Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson says he’s progressive

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      Mayor Gregor Robertson says he plans to focus on “progressive issues” during his third term. In a year-end interview with the Georgia Straight in his spacious, wood-panelled office at Vancouver City Hall, Robertson said his top priorities are affordable housing and promoting a 10-year transit plan endorsed by Vancouver mayors.

      “From homelessness to low- to middle-income affordable housing, that whole spectrum of housing needs ongoing focus and that will be a huge piece of work,” Robertson said.

      The transit plan includes more bus service and a subway along Broadway from VCC–Clark Station to Arbutus Street. The 5.1-kilometre underground line will only be built if voters approve next year’s transit referendum and if the federal and provincial government each contribute one-third of the estimated $2-billion cost.

      When asked if the Conservatives need to be defeated next year for Vancouver to get a new subway, the mayor sidestepped the question. Instead, he emphasized that the country’s future depends on all federal parties recognizing the importance of cities.

      “We need the next government of Canada to be very supportive of urban priorities—transit first and foremost,” Robertson said. “Affordable housing is essential as well, to have more federal support.”

      He said that there is still a “ton more capacity in existing zoning along Broadway”, saying the corridor has not been built out to levels already approved under council’s policy. However, he hinted that if the subway is approved, there could be more changes in the future.

      “There will be opportunities for the community to look at next steps with Broadway in the context of rapid transit coming,” he acknowledged. “You know, we’ll have to gauge the timing on that. The referendum is the priority right now. We have to get the referendum approved and ensure we have a clear signal from local voters that the province and the feds need to step up and fund the whole package. At that point, we’ll have a good sense of our destiny.”

      In addition, the mayor stated that voters supported candidates in the last election who favour more childcare and want to address climate change, whether they ran for Vision Vancouver, the Greens, or the Coalition of Progressive Electors.

      “We got good validation from voters on those issues,” Robertson said. “The vote was split between Vision, COPE, and Greens, but all, I think, are rallying around that set of progressive issues that needs attention in Vancouver.”

      Robertson claimed that the Non-Partisan Association hasn’t grown in popularity, even though the party’s mayoral candidate, Kirk LaPointe, attracted 15,000 more votes than the previous NPA mayoral candidate, Suzanne Anton. LaPointe attracted almost 25,000 more votes than 2008 NPA mayoral candidate Peter Ladner.

      “NPA voters tend to vote the entire NPA ticket in every election, and their base of support hasn’t grown much for many years, whereas the progressive vote continues to grow significantly,” Robertson alleged. “But people spread their votes around Vision, COPE, and Green. That ended up costing us some amazing diverse young candidates that would have been great for our city. We lost diversity on council, school, and park board, and that’s not reflective of who Vancouver is now.”

      Two-thirds of Vision Vancouver’s white candidates were elected, whereas only three of its nine candidates of colour—school trustee Allan Wong and councillors Raymond Louie and Kerry Jang—were successful. Among the defeated Vision candidates of colour were incumbents Niki Sharma, Tony Tang, Cherie Payne, and Ken Clement.

      “So that’s a concern, when the vote split among progressive parties results in the NPA winning more seats and an overall loss of diversity and youth,” Robertson said. “That’s really troubling. But, you know, it’s hard. We didn’t have success rebuilding the coalition we’d had in 2008 and 2011. So the vote split was costly for progressive issues.”

      The mayor noted that Vision Vancouver lured some COPE supporters, including school trustee Allan Wong, into its camp before the election. But even though five 2011 COPE candidates ran for other parties in this campaign, COPE still attracted a large number of votes.

      “Many people considered COPE to be much farther left than ever before and the NPA farther right than ever before, but votes ended up going there with both COPE and Green,” he said. “Those brands attracted votes. My work is clearly to continue demonstrating that Vision is all about progressive issues: transit and housing and greening our city, childcare, reconciliation. That’s what we’re all about.”

      Comments

      12 Comments

      Chris Green

      Dec 23, 2014 at 4:57pm

      The real story of this election was the conservative surge. It was vote-splitting on the right due to Vancouver First that kept Vision in control of council (and in a split with the NPA on school board). And Gregor's comment suggesting further re-zoning along Broadway for more and bigger condo towers is on the way indicates he still doesn't understand why so many voters chose COPE and OneCity instead of Vision.

      Weedman Pots McBong

      Dec 23, 2014 at 7:31pm

      Gregor Robertson doesn't ever take credit for his awesome work decriminalizing marijuana in the city. thank you gregs for this sweet dank kush

      @VanCity_Chic

      Dec 23, 2014 at 8:57pm

      Meena Wong would have scored a scad more votes if she'd been a tad more civil during the Mayoral Debate. Scary stuff. Mayor Gregor graciously dodged bullets from both barrels on both sides. Pride goes before a fall but humility wins hearts. And now a fresh NPA attack from a nasty angle et al etc ad nauseum. Mild-mannered Bob Kasting eased the tension with valuable feedback. Sit back and absorb the energy at work here. Question: Can a city divided against itself stand?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNjiFh2oILw

      0 0Rating: 0

      Disgusted

      Dec 23, 2014 at 10:40pm

      Gregor and VV talking points---always hilarious!

      In fact, as I flip through the list of electeds, I note that two young women---from the NPA!---are the ONLY under 35's elected in that city on council, school board and park board. Are Shum and de Genova the pre-cursor of something new actually happening in that party? The Mayor seems a little nervous. You can see and hear it in his script.

      Note to youse: Of course the badly bobbled Park Board slate for Vision didn't have a chance (Trish Kelly or not). The former VV commissioners took their marching orders from City hall. The results of that interference rest on their head.

      And if they really wanted to set a new direction, tone and look at City Hall, why didn't they clean out the 'recognizeable' names from the roster.

      No. Gregor, he too often speaks out of both sides of his mouth. Do you think it's because he thinks that if if he says something 'is so', often enough, people will believe it?

      John Baskios

      Dec 24, 2014 at 4:09am

      "The transit plan includes more bus service and a subway along Broadway from VCC–Clark Station to Arbutus Street."

      Okay, once and for all can we clean up this idiocy of naming the skytrain system?
      Why - really, WHY? - does a train saying VCC Clark pull into the eastbound direction of Commercial/Broadway station? The f***ing station it JUST CAME FROM?
      Am I the only person who's driven bat shit by a train titled with the name of a station BEHIND it? The whole signange aspect of Skytrain needs a serious and clear-headed approach. It's a clusterf*** of bad design decisions. Do you know how many tourists get screwed by taking that idiotically titled train all the way to hell and back, simply because some dipshit asswipe thought of the brilliantly stupid idea of naming a train with its origin station? Lots. LOTS.

      For the love of all that is reasonable and rational and intelligent can someone please go down to the Skytrain administrators and kick their asses across the floor while instructing them on how to name stations and where to put maps?

      mike

      Dec 24, 2014 at 10:46am

      What has this mayor done for Vancouver, bike lanes and homeless shelters in all the wrong places. He has no vision for vancouver other than that.

      Adrian C.Y. Fu

      Dec 25, 2014 at 10:06am

      Vision Vancouver is "progressive"? This party is beholden to developers.

      If the Shoe Fits

      Dec 25, 2014 at 9:22pm

      PROGRESSIVE: adj.adjective

      Moving forward; advancing.

      Proceeding in steps; continuing steadily by increments.

      Open to or favoring new ideas, policies, or methods.

      A progressive politician; progressive business leadership.

      Nelson100

      Dec 26, 2014 at 8:39am

      Sorry, political parties that hold $25,000 a plate fund raising lunches with developers are not progressive.

      mike

      Dec 26, 2014 at 9:12am

      You pompous fool you got no validation from the people, 30%, the other 70% think you stink. Your not getting your 5% to waste on more bike lanes so better start thinking of a new plan.