Bob Kasting: Upcoming land sale is missed opportunity for affordable housing

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      The upcoming sale of the Pearson-Dogwood lands by the Vancouver Coast Health Authority, the British Columbia Building Corporation, and other provincially controlled bodies is another sad chapter in the lesson about how to destroy an opportunity to create affordable living in Vancouver.

      BCBC and other provincial bodies are the registered owner of 25.4 acres of land on Cambie Street, between 57th and 59th Ave in Vancouver. Since 1985 the City of Vancouver has had an option to purchase these lands (registered on title since 1985). The City of Vancouver could exercise this option and add the land to its Property Endowment Fund. It has decided not to do this.

      Alternatively, the province and the city could partner on provincially owned land to build rental housing stock which, because the land is without cost to the province, could provide a large and deep rental pool and the nucleus of a community for young families close to the SkyTrain and across the street from a golf course.

      Instead, the city has foregone the choice to buy the property and the province has decided to sell it to the highest bidder. The next step is according the city’s current playbook. The city will allow the land to be up-zoned to maximize its density. The city will insist on receiving development contribution levies (DCLs) for infrastructure costs. The city will also “negotiate” the payment by the new developer/owner of community amenity contributions (CACs) to provide for a variety of negotiated benefits such as libraries, public art, perhaps a park or two, and the like. It is expected that the city will demand CACs of approximately 75 percent of the increased value of the land as result of the rezoning.

      That is a critical mistake. The rezoning will increase the value of the land spectacularly, and the only way that the developer will be able to maximize its profit (which developers do) will be to build high rise condominiums with good views and fancy interiors. Since the average holder of an undergraduate degree in Vancouver earns $41,000 per year according to Statistics Canada, she and her young family will not be able to afford to buy, or live in these condos. They will be marketed to people from elsewhere, or to people from Vancouver who do not intend to live in them.

      If the province and the city could partner in a rental development with human scale buildings and rent values which reflect the cost of construction rather than the cost of construction and land value, there would be a large and steady cash flow into the provincial (and civic) coffers over the life of these buildings, which could pay for libraries, parks, and even the odd public statue or two.

      The bids for the purchase of the Pearson-Dogwood property close at the end of October and the “winning” bidder will likely be announced after the election on November 15 but before the end of the year. Unless of course, the current civil administration is defeated and replaced with a council which is more willing to help Vancouverites find an answer to the lack of affordable rental housing in the city.

      Bob Kasting is an independent candidate for mayor of Vancouver. He is a lawyer by profession who has taught administrative law at the UBC Law School and worries about his children’s generation.

      Comments

      4 Comments

      RUK

      Oct 3, 2014 at 3:41pm

      Wait, you're against CACs?

      Also Mr. Kasting can you weigh in on whether it would be lawful to try to put a drag on vendor profit margins by capping the percentage of increase of cost (aka "value") that one can flip?

      For example, my house has increased about 5x in market cost in 15 years. As an investor that's great, as a concerned citizen it is extremely worrisome.

      I think that land is different from any other kind of investment commodity because they just don't make more of it, and because we all live on it, and because if we don't have access to it, working people cannot live close to their jobs in Vancouver (thus, pollution from commuting, stress on families, etc).

      That would be my rationale for trying to artificially cap the amount that a property owner can sell.

      Flame away, everyone! (But you know I'm right.)

      Boris Moris

      Oct 3, 2014 at 4:14pm

      I'd like the mayor-in-waiting to tell us all how proud he is of the Cedar Party's de rigeur fascist lightning bolt logo. Is he comfortable with his muscle car driving running mates wanting to dismantle most bike lanes? I can understand their motivation. Every time you floor your Z28 on a city street the clouds of burning rubber will obscure cyclists and your insurance might triple with all the ensuing carnage and maiming. Their conscience might even assert itself for an inconvenient hour or two.

      P

      RUK

      Oct 3, 2014 at 8:44pm

      Hee! To be fair, the Tampa Bay Lightning has the same logo. It doesn't necessarily read as fascist. It also reads as "9 year old doodling in class instead of paying attention."

      As for the car, I'm thinking that the Camaro would be good to attract white rockers to the party. Now they need to get an import tuner e.g. right hand drive Skylark with drift suspension

      RUK

      Oct 8, 2014 at 11:16am

      No reply from Bob. Well, I guess he has given up already.