aquarium argues that the park board is imposing substantial costs on the aquarium, that it is compromising the aquarium’s cetacean program, and that it is contradicting the terms of its licensing agreement.

      That contract states that the park board shall “not interfere with the day-to-day administration of the Aquarium unless such interference is permitted or required by this Agreement”.

      In those court filings, the aquarium maintains that the park board’s July 31 vote is “putting at risk the well-being of the Aquarium’s cetaceans by placing decisions related to their care in the control of those with no scientific expertise and imposing unnatural segregation on some of them”.

      Nightingale expanded on that last point at the August 27 press conference.

      “A ban on breeding cetaceans is both impractical and unwise from an animal care and animal welfare standpoint,” he said.

      Fielding questions from reporters shortly after, Nightingale went further, suggesting that the park board was considering enforcing its breeding ban with invasive methods of contraception and even surgery.

      Jasper described those arguments as a “red herring”.

      “I think he throws these out to scuttle the issue,” he said.

      Jasper explained that the park board’s motion wasn’t designed to stop incidental mating (of which there is very little in aquariums). He said that the intended target is organized breeding programs.

      The Straight previously reported that the aquarium has been involved with one such program spearheaded by the Georgia Aquarium in Atlanta.

      According to documents filed with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Vancouver Aquarium assisted the Georgia facility with its efforts to obtain a permit to import 18 beluga whales previously captured from the wild off the coast of Russia. According to U.S. court filings, those animals were sought for the explicit purpose of expanding a cross-continent breeding program run by aquariums. (See “Vancouver Aquarium beluga whales used in cross-continent breeding”.)

      In addition, an August 27 Globe and Mail report details how some of the aquarium’s seven belugas it currently has loaned to U.S. facilities have been used in artificial reproduction programs.

      “Two of its males are believed to have sired at least a dozen calves – including several that were stillborn or have since died – since 2006 as part of breeding programs in the United States,” that article reads. “In one Seaworld study, semen was collected from Vancouver Aquarium beluga Nanuq 42 times and subsequently used for 10 insemination attempts with seven females. This resulted in two pregnancies, one of which was twin calves.”

      Jasper said it’s those kinds of activities that the park board does not want to see continue.

      “I think it’s been made very clear that they are participating in a breeding program, albeit with their whales in the States,” he said. “And I don’t think they made a strong case that the breeding of cetaceans is crucial to the research and to the educational components of their programing.”

      Follow Travis Lupick on TwitterFacebook, and Instagram.

      Comments

      13 Comments

      Tommy Khang

      Aug 29, 2014 at 3:45pm

      Bravo! Bravo! Look at how fiscal responsible Vision Vancouver is, oh wait we never thought they might sue! And surely Jasper is not dumb enough to admit that by banning captive breeding that they were trying to curtail organized breeding programs, that don't take place in Vancouver - but wait he is; as admitting to in this piece.

      I wonder what further incompetence would be found at 2099 Beach Avenue, if more people paid attention.

      Travis Lupick

      Aug 29, 2014 at 3:49pm

      @Tommy Khang, the Vancouver Aquarium has not sued the park board.

      The aquarium has requested a judicial review of the park board's actions, and argued motions passed on July 31 be declared invalid and of no effect.

      Marcus W

      Aug 29, 2014 at 4:00pm

      "Jasper explained that the park board’s motion wasn't designed to stop incidental mating (of which there is very little in aquariums). He said that the intended target is organized breeding programs."

      Jasper was quoted earlier commenting specifically on Jack and Daisy, rescued and rehabilitated harbour porpoises that are not part of any breeding program:

      »Jasper wants to know whether the porpoises have tried to mate since being brought to the aquarium. He said the best indicator of future activity is past activity.
      “If the [porpoises] have not had a history of trying to couple, then chances are the odds are low that it’s going to happen,” said Jasper« (vancourier.com)

      (He ignored that Jack is not sexually mature yet, so that 'previous behaviour' means little. But that is irrelevant here...)

      So if incidental mating is not the issue here - and no formal breeding program exists at the Vancouver Aquarium - why the breeding ban? The only animals affected right now are Jack and Daisy, and since no contraceptives have ever been tried on harbour porpoises (and surgery would potentially be life-threatening, that applies to all cetaceans), separation would be the only way to prevent them from mating. So Nightingale does have a point.

      Tara Sundberg

      Aug 29, 2014 at 4:19pm

      None of the Parks Board members are qualified to have governing power over what the scientists at the Vancouver Aquarium are doing. Are any of them marine biologists? Scientists? No, they are acting on their emotions which is totally inappropriate. The Vancouver Aquarium is nothing like Sea World, and the movie Blackfish is about Orcas, which there are none at the Vancouver Aquarium. Let them do their jobs.

      Tommy Khang

      Aug 29, 2014 at 4:27pm

      @Trevor I understand this however if the city loses this review they may be potentially obliged to also pay for te aquarium's legal cost per the affidavit. That has a financial implication and this point was brought up by Charlie Smith in his commentary piece also published today.

      Don't Exploit Them under the Pretext of Research

      Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09pm

      Markus W "So if incidental mating is not the issue here - and no formal breeding program exists at the Vancouver Aquarium - why the breeding ban?"
      Why the breeding ban? Because though no formal breeding program exists within Vancouver Aquarium itself - that much is true - it currently has several belugas on loan in breeding programs to SeaWorld. This information is widely known - likely you are already aware of it, but choose to ignore it - and is what underpins the breeding ban that was included as one of the motions.

      Kevin slichter

      Aug 29, 2014 at 11:44pm

      I Support the Aqurium, get rid of the power hungry parks board children,

      Darla Brown

      Aug 30, 2014 at 12:22am

      Invest money and move the aquarium to the valley! It will encourage more tourist to come to this side of the bridge! Im sure the township of langley would live to host with all the land available!

      Eric

      Aug 30, 2014 at 9:32am

      @Kevin slichter, the park board is also a huge supporter of the Aquarium. Through all of this, all commissioners, including Blyth, etc, have heaped praise on it.

      The only issue is the breeding of captive whales and dolphins for purposes of entertainment.

      Don't troll.

      RealityCheck

      Aug 30, 2014 at 4:08pm

      How very Stephen Harper of them. The Parks Board is the scientific equivalent of the Flat Earth Society. They need to deal with real park issues, and leave science to the scientists.