Gayle Gavin: Community consultation is a sham under Vision Vancouver

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      I am seeking the COPE nomination for council. I have been disappointed over and over again by the decisions made by the Vision Vancouver council to allow inappropriate development in our neighbourhoods.

      Not only are the decisions bad, there is no transparency about the process. Not only is there no transparency, these decisions contravene residents’ rights protected in the Vancouver Charter.

      The community consultation process has been a sham!

      I have watched residents contribute their time, energy, thoughtfulness, and expertise for over three years in the community planning process only to be betrayed over and over by a Vision-controlled council. The stories go on and on and there are now 17 cases in the courts of residents challenging city hall.

      The Vision Vancouver council is trying to move downtown-style development into other neighbourhoods.

      Last summer there was an up-roar in Grandview Woodland because many residents felt that their community plan was sold out to developers’ interests. You will be hearing a lot more from Grandview Woodland in this election.

      In Mount Pleasant, they did a similar thing. At the last minute, after consultation was finished, they added the very drawing submitted by Rize Alliance into the plan and within weeks held six nights of public hearings and rammed it through against overwhelming community protest. This case is now before the courts.

      The Emery Barnes Park fiasco is another disaster. There was hope that a city-owned property at the northeast end of the park could one day be turned into park space. But, the Vision council made a secret deal swapping this property to a developer to build a 36-storey tower with incredibly high density. This challenge was heard by the court last week.

      Then there is the closure of Point Grey Road, a public road serving 10,000 vehicles a day. Now it is a private road for residents and cyclists. It cost between $12 and $25 million. It is a heck of a lot of money for one neighbourhood. When there is such need in our city. And New Yaletown—they can take more density even if it is on potential parkland.

      This will end. Why?

      A COPE council can carry out its mandate only by being transparent.

      Because we understand that you can only move forward effectively if you understand the problem. We can only understand the challenges if you listen to those affected. Then you can move forward to develop the community.

      COPE has a comprehensive housing policy and the centre piece is building affordable housing. This is according to the rights and the responsibility we have in the Vancouver Charter. Read the charter. As a city we are allowed to build, own, maintain, and operate housing. Your COPE council is going to do just that.

      Only the community as a whole can design the community it wants to live in. Developers may be able to construct buildings but they do not know how people want to live together.

      There is nothing wrong with the community planning process. It works fine without political interference. We are going to change city hall to fix that problem. No longer are developers going to give us the shapes and then tell the community to fit their lives into those boxes.

      COPE doesn’t have $2 million and developers’ money to run this campaign. We have the support of ordinary people who donate money and their time and energy, their skills and hopes to build an affordable city, with access for all to services in our parks, our schools, and our housing.

      We are going to have a government that does not run roughshod over people and their communities.

      Go to our website. Read our platform, become a member, work on our campaign so we can fix the problems. Let’s use our precious time and skills to build the city we want, not fight city hall one tower at a time.

      Comments

      12 Comments

      RUK

      Sep 4, 2014 at 2:53pm

      It's so weird when people write about things that you saw and saw it differently. While there were many people who didn't like Rize -- "weeeee had a charrettttttteeeee!!!" - there were plenty like me who signed Rize's guest book under the apparently odd and wrong belief that making a big housing project out of a burned-down vacant lot at the future corner of a mass transit stop was a-ok. And plenty more who, things being what they are, don't really care.

      Boris Moris

      Sep 4, 2014 at 3:19pm

      That sure sounds like a lot of sour grapes. I guess the COPE/ VV honeymoon is over (snicker).

      Now for a reality check. COPE is a fracking disaster zone. Anyone paying attention won't soon forget all the internecine battles between the looney cultists and other fringe zombies in COPE. Fer fuck sakes...certain COPE leaders still identify as Marxists.

      @Boris Moris

      Sep 4, 2014 at 8:20pm

      I think there were a lot of pro-vision people in COPE. Warzone might have been necessary. Look at "OneCity".

      Brian Greene

      Sep 4, 2014 at 10:06pm

      This is a very straight, unassailable analysis by a committed and experienced lawyer that simply tells it like it is. She brings up highly inconvenient truths about the sham public hearing processes, the admitted "done deals" that come unraveled after the courts get involved, and the pure insanity behind the 581 CD-1 rezonings in the City that make a mockery of community plans and spike land values through the roof to make the city affordable to no one.

      The fact that COPE can attract such a highly accomplished, UBC-trained lawyer who's been in the trenches on so many vital public policy and social justice issues should scare the bejeezus out of Vision Vancouver. And judging certainly from the first two comment posts above, that appears exactly the response. Some shills are already on the warpath to discredit her efforts to speak truth to power.

      Gandhi wrote "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they attack you, and then you win." Well clearly Gayle Gavin has just been viciously attacked, so this bodes well for her election on November 15.

      Go Gayle!

      BikerCK

      Sep 4, 2014 at 10:17pm

      "Now it is a private road for residents and cyclists."

      I never used point Grey Road for any reason before the change. Now I walk and ride on it regularly. Some 'private' road.

      Could some of the wannabe councillor please grow up and treat constituents with respect? We have real world problems that intelligent civic politicians could play a role in addressing. This reliance on demonizing dreaded cyclists and rich-bashing is tiresome. I wish my east van street could get the pt grey makeover. I don't care if rich people have nice things. Worry a bit more about poor people having food and shelter and offer concrete solutions instead of divisive rhetoric and maybe you'll get some votes.

      RUK

      Sep 5, 2014 at 8:24am

      The comparison of Gavin to Ghandhi is as meritorious as that describing the comments in this section to a "vicious attack."

      Boris Moris

      Sep 5, 2014 at 8:45am

      Point taken, Brian Green. Anyone who invokes Gandhi should be regarded as a sacred cow. Personally I've been dead animal free for 34 years and wouldn't dream of devouring a docile beast like a sacred cow. Unfortunately, for local Gandhi quoting cows and UBC trainer law wranglers , this ain't India Toto and all the lunacy at COPE over the last few years has been well documented. Ultimately voters want stability and, in Vancouver, they want a party that shares the majority's desire for a greener city that values social justice. A party that will have common interests with the next Federal government in one short year from now. They don't want a basket case and they don't want the farm team for extremist right wing parties in decline...or any of their ridiculous proxies.

      SouthVancouver

      Sep 5, 2014 at 9:03am

      Well said. It is time to harness the energy neighbourhoods have devoted to protests and lawsuits and direct it towards a political solution. Some years ago, those frustrated with the NPA's focus on development put their trust in a new party, Vision Vancouver, believing their claims that they would be a grass roots party that respected community input and democracy. It is now apparent that we elected a Trojan Horse. Vision is a party devoted to developer profits hiding under the best "progressive" smokescreen money can buy. If they are not removed from power in November there will be absolutely nothing we can do to stop our city from being bulldozed before our eyes.

      John S

      Sep 5, 2014 at 9:09am

      The community consultation process has indeed been a sham under Vision. The only "consultation" Robertson does is with his developer buddies at private events like the $25,000 a plate lunch put on by Bob Rennie.

      City Hall is run by the developers. The Marpole Community Centre should have been renewed, but the money allocated for it simply vanished. Now it's been competely taken off the table. But Robertson will hire 28 people for a bloated communications / propaganda team to tell residents that it's good to have the oligarchs in charge. This insanity has to stop.

      It's time to show Vision the door and to vote in good politicians who will stand up for ordinary Vancouverites.

      Black Heart

      Sep 5, 2014 at 9:59am

      "We are going to have a government that does not run roughshod over people and their communities."

      The thing is, they don't "run roughshod". They are much smoother than that. Vision is the party that was torn from the right side of COPE as the "Friends of Larry Campbell", and Larry passed the Vision torch to Jim Green, and Campbell, Green were nothing if not a couple of smoothies. It has been only a slight move to the right from Jim Green to Gregor Robertson. They build consensus among "stakeholders", not citizens. They don't run roughshod, they bamboozle, scheme, and bullshit. They are rentier technocrats, bound hip and thigh to the developers who finance them.